Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1041-1060 of 6818 results.
Jashimuddin Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....cted and sentenced. 6. We do not find any infirmity with the impugned judgment for our interference. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......p;….(5) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on‑Record‑For the Petitioner. Not Represented‑Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 29 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 9th February, 2002 pas......cted and sentenced. 6. We do not find any infirmity with the impugned judgment for our interference. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......e the accused petitioner has admitted his guilt not examination under section 342 is required while convicting and sentencing the accused on the basis of the same…….(5) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on‑Record‑For the Petitione..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 26 Oct, 2003 | Hits: 79
Amir Hossain Vs. Md. Amir Ali and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....tered through the Court. In case of default by the appellant to pay the above amount as directed, the appeals shall stand dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 38. ......ed by the High Court Division in First Appeal Nos, 13 of 1991 and 79 of 1991. 2. The present appellant Amir Hossain filed Title Suit No. 7 of 1986 against the respondent Md. Amir Ali and others for a decree for specific performance of contract and the respondent Amir Ali filed Title Suit No. 6......tered through the Court. In case of default by the appellant to pay the above amount as directed, the appeals shall stand dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 38. ......ant (In both the cases) Vs. Md. Amir Ali and another....................Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment October 20, 2003. Result: The appeals are allowed. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by S. R. Khoshnabish..Category: Contract Law | Date: 20 Oct, 2003 | Hits: 256
Abul Kashem Khan Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....rvations made in the body of this judgment. Communicate the order to the Tribunal below along with a copy of the judgment expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 431. ......ari‑o‑Shishu Case No. 213 of 2002 should not be quashed and/or such other or further order of orders passed as to this Court might seem fit and proper. 2. On 27‑11‑2001 the petitioner as informant lodged a FIR with Daudkandi Police Station alleging that on 20‑10‑2001 he, his wife and ......rvations made in the body of this judgment. Communicate the order to the Tribunal below along with a copy of the judgment expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 431. ......Chowdhury J Abul Kashem Khan……………Petitioner Vs. State………………………………Opposite Party Judgment August 27, 2003 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Harunur Rashid, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Alamgir Kabir, Assistant At..Category: Women and Children | Date: 27 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 157
Shamsuddin alias Shamsuddoha Vs. Mvi Amjad Ali & others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ision No. 72 of 1987 affirming those dated 14‑6‑1987 in NGR Case No. 132 of 1978 passed by the Magistrate, First Class, Cox's Bazar are hereby restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... of the Cr.P.C. to go to competent civil court…………….(18 & 20) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908 (V of 1898), Sections 439A & 561A A revision petition cannot be brought before the High Court Division in the camouflage of a petition under section 561A. In a very rare case......ision No. 72 of 1987 affirming those dated 14‑6‑1987 in NGR Case No. 132 of 1978 passed by the Magistrate, First Class, Cox's Bazar are hereby restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......bdul Jabbar vs. Azizul Huq and others 46 DLR 460; Nader Ali Sk vs. Bangladesh 1984 BLD (AD) 7; Emperor vs. Nazir Ahmed AIR 1945 Privy Council 18; Shafiqur Rahman vs. NI Chowdhury 35 DLR (AD) 127. Lawyers Involved: Khan Saifur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 414
General Manager, Bangladesh Bank Vs. Saiyed Shahidul Haque and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....se we direct that parties shall bear their respective costs of litigation. Lower Court's Record be sent down as early as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 161. ...... Sardar, being Dead & others, 1 BCR HCD 393. Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed with Md. Mofizul Islam, Advocate - For the Appellant. Nahid Yesmin, Assistant Attorney General - For Proforma-Defendant-Respondent No.4. Muhammad Salahuddin - For Proforma-Defendant-Respondent No.5. ......er East Pakistan during Liberation War of Bangladesh of the year 1971 and their whereabouts were not known and property was enlisted as Abandoned property under President's Order No.16 of 1972. Chief Martial Law Administrator, on behalf of the Government of Bangladesh through Section Officer, Minist...... Gangopadhyay and others, 40 C.W.N. 566; Abdul Hafez and another Vs. Lal Meah and others, 1988 BLD HCD 497; Bangshadhar Mitra and others Vs. Natabar Sardar, being Dead & others, 1 BCR HCD 393. Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed with Md. Mofizul Islam, Advocate - For the Appellant. Na..Category: Property Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 35
