Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1141-1160 of 3578 results.
Hafiz Ahmed Vs. Ahmedur Rahman and others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....llowing the pre‑emption are set aside. The pre‑emption case is dismissed. No order as to costs. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 170. ...... failed to resist pre‑emption in both the Courts below under section 96 of the State Acquisition & Tenancy Act (which shall hereinafter be called the Act). 2. Nazamat Ali gifted the disputed land including his homestead measuring 0.70 acres to his daughter‑in‑law (son's wife) the opposi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Shahjahan (Md.) Vs. State, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... into life imprisonment. The sentence of life imprisonment will start from the date when the accused will be apprehended or surrenders. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) (HCD) 373.......ounsel for the condemned prisoner also cites another decision which is in the case of Shihabuddin Vs. State reported in PLD 1964 (SC) 177 = 16 DLR (SC) 269. In that case the murder was committed over land dispute and the Supreme Court altered the sentence of death into sentence of imprisonment for l..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Nazrul Islam and others Vs. State, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....is directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law and dispose of the same expeditiously. Send down the LC records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) (HCD) 368....... the remaining Taka 54,241.00 was misappropriated by the accused persons in collusion with one another. The project Chairman claimed that no amount was misappropriated and he purchased 23 decimals of land at Taka 40,000.00 for construction of a Tahshil Office in the concerned Union but, in fact, no ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Ayat Steels Limited Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... Rule being CRNo.421 (fm) of 2010 also stands disposed of accordingly. Send down a Copy of this order to the trial Court, at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 417. ......n the said Execution Case No.340 of 2005 the property was sold to Mr. MohamÂmad Ali son of Badiur Rahman of Chittagong Commercial Area i.e. respondent No.1 herein (the suit property along with other land) vide order No.37 dated 17-4-2008 at a price of Taka 4,05,000,00 and the said sale was confirme..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 235
State Vs. Manik Bala, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....s acquitted of the charge. Let the condemned prisoner be set at liberÂty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 435.......hat Kanchan, Shahjahan, Barek and accused SeraÂjul Hoque were his cousin brothers living in the same house with him. He stated that while he was suffering from insanity his cousin took 3-1/4 kani of land from him by registered deed without proper payÂment of consideration money. He further stated ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Abul Hashem Khan & others Vs. Md. Shamsuddin Khan & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....em. In the face of our findings in respect of Ext. W and Z series the appliÂcation is not maintainable. Accordingly, it is rejectÂed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 415.......f Tk.45,000/-the plaintiffs were requesting the defendant No.1 to dissolve and reconstitute the partnership so that the plaintiffs could sell out their one storied building on 11 Kathas 8 Chhataks of land in Gulshan model town, Dhaka to make payÂment of the balance consideration of Tk.7,55,0007-as ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 349
Muzaffar Ali and another Vs. Monwara Hospital & others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....lier by this Court on 8-5-95 is hereby vacated and the learned Court below is directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) (HCD) 341.......plaintiff has stated that although the said time was not the essence of the contract, the principal defendant Nos. 1 and 2 did not perform their obligation undertaken by them for the sale of the suit land as per agreement. On the contrary, the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are trying to sell the Suit land ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Abdul Kader Vs. Abdullah and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
.... 2. Opposite parties 1-9 instituted the suit for declaration that the order pussed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner Chittagong on 4-4-84 in Settlement Appeal Case 154 of 1981-82 cancelling the settlement of the suit land made earlier in favour of the plaintiff and the order dated 9-10-85 pass......1-9 instituted the suit for declaration that the order pussed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner Chittagong on 4-4-84 in Settlement Appeal Case 154 of 1981-82 cancelling the settlement of the suit land made earlier in favour of the plaintiff and the order dated 9-10-85 passed by the Additional. D..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Nurjahan Begum Vs. Government of the Peoples Republic of and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
.... 2-9-87 (Annexure H) and the notice dated 24-10-1987 (Annexure-J) within one month from the date of receipt of this judgment and order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 426.......suance of the Rule the parties were directed to maintain status-quo in respect of possession of the property. 3. The short facts relevant are that CS Plot No.1009 measuring an area of 0.60 acre of land appertaining to CS Khatian No.225 of mouza Kafrul, JL No.268 under former PS Keraniganj was own..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 156
