Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Hafez Abdus Salam Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ssain and another, 50 DLR 487; District Primary Education Officer Vs. Joynal Abedin and others, 40 DLR 328; Radha Rani Vs. Durga Rani Adhikari, 47 DLR 360. Lawyers Involved: SK Md. Morshed, Advocate- For the Appellant. Md. Momtazuddin Ahmed, Advocate‑ For the Respondents. First......sion (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Syed AB Mahmudul Huq J Hafez Abdus Salam............................................Appellant Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another............................Respondent Judgment Jun......onnected Civil Rule 550(FM) of 2003 is accordingly, discharged with cost. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ......onnected Civil Rule 550(FM) of 2003 is accordingly, discharged with cost. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 3
Rajshahi Development Authority Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....usain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Rajshahi Development Authority……...........Appellant Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others.............. Respondents Judgment J...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Rajshahi Development Authority……...........Appellant Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others.............. Respondents ......ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 232
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rul Islam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD), 230; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan Vs. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, being dead his heirs Amena Khatun, 35 DLR (AD) 338. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant(In all the appeals......5.......on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......pre-emption was sought under Section 24 of the Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act. 12. Facts of the case reported in 35 DLR (AD) 230, in short, are that the land of C.S Khatian No. 214 was owned by Akshoy Kumar Saha Banik and Rangubala Chowdhurani. Akshoy Kumar Saha Banik instituted Title Suit No. 126 of..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
Category: Civil Law | Date: 21 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 321
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Azmalul Hossain, QC with Reba Kaniz, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Morshed Ahmed Khan with ASM Abdur Razzaque, Advocates—For Resp......57 DLR (2005) 138. ...... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ...... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ssessed both for the movable and immovable properties……..(5) Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on‑Record‑For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on&......Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh, represented by Deputy Commissioner…….Appellant Vs. Anwara Huq and ors .........................Respondents Judgment ......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
AHM Mustain Billah & others Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....icipality AIR 1533 Bombay 133; Manaj Kumar Roy vs. Government of Bangladesh and others 7 BLC (AD) 42: Hafazatur Rahman vs. Kazi Anwar Hossain 53 DLR (AD) 89. Lawyers involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, M Zahir, Senior Advocate and Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J AHM Mustain Billah & others…………. Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others ...........R......aid appeal was heard and dismissed on merit, the Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 1998 shall also stand dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......75 (SC) 1500; JM Jamuna vs. Chairman, Labour Court and others 53 DLR (AD) 28, ETV Ltd vs. Dr Chowdlhury Mahmood 55 DLR (AD) 26: Batuk K Kyas vs. Surate Borough Municipality AIR 1533 Bombay 133; Manaj Kumar Roy vs. Government of Bangladesh and others 7 BLC (AD) 42: Hafazatur Rahman vs. Kazi Anwar Hos..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 23 May, 2004 | Hits: 128
State Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ...... Present: AK Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J State………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji…………Convict (in abscondence) Judg......lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ...... Faraji…………Convict (in abscondence) Judgment May 18, 2004. Result: The Death Reference No.39 of 2001 is accepted. Cases Referred to- Gourangh Kumar Saha Vs. State, 2 BLC (AD) 126; Abdul Matleb Howlader Vs. State, 6 BLC (AD) 1; State Vs. Kalu ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 18 May, 2004 | Hits: 3
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 10 May, 2004 | Hits: 9
Sultan Miah (Md) Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ent of the appellate court is tainted with error of law resulting taking decision erroneously occasioning failure of justice. Lawyers Involved: Md. Roushan Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ataul Haque, Advocate‑ on‑ Record‑ For the Petitioner.......udassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Sultan Miah (Md)…………………....Petitioner Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others .............Respondents Judgment May 8......ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 May, 2004 | Hits: 825
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....llip;………….Respondents Judgment May 5, 2004. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moazzam Hossain with Md. Hasmatullah Sheikh, Advocates‑ For the Appellant. Gazi Md. Neamat Hossain, Advocate‑ For the Respondents. ...... Md. Abdul Hafiz J Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another………………&hell...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4
Sunder Ali being dead his heirs A. Hannan & ors. Vs. Md. Serajul I. Sarker & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... and for the ascertainment of the cause of action Court is required to read the plaint in its entirety……………….(11) Lawyers Involved: Md. Jalil, Advocate, instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑For the Appellant...... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sunder Ali being dead his heirs Abdul Hannan and others .........Appellants Vs. Md. Serajul Islam Sarker & others................Respondents Judg......allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....) 338; Abdur Rabban Vs. Aminul Hoque Sowdagar and another, 43 DLR (AD) 19; Ahmed Hossain and others Vs. Basharat Ali and others, 32 DLR (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A. S. M Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants (In both the app.............Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and others……………...............Respondents (In C.A.No.85 of 1999) Judgment April 25, 2004 Cases Referred To- Jadav Chandra Mali Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 27 DLR (AD) 114; Md. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal a......e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Rungta AIR 1952. Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Additional Attorney-General, (Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, Deputy, Attorney‑ General with him), instructed by Mvi Md. Wahididlah, Advocate‑on‑Record-For the Petitioners. TH Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Amir Ho...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Bank and others......Appellants Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another .........Respondents Judgment April 24, 2004...... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Lokman Hossain being dead his legal heirs and Md. Abdul Latif and others. ...........................Respondents. Judgment 21 April 2004 Lawyers Involved: Herendra Nath Nandi, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioner Nurul Amin, Advo......issed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....shmat Ali Jamader Vs. Asmat Ali Jamader, 6 DLR 478; R. Sim & Co. Vs. Pakistand Industries Ltd., 8 DLR 305; Bangladesh Vs. Masriki Textile, 35 DLR (AD) 123. Lawyers Involved: MA Gaffar, Advocate- For the Appellant. Shafique Ahmed with ARM Shahidul Islam, Advocates‑ For the Respo......rt High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur................Appellant Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd...................................Respondent Judgment A......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....Cases Referred to- Sonali Bank vs Ruhul Amin Khan 46 DLR (AD) 85: Union of India and another vs G Ganayutham AIR 1997 (SC) 3387. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellants. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment ...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....arping Matshyajibi Samabaya Samity Vs. Bangladesh 39 DLR (AD) 85; Bangladesh Power Development Board Vs. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder 8 MLR (AD) 241. Lawyers involved: Rafique ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, Abdur Razzaque, Senior Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Rec......1. ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Nurul Huq (Md) @ MN Huq Vs. Nirmal Chandra Dutta & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....iting expert as to execution of the document in question……………………(8 & 9) Lawyers Involved: Rafique‑ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, (MI Farooqui, Advocate with him), instructed by Mr. MG Bhuiyan, Advocate‑on‑Re......p; Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Nurul Huq (Md) @ MN Huq ………….Appellant Vs. Nirmal Chandra Dutta and another ........................Respondents Judgment ......ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ......ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 103
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....the termination of such appointment…..(14) Lawyers Involved: Syed Abu Kowser and Md. Dabirush Shan, Deputy Attorneys‑General, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellants. ldris Khan, Advocate (appeared wit......p; Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and others……..................Respondents Ju......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201