Judgment search - Chancery Law Chronicles

Displaying 1141-1160 of 3679 results.

Dr. Md. Rahmat Ali Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....er is discharged from his bail bond. Send down the lower Courts record and a copy of the judgment and order to the Court concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 452. ......nt and order to the Court concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 452. ...... Hakimpur PS case No.5, dated 13-3-2007 should not be set aside and or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 13-3-2007 at 17-15 hours the informant Anzuara Begum, a retired Assistant Nurse of health Com...... Plaintiff Vs. State……………………Opposite party Judgment February 14, 2011. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Yesmin Begum Bithi, Advocate - For the State. Criminal Revision No.1062 of..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87

Ganendra Nath Mondal Vs. Kalipada Mondal and another, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....rul Islam Chowdhury J.- The Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 2 as pre-emptor brought Miscellaneous Case No.59 of 1993 before the Senior Assistant Judge, Shyam Nagar, Satkhira seeking pre-emption of the case land under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act claiming themselves to be co-sharer......……Petitioner Vs. Kalipada Mondal and another………………………Opposite Parties Judgment January 11, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Bivas Chandra Biswas, Advocate - For the Petitioner. PC Guha, with Samiran Mallick, Advocates - For ......d the present Rule. 5. Mr. Bivas Chandra Biswas, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner has taken us through the entire materials on record including the two judgments and then submits that the learned District Judge as appellate Court and last Court of fact did not at all consider the......pada Mondal and another………………………Opposite Parties Judgment January 11, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Bivas Chandra Biswas, Advocate - For the Petitioner. PC Guha, with Samiran Mallick, Advocates - For Opposite Parties. Civil Revi..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79

Badiul Alam Vs. Md. Nurul Islam, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....learned Assistant Judge, Fatikchari, Chittagong passed on 18‑7‑1975 in Miscellaneous Case No.38 of 1970 allowing pre‑emption. 2. The petitioner's predecessor sought pre-emption of the case land alleging, inter alia, that he is a co-sharer in the case holding by way of purchase on the basi......…Petitioner Vs. Md. Nurul Islam……………………………………………………………..Opposite Party Judgment June 26, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Basarat Ali Mondal and others Vs. Messem Ali Biswas and another, 6 DLR 589; Sar......tor petitioner is directed against the Judgment and order dated 16‑10‑1995 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Chittagong in Miscellaneous Appeal No.386 of 1995 reversing that of the learned Assistant Judge, Fatikchari, Chittagong passed on 18‑7‑1975 in Miscellaneous ......to- Basarat Ali Mondal and others Vs. Messem Ali Biswas and another, 6 DLR 589; Saroop Singh Vs. Narsingh and others, AIR 1929 Allahabad 846. Lawyers Involved: Md. Maqbul Ahmed, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Mihir Kanti Majumder, Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No...

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 132

Haripada Mandal Vs. Bidhan Chandra Mondal, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

.... and those are: a) First opposite party as pre‑emptor exercised his right of pre‑emption under section 96 of the Act against pre-emptee petitioner on presentation of a petition in respect of land described in schedule to petition in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Khoksha, Kushtia. Pet...........................................Petitioner Vs. Bidhan Chandra Mondal............................Opposite Party Judgment July 17, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Belayet Hossain and another Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others, 32 DLR (AD) 231. L......setting aside order dated 2‑2‑1999. 3. Pre‑emptor petitioner, thereafter, approached this Court in invoking jurisdiction envisaged under section 115 of the Code pressing into service ground that appellate Court had no jurisdiction to entertain appeal and Order XLIII, rule 1(c) contemplates ......7, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Belayet Hossain and another Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others, 32 DLR (AD) 231. Lawyers Involved: Zaman Akter, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Shasti Sarker, Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.1972 of..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104

