Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......s were short landed. The Chittagong Port Trust accordingly issued a short landing certificate on 10-10-79 to that effect. The plaintiff claimed from defendants 1 and 2 damages of Tk. 5, 82,825/- for the Un-delivered cargo of 25 fibre drums. Defendant No.2, acting for defendants No.1 informed th...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....(1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... drums were short landed. The Chittagong Port Trust accordingly issued a short landing certificate on 10-10-79 to that effect. The plaintiff claimed from defendants 1 and 2 damages of Tk. 5, 82,825/- for the Un-delivered cargo of 25 fiber drums. Defendant No. 2, acting for defendants No. 1 informed ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ndatory or not could be decided upon the consequence that would follow in the event of not doing the thing by the authority. The petitioners were not Government employees under Rule 5(53) of the Bangladesh Service Rules and their pay were not paid out of the State Treasury— Under the......all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ...... report 47 days after the completion of the enquiry. The Inquiry Officer recommended the dismissal of the petitioner; the respondent No. 1 on consideration of the report by his order dated 14.12.79 informed the petitioner directing him to show cause why he should not be dismissed from service. Accor......all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....igh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhery J A.T. M. Afzal J Ragib Ali.......................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ...... Constitution of Bangladesh (1972), Art. 31 As a citizen of the country the petitioner was entitled to due protection of law. When he could legitimately expect due protection from the Government for maintaining his rightful possession, he was instead illegally dispossessed by the Government off......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Salehuddin Khan..................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. ......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ...... its mind and exercised its descretion in favour of one of the two alternatives--The papers on record no where indicate that the authorities applied their mind to the alternative proviso in Rule II before the impugned order was passed. Delegation of power- Whenever there is a question of d......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....hury J ATM Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate & another……………………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors……………………&helli......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......d a few words of my own. 2. We have felt obliged to take notice of certain facts that came to light in course of hearing of this matter and also from the government file that was produced before us by the learned Assistant Attorney General. 3. The petitioners in the Rule has alth......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....riginal Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another……………........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judgment ......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ......e to add a few words of my own. We have felt obliged to take notice of aerie in facts that came to light in course of hearing of this matter and also from the Government file that was produced before us by the learned Assistant Attorney General. 2. The petitioner in the Rule have although ......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Gopal Chandra Mondol Vs. Lashmat Dasi, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......ndra Mondal and others is against the judgment and decree of the learned Special and Additional District Judge, Dacca, reversing those passed by the learned Munsif Second Court, Narayangonj in a suit for partition. The plaintiff's case may briefly be stated as follows: That the suit propert......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 3
Zainal Abedin & Another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....sp;J M.H. Fahman J Zainal Abedin & Another………………………………........Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others…………........Respondents Judgment Decemb...... transmitted to the appellate Division of this Court alongwith the certificate for leave to appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 77, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 493 ......of a memorandum No. ED/SP-11(M)-9/78-47(500) dated 18th March, 1978 issued by the Secretary Establishment Division of the Cabinet Secretariat of the Government of Bangladesh providing a comprehensive formula for grating benefits to the employees who participated in the war of liberation; the aforesa...... consider the circumstances that led to the making of the Rules. 23. The elected representatives of the country proclaimed independence on 10th April, 1971 at Mujibnagar. By the taws Continuance Enforcement Order of the same date it was declared "that all Government officials. Civil, Milit..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Hasina Begum & others Vs. Haji Md. Ekramullah & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... view of the above the appeal is dismissed with costs. The judgment and decree of Courts below are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)116 ...... view of the above the appeal is dismissed with costs. The judgment and decree of Courts below are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)116 ......age Does Automatically Mature Into a Sale— Section 67 of the Transfer of Property Act confers upon the mortgagee, any time after the mortgagee, money has become due to him and before a decree has been made for redemption of mortgaged property, a right to obtain from the Court a...... view of the above the appeal is dismissed with costs. The judgment and decree of Courts below are hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)116 ..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 7 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 10
Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 2 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Syed Abdul Aziz Vs.Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....ginal Jurisdiction) Present: Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J Sultan Hossain Khan CJ Syed Abdul Aziz……………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others……Respondents Judg...... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ...... under Article 102 of the constitution is not entitled to take a different view or reverse the finding of the enquiry committee on appreciation or review of the materials afresh as placed before the enquiry officer. The petitioner though in his explanation named certain persons to be ...... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 18 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 2
Kazi Habibul Awal Vs. Bangladesh Bar Council, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....diction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J ATM Afzal J Kazi Habibul Awal…………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Bar Council……………Respondent Judgment Nov......sons referred to hereinbefore, accede to his prayer. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 58. ......Rahman Chowdhury J. — While concurring with the order passed by my learned brother I propose to add a few words of my own. In course of hearing of this petition several points have come up for consideration of the Court and in course of our perusal of the Bar Council Order (here......sons referred to hereinbefore, accede to his prayer. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 58. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 17 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 1
Bazlur Rahman Bhuiyan Vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Bazlur Rahman Bhuiyan……………………………Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation…………….Respondent Judgme......time stipulated in the contract the suit shall be dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 443;34 DLR (AD) (1982) 42. ...... The appeal is allowed. Specific Relief Act (1 of 1877) Section 22 & 26 Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), Section 58 Code of Civil Procedure (V of 1908). O.XLVII r.6 Suit for specific performance - Court is to be guided by the principles laid down in chapter II of S.R. A......time stipulated in the contract the suit shall be dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 443;34 DLR (AD) (1982) 42. ..Category: Company Law, Contract Law, Procedural Law | Date: 12 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 0
Kiron Chandra Das Vs. Sirajul Hoque Patwari, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....affirmed but in the facts and circumstances of the case. I direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 255 ......affirmed but in the facts and circumstances of the case. I direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 255 ......dhury J. — This appeal at the instance of the plaintiff is against the decision of the learned Sub-ordinate Judge, Noakhall affirming those of the Munsif, Third Court, Noakhall passed in a suit for more declaration that a sale deed No. 5058 registered on 30.6.70 at the Senbagh Sub-Registrar Of......affirmed but in the facts and circumstances of the case. I direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 255 ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 6 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 2
Saad Ahmed Vs. The State, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....For the Appellant. Mashuque Hossain Ahmed, Advocate— For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 220 of 1973. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.— This appeal under Article 16(1) of the Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972, hereinafter referred to as P.O. ....../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ......cial Tribunal Case No.27 of 1972. 2. Accused appellant Saad Ahmed was convicted by the said Special Tribunal under section 121 of the Penal Code read with Article 11(a) of P.O. No.8 of 1972 for waging war against the People's Republic of Bangladesh during the war of liberation and....../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 1
Archana Proshad Nandi Vs. Miss Chilia RanÂdolph and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ......t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ......ed 7th August, 1979 passed by the High Court Division in Second Appeal No. 791 of 1965.) Judgment Badrul Haider Chowdhury J.- This is an appeal by special leave. It arises out of a suit for specific performance of a contract dated 10.12.1959 wherein the defendants entered into ......t of the full purchase money, and the judgment of the Courts below are set aside without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 106. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 28 Oct, 1981 | Hits: 234
Jamil Huq (Ex-Captain) Vs. Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....uhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Jamil Huq (Ex-Captain)………………………Appellants Vs. Bangladesh & Others………………… Respondent ......tion is rejected. The varbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. M.H. Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 488 ...... lawful authority and when a person is serving out an order of sentence passed by a Court or tribunal, the jurisdictional validity of that order could be looked at. When such a question is agitated before the Court, the Court is first to see the provisions of the law as well as the provisions of the......tion is rejected. The varbal prayer for stay of the execution of the sentences made by Mr. M.H. Khandker is refused. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 488 ..Category: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law | Date: 22 Sep, 1981 | Hits: 2
Md. Ismail & others Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... Present: Amirul Islam Chowdhury J Mustafa Kamal J Md. Ismail & others…………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Land Re-forms and Land Administration, Govt. of......nd Md. Rafiq Mia & others...........................Petitioners Vs. Republic of Bangladesh & others..............Respondents and Panthoshala Co-operative Housing Society Ltd..........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh, through the Secretary & others.............al J Md. Ismail & others…………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Land Re-forms and Land Administration, Govt. of Bangladesh and others...........Respondents and Md......he operation of the impugned order of requisition is stayed till 21st October, 1981 from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 4, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 407 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Aug, 1981 | Hits: 2