Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1081-1100 of 2859 results.
Harunar Rashid (Md.) Vs. Subordinate Judge, (Artha Rin Adalat) Bogra and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....92 (Annexure to the petition) is hereby declared to have been passed or made without any lawful authority and to be of no legal affect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 170....... Qazi Shafiuddin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Harunar Rashid (Md.) son of late Rafique Uddin, Jinnath Mahal.......................Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge, (Artha Rin Adalat) Bogra and others………………..Respondents Judgment November 11, 1997. Result: The Rule i......92 (Annexure to the petition) is hereby declared to have been passed or made without any lawful authority and to be of no legal affect. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 170.......nd all such suits shall be decided only in the said Adalat. The clear implication of section 5(1) read with section 2(Kha) of the Adalat Act is, that it is only a financial institution which can be a plaintiff before the Artha Rin Adalat and no one else It also implies that all kinds of suits are no..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Abdur Rahim Vs. Arifur Rahman and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....impugned judgment to call for any interference by this Court exercising revisional power. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 166.......Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Gour Gopal Saha J Abdur Rahim........................Petitioner Vs. Arifur Rahman and others.......................Opposite Parties Judgment November 27, 1997. Result: N......impugned judgment to call for any interference by this Court exercising revisional power. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 166.......uit No.32 of 1983 have been called in question. By the impugned judgment the learned Additional District Judge reversed the judgment of the trial Court and dismissed the suit. 2. The petitioner as plaintiff instituted a suit for specific performance of contract in the 2nd Court of the Subordinate..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Ihteshamur Rahman Vs. Masuda Khatun and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....tively within 3(three) months from the d of receipt of this order. The order of stay earlier granted by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 159. ...... High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Gour Gopal Saha J Ihteshamur Rahman………………………Petitioner Vs. Masuda Khatun and others………………………Opposite Parties Judgment January 15, 1998. Result: ......tively within 3(three) months from the d of receipt of this order. The order of stay earlier granted by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 159. ...... Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule calls in question the order dated 6-7-94 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Suit No.258 of 1992 allowing the plaintiffs application for re-examination of witness No.1 for the plaintiff. 2. Short facts relev..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
....down the lower Court records immediately.
Cost assessed by the lower Court in respect of the share of the suit land is maintained.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 156.
......maintained.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 156.
......down the lower Court records immediately.
Cost assessed by the lower Court in respect of the share of the suit land is maintained.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 156.
......t, Dhaka in TA No.185 of 1968 affirming those dated 30-3-1968 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka in TS No.22 of 1967.
2. The opposite party No.1 Md. Afsaruddin (now dead) as plaintiff filed Title Suit No.22 of 1967 against the predecessor of present petitioner and opposite ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Bainchitala Islamia Junior Madrasha Vs. Md. Abdur Rashid & others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....henidah in Miscellaneous Appeal No.54 of 1995 is set aside and the application dated 22-2-95 filed by the opposite parties is rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 153.......ment March 2, 1997. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- PLD 1974 (Lahore) 312; 22 DLR 500; 42 DLR 481; 32 DLR (AD) 96; PLD 1974 (Lah) 312. Lawyers Involved: HN Nandi, Advocate - For the Petitioner. A Salam Khan, Advocate - For the Opposite Parties. Civil......henidah in Miscellaneous Appeal No.54 of 1995 is set aside and the application dated 22-2-95 filed by the opposite parties is rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 153.......ted against the order No.15 dated 22-2-95 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No.54 of 1985 by the learned District Judge, Jhenidah allowing an application for addition of parties. 2. The petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.16 of 1081 for declaration that the petitioner is the successor o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
.... the plaintiff's dismissal shall be treated to be special leave without pay and other benefits.
Send down the LC records accordingly.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (HCD) (2010) 41.......ction)
Present:
Md. Azizul Haque J
Shefali Bala...............Petitioner
Vs.
Khalipur Pukurpara Registered Non-Government Primary School Managing Committee represented by its President and others………………Opposite Parties
Judgment
July 2, 2009.
Result:
The Rule ...... the plaintiff's dismissal shall be treated to be special leave without pay and other benefits.
Send down the LC records accordingly.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (HCD) (2010) 41.......in-charge, Baliadangi, Thakurgaon in Other Class Suit No.4 of 2000 decreeing the suit should not be set aside and/or any other order passed this Court may seem fit and proper.
