Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1101-1120 of 8151 results.
Rajshahi Development Authority Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;…(8) Cases Referred to: Bangladesh vs. Basaratullah 42 DLR (AD) 91; Abdul Gafur Khan and another vs. Government of Bangladesh and others 42 DLR (AD) 99. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate......nt case having been taken pursuant to the Emergency Requisition of Property Act of 1948, the impugned order directing payment of full compensation money at the present market rate in the provision of Order 11 of done without lawful authority." Mr. Sultan Ahmed, the learned Advocate a..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 232
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......8, 2004. Cases Referred to- S.M. Basiruddin Vs. Zahurul Islam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD), 230; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan Vs. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, being dead his heirs Amena Khatun, 35 DLR (AD) 338. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, A......cted by Md. Aftab Hossain,Advocate-on-Record-Respondent No. 1 (In all the appeals). Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-30 (In all the appeals). Civil Appeal No. 85-86 of 1998 (From the Judgment and Order dated 30, 1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Order Nos. 3230, 3231, 3232, 3233 an..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
ACI Ltd Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ......lt: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Nurul Islam and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1977 BSCR 32; Abdul Jalil Munshi Vs. Abu Bakr Siddique, 35 DLR (AD) 42. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul Huq with Anik R Hoque, Advocates- For the Petitioner. Rokanud......il Revision No.2091 of 2003. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- Defendant No.2 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an Order dated 14‑5‑03 passed by Additional District Judge. Court No.2 at Pabna in Miscellaneous Ap..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 1
....ot find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:56 DLR (AD) 166.
......ley Corporation vs KKK Kar (1974) 1 SCC 141; (1996) 1 SCC, 54 (Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd vs Indo Swiss Synthetics Gem Manufacturing Company Ltd and others); (2001) 6 SCC, 365 (Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd vs Jindal Exports Ltd); AIR 1959 SC, 1362 (Union of India vs Kishorilal Gupta and Brother......axwell Engineering Works Ltd and another...............Respondents
Judgment
June 21, 2004.
Result:
The petition is dismissed.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XXXIX rules 1 & 2
The Arbitration Act, 1940, Sections 3(1)(4)
The law ..
Category: Civil Law | Date: 21 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 321
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ......affar Chowdhury............... Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Azmalul Hossain, QC with Reba Kaniz, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Morshe......7 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 insofar as they provide for payment of 50% of the decretal amount when it was sought by the defendant petitioner to either have the ex parte decree set aside under Order IX, rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure or for preferring an appeal against the ex parte pr..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e land and permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth and, in other words, compensation is to be assessed both for the movable and immovable properties……..(5) Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by B......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
AHM Mustain Billah & others Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....aid appeal was heard and dismissed on merit, the Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 1998 shall also stand dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......6: Batuk K Kyas vs. Surate Borough Municipality AIR 1533 Bombay 133; Manaj Kumar Roy vs. Government of Bangladesh and others 7 BLC (AD) 42: Hafazatur Rahman vs. Kazi Anwar Hossain 53 DLR (AD) 89. Lawyers involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, M Zahir, Senior Advocate and Subrata Chowdhury, Advo...... Judgment May 23, 2004. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Articles 104 & 105 The Appellate Division Rules, 1988, Rule 45 The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XLVII Appellate Division’s paramount power of review can be exercised to do full and e..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 23 May, 2004 | Hits: 128
....he Bankruptcy Court is directed to dispose of the bankruptcy case expeditiously.
The order of stay granted earlier by this Court
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 716.
......e their own averments made in the plaint and the written statements and in the petition under section 28 of the Act for decision in the suit on taking evidence……. (10, 11 & 13)
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Fazlul Karim with Md. Mozibur Rahman, Advocates- For the Petitioners.
......the hearing of the main case.
15. It appears that the respondent bank earlier filed a miscellaneous case being Miscellaneous Case No.2 of 1998 (Annexure-F) under Article 3 of the President's Order No.129 of 1972, praying for a decree for Taka 8,08,99,511 filed on 3‑5‑1998. In respect of..
