Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ziaul Hoque Vs. Election Commission, 1990, 19 CLC (HCD)
....oque Vs. Additional Deputy Commissioner, 17 DLR 744; Farid Miah vs. Amjad Ali and others, 42 DLR (AD) 13; Hazrat Ali Vs. Election Commission and others, 1990 BLD 157. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim with Syed Lutfor Rahman, Advocates ‑For the Petitioner. AKM Mozammel Hoque B...... is discharged with compensatory cost of Tk. 5,000/‑ (Taka five thou sand) only to be paid to the respondent No. 5 by the petitioner. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 43 DLR (1991) 9. ......o- 40 DLR (AD) 270; Chief Commissioner of Ajmeer Vs. Radheshyani Dhani, AIR 1957 (SC) 304; Munshi Abdul Hoque Vs. Additional Deputy Commissioner, 17 DLR 744; Farid Miah vs. Amjad Ali and others, 42 DLR (AD) 13; Hazrat Ali Vs. Election Commission and others, 1990 BLD 157. La......ent: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Ziaul Hoque........................................................................................Petitioner Vs. The Election Commission, Sher‑e‑Bangla Nagar, Dhaka and others ............Re..Category: Election Law | Date: 14 Jun, 1989 | Hits: 98
Meher Ali Vs. A.K. Murshid and others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... to- Nasiruddin Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh & ors. 32 DLR (AD) 216; Khondoker Ehteshamuddin Ahmed @ Iqbal Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981 BLD (AD) 107=33 DLR (AD)154. Lawyers Involved: Md. Awlad Ali, Advocate— For Petitioner. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate—For ......inate Judge, Narayanganj is directed to dispose of T.S. No.56 of 1984 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 357. ...... Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 357. ......t Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: FHMH Rahman J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Meher Ali....................................................Appellant Vs. A.K. Murshid and others...................................Respondents Judgment M..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 25 May, 1989 | Hits: 152
Ananda and others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....not wanted in connection with any other case. The suo motu Rule for enhancement is discharged. Send down the L.C. records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 533.......not wanted in connection with any other case. The suo motu Rule for enhancement is discharged. Send down the L.C. records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 533.......k her and left her on the road and she did not know whether that person was Prem Charan or not. She further stated that having been left on the road she started running and went to the house of Prof. Ali Ahmed when she narrated to him everything and requested him to inform her uncle, Advocate Raha......33...Category: Women and Children | Date: 24 May, 1989 | Hits: 143
Hazrat Ali & Abdur Rahman Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ur Rouf and others Vs. The State, 38 DLR 197. Lawyers Involved: S. A. Hasan, Assistant Attorney General with Sajjad Ali Chowdhury, Assistant Attorney General—For the State. Md. Shahjahan, Advocate— For the Condemned Prisoner Hazrat Ali (appointed by the State)&n......emned prisoner Hazrat Ali with the modification of sentence of both the condemned prisoners from death to imprisonment for life. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990)177. ......77. ......l Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Habibur Rahman Khan J Hazrat Ali & Abdur Rahman...............Condemned Prisoner & Appellant Vs. The State.........................................Respondent Judgment April 26..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 26 Apr, 1989 | Hits: 152
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 18 Apr, 1989 | Hits: 87
Niropoma Ritchel Vs. Mohammad Abdul Jalil Mea & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... defendant No.1 for the agreement for sale. He also denied the suggestion of the contesting defendant that defendant No.1 had no interest in the suit land and he did not execute the bainapatra. P.W.2 Md. Hossain, P.W.3 Abdul Jabbar are all witnesses of bainapatra and they testified that the plaintif......and the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost and the suit is dismissed. Let the records of the case be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 467....... nothing on record to show that the trial Court gave notice to the parties and amended the issues but formulated this issue suo motu and decreed the suit on this issue alone. In the case of Miser Ali Vs. Abdul Rashid and others reported in 5 DLR 490 Ibrahim, J. observed as follows :- "I must ...... Court Division (Dhaka Bench) (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Dalil Uddin Ahmed J Niropoma Ritchel..............................................Appellant Vs. Mohammad Abdul Jalil Mea & others....................................Respondents Judgm..Category: Contract Law | Date: 13 Mar, 1989 | Hits: 941
Category: Women and Children | Date: 13 Dec, 1988 | Hits: 193