Al-Amin Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....nvoke writ jurisdiction. However, if the contract is rooted in any statute for enforcement of the same writ jurisdiction can, of course, be invoked such as the lease of haat, bazar, fishery, khash land, etc or if there is any international contract. Even in case of a private contract being a tra..........................Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others……………Respondents Judgment May 10, 2001. Result: The Rule is disposed. Cases Referred to — Kulchhinder Singh and others Vs. Hardayal Singh Brar and others, AIR 1976 S......0 in favour of respondent No.4 at the price (lowest) quoted by the petitioner for acceptance by the Government vide Annexure H dated 11‑23‑2000. 2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that it is a private limited company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913. It was registered ...... The Rule is disposed. Cases Referred to — Kulchhinder Singh and others Vs. Hardayal Singh Brar and others, AIR 1976 SC 2216; Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & ors, 39 DLR (AD) 85; Bangladesh Telecom (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh T & T Board and another, 48..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 207

Dr. MB Rahman Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Taxes, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....the petitioner Dr. M. B. Rahman bearing I.R. No.7633/TC-VI. 2. Shortly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner who is an income-tax assessee and a retired Government official sold his land with some structures at Banani Model Town and applied for gain tax clearance certificate to r......��……………………………………Petitioner Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Taxes………………….Respondents Judgment July 15, 1986. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- S.A. Haroon & others Vs. the Collector of Customs, Karachi, 11 DLR (SC) 200...... the Deputy Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Circle-VI, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka in respect of the petitioner Dr. M. B. Rahman bearing I.R. No.7633/TC-VI. 2. Shortly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner who is an income-tax assessee and a retired Government official sold his land wit....... Deputy Commissioner of Taxes………………….Respondents Judgment July 15, 1986. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- S.A. Haroon & others Vs. the Collector of Customs, Karachi, 11 DLR (SC) 200, Lt. Col.; Nawabzada Muhammad Amir Khan Vs. the Controller..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 170

Rehanuddin & others Vs. Abdul Hakim Maser and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....s plaintiff instituted the suit against the petitioners (defendants Nos.24, 25 and 56) opposite party No.1 and opposite parties 3 to 61 as defendants for partition for getting a specific saham of the land out of the suit land. The defendants Nos. 23, 26, 28, 29, 30, 35 and 40 contested the suit by f...... (Comillah Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Nurul Huque Bhuiyan J Rehanuddin & others………………………………………Petitioners Vs. Abdul Hakim Maser and others…………………….Opposite-Parties Judgment September 14, 1986. Resu......ction 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for vacating the order dated 20.09.1978 accepting the Advocate Commissioner's Report. 2. The facts relevant for the purposes of disposal of the rule are that the opposite party No.2 as plaintiff instituted the suit against the petitioners (defendants Nos...... Hakim Maser and others…………………….Opposite-Parties Judgment September 14, 1986. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Kader Chowdhury, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Nikhilesh Dutta, Advocate - For the Opposite Party No.1. Civil Revision No...

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106

Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....not vested and non-resident property and the plaintiff acquired title by adverse possession. His case in short was that Kali Prasana Das (Borada Chandra Das and Anil Charan Das sold .61 decimals of land to Jainal Abedin at a price of Tk.1250/- and on receipt of Tk.1000/- executed a bainapatra on 7......��.Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & others…………….Opposite-Parties Judgment August 23, 1986. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Mvi. Azizur Rahman and others petitioners Vs. Kailas Chandra Bumecha & other......umganj, in Title Suit No.66 of 1984 appointing receiver in respect of the suit property at the instance of the defendant No.11. 2. The facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of the Rule are that Jainal Abedin, predecessor of the petitioners, as plaintiff instituted the suit against the oppo......e. Case Referred to- Mvi. Azizur Rahman and others petitioners Vs. Kailas Chandra Bumecha & others Opposite parties, 25 DLR (HC), 252. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ruhul Amin-II, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Humayan Habibibur Rasul, Advocate-For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revisio..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 139

Joinal Abedin Jamal and others Vs. Noor Afza, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

....side the arbitral award dated 11-6-2003 passed by the sole Arbitrator. Facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal in short are that the appellants being owners of, approximately, 18.40 kathas of land, comprising of Dhaka City Corporation holdings No.80, 80/1, 80/2 and 80/3, Nowabpur, within Sut......al Abedin Jamal and others........................Appellants Vs. Noor Afza…………………..............Respondent Judgment April 28, 2010. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Hazrat Ali Vs. Election Commission, 41 DLR 486; Darbari Lal Mudi Vs. Raneeganj ......) 497 (In re All India Groundnut Syndicate Ltd.); Gopal Krishna Das Vs. Abdul Kader Mia, 35 DLR 14; Nagendra Nath Sen Roy Vs. Saiyad Ali Jamadar, 8 DLR 100; Abdus Samad Paramanik Vs. Mosammat Bilkis Khatun, BSCD Vol-VI Page 53; The Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shafiuddin, 10 BLT (A......o cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 432. ..

