Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abul Kashem @ Kashem Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....unal is hereby set aside. The accused appellant is acquitted of the charge brought against him. He should be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 420. ......unal is hereby set aside. The accused appellant is acquitted of the charge brought against him. He should be discharged from the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 420. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 15 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 99
Mahbubul Alam Chowdhury and others Vs. Chaman Ara Begum and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....rs of the defendant‑appellants and plaintiff‑respondents, are in fact partnership properties or personal properties of both, is the precise question that falls for determination in this appeal by special leave by the defendant-appellants from the judgment and decree of a Division Bench of the Hi......e defendant‑appellants and plaintiff‑respondents, are in fact partnership properties or personal properties of both, is the precise question that falls for determination in this appeal by special leave by the defendant-appellants from the judgment and decree of a Division Bench of the High Court..Category: Civil Law | Date: 14 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 121
Nannu Gazi Vs. Awlad Hossain & others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.... (From the judgment and order dated 3.11.1985 passed by the High Court Division, Barisal Bench, in Criminal Revision No.46 of 1985). Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ.- In this appeal by special leave the simple question for determination is whether a Magistrate can discharge the accuse......rom the judgment and order dated 3.11.1985 passed by the High Court Division, Barisal Bench, in Criminal Revision No.46 of 1985). Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ.- In this appeal by special leave the simple question for determination is whether a Magistrate can discharge the accused, witho..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 14 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 60
Golam Kader Vs. Abdul Khaleque Choukder and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....1984 (From the Judgment and order dated 19.1.1984 passed by the High Court Division Comilla Bench, Comilla in Civil Revision No.329 of 1983). Judgment Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by special leave at the instance of the added defendants is directed against the judgment and order pas...... (From the Judgment and order dated 19.1.1984 passed by the High Court Division Comilla Bench, Comilla in Civil Revision No.329 of 1983). Judgment Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by special leave at the instance of the added defendants is directed against the judgment and order passed by a..Category: Civil Law | Date: 13 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abdus Sattar and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....nder section 201 is set aside. The respondents are directed to surrender forthwith and serve out the sentence imposed upon them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 44. ......l No. 30 of 1986. (From the Judgment and Order dated 20.5.85 passed by the High Court Division, Barisal Bench in Criminal Appeal No.9 of 1982.) Judgment ATM Afzal J.- This appeal by leave at the instance of the State is from an order of acquittal passed in appeal by the High Court ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 50
Keramat Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Ramizuddin Ahmed Bhuiyan, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....earned advocate of the parties about the receiving back of the record and the next date fixed. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 58. ......s order has been upheld in revision by the High Court Division by the impugned order dated 5 March, 1987. 3. Mr. Shamsul Huq Chowdhury, learned Advocate for the defendant‑petitioners, seeking leave to appeal from the aforesaid order of the High Court Division, submitted that the learned Subo..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 8 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 108
Bangladesh Parjatan Corporation Vs. Shahid Hossain Bhuiyan (Md) & others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....89 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Writ Petition Nos.167, 168, 169, 170, 219, 220 and 221 of 1987). Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ.- All these seven appeals have been brought by special leave granted by us on 20 May, 1990. A common question of law being involved in these appeal......Itself. The appointing authorities have has also the power to reinstate a terminated employee on the merit of his individual case. Lawyers Involved: Akhtar lmam, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants (In ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 8 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 101
Kazi Abdul Jalil Vs. Jashim Munshi and another, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
..... (From the judgment and order dated 1.8.1984 passed by the High Court Division, Barisal Barisal0 Criminal Revision No.11 of 1984). Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ.- In this appeal by special leave the only question is whether the investigation, on the basis of which the police submi......(From the judgment and order dated 1.8.1984 passed by the High Court Division, Barisal Barisal0 Criminal Revision No.11 of 1984). Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ.- In this appeal by special leave the only question is whether the investigation, on the basis of which the police submitted cha..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 6 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 50
Afruz Miah (Md) and another Vs. Alhaj Md. Siraj Miah, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.... The Companies Act, 1913, Section 38 Although section 38 of the Companies Act empowers the Company Court to rectify share register, it is well‑settled that a suit is not barred thereby, especially when detailed evidence is to be taken to settle issue of fact. Lawyers Involved: ....... (From the judgment and order dated 29.8.1989 passed by the High Court Division, Sylhet Bench in Civil Revision No. 103 of 1985). Judgment Latifur Rahman J.- This appeal by special leave at the instance of the defendants is directed against the judgment of the High Court Division,..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 5 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 91
