Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Shamsul Haque (Md) Vs. Amina Khatun and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....nt Vs. Amina Khatun and others...........Respondents Judgment August 31, 2004. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (V of 1908), Order XIX, Rule 1(1), (3) When there was no issue before the trial court nor the appellate court regarding......an, EP Enemy Property Management Board, Dhaka and others Vs. Shah Gulam Nabi and others, 27 DLR (AD) 156; Hazari Bala Sana and another Vs. Niron alias Niranjan Mandal and others, 1997 BLD (AD) 294. Lawyers Involved: Probir Neogi, Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑..Category: Civil Law | Date: 31 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 156
Bangladesh Jute Corporation Vs. AB Jute Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....2000 against order dated 28‑7‑99 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4 at Dhaka in Title Suit No.205 of 99 which decreed the suit ex-parte and made the award dated 11‑1‑95 Rule of the Court. Then, the appellant on payment of ad-valorem court fees got the appeal registered......Rajuk Vs. MN Alam and Associates, FA No.282 of 2003; Awan Industries Ltd. Vs. Executive Engineer, Lined Channel Division, 1992 SCMR 65; Union of India Vs. Manager, Jain and Associate, 3 SCC 277. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan with Fazlul Karim, Md. Mohiuddin Ahmed and Rezina Choudhury, Advocat..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 18 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 8
Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 17 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 2
Ashraful Alam Vs. Md. Moniruddin and ors, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....gment and decree are hereby set aside. The suit is dismissed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 260. ......is case, possession of the plaintiffs in the suit shops cannot be termed as adverse....(34 & 35) Case Referred to- Cf: Thakur Kishan Singh (dead) Vs. Arvind Kumar; 1994(6) SCC 591. Lawyers Involved: Md. Emdadul Haque Azad, Advocate‑ For the Appellant Mahbubey Alam with..Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 2
Hasina Begum Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d auction sale is also declared without jurisdiction, illegal and void; and accordingly, quashed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 257. ......thers........Respondents Judgment August 15, 2004. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Nasrin Kader Siddique Vs. Bangladesh and others, 44 DLR (AD) 16. Lawyers Involved: Shafique Ahmed with Md. Aminul Islam Advocates- For the Appellant. ..Category: Others | Date: 15 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 3
Yusuf Chowdhury (Md.) Vs. Administrator of Waqf and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... Administrator of Waqf and others……………………………Opposite parties Judgment August 11, 2004. Result: The Rule is discharged. Since the applicant is a beneficiary in the Waqf estate, he is entitled to ......ision of the District Judge. So, the application made by a son of last Mutawali claiming interest in the Waqf estate cannot be denied to prosecute the appeal………(17 & 18) Lawyers involved: TH Khan with Sk Zulfiquar Bulbul Choudhury‑ For the Petitioner. Mahmud..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 11 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 1
Jane Alam (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....e Alam (Md.)...........................................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others..............Respondents Judgment August 10, 2004. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Dr. AKM Ali with AB Showkat Ali, Advocates- For t.................................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others..............Respondents Judgment August 10, 2004. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Dr. AKM Ali with AB Showkat Ali, Advocates- For the Petitioner. Zaman Ak..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 10 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 4
State Vs. Md. Arab Ali, Ex-Manager, Rupali Bank and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....on in Criminal Revision No. 345 of 1991 registered upon a petition filed under section 561 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. By the aforesaid judgment the High Court Division upon making the Rule absolute quashed the proceedings of Special Case No.12 of 1985 (arising out of Motijheel PS Cas......mplete justice. ..............(12) Cases Referred to: Md. Shamsuddin vs. State and others, 40 DLR (AD) 69; Bangladesh vs. Amjad Ali Mridha and others, 56 DLR (AD) 119. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B Hoss..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 10 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 84
Ayub Ali Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....Chowdhury............................................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others..................Respondents Judgment August 8, 2004. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Service Regulations of the Islamic Foundation Regulations 43, 44, 4......al justice, the order imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement cannot be allowed to stand…......(14-15) Cases Referred to- 13 DLR (SC) 105; 29 DLR (SC) 232; 52 DLR (AD) 17. Lawyers Involved: Shafique Ahmed, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner Not represented‑ the Re..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 8 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 3
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 1 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 4
SM Salim Vs. Chairman, Chittagong Club Ltd. and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ed 3‑12‑2001 and 4‑12‑2001 in Writ Petition No. 2580 of 2000 heard analogously with Writ Petition No. 3386 of 2000 by a Division Bench of the High Court Division making the Rules absolute. 2. The writ‑petitioner in Writ Petition No.3386 of 2000 as the f......LR (SC) 284; Khulna Newsprint Mills Ltd Vs Khulna Newsprint Employees Union 25 DLR (SC) 85 and Bangladesh Tea Estate Ltd vs. Bangladesh Tea Estate, Staff Association 28 DLR (AD) 190. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rob Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Ad..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 1 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 100
