Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Nawab Ali Khondker Vs. Md. Aminuddin & Others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....t to the submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. There is no apparent violation of any rule and furthermore this point also involves a question of fact as to how and in what manner the rules have been violated. 8. In the present case we are called upon to decide a complicated que..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 171
Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque and another Vs. Bangladesh, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....se to be prepared estimates of the cost of such works, including such works, including such proportion of the establishment charges as may be chargeable to the works in accordance with the prescribed rules or as may be specifically directed by the Provincial Government as the Authority, together wit..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 1051
Nur Mohammad Fakir Vs. Bangladesh, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....rict Registrar, Bogra and the respondent No.1 by memo No. 94-Justice 7/2-27/86 dated 11-3-86 approved the said appointment on temporary basis and directed the respondent No.2 to take steps as per the rules for filling the said office permanently (Annexure-C). 6. The petitioner further asserted th..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Hakim Ullah Vs. Mutaleb and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....cord and the appeal be heard on merit in accordance with law as if it were presented within time. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 49 DLR (HD) (1997) 118...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Sk. Helal Uddin and another Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ective appellants. The office is directed to send down the L.C. Records immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 286, 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 444, 8 LG (2011) HCD 342. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Md. Abdu Mia Vs. The Election Commission & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....on given by the Returning Officer in Annexure 'C1 for holding piecemeal election for members only at Mohanpur Primary School polling station is violative of the provisions of Rules 25, 26 and sub-rules (b) and (c) of Rule 29 (2) of the Union Parishad (Election) Rules, 1983 inasmuch as it is mand..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 161
Jn. Md. Saleh Ahmed Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... without jurisdiction and without lawful authority. In the result, the Rule Nisi is made absolute but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 210...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
AKM Ruhul Amin Vs. Al-haj Abdul Latif & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... to that result the petitioner secured 1307 votes as against 1382 by the opposite party No.1. It is alleged that the election was not held in accordance with the provisions of the Ordinance and the rules of the Union Parishad. Opposite party No.1 resisted the female voters from attending the polli..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 163
Mostofa Kamal Vs. B. D. Habibullah & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....o cost. The impugned order passed by the learned Assistant Judge is set aside and the plaint in Title Suit No. 87 of 1988 is rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 197. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 207
Siddiqur Rahman and others Vs. Abdul Jalil Meah and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....are the paper-books out of Court in accordance with Rules. The parties are directed to maintain status quo till disposal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 1002...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Ministry of Communication and others Vs. Md. Ferozur Rahman & ors, 1991, 20, CLC (HCD)
....in his catering services as per his original licence agreement. 3. In that suit, the plaintiff caterer namely, M/s Golden Dragon Ltd., filed an application for temporary injunction under Order 39, rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure with a prayer for ad interim inju..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Shafiuddin Sarwar Vs. Dhaka Club Limited and others, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....রতিকার পাইতে পারে তাহার ডিক্রী দিতে।” 3. After institution of the suit the plaintiff petitioner filed an application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 and pending hearing of the application under Order 39 rules 1 and 2 obtained an ad int..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Al-haj Abdul Aziz Vs. Kalipada Das & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....sis of such a decision calls for no interference in revision. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 170. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Ayar @ Ayaruddin and others Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... appeals must reach the Appellate Court in order to prevent their being time-barred. A 'special law’ means a law enacted for special cases, in special circumstances, in contradiction to the general rules of the law laid down as applicable generally to all cases with which the general law deals. If..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Foez Ahmed Vs. Joynal Abedin and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....desh under section 69 of the Registration Act, 1908; the said section vested the Inspector General of Registration with the general power of superintendence over all registration officers and to make rules consistent with the Act on the subject, amongst others; (a) ............. (b) ......... ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Jamal Uddin Vs. Mir Kashem Bahumukhi High School and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....LR 458, 13 DLR (AD) 228, 19 DLR 307, 21 DLR 581 and 30 DLR 262, the service of a servant cannot be enforced against an unwilling master as the service of the plaintiff petitioner is governed by the rules of Master and Servant. The plaintiff petitioner in his plaint stated that his service is not r..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 96
MR Trading Co. Vs. Superintendent Engineer and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... a money decree of Taka 47,000,000 for price of the works done. 3. The plaintiff made two applications, one under section 151 for mandatory injunction on 19-03‑03 and the other under Order XXXIX rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In the applications, it is stated that the plaintiff g..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Uttara Bank Ltd. Vs. Syed Abidur Reza and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....81. 8. It was further stated that the plaintiff was a confirmed employee. The termination was issued in violation of Clause 18(b) of the Bank Staffs' (Service) Rules, 1965. Besides, said service rules was already revised and replaced on 12‑9‑81 by the Uttara Bank (Employees) Service Regulat..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 174
Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 181