Harunur Rashid and ors. Vs. State and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....offence against the petitioners has been well proved beyond reasonable doubt. So, we find nothing to interfere. The petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......Not represented‑‑Respondent No. 1 (In Criminal Petition No. 22 of 2003) Not respondent‑‑Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 23 of 2003.) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 22 and 23 of 2003. (From judgment and order dated 25‑8‑2......offence against the petitioners has been well proved beyond reasonable doubt. So, we find nothing to interfere. The petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......he penal code. The other accused participated in making such deed committed offence under section 463 of the penal code and conviction under section 467 of the penal code is proper. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 85
Shafiqul Islam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....d period provided by law. In the circumstances we find no substance in the petition. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 37. ...... and another…….Respondents Judgment August 23, 2003. Result: The petition is dismissed. The Bangladesh Service Rules, Rule 72(a) There was no trial of the petitioner for allegation of the offence under section 161 of the Penal Code, 1860 read with section 5 (2) of t......d period provided by law. In the circumstances we find no substance in the petition. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 37. ...... section 339 (c) (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the petitioner was released as the trial could not be concluded within specified time. So, he is not entitled to all arrear benefits. Lawyers involved: Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate instructed by M Khaled Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑R..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 128
DU rep. by its VC Vs. Associated Engineering & Drillers, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....sts. The respondents are entitled to realise an amount of Taka 30,35,312 for which the execution case can proceed if the appellant fails to deposit the amount within 15 days from the date. Ed. ......tle Execution Case No. 21 of 1998 allowing amendment of the execution application by way of inserting Taka 38,25,141.53 towards interests and costs. 2. This appeal arose out of the suit for a decree of a bill of Taka 1,37,68,309,47 filed on the averments, inter alia, that the appella......sts. The respondents are entitled to realise an amount of Taka 30,35,312 for which the execution case can proceed if the appellant fails to deposit the amount within 15 days from the date. Ed. ......provides inherent power of the court whereas section 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the court to amend any defect or any error in any proceeding of the suit at any time. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Md. Zahir, Senior Advocate, (Md. Ozair Farooq, Senior Adv..Category: Civil Law | Date: 20 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 291
Capital Tower Ltd. Vs. Mirpur Mazar Co operative Market Society Ltd. & ors, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....previously numbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 of the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) is set aside and the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... August 18, 2003. Company Matter There is no bar in law for a company which is going to be registered to act in its name or on its behalf prior to registra......previously numbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 of the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) is set aside and the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......undai Corporation vs. Sumikin Bussan Corporation and others 54 DLR (AD) 88; AIR 1979 SC 1628; AIR 1980 SC 199‑2; AIR 1985 SC 1147 AIR 1988 SC 157; PLD 1965 SC 671 and AIR 1958 MP 393. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior‑Advocate, instructed by S..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 216
Debendra Kumar Saha & another Vs. Uttara Bank Ltd, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....no substance in both these Rules. In the result, both the Rules are discharged. No cost, Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 253. ......itions-one is defaulter and another is bonafide requirement. Existence of any one of these two conditions is suffice to eject a tenant. From their own averments the defendants are habitual defaulters for not paying rents for the year 1385‑1386 BS. The Court of appeal below further found that the s......no substance in both these Rules. In the result, both the Rules are discharged. No cost, Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 253. ......ed by the plaintiff-Bank for installing a branch at the suit premises………….(15) Cases Referred to- 43 CWN 797; 22 DLR 56; 22 DLR (SC) 360; 1987 BLD (AD) 147. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta with Mihir Kanti Majumder, Advocates-For the Petitioners. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 12 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 3
....y to issue necessary order for auction sale and/or civil warrant of arrest etc after compliance of the provisions of law.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 245.
......dated 25‑3‑2063 passed by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court, Dhaka by which civil warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner, fixing the next date on 30‑4‑2003 for execution and return of warrant.
2. The case of the petitioners is that he applied to the r......y to issue necessary order for auction sale and/or civil warrant of arrest etc after compliance of the provisions of law.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 245.
......t and others, 55 DLR (AD) 13; Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 54 DLR 78; Sultana Jute Mills Limited Vs. Agrani Bank, 46 DLR (AD) 174; Islami Bank Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shajuddin, 52 DLR (AD) 76.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Idrisur Rahman-For the Petitioner.
Md. Ziaul Haque-For Respondent No..