Abdul Hai Sikder and another Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....ppeal No.19 of 1988. (From the judgment and order dated 29.6.66 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Appeal No.47 of 1985). Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This appeal by special leave by the 2 accused-appellants is from the judgment and order dated 29.6.86 passed by a D.......19 of 1988. (From the judgment and order dated 29.6.66 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Appeal No.47 of 1985). Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This appeal by special leave by the 2 accused-appellants is from the judgment and order dated 29.6.86 passed by a Division ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 1 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 91
Abul Kashem and others Vs. The State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....lowed. The appellants shall appear before the Sessions Judge, Bhola and till then the bail granted by this Court will continue. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 77. ......lowed. The appellants shall appear before the Sessions Judge, Bhola and till then the bail granted by this Court will continue. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 77. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 1 Aug, 1990 | Hits: 51
Badsha Mia and others Vs. Abdul Latif Majumder and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....t of Court the learned Judges of the High Court Division correctly found the appellants are guilty of Contempt of' Court. Power of High Court Division to initiate a contempt proceeding is a special jurisdiction which is inherent in all courts of record and the High Court Division can deal ......ond forthwith. The Deputy Commissioner, Comilla will report compliance of the order of this Court within 2(two) months from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 10. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 30 Jul, 1990 | Hits: 59
Category: Banking Law | Date: 23 Jul, 1990 | Hits: 158
Abdur Rahman Mondal and others Vs. State, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....- The justification of an order of the Appellate Court, upheld by the High Court Division, remitting the case for re‑trial upon taking additional evidence is the question involved in this appeal by special leave obtained by the accused-appellants. 2. A Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka in GR Ca......stification of an order of the Appellate Court, upheld by the High Court Division, remitting the case for re‑trial upon taking additional evidence is the question involved in this appeal by special leave obtained by the accused-appellants. 2. A Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka in GR Case No. 1..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Jul, 1990 | Hits: 52
Attor Mia and another Vs. Mst. Mahmuda Khaton Chowdhury and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....owed. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 107(1) (b) Credibility, trustworthiness, etc, of witnesses are matters pertaining to the domain of appreciation of evidence, a special preserve of the Trial Court and the first Appellate Court and once the option has been exerc......udgment and Order dated 14.5.87 passed by the High Court Division Sylhet Session in Civil Revision No.66 of 1986). Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- The question raised in this appeal by special leave by the plaintiff-appellants is whether the High Court Division was justified as a revisional C..Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Jul, 1990 | Hits: 43
Rahima Khatun (Mst) & others Vs. Daily Rani Dasi, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....15 of 1986. (From the Judgment and Decree dated 10.12.84 passed by the High Court Division, Rangpur Bench in Second Appeal No.162 of 1974). Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This appeal by special leave by the defendant-appellants is from the second appellate judgment and decree dated 10.......86. (From the Judgment and Decree dated 10.12.84 passed by the High Court Division, Rangpur Bench in Second Appeal No.162 of 1974). Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This appeal by special leave by the defendant-appellants is from the second appellate judgment and decree dated 10. 12.84 p..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 17 Jul, 1990 | Hits: 115
Idris Ali Bhuiyan Vs. Enamul Haque and another, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....e scope of the review which has been correctly enunciated by his Lordship of the Supreme Court of India. 15. Before parting with this petition, it may be mentioned that this Division possesses a special power of review under the Constitution and that can at times also be exercised to do full an......it was held by the learned Judge, was like asking the Trial Court to whip a dead horse which would be an exercise in futility and the suit was accordingly dismissed. 7. The petitioner prayed for leave to appeal from the judgment of the High Court Division by filing CPLA Nos. 470 and 471 of 1989..Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Jul, 1990 | Hits: 30
Abdur Rouf Miah Vs. Fazlur Rahman and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....n a fair and honest manner. But he is also subject to the Election Rules. Subject to this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (AD) (1991) 23. ......to hold repoll in 4 out of 87 Centres, (polling stations) but the learned judges, after hearing the parties, dismissed the petition and discharged the rule issued thereupon earlier. He is now seeking leave to appeal from that order of the High Court Division, dated 24 May 1990. 2. Election was..Category: Election Law | Date: 27 Jun, 1990 | Hits: 139
Ishaque (Md) and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....ppeal is not filed within the period of limitation under the Special Law In Bangladesh there has been no amendment of the Limitation Act extending the scope of section 5 of the Limitation Act to special or local law which prescribes a different period of limitation as provided under Schedule 1 ......0 (From the Judgment and order dated 11.1.1990 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 1089 of 1989). Judgment Latifur Rahman J.- These three appeals by special leave are disposed of by this judgment as common questions of law are involved in all these appeals...Category: Limitation Law | Date: 25 Jun, 1990 | Hits: 176
Dr. Naimur Rahman and another Vs. Shahbazpur Tea Co. Ltd and another, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....nd 59 of 1984. (From the Judgment and order dated 21.4.1983 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Matter Nos. 27 and 28 of 1982). Judgment Latifur Rahman J.- These two appeals by special leave at the instance of two share‑holders and directors are directed against the judgment...... 1984. (From the Judgment and order dated 21.4.1983 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Matter Nos. 27 and 28 of 1982). Judgment Latifur Rahman J.- These two appeals by special leave at the instance of two share‑holders and directors are directed against the judgment of a Co..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 19 Jun, 1990 | Hits: 124