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 251

Hajee Abdul Latif Vs. Abdul Huq & others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)

....3 others filed Title Suit No.210 of 1981 in the First Court of Munsif, Dhaka for permanent injunction against this petitioner and 2 others as defendants. 3. The plaintiffs case is that the suit land originally belonged to Sk. Munshi and Bahar Ali in 8 annas share each. After their death the ......any order for costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (HCD) (1992) 601. ......he opposite party No.1 to show cause why the Order No.37 dated 19.3.85 passed by Munsif, First Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.188 of 1982, should not be set aside. 2. The facts of the case are, that Abdul Huq, opposite party No.1 as plaintiff, along with 3 others filed Title Suit No.210 of 1981...... Hajee Abdul Latif ...........Petitioner Vs. Abdul Huq & others .........Opposite Parties Judgment March 13, 1991. Result: The Rule is discharged without any order for costs. Case Referred To- Haji Nurul Islam Vs. Ashraf Ali and others, 30 DLR ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 166

Anowar Hossain & others Vs. Abul Hossain Molla & others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)

....ing the Judgment and decree passed by Munsif, Goalundo in TS No. 84 of 1968. 2. Plaintiff‑Appellant filed this suit for a declaration of title and confirmation of possession in respect of the land described in the schedule of the plaint. The case as set up in the plaint may briefly be stated...... Hossain & others…………Appellants. Vs. Abul Hossain Molla & others…………..Respondents. Judgment May 7, 1991. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred To- Habibur Rahman Vs. Abdul Wadud and others, 21 DLR page 382. Lawyers Inv...... 2 daughters plaintiff Nos.3 and 4. Thereafter Azibar Ali died leaving mother (since dead), full brother defendant No.7 and two sisters defendant Nos.8 and 9. It is the further case of the plaintiff that the sale deed executed and registered by Roushan Ali in favour of his step‑brothers Azibar Ali......91. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred To- Habibur Rahman Vs. Abdul Wadud and others, 21 DLR page 382. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Chowdhury, Advocate-For the Appellants. Habib, Advocate ‑ For the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Second Appeal No..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 122

Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....been declared as a Court of Sessions by the aforesaid Gazette notification dated 28th August, 1995. Let an advance order be issued. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 95. .............Opposite Party Judgment November 9, 1995. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbub Hossain with Golam Kibria, Md. Afzal Hossain, Md. Harun‑or‑Rashid and Khurshida Bilkis Banu, Advocates - For the Petitioner. AFM Hasan Arif, Deputy Attorney�......gned order dated 16.8.95 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dhaka, in Sessions Case No.256 of 1995 arising out of Panchlaish PS Case No.23(2)95 shall not be set aside. 2. Short facts of this case are, that this is an application under sections 439/435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure riled by the for...... Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 95. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121

Rup Charan Das @ Sree Rupcharan Das & another Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....84 under section 95A of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 before the Local Thana Magistrate, the Respondent 4, for redemption of the disputed property on the ground that the transfer of the land was a complete usufructuary mortgage. The Respondent 4 on contest allowed the same by his order...... This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 94.......s Cases No.22‑26 of 1984 under section 95A of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 before the Local Thana Magistrate, the Respondent 4, for redemption of the disputed property on the ground that the transfer of the land was a complete usufructuary mortgage. The Respondent 4 on contest allow......f the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others.............Respondents Judgment May 21, 1995. Result: The application is rejected. Case Referred to- MA Hai and others Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 8 BLD 84 (AD). Lawyers Involved: Md. Abu Bakr Siddique, Advocate - F..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95