Jalaluddin Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... Rahman J.- The accused appellant was convicted for having committed the offence of criminal breach of trust by the Additional Divisional Special Judge, Chittagong Division, Chittagong. 2. One Md. Sekandar Ali, Assistant Inspector, D.A.B, Rangamati, Chittagong Hill Tracts lodged a First Infor......der of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Divisional Special Judge is right. In the result, I dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 87. ...... The accused appellant was convicted for having committed the offence of criminal breach of trust by the Additional Divisional Special Judge, Chittagong Division, Chittagong. 2. One Md. Sekandar Ali, Assistant Inspector, D.A.B, Rangamati, Chittagong Hill Tracts lodged a First Information Report......(1989) 87. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 32
Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....is satisfied that the accused will indulge in prejudicial activities if he is allowed to remain at large. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 178; BCR 1988 (AD) 89. ......is satisfied that the accused will indulge in prejudicial activities if he is allowed to remain at large. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 178; BCR 1988 (AD) 89. ......statue of law which preserves a fundamental human right is to be given rather than one which destroys it. We are in agreement with the view of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Rowshari Bijaya Shaukat Ali Khan’s case on this question. We therefore, find that an illegal order of detention cannot......Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mrs. Sajeda Parvin Banu...........................Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.........Respondents Judgment March 20, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Mar, 1988 | Hits: 95
Firoza Begum Vs. Hormuz Ali & another, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....bur Rahman J. - This appeal at the instance of informant Firoza Begum is directed against the order dated 27.4.87 passed by Mr. A.J. Mustafa, Special Tribunal No. III, Tangail discharging accused Md. Hormuz Ali in Special Powers Act case No. 31 of 1986. The impugned order dated 27.4.87 is as fol......appeal is, therefore, not maintainable on this ground also. The appeal accordingly is summarily dismissed on the grounds suited above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 161.......ourt Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Abdul Bari Sarkar J Firoza Begum …………………….Appellant Vs. Hormuz Ali & another..............Respondents Judgment July 29, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Ab......ourt High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Abdul Bari Sarkar J Firoza Begum …………………….Appellant Vs. Hormuz Ali & another..............Respondents Judgment July 29, 1987. Lawyers I..Category: Women and Children | Date: 29 Jul, 1987 | Hits: 112
Sachindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
..... Basti Mondal, AIR 1929 Cal. 449, Munni Bibi v. Tirloki Nath, 53 ILR PC 103 and Kishun Prasad v. Durga Prashad, AIR 1931 PC, 231. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, ......nciple of res judicata and dismissed the suit. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 56. ......bered, filed the mortgage suit without impleading the second mortgagee in possession and ultimately purchased the land. The pertinent question is what he actually acquired thereby? According to Nasim Ali J, of the Calcutta High Court, he acquired nothing, as the ownership of he equity of redemption ...... (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sachindra Lal Das and others...................................Appellants Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das being dead his heirs: Bimal Kanti Das and others………&..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 20 Jul, 1987 | Hits: 106
Category: Evidence Law | Date: 16 Sep, 1986 | Hits: 259
Mansur Ali Vs. State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
............Accused-Appellant Vs. State……………………………………………..Respondent Judgment May 13, 1986. Result: The appeal is disposed of. Case Referred to- Md. Md. Mosaddur Haque Vs. State (1958) 10 DLR (SC) 29. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin w......trial in accordance with law. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of accordingly. Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 184. ......39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 184. ......t Division (Rangpur Bench) (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Daliluddin Ahmed J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J Mansur Ali.............................Accused-Appellant Vs. State……………………………………………..Respondent Judgment May 13, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 May, 1986 | Hits: 30
Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....f Public and Urban Development and others, 1981 BLD (AD) 329; Bangladesh Vs. A.T.J. Industries, 29 DLR (AD) 181; D.F.O. South Kheri Vs. Ram Sanchi, A.I.R. 1973 (SC) 205; Chittagong Pourasava Vs. Md. Ajmal Khan, 4 BSCR page 5; E.P. Sugar Mills, AIR 1979 (SC) at page 621; Indo-Afgan Agencies Case......eration of this judgment and order be stayed for a period of two months from today. Sultan Hossain Khan J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 78. ......eration of this judgment and order be stayed for a period of two months from today. Sultan Hossain Khan J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 78. ......ion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: S Hossain Khan J Anwarul Haque Chowdhury J Sarping Matshajibi Samabaya Samiti Ltd…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Refo..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 23 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 247
