Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 1101-1120 of 5076 results.

Jamsed & others Vs. Abdus Samad & others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)

.... dis­posing criminal appeals in the light of the ob­servations made in this judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 68.       ...... examined before the Magistrate and the learned Magistrate on consideration of the materials on record convicted 10 accused per­sons and sentenced them as aforesaid. 4. Against the aforesaid decision, an ap­peal was preferred before the Additional Dis­trict Magistrate of Dinajpur un..

Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 1 Dec, 1982 | Hits: 1

Ramesh Chandra Barman & others Vs. Naresh Chandra Barman & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....e-emption case is dismissed. In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 99.     ......at page 229 it has been stated in clear terms that if the reconveyance takes place before the starting of the proceed­ing for pre-emption the right to pre-emption does not exist. In an unreported decision in the case of Bandar Ali Halder Vs. Kalu Halder and others Mr. Justice Ruhul Islam also fo..

Category: Property Law | Date: 24 Nov, 1982 | Hits: 2

Nurul Islam Vs. The State, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)

....ivisional Magistrate, Madaripur continue in respect of the accused Ashit Aaron Saha and be disposed of expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 33.   ......ce. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate has no power to revive in respect of the discharged accuses the proceeding which has come to an end by the passing of an order discharge. 9. We have perused the decision reported in 15 DLR (SC) 55. That was a case where the accused was discharged under section ..

Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 15 Jul, 1982 | Hits: 1

Sufia Khatun & others Vs. Ijsharani Karmakar & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....nd any substance in this appeal. I uphold the judgment and decree of the court of appeal below and dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 30. ......ter had already been sealed and signed on 2nd December, 1974, and thus, he submitted, that the appeal became infructuous. I do not find any substance in this sub­mission. Long ago in a Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Musamat Bibi Wahiduiuaisa Vs. Babu Deep Narain Prasad, 20 C.W.N...

Category: Property Law | Date: 1 Jul, 1982 | Hits: 2

Dilip Kumar Chakravorty Vs. Abdul Muyeed Chowdhury and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....ssed by the learned Subordinate Judge is restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 49. ...... has been obtained. 3. The matter came up before a single Bench of this court but since a larger. Bench should receive the question involved in the Rule, it has been referred to this Bench for a decision by the learned Chief justice. The pe­titioner was represented by Mr. B.N. Chowdhury the..

Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 27 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 1

M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)

....ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ......Admiralty Court. Hence, the rejection of a plaint by that Court under Order 7, rule 11 (a) was wrong. Se­condly, even if such provisions are held to apply to proceedings in an Admiralty Court the decision that the plaint did not disclose a cause of action that can be entertained under the admira..

Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 400

United Planters And Traders Limited And Another Vs. Md. Mosharraf Hossain Knan & Others, 182, 11 CLC (HCD)

....Advocates of the parties and by Mr. Rafiq-ul Huq who appeared as amicus Curiae. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 345; 3 BLD (HCD) (1983)149     ......hat the matter involves complicated questions of facts and the matter cannot be disposed of in a summary jurisdiction under section 38 of the Companies Act. Let me refer to some of the decisions placed before me by Mr. Rafiq-ul-Huq who has acted as amicus curiae in this matter. 5..

Category: Company Law | Date: 28 May, 1982 | Hits: 3

Abdul Quddus & Another Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18.   ...... from whose custody P.W.2 Ferdousi was taken away by the accused appellants, the convic­tion of the said accused appellant under sec­tion 366 or the Penal Code cannot be upheld in view of the decision in the case of Eaar Ali and others Vs. The State, 11 D.L.R. 249 and that the conviction of ..

Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 6 May, 1982 | Hits: 1

Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

.... regard to the facts and cir­cumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40.   ......sposition of the property by the will was a transfer within the meaning of the Transfer of Property Act. Therefore, in our opinion, section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act has no part to play. The decision in the case of Seth Jaasumal Vs. The Central Govt. Rehabilitation Department and others rep..

Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1

Albert David (Bangladesh) Limited Vs. Messrs. Nedlloyd Lunen B.V., Rotterdam owners of Nedlloyd Lines Bremen, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....DLR(AD) 234 in that decision it was observed; “No doubt, because of the vesting of the shares of the company in the Government, certain necessary and consequential changes were made by the legislative authority, but on scrutiny it appears that these amendments were effected only to keep t......iff it has been submitted that the plaintiff company has not lost its corporate character, and reliance has been placed on New Dacca Industries Ltd. Vs. Quamrul Huda and others 31 DLR(AD) 234 in that decision it was observed; “No doubt, because of the vesting of the shares of the company ..

Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5

Md. Reazul Karim Vs. Mst. Shirin Begum, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....adjudication in the light of the observation made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 250             .......P. had got his kabala executed and registered on a date earlier than that of the date of the kabala sought to be preempted he could not claim ratable preemption. 9. Mr. Answer Ali referred to a decision reported in 9 DLR page 258 wherein it has been held that a document takes effect from the d..

Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 7 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2

Md. Asghar Vs. Nowab Miah and others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)

....ds expeditiously. The connected Rule for stay of further pro­ceeding is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37.   ......uch contention in the suit. It is there­fore, premature at this stage to enclude and say anything as to the identity or otherwise of the suit land. We have taken sufficient pre­caution in our decision so that the parties to the suit are not prejudiced in the trial. In our considered opinion,..

Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2

Bashir Ahmed Vs. Abdul Shaheed, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154     ......h notice is however a matter which should be left to the discretion of the Court concerned. While appointing a Receiver under Order 40, rule 1, C.P.C. the Court does not arrive at any final decision on the merits of the case, but its object is only to preserve the status quo ante during th..

Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1

Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157     ......mme may kindly be furnished to this Ministry by the 15th July, through special messenger as per proforma enclosed herewith." 6. Mr. Mainul Hosein, has strenuously argued that in view of the decision of the Government to appoint all Rural and Urban Works Programme Officers and staff as from..

Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1

Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185.         ......of the Govt. High School by you. You are directed to produce documents if any to justify the dismantling of the hostel. You are further directed to keep the dismantling work suspended till final decision in the matter.” 4. The petitioner duly produced the necessary documents and pape..

Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1

Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120   ......y the Secretary to the competent authority. This, in our opinion, was necessary to enable the competent authority to apply its mind in the facts and circumstances of a particular case and arrive at a decision as to whether it would be more expedient to allow the petitioner to proceed on leave or to ..

Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2

Gopal Chandra Mondol Vs. Lashmat Dasi, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)

....dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ...... of law or procedure affecting the merits of the case. It could not be said to be a finding arrived at without consideration of the material facts and circumstances on which the trial Court based its decision. The finding as no the ancestry of a party is a finding of fact and need not be very lightl..

Category: Evidence Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 3

Zainal Abedin & Another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)

.... appointment of service as contemplated in Article 133 of the Constitution. 7. Even if it is assumed that conditions of service may be varied or revoked by any law in the nature of any legislative enactment by way any Parliamentary Act of Presidential Ordinance with regard to any pers......rayer in the writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Government Servants (Seniority of Freedom Fighters) Rules, 1979. Thus at present in this writ petition, the only question for decision of this Special Bench is as to whether the aforesaid Government Savants (Seniority of Freed..

Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1

Shahidur Rahman Molla & others Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)

....for pre­emption are affirmed. In the facts and circum­stances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 89.   ......l Hoque— For Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 54 of 1978. Judgment Sultan Hossain Khan J. — This Rule has been referred to this Bench by the learned Chief Justice for a decision since contrary views with regard to the question whether an application for pre-emption und..

Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1

Shahidur Rahman Molla & other Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)

....ion are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 79. ...... Hoque, Md. Aminul Hoque - For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.54 of 1978. Judgment Sultan Hossain Khan J.- This rule has been referred to this Bench by the learned Chief Justice for a decision since contrary vie­ws with regard to the question whether an ap­plication for pre-emption..

Category: Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 19