Anwar Hossain & others Vs. State & others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....ention also. In the result, the Rule is discharged and the order of stay stands vacated. Communicate the order to the Court below. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 89. ......rties Judgment November 23, 1995. Result: The Rule is discharged and the order of stay stands vacated. Lawyers Involved: Mustafa Niaz Mahmud, Advocate ‑ For the petitioner. SC Das, Advocate ‑ For the Opposite Party No.1. S A Hasan, Advocate ‑ For the State. Criminal ......989. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- This Rule at the instance at the accused Petitioners of CR Case No. 28/85 pending in the Court of Upazila Magistrate, Chakoria, Cox's Bazar, is for quashing that proceedings. 2. Facts relevant are, that a case under section 144 of the Code of Criminal Pro...... Anwar Hossain & others..................Petitioners Vs. State & others.................Opposite Parties Judgment November 23, 1995. Result: The Rule is discharged and the order of stay stands vacated. Lawyers Involved: Mustafa Niaz Mahmud, Advocate ‑ For the peti..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Bisheswar Dutta Vs. Sree Gopal Chandra Dey being dead his heirs No.1 (a) Harendra Chandra Dey & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....f Act. 2. One Gopal Chandra Dey, predecessor of the opposite parties sued the petitioners for a decree under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act alleging that he was in possession of the disputed land bat the defendants forcibly dispossessed him therefrom in the last part of Kartick, 1375 B.S.......rder as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 8.......mber 3, 1986. Result: The petitions are disposed of. Cases Referred to- Ananta Kumar Sarkar and another Vs. Meghu Kurmi & others, 61 CWN 347; Sana Mia and another Vs. Prokash Chandra Bhattacharjya and others, AIR 1940 Cal. 464-44 CWN 895. Lawyers Involved: A.K. Badrul Huq, Advo......another Vs. Meghu Kurmi & others, 61 CWN 347; Sana Mia and another Vs. Prokash Chandra Bhattacharjya and others, AIR 1940 Cal. 464-44 CWN 895. Lawyers Involved: A.K. Badrul Huq, Advocate - For the Petitioners. Md. Nizamul Huq, Advocate - For the Opposite Party No.1 (a). Civil Revisi..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 119

Misir Ullah (Md) Vs. Syed Khalilullah Malek others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....Dargah Committee consisting of the plaintiffs as current members thereof to continue in control and management of the Dargah Sharif of Hazrat Sayd Shah Mostafa and adjacent thereto constituted of the lands described in the schedule of the plaint." 3. The case of the plaintiffs is that the land, m...... Misir Ullah (Md)..................Petitioner Vs. Syed Khalilullah Malek others.................Opposite Parties Judgment November 20, 1995. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Nazir Ahmed Vs. Rabibgr Rahman Miah and others, 7 DLR 192; 21 DLA (SC) 46; 15 C......r J.- This Revisional application is directed against the order dated 9.11.1991 of the District Judge, Maulavi Bazar, passed in Title Appeal No.145 of 1986. 2. Short facts involved in the case is that the plaintiffs‑petitioners filed Title Suit No.17 of 1979 in the Court of the Subordinate Judg......ir Ahmed Vs. Rabibgr Rahman Miah and others, 7 DLR 192; 21 DLA (SC) 46; 15 CLJ Page 339; 28 DLR (AD) 127; 25 DLR 96. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali with Md. Alauddin Biswas, Advocates ‑ For the Petitioners. Azizur Rahman Chowdhury, Advocate ‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revi..

Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 181

Moudud Ahmed Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....sector violating the Rules of the Dhaka Improvement Trust (DIT). it was further stated that the petitioner requested the then Works Minister Md. Shafiqul Ghani to consider payment of the price of the land at 12 equal half yearly installments without interest. The President illegally ordered for allo...... M Mahmudur Rahman J Moudud Ahmed........................Petitioner Vs. State ..........................Opposite‑Party Judgment May 9, 1995. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Jyoti Prokash Mitter Vs. Hon’ble Mr. Justice HK Bose, the Chief Justice the ......al days before the Division Bench comprising of Naimuddin Ahmed and Md. Ruhul Amin, JJ. Naimuddin Ahmed, J after examining the summary, FIR, 161 statement and the charge sheet came to the conclusion that the First information Report is founded on the basis of the Second summary and the facts disclos......utta and another, 1965 (SC) 961; State of Rajasthan and others Vs. Union of India, 1977 (SC) 1361; SP Gupta Vs. Tarkunde, 1982 (SC) 149; Deypack Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, 1988 (SC) 782; Pooran Mal Vs. Director of Inspection, 1974 (SC) 348; Bangladesh Jatiya Matsha Jibi Samabaya Samity Lt..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 111