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 10 May, 2004 | Hits: 9
Sultan Miah (Md) Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......e passed by the appellate court as because judgment of the appellate court is tainted with error of law resulting taking decision erroneously occasioning failure of justice. Lawyers Involved: Md. Roushan Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ataul Haque, Advocate......ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 May, 2004 | Hits: 825
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ......llip;………………………………….Respondents Judgment May 5, 2004. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moazzam Hossain with Md. Hasmatullah Sheikh, Advocates‑ For the Appella...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4
Sunder Ali being dead his heirs A. Hannan & ors. Vs. Md. Serajul I. Sarker & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Cause of action is bundle of facts and for the ascertainment of the cause of action Court is required to read the plaint in its entirety……………….(11) Lawyers Involved: Md. Jalil, Advocate, instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate‑on&#...... Vs. Md. Serajul Islam Sarker & others................Respondents Judgment April 27, 2004. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order VII rule 11 Cause of action is bundle of facts and for the ascertainment of the ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......llah Bhuiyan Vs. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD) 338; Abdur Rabban Vs. Aminul Hoque Sowdagar and another, 43 DLR (AD) 19; Ahmed Hossain and others Vs. Basharat Ali and others, 32 DLR (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A. S. M Khalequzzaman, ......nd Rule 19 of the Civil Rules and orders. 16. True pleadings as well as petitions of allkinds requiring to judicial investigation of determination require to be verified in the manner as provides in Order 6 Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but in our view in a fit case while in the backgroun..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......roller of Estate Duty PLD 1961 SC 119 = 13 DLR (SC) 105; Kumudini Welfare Trust vs. Province of East Pakistan PLD 1963 Dhaka 136 = 12 DLR (SC) 17, State of Orissa vs. Modan Gopal Rungta AIR 1952. Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Additional Attorney-General, (Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, ...... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......lias Lalim........Petitioner. Vs. Md. Lokman Hossain being dead his legal heirs and Md. Abdul Latif and others. ...........................Respondents. Judgment 21 April 2004 Lawyers Involved: Herendra Nath Nandi, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-rec......e Petitioner Nurul Amin, Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-record- For the Respondents Civil petition for leave to appeal No. 528 of 2003. (From the Judgment and Order, dated February 9, 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 934 of 2001) ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......ent of Andhra Pradesh, 4 SCC 93; Hashmat Ali Jamader Vs. Asmat Ali Jamader, 6 DLR 478; R. Sim & Co. Vs. Pakistand Industries Ltd., 8 DLR 305; Bangladesh Vs. Masriki Textile, 35 DLR (AD) 123. Lawyers Involved: MA Gaffar, Advocate- For the Appellant. Shafique Ahmed with ARM Shahidu......23‑9‑1998. On 23‑9‑1998 the application was however, rejected as not pressed. Then, the company made another application for appointment of an arbitrator from amongst a list of former Judges. Order dated 28‑1‑1998 recorded that the company expressed the desire to pay entire fees of the a..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;………(13) Cases Referred to- Sonali Bank vs Ruhul Amin Khan 46 DLR (AD) 85: Union of India and another vs G Ganayutham AIR 1997 (SC) 3387. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali advocate̴......ts. Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 288 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated June 27, 2000 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka in Administrative ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ......tract….(19) Cases Referred to- Sharping Matshyajibi Samabaya Samity Vs. Bangladesh 39 DLR (AD) 85; Bangladesh Power Development Board Vs. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder 8 MLR (AD) 241. Lawyers involved: Rafique ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, Abdur Razzaque, Senior Advocate with him, ins...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Nurul Huq (Md) @ MN Huq Vs. Nirmal Chandra Dutta & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ......r the appeal a fresh after obtaining report from the hand-writing expert as to execution of the document in question……………………(8 & 9) Lawyers Involved: Rafique‑ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, (MI Farooqui, Advocate with hi......#8209;ul-Huq, learned Counsel, submits, inter alia, that the learned Judges of the High Court Division committed error of law by observing that the deed of compromise requires verification under Order XXIII rule 3 read with Order VI rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure though such verificatio..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 103
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Ud......on‑Record‑For Respondent Nos. 2, 16 & 18‑32. Not represented ‑‑Respondent No. 17. Civil Appeal No. 46 of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated June 29, 1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3005 of 1998).&nbs..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......y be considered legally well conceived” and such person is not competent to question the legality of such action……………………(8) Lawyers Involved: Md. Mujibur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ataur Rahman Kha......ocate‑on‑Record‑For Respondent Nos. 3‑31. Not represented‑Respondent Nos. 1‑2. Civil Appeal No. 45 of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated June 29, 1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2982 of 1998).&nbs..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
9430988909145595015162903210189351612261147320902413759141136134