State Vs. Md. Amir Hamza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... sections 439/435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the aforesaid order. The High Court Division heard the parties and in its turn by the judgment and order dated 26‑5‑2004 discharged the Rule thereby affirming the judgment and order of the learned Judge of the Tribunal. Hence is this pe......rosecution and affirming the same judgement and order by the High Court Division on appeal has been confirmed. Case Referred to- Prativa Rani Dey Vs. Dr. Md. Yousuf 52 DLR (AD) 8. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney‑General (Khondaker Mahbubuddin A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 31 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 115
Dewan Abul Abbas Vs. Muna Haque and other, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ellant. If no deposit is made within that period the appeal stands dismissed. Let the lower Courts records be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 310. ......ah and others, 39 DLR (AD) 242; Santosh Kumar Paul Vs. Nuruddin Ansari, 47 DLR 72; Saru Meah Sowdagar and another Vs. Al‑haj Jahanara Begum and others and Dula Meah Vs. Md. Ibrahim, 8 DLR 616. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with SM Moonir, Advocates- For the Appellant. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 28 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 6
Nurul Haque (Md.) Vs. Anowara Begum and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
..... Anowara Begum and others………………………………Opposite Parties Judgment July 27, 2004. Result: The Rule is discharged. Easement Act (V of 1882); Section 60 Possession is the objective reali...... Council and others, 44 Indian Appeals 104; (Pannamma Velly Vs. Achu Thana Union, ILR 1966, 1 Kerala 689); Basanta Kumar Roy Vs. Secretary of State, LR 44 IA 104; Play Fair Vs. Musgrove, 153 ER, 465; Lawrence Vs. Tucker, (1938) 160 Ore 474: 85; Bush Vs. Smith, (1953) 6 PL 670; Thakur Singh Vs. Bhoge..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 2
Chairman, RAJUK Vs. MN Alam and Associates Limited, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.............................. Appellant Vs. MN Alam and Associates Limited..............................Respondent Judgment July 27, 2004. Result: The Appeal is allowed and Rule is disposed of. In the circumstances and on the failure of the parties to concur in the ap...... AIR 1992 (SC) 232; Awan Industries Ltd. Vs. Executive Engineer, Lined Channel Division, (1992) SCMR 65; Union of India Vs. Manager, W/s Joy and Associates, (2001) 3 SCC 277 = AIR 2001 (SC) 809. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan with Mahbubey Alam and Rezina Chowdhury, Advocates- For the Appellant..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 8
MM Ishak Vs. State and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....sain J AKM Fazlur Rahman J MM Ishak....................Accused Petitioner Vs. State and another .......................Opposite Partes Judgment July 25, 2004. Result: Both the Rules are made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mizanur Rahman with SRM Lutfor Rahman Akhand, ......J MM Ishak....................Accused Petitioner Vs. State and another .......................Opposite Partes Judgment July 25, 2004. Result: Both the Rules are made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mizanur Rahman with SRM Lutfor Rahman Akhand, Advocates ‑ For the Petiti..Category: Women and Children | Date: 25 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 156
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya (RAJUK) Vs. Jahanara Begum & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Ruhul Amin J.- The delay is condoned. This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated February 6, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division making the Rules absolute obtained in Writ Petition No. 3602 of 1999. The writ petition was filed impugning the......nd to that affected person whenever such affected person fulfils and satisfies the conditions and the criteria set forth by RAJUK entitling him to have allotment of lands as an affected claimant. Lawyers Involved: Shah Md. Khasruzzaman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Waliul Islam, Advocate‑on..Category: Property Law | Date: 21 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 133
Abdul Malek Sawdagar Vs. Md. Mahbubey Alam and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....Alam and others…………Respondents Judgment July 20, 2004. The Waqf Ordinance, 1962 (I of 1962), Sections 64 and 102 The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(V of 1908), Order VII, Rule 11 What is to be considered in rejecting a plaint? From averment in the plaint itself......? From averment in the plaint itself ground is to be found out, whether plaint prima facie is liable to be rejected as being barred under section 50 or 102 of the Waqf Ordinance........(18) Lawyers involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mokbul Ahmed, Advocate with him), instructed by Md..Category: Civil Law | Date: 20 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 160
Category: Banking Law, Criminal Law | Date: 19 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 3
M. A. Mazid and another Vs. The Chairman, Chittagong Port Authority and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....equires adjudication of factual aspect by evidence" in the impugned judgment is hereby expunged. With above expunction of the redundant observation, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......llip;………..Petitioner Vs. The Chairman, Chittagong Port Authority and others…………..Respondent Judgment 18th July 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. S.R. Khoshna..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 18 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 109