Category: Civil Law | Date: 11 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 21
Loretto represented by Nasreen Rahman, Principal Vs. Nasreen Sobhan and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
..... In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the impugned judgment and decree are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 581. ......trict Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.12 of 1999 decreeing the suit. 2. The respondents as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.12 of 1999 in the 3rd Court of Joint District Judge, Dhaka for ejectment of defendant-appellant from the suit property and for delivery of vacant possessi....... In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the impugned judgment and decree are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 581. ....... Cases Referred to- Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan Vs. Municipal Board of Sitapur and another, AIR 1965 SC 1923; Chandra Nath Mukherjee Vs. Chulai Pashi and another, AIR 1960 (Cal) 40. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim with Khandaker Aminul Huq, Advocates—For the Appellant. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 4 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 171
Motiar Rahman (Md.) and 18 others Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others
....rculate this Order among all the District Magistrates and all the District and Sessions Judges of Bangladesh. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 327. ......t July 29, 2003. Result: Order was circulated. Whether a District Magistrate or Additional District Magistrate is empowered to pass an order of detention making the same effective for 30 days from the date of service of the order of detention The law enunciated in sub-sectio......rculate this Order among all the District Magistrates and all the District and Sessions Judges of Bangladesh. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 327. ......of the Supreme Court may, if necessary, be requisitioned by the government to avoid recurrence of the mistakes committed by officers making/passing the order of detention..……. (31) Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with Khan Saifur Rahman, Advocates‑ For the Petitioners...Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 11
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on on acceptance of the customs duty and other levies to be assessed by the Customs Authority is stayed till disposal of the writ petition. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......nal Attorney General, (Borhanuddin, Deputy Attorney General, with him) instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Rccord-For the Appellants. A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- for the Respondent No. 1. Rokonuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab All, Advo......on on acceptance of the customs duty and other levies to be assessed by the Customs Authority is stayed till disposal of the writ petition. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... others………Appellants Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman and another………………………Respondents Judgment 26th July 2003 Lawyers Involved: Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General, (Borhanuddin, Deputy Attor..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 26 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 128
Hossain Shially (Fakir) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Send down the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 637. ......ing him (accused-appellant) under section 6(1) of the Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman (Special Provisions) Ain, 1995 (hereinafter shall be referred to as said Ain) and sentencing him to imprisonment for life as well as to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two y...... Send down the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 637. ......r).................... Appellant Vs. State............................. Respondent Judgment July 19, 2003. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- 19 DLR (SC) 259. Lawyers Involved: Md. Habibur Rahman Miah, Advocate ‑ For the Accused ‑ Appellant. ABM Wal..Category: Women and Children | Date: 19 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 162
Bangladesh Vs. Rehana Kamal and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....d any merit in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......the judgment and order dated 26‑11‑1992 in Case No. 3 of 1992 by the First Court of Settlement refusing to exclude the house from the said 'Ka' list on the purported ground that the application before the First Court of Settlement was barred by limitation. 2. The writ‑petitioner‑respon......d any merit in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......s. Helaluddin Ahmed 4 MLR (AD) 140; lqbal Ahmed Qurishi vs. Bangladesh 45 DLR 416; Bangladesh Vs. Professor Golam Azam 46 DLR (AD) 192; Government of Bangladesh Vs. MS Ispahani 40 DLR (AD) 116. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Md. Ataur Rahm..Category: Immigration and Citizenship Law | Date: 8 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 279
Abdul Kader Rabbani and others Vs. Ebaruddin and others, 2003,32 CLC (HCD)
....ance with law and in the light of the observation made in the body of the judgment. Send down the LC record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 307. ...... the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners and opposite party Nos.14‑28 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.96 of 1956 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, (now Joint District Judge) Rangpur, for declaration of title of 'Ka' and 'Kha’ schedule land and for khas possession o......ance with law and in the light of the observation made in the body of the judgment. Send down the LC record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 307. ......rs..................Petitioners Vs. Ebaruddin and others.................................Opposite Parties Judgment July 1, 2003. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mansur Habib with Lutfunnessa Lucky, Advocates- For the Petitioners. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 1 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 4
Mrs. Razia Satter Vs. Mr. Azizul Huq and two others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....in this rule and accordingly this rule is discharged and the contemners are acquitted of the charges-eveled against them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 515. ......- Amicus Curieas. Contempt Petition No.116 of 2001. Judgment Syed Amirul Islam J.- This rule was issued calling upon the respondent-contemners to show cause as to why a proceeding for contempt of Court should not be drawn up against them and punished accordingly for violatin......in this rule and accordingly this rule is discharged and the contemners are acquitted of the charges-eveled against them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 515. ......n-La Roche Vs. Secretary of State, (1975) AC 295; Ong Ah Chuan Vs. Public Prosecutor, (1981) AC 648; Wood Vs. Wood, (1874) LR 9 Ex. 190; 1985 Crl. L.J 359 (Bom); Marbury Vs. Madison, 2 L.Ed. 60. Lawyers Involved: Akhtar Imam with Syed Mamun Mahbub, Advocates-For Petitioner. Mahbubey A..Category: Constitutional Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2003 | Hits: 13
Zahed Ali Foreman (Driver) and ors. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....terference is called for by this Division in respect to the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......them unreliable or, in other words, their evidence is not worthy of consideration.” …….(7) Prosecution shall determine how many cited witnesses to be examined for proving it’s case. ……………………&helli......terference is called for by this Division in respect to the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Prosecution shall determine how many cited witnesses to be examined for proving it’s case. ……………………….(7) Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbub Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md Wahidullah. A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 24 May, 2003 | Hits: 84
Begum Lutfunnessa Vs. Md. Shafiullah and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....of Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court No. 2, Dhaka. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 102. ...... Procedure (V of 1908), Section 107(b) It is now the settled principle of law that order of remand should not be made lightly by the superior court and that if materials on record are sufficient for the disposal of the suit in that case the superior court should dispose of the same. But there m......of Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court No. 2, Dhaka. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 102. ...... the result of a suit filed earlier still remains pending the order of remand by the appellate/higher court made in such a situation cannot be considered unjustified ……… …………..(12) Lawyers Involved: KS Nabi, Senior Advocate, HR Sharif (Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Af..Category: Civil Law | Date: 18 May, 2003 | Hits: 202
16730856711198489157601271068881887977078907314663610588988731114206