2. The petitioner as plaintiff tiled the aforesaid suit for declaration that her dismissal order dated 19-6-1997 from ser..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Al Baraka Bank Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Rina Alam and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ffirmed. The bank is directed to return the schedule document within seven days of receipt of this judgment. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 588....... High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Al Baraka Bank Bangladesh Ltd ....................Appellant Vs. Rina Alam and another............Respondents Judgment April 12, 2004. Result: The appeal is dismis......ffirmed. The bank is directed to return the schedule document within seven days of receipt of this judgment. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 588.......e appeal against the decree dated 26‑11‑2001 passed by the Joint District Judge and First Commercial Court at Dhaka in Title Suit No. 197 of 2001, which decreed the suit. 2. Respondent No.1 as plaintiff on 14‑7‑97 instituted Title Suit No. 208 of 97 against the appellant bank and another ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Abdur Rashid Chowdhury Vs. Additional District Judge and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....by directed to proceed with the suit by issue of the summons/notice however, in accordance with law, expeditiously. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 573. ......rt Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J S Rahman Miah J Abdur Rashid Chowdhury...........................Petitioner Vs. Additional District Judge and others……………Respondents Judgment October 20, 2003. Result: The Rule is made......by directed to proceed with the suit by issue of the summons/notice however, in accordance with law, expeditiously. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 573. ...... not be directed to issue summons/notice of said bankruptcy suit upon respondent No. 2, the Shinepukur Holding Limited and respondent No. 3, Mahmudur Rahman. 2. On 25‑4‑2000, the petitioner as plaintiff presented a plaint before the Bankruptcy Court at Motijheel in Dhaka, briefly the Court, a..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 185
Shahid Hamid and another Vs. Nilufar Momtaz and anothe, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....erference. Therefore, we do not find any substance in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLC (AD) (2012) 34. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Muzammel Hossain CJ MA Wahhab Miah J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Md. Imman All J Md. Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Shahid Hamid and another....................................Appellants Vs. Nilufar Momtaz and another...........erference. Therefore, we do not find any substance in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLC (AD) (2012) 34. ...... reversing those dated 1-6-2006 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Second Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.100 of 2006. 2. The facts involved in the appeal, in brief, are as follows: The plaintiff and defendant No.1 both are citizens of Bangladesh by birth and they got married. They wer..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Prodip Kumar Dutta & another Vs. Mira Rani Dutta and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....to hear and dispose of the miscellaneous case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 571.......Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J S Rahman Miah J Prodip Kumar Dutta & another........................Petitioners Vs. Mira Rani Dutta and another ......Opposite Parties Judgment March 13, 2004. Result: The Rule is made abs......to hear and dispose of the miscellaneous case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 571.......dge by a petition signed and verified by or on behalf of the applicant in the manner prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for the signing and verification of a plaint by or on behalf of a plaintiff, and setting forth the following particulars, namely: (a) ...............................Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
NFM Universeum Estate Ltd. Vs. ANM Obaidul Islam and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....rocedure for using said deed in the suit knowing it to be forged and fraudulent for criminal prosecution. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 563. ......t High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Syed ABM Huq J NFM Universeum Estate Ltd. .....................Appellant Vs. ANM Obaidul Islam and others......... Respondents Judgment April 20, 2004. Result: The appeal is dismissed......rocedure for using said deed in the suit knowing it to be forged and fraudulent for criminal prosecution. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 563. ......1 passed by the Fifth Court of Joint District Judge at Dhaka in Title Suit No. 135 of 1997, which decreed the suit. 2. One ANM Obaidul Islam, predecessor-in-interest of respondent Nos. 1 to 8 as plaintiff instituted title Suit No. 120 of 1992 for declaration of title and recovery of possession ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Sonali Bank Vs. Mahbubul Amin & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....Execution Case No.791 of 1986 is vacated. The Execution Case will proceed in accordance with law. The records be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 298. ......ution Case will proceed in accordance with law. Cases Referred to- AIR 1940 (Madras) 29; AIR 1937 (Madras) 511; AIR 1931 (Madras) 650; 3 BCR 1983 (HCD) 339; M/s. M.M. Ispahani Vs. Sonali Bank and Ors., 1985 DLR (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain with Syed Sakhwat Ali - For petit......Execution Case No.791 of 1986 is vacated. The Execution Case will proceed in accordance with law. The records be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 298. ......gment-debtor has challenged order Nos.9 and 10 dated 3.6.87 and 17.6.87 respectively passed by the Subordinate Judge and Commercial Court No.1, Dhaka in Money Execution Case No.791 of 1986. 2. The plaintiff/decree-holder filed a Money Suit against the defendant Bank and others for recovery of a..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Md. Osman Vs. Fatema Khatoon & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....l is allowed with costs and the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court is set aside and those of the Trial Court is upheld. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 270....... Moqbul Ahmed, Advocate - For the Respondent. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 482 of 1975. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- This appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Third Court, Chittagong in other Appeal No.3......l is allowed with costs and the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court is set aside and those of the Trial Court is upheld. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 270.......uddin Ahmed, Advocates - For the Appellant. Moqbul Ahmed, Advocate - For the Respondent. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 482 of 1975. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- This appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Thi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Shamir Ghosh Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....s. Accordingly, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit preferably within 3(three) months from the date of receipt of the order, Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 560. ......reme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mir Hashmat Ali J Shamir Ghosh……………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the DC and others...............Opposite Parties Judgment February 17, 2004. Result: The Rule i......s. Accordingly, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit preferably within 3(three) months from the date of receipt of the order, Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 560. ......ersing the Judgment and order dated 27‑7‑2002 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar, Kishoregonj in other Class Suit No. 136 of 2002 should not be set aside. 2. The petitioner as plaintiff instituted Other Class Suit No. 136 of 2002 before the Court of learned Senior Assistant J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Rahima Khatun Vs. Md. Nurul Hoque & others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The order of stay earlier granted by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 140.......er. Abdul Wahab Miah with M Enayetur Rahim, Advocates - For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 821 of 1996. Judgment Syed Amirul Islam J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.2.96 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Laksam Thana Assistant Judge’s Cour......the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The order of stay earlier granted by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 140.......a Assistant Judge’s Court at Comilla in Miscellaneous Case No.35 of 1995, setting aside the ex parte preliminary decree dated 24-4-95 passed in Partition Suit No.12 of 1992. 2. The petitioner as plaintiff instituted Partition Suit No.128 of 1984 in the Second Court of Subordinate Judge Comilla,..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
.... The judgment and the decree passed by the trial Court are upheld.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Let the LCR be sent down.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 134.......urt
High Court Division
(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)
Present:
Kazi AT Manowaruddin J
Binode Bihari Ghose………………Plaintiff-Petitioner
Vs.