Zagir Hussain Vs. Aminul Haque and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....thin the said specified period. In the result the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs and send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 425.......plication under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure the petitioner stated, inter alia, that Partition Suit No.37 of 1991 between the parties was decreed on compromise in respect of the suit land against which Execution Case No.32 of 1993 was instituted. During the pendency of the same the ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdur Rahman Vs. Sajjadur Rahman, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....is set aside without any order as to costs. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the suit and dispose of the same expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 420.......as plaintiff filed Title Suit No.164 of 1977 which was subsequently renumbered as Title Suit No.159 of 1984 on transfer. The aforesaid suit is for specific performance of contract of sale of the suit land. The petitioner has alleged in the plaint that the predecessor-in-interest of the defendant-opp..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Muklesur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Waziullah, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....eferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 418.......ecree and restoring the original suit to its file and number. 3. Mr. Mokhlesur Rahman, learned Advocate for the petitioner, submits that the opposite party has no title and interest in the suit land and as such, Miscellaneous Case No.7 of 1998 under Order 9 rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedu..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Ebadat Ali Vs. Ismail Hossain Akhond & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....uty Attorney-General as amicus curiae in this matter. Let a copy of the judgment be transmitted to the Courts below expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 490. ...... 3. The present petitioners as plaintiffs institutÂed a suit on 17.9.80 being O.C. Suit No.305 of 1980 in the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge, Bogra for declaration of their title in the suit land and the same was valued at Taka 10,500/- only. At the time of the institution of the suit, the ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Monoranjan Mukharjee Vs. Election Commission Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka & Others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD
....r all the above reasons we find no ground for interference. In the result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 484.......n the said Union Parishad. 2. The petitioner alleges that for violation of Martial Law Regulation Nos.14 and 15 of 1982, i.e., for unauthorised detention and illegal possession of 1709.24 acres of land for the period from 23.5.82 to 7.11.83, the respondent No.6 was convicted by the Chairman, Summ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 220
Sheikh Ahmed & others Vs. Abdul Alim, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... land described in the schedule to the plaint from the defendant Kamaluddin by registered kabala dated 22.3.72 and has been in possession thereof since then and he also mutated his name in the recent settlement record and has been paying rents to the government. His further case was that defendant N......s relevant are these: The plaintiff Abdul Alim filed a suit for permanent injunction against the petitioners one Kamaluddin and his venÂdor. The plaintiff’s case was that he purchased 26 sataks of land described in the schedule to the plaint from the defendant Kamaluddin by registered kabala date..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Abu Bakar Sikder Vs. Monowara Begum (Mst.), 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....do not find any substance in the appeal and the same is dismissed with cost. The judgment and decree of the Court below are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 403. ......through many-borga cultivators. She emphatically states that no one possessed the heba property save and except herself. D.W.2 Abdul Wahab Rari states in his depoÂsition that he borga cultivated the land in item No.5 of the schedule under the defendant No.1 since 1375 BS Before that he used to cult..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Hafizuddin Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....quitted of the charge levelled against him. Let him be released from jail forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 397. ......e present. It has also been brought out in the cross-examination of this witness that the Chairman (P.W.5) was present at the time of lodging of the FIR. He has denied the defence suggestion that for land disÂpute with accused Kofiluddin and for defeat of MohÂsin Ali in the Chairmen Election, he (..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Shahidulla @ Md. Shahidulla & others Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....he satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur till commenceÂment of the trial of this case before the learned SesÂsions Judge. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 394.......informant Shahidul, son of Haji Khandaker Ahmed Ali and accused Asheque Ali, petitioner No.3 still pending in a Civil Court in respect of the disputed plot No.2680/3168 measuring about 70 decimals of land of mouza Nandanpur; that the disputed plot is in the possession of the inforÂmant; that on 8.1..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
....isposal in accordance with law and consonant to the observations made by this Court. The parties shall bear their respective costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 393.
......Bikash Roy Choudhury J.- This Rule arises out of a suit instituted by opÂposite party No.1 seeking a declaration that the orÂders dated 28.7.78 and 12.4.82 passed by defendants 1 and 3 treating the land in suit as described in the schedule of the plaint as vested property were illegal, without jur..
Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 488
Ujjal Hossain (minor) & Others Vs. Firoja Khatun & Others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ners as plaintiffs in the aforesaid suit and also to proceed with the suit in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 481.......sor of the present petitioners, and opposite-party Nos.19 to 24 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.72 of 1975 in the First Court of Munsif, Kushtia for declaration of title in respect of the suit land. The defendant opÂposite party Nos.2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 15, 16 and 19 conÂtested the suit by filin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
74807478747774727470746874657461745974587456745574537451744974487447744674457443