Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1181-1200 of 8282 results.
Harunur Rashid and ors. Vs. State and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... dated 25‑8‑2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 121 of 2001 discharging the Rule affirming those dated 31‑10‑2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, First Court, Sylhet in Criminal Appeal No 23(IV) of 1990 disallowing the appeal, affirming th......ence against the petitioners has been well proved beyond reasonable doubt. So, we find nothing to interfere. The petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......inst the petitioners has been well proved beyond reasonable doubt. So, we find nothing to interfere. The petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......offence against the petitioners has been well proved beyond reasonable doubt. So, we find nothing to interfere. The petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 85
Shafiqul Islam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....nst the petitioner out of grudge and he was arrested by the police and was placed under suspension on 7‑12‑1983 with effect from 27‑10‑1983. The case was ultimately brought before the Special Judge. Dhaka Division for holding trial for allegations of offence under section 161 of the Penal Co...... period provided by law. In the circumstances we find no substance in the petition. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 37. ......provided by law. In the circumstances we find no substance in the petition. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 37. ......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J A S Ahammad J MM Ruhul Amin J Shafiqul Islam………..............................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another…….Respondents Judgment August 23, 2003. Result: The peti..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 128
DU rep. by its VC Vs. Associated Engineering & Drillers, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule in Civil Revision No. 1595 of 2000 filed by the appellant against order No. 12 dated 23‑11‑1999 passed by the Court of Subordinate Judge and Commercial Court No. 2, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No. 21 of 1998 allowing amendment o......e entitled to realise an amount of Taka 30,35,312 for which the execution case can proceed if the appellant fails to deposit the amount within 15 days from the date. Ed. ......d to realise an amount of Taka 30,35,312 for which the execution case can proceed if the appellant fails to deposit the amount within 15 days from the date. Ed. ......ing the awarded amount in the form of bank guarantee and the matter got its finality on 30‑6‑1999 when the leave petition was dismissed by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and during the period the awarded money was secured and covered by deposit of the Bank ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 20 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 291
Capital Tower Ltd. Vs. Mirpur Mazar Co operative Market Society Ltd. & ors, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ision Bench of the High Court Division in Transfer Suit No. 1 of 1995 decreeing the same in part. (The suit initially was registered as Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 in tile 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka and the same was transferred to the High Court Division oil a petition of the plaintif......Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 of the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) is set aside and the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......t No. 92 of 1993 of the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) is set aside and the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......R 1975 SC 1810, 9 PLR (Dhaka Series) 477 and 8 BLC (AD) 111,Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya and another vs. Mohshinul Islam and another 53 DI‑R (AD) 79; Sharping, Matshajibi Samabaya Samity vs. Bangladesh 39 DLR (AD) 85; Hyundai Corporation vs. Sumikin Bussan Corporation and others 54 DLR (AD..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 216
Debendra Kumar Saha & another Vs. Uttara Bank Ltd, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....- These two Rules arise from a common judgment, as such, this judgment would govern both the Rules. 2. Plaintiff-opposite party filed Title Suit Nos.396 and 397 of 1981 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Sadar, Noakhali for ejectment of the defendant-petitioners from the suit land on the ground o......o substance in both these Rules. In the result, both the Rules are discharged. No cost, Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 253. ......nce in both these Rules. In the result, both the Rules are discharged. No cost, Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 253. ...... Judge, Noakhali and got delivery of possession on 19‑6-1952. Thereafter, the said Bank converted to Eastern Banking Corporation and thereafter converted to Uttara Bank Limited. After liberation of Bangladesh, the defendant did not pay rents regularly and paid rent up to 1384 BS. Thereafter, they ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 12 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 3
....on)
Present:
Md. Tofazzul Islam J
AFM Abdur Rahman J
Amir Ali (Md.).........……………………Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat Fourth Court, Dhaka and another……………&h...... to issue necessary order for auction sale and/or civil warrant of arrest etc after compliance of the provisions of law.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 245.
......e necessary order for auction sale and/or civil warrant of arrest etc after compliance of the provisions of law.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 245.
......s and others Vs. Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others, 55 DLR (AD) 13; Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 54 DLR 78; Sultana Jute Mills Limited Vs. Agrani Bank, 46 DLR (AD) 174; Islami Bank Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shajuddin, 52 DLR (AD) 76.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Idrisur Rahman-For the..
Category: Civil Law | Date: 11 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 21
Loretto represented by Nasreen Rahman, Principal Vs. Nasreen Sobhan and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ee (FA) No. 13 of 2003. Judgment Md. Abdul Matin J.-This appeal at the instance of the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30‑9‑2003 passed by the joint District Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.12 of 1999 decreeing the suit. 2. The respondents as p...... In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the impugned judgment and decree are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 581. ...... the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the impugned judgment and decree are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 581. ......y and for delivery of vacant possession of the suit property in their favour contending, inter alia, that the property described in the schedule of the plaint originally belonged to the Government of Bangladesh and was allotted to the husband of the plaintiff No.1 by executing a registered deed of l..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 4 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 171
Motiar Rahman (Md.) and 18 others Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others
....airs and the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs. The Registrar is directed to circulate this Order among all the District Magistrates and all the District and Sessions Judges of Bangladesh. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 327. ......he power to detain a person because of lack of knowledge of the law, particularly the law under which they have been empowered to pass an order of detention. The service of Senior Counsel of the Supreme Court may, if necessary, be requisitioned by the government to avoid recurrence of the mista......e this Order among all the District Magistrates and all the District and Sessions Judges of Bangladesh. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 327. ......ent: MA Aziz J Syed Refaat Ahmed J Motiar Rahman (Md.) and 18 others………………Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others………Respondents Judgment July 29, 2003. Resu..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 11
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on on acceptance of the customs duty and other levies to be assessed by the Customs Authority is stayed till disposal of the writ petition. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......n on acceptance of the customs duty and other levies to be assessed by the Customs Authority is stayed till disposal