Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Roquib Mohammad Fakrul alias Rocky Vs. Md. Abdul Kashem & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... not find any error of law in the said judgment. For the reasons mentioned above, the appeal appears to be bereft of any sustenance. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......on-Record‑For‑ the Respondent No. 2. Not Represented ‑ Respondent No. 3‑5. Criminal Appeal No. 68 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 26‑8‑2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revisi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 80
Hafez Abdus Salam Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....onnected Civil Rule 550(FM) of 2003 is accordingly, discharged with cost. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ......nbsp; 2. Short facts for disposal of the appeal are that respondent No.1 as plaintiff instituted Other Suit No.42 of 97 for Specific Performance of a contract. The suit was decreed on contest by judgment and decree dated 20‑3‑2002. 3. Being aggrieved, on 20‑6‑2002 the appellant pre..Category: Civil Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 3
Rajshahi Development Authority Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......y Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented‑Respondent Nos. 2‑6. Civil Appeal No. 292 of 2003 (From the judgment and order dated 29th April 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1931..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 232
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......h of the High Court Division passed in Civil Order Nos. 3230, 3231, 3232, 3233 and 3234 of 1997 rejecting the 5 revisional applications summarily. The revisional applications were filed against the judgment and order dated 10.4.1996 of the 1st Court of Additional District Judge, Sylhet, passe..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
ACI Ltd Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ...... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 1
Category: Civil Law | Date: 21 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 321
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ......d in the English daily newspaper and therefore, the petitioner had no knowledge about the proceeding of the suit and the ex parte decree obtained by the respondent bank and consequently, the ex parte judgment and decree is an irregular judgment which has to be set aside on the ground of non-service ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ate on‑Record‑For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 67 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated August 14, 1994 passed by the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous A..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
AHM Mustain Billah & others Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....aid appeal was heard and dismissed on merit, the Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 1998 shall also stand dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......‑ul‑Islam, Senior Advocate, Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For Respondent Nos. 2‑61. Civil Appeal No. 38 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 21st August 2000 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal No. 132 o..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 23 May, 2004 | Hits: 128
State Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ......lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 18 May, 2004 | Hits: 3
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 10 May, 2004 | Hits: 9
Sultan Miah (Md) Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... High Court Division committed no error of law in confirming judgement and decree of the trial court at the same time setting aside the judgement and decree passed by the appellate court as because judgment of the appellate court is tainted with error of law resulting taking decision erroneously ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 May, 2004 | Hits: 825
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4
Sunder Ali being dead his heirs A. Hannan & ors. Vs. Md. Serajul I. Sarker & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Advocate, instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑For the Appellants. Not represented - The Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1997. (From the judgment and order dated December 9, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......(In both the appeals) Ex-parte - For Respondent No. 4-36 (In both the appeals) Civil Appeal Nos. 84& 85 of 1999 Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- These 2 appeals, by leave, are directed against the judgment and order dated November 15.1993 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Mi..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... parties in order to maintain status quo ante in the pending suit proceeding before it. 11. The learned Additional Attorney General also found fault with certain observations in the impugned judgment wherein the High Court Division has allegedly prejudiced/opined that the Bangladesh Bank ha..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......and Order, dated February 9, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 934 of 2001) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin, J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated February 9, 2003 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revi..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......54 DLR 161 and Bangladesh Water Development Board Vs. Progati Prakushali 49 DLR 335. 20. Then, he submitted that as the award was already made Rule of the Court and a decree passed following die judgment, no appeal mould lie against such decree except on the ground that it was in access of or n..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ............................Respondent Judgment April 6, 2004. Service Matter Punishment- In modifying the order of dismissal in the manner as stated in the judgment of AAT upon importing the concept of proportionality which has no application in the inst..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ...... instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For Respondent No. 1. Dispensed with‑ Respondent No.2. Ex parte‑ Respondent No.3. Civil Appeal No.300 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 8th May 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5311 of..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215