Ajit Kumar Sarkar and others Vs. Radhakanta Sarkar and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

.... case are, that the opposite party No.1 being complainant instituted the aforesaid complaint case in the court of the Upazila Magistrate, Paikgacha, on the allegations that he took lease of the case, land from one Amodini Dashi by an amalnama dated 7th Chaitra, 1356 BS and has been possessing the sa......rs…………Petitioners Vs. Radhakanta Sarkar and others .....................Opposite Parties. Judgment July 29, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abdul Hai Khan & others Vs. State, BLD 1988 (AD) 195; Nur Mohammad Vs. K...... Cases Referred to- Abdul Hai Khan & others Vs. State, BLD 1988 (AD) 195; Nur Mohammad Vs. Kalimuddin Ahmed, BCR 1987 (AD) 152; ldris Ali & another Vs. State, 38 DLR 270; Mrs. Saleha Khatoon Vs. State, 39 DLR 109. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Jabbar, Advocate ‑For the Petiti......ur Mohammad Vs. Kalimuddin Ahmed, BCR 1987 (AD) 152; ldris Ali & another Vs. State, 38 DLR 270; Mrs. Saleha Khatoon Vs. State, 39 DLR 109. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Jabbar, Advocate ‑For the Petitioners. Syed Badrul Alam, Advocate‑For the Opposite Party. Criminal Revisi..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 142

Nurul Huda Vs. Bahar Uddin & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)

....n Case No.47(d)/82 preferred against the order dated 9.11.82 passed by Mr. Tayabur Rahman, Magistrate, 1st Class, Hatiya declaring the possession of the opposite party Nos.1 and 2 in the proceeding land in N.G.R. Case No.14/78 under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3. Both the pet......��……………………….Petitioner Vs. Bahar Uddin & others.....................................Respondents Judgment March 22, 1989. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Mustafa Mondal Vs. The State, 35 DLR 362; Nazir Ahmed & others Vs. Yon......Noakhali who was deemed to be an Additional Sessions Judge by virtue of the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 9. He discharged the same by the impugned judgment and order dated 27.11.83, holding that he found no procedural illegality in the final order of the learned Magistrate. 5. The presen...... 1984 BLD 250; Rupdhan Vs. The State, Criminal Appeal No.291 of 1982; Shamsul Huda & others Vs. The State, 1986 BLD 367; the Commissioner of Income-tax, Dhaka Zone Vs. M/s. Reliable Machinery Stores, PLD 1968 Dhaka 975; 1984 BLD 250; Ram Narain Sons Ltd. & others Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 158

MA Jahangir & another Vs. Abdul Malek & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)

....lication for amendment was filed on 4.11.1985, in view of the disclosure of facts in the written statement filed on 4.3.1985 to the effect that the suit property includes also 13 decimals of gifted land appertaining to Mogi Survey plot No.5514 which was not mentioned in schedule I of the origina......other.............................Petitioners Vs. Abdul Malek & others..............................Opposite Party Judgment January 11, 1989. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Fakirullah Mia Mutwalli Vs. Bimalendra Nath Maitra, 12 DLR 704; 12 DLR 704......st an order of amendment of the plaint, acceptance of valuation put on the plaint and for direction to file replies to the interrogatories made by the Subordinate Judge in a suit for declaration that the suit property is a Waqf property and the plaintiff is Mutualli. 2. The learned Advocate f...... Adam Sahib, 1977 Mad. 368; India Cable Co. Ltd. Vs. The Union of India, 1976 Pat.76; M/s. Ganesh Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Moji Ram 1978 (SC) 484. Lawyers Involved: S.C. Das with Rabi Sankar Chakraborty, Advocates - For the Petitioners. Moqbul Ahmed, Advocate - For the Opposite Party. Civi..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133

Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search