Assistant Custodian, Vested and Non-Resident Property and others……………Defendant-Opposite Parties
Judgment
January...... The judgment and the decree passed by the trial Court are upheld.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Let the LCR be sent down.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 134.......by the learned Assistant Judge, Tala, Satkhira, in Title Suit No.27 of 1987 decreeing the suit.
2. Facts, giving rise to this Rule may briefly be stated as follows:
The respondent-petitioner as plaintiff filed Title Suit No.402 of 1982 in the 2nd Court of the learned Assistant Judge, Satkhira ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Nirman International Ltd. Vs. Islam Steel Mills Ltd. and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
.... learned brother has already discussed and observed very clearly the legal aspect on this point in view of case laws cited before us. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 125. ......ourt Division (Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Md. Nurul Islam J Nirman International Ltd…………………Appellant Vs. Islam Steel Mills Ltd. and others……………………Respondents Judgment February 5, 1997. Result: The app...... learned brother has already discussed and observed very clearly the legal aspect on this point in view of case laws cited before us. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 125. ......5 and under section 151 CPC we are unable to find any concrete allegation and material about the action of the appellant for sale of the property and for closing the business. Rather we find that the plaintiff made a sweeping statement without any concrete allegation and material regarding the alleg..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Nurul Islam and others Vs. Khatibuddin Ahmed and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....accordance with law on the evidence adduced by the parties, if any. Send down the copy of this judgment and order to Courts below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 545.......Courts below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 545.......accordance with law on the evidence adduced by the parties, if any. Send down the copy of this judgment and order to Courts below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 545.......he learned Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar, Dinajpur in Other Suit No. 142/03 should not be set aside. 2. The facts leading to issuing the Rule, in short, inter alia, is that the opposite parties as plaintiffs instituted Other Class Suit No. 142 of 2003 on 17‑9‑03 in the Court of the learned Se..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Naogaon Rice Mills Ltd. Vs. Pubali Batik Ltd., 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....he learned Artha Rin Adalat and the learned Cognizance Court and Magistrate, 1st Class, Naogaon for their information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 543. ......inate Judge rightly found that the plaintiff against the order dated 10‑1‑2001 passed in had done works beyond the tender, which the Miscellaneous Case No. 1 of 1999 sending a defendants received and enjoyed. Not only that the complaint against the petitioner to the Criminal defendants already t......he learned Artha Rin Adalat and the learned Cognizance Court and Magistrate, 1st Class, Naogaon for their information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 543. ......tes ‑ For the Petitioner. No one ‑ For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 1757 of 2001 Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J. - This Rule is directed Subordinate Judge rightly found that the plaintiff against the order dated 10‑1‑2001 passed in had done works beyond the tender, which th..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Shahidul Hoque Vs. Deputy Commissioner and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....l get a decree for 2,43,505 + 3,66,225.81 = Taka 6,09,730.81 with interest at the rate of 10% from the date of the decree till realisation. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 538. ......High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J S Rahman Miah J AKM Shahidul Hoque ...............................Appellant Vs. Deputy Commissioner and others ....................Respondents Judgment August 3, 2003. Result: The appeal i......l get a decree for 2,43,505 + 3,66,225.81 = Taka 6,09,730.81 with interest at the rate of 10% from the date of the decree till realisation. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 538. ......tash Kumar Sarker, Advocates ‑ For the Appellant. Humayun Kabir Khadem, Advocate ‑ For the Respondents. Appeal from Original Decree No. 239 of 1995. Judgment Md Abdur Rashid J. - The plaintiff presented the above appeal against the decree dated 30‑4‑95 passed by the Subordinate ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 99
63446343634063396338633163216318631563076306630563026300629762956294629362926291