Reajuddin and another Vs. Azimuddin@ Abdul Aziz and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ri Verikataramayya, 1940 (Mad) 768; P.L.D. 1967 (Lah)1051; 19 DLR 349 PLD 1967(Lah) 2057; Santosh Kumar Chakraborty & ors. Vs.M. A. Motaleb & ors. 36 DLR (AD) 248. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdus Sobhan with Md. Abdus Satter Howlader and S.M.A. Malek—For the Petitioner. ......ent of the learned Lower Appellate Court it affirmed. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD)(1987) 228. ......raborty & ors. Vs.M. A. Motaleb & ors. 36 DLR (AD) 248. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdus Sobhan with Md. Abdus Satter Howlader and S.M.A. Malek—For the Petitioner. Moslem Ali Howlader—For Opposite Party No.1. Civil Revision Case No.83 of 1983. Judgment ...... Bench (Civil Rivisional Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Reajuddin and another…………..............Plaintiff-Respondents-Petitioners Vs. Azimuddin @ Abdul Aziz and others…………………&h..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 3 Apr, 1986 | Hits: 8
Ruhul Amin Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... ......cord be sent down with a copy of this order at once. Md. Abdul Jalil J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 166. ...... AC 369; Delhi Cloth and General Mills. Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-Tax Commissioner, Delhi, AIR 1927 PC 242; Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Mannan and others, 29 DLR (SC) 17. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mohammad Ali with Ahsanul Kabir— For the Petitioner. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury— For the State. ...... (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J Md. Abdul Jalil J Ruhul Amin........................................Petitioner Vs. The State..........................................Opposite party Judgment March ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 19 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 3
Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu………………………………...Appellant Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali…………………………&he......ce to pay a fine of Tk. 1000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months. Latifur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 140. ......an J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu………………………………...Appellant Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali………………………………&......sent: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Mst. Ayesha Sultana @ Minu………………………………...Appellant Vs. Md. Shahjahan Ali………………………&h..Category: Family Law | Date: 17 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 1
Abdul Awal Vs. Abdul Mannan & another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ses in the same court according to the proceeding governing trials of cross-cases. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 254. ......ses in the same court according to the proceeding governing trials of cross-cases. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 254. ......of the Accused and trial of two cases in the same Court according to the procedure of trial of Cross Cases is proper. The Petition is dismissed………..(5) Cases Referred To- Shahed Ali Vs. State, (1961) 13 DLR 414; Falak Sher v. State, (1967) 19 DLR 426 (SC). Lawyers Involved......he Accused and trial of two cases in the same Court according to the procedure of trial of Cross Cases is proper. The Petition is dismissed………..(5) Cases Referred To- Shahed Ali Vs. State, (1961) 13 DLR 414; Falak Sher v. State, (1967) 19 DLR 426 (SC). Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 16 Mar, 1986 | Hits: 77
Shaikh Obaidul Haq Vs. The State & another, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....ioner Vs. The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment February 20, 1986. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Anwar Ali and Md. Liaquat Ali Vs. State & Md. Nezamuddin, 30 DLR at page 327; Saeeduddin Qur......litan Magistrate, Dhaka be quashed. Latifur Rahman, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 105. ...... Vs. The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment February 20, 1986. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Md. Anwar Ali and Md. Liaquat Ali Vs. State & Md. Nezamuddin, 30 DLR at page 327; Saeeduddin Qureshi Vs. T......ivision (Dhaka Bench) (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Latifur Rahman J Amin-Ur-Rahman Khan J Shaikh Obaidul Haq..............................Petitioner Vs. The State & another............................Opposite Parties Judgment Febr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 1
Abul Hashem (Bulbul) Vs. Mobarak Uddin Mahmud, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....shem Vs. Safdar, ILR 14 (Lahore) 473; Bij Mohan Singh Vs. Priya Brata Narayan Singh and others, AIR 1965 (SC) 282. Lawyers Involved: M.A. Karim—For the Petitioner. T.H. Khan with Md. Ruhul Amin—For the Opposite Party No.1. Civil Revisional No. 133 of 1985. Judgme......below are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 145. ......below are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (HCD) (1986) 145. ......me Court High Court Division (Comilla Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Abul Hashem (Bulbul)..............................Petitioner Vs. Mobarak Uddin Mahmud .........................Opposite parties Judgment February ..Category: Election Law, Evidence Law | Date: 12 Feb, 1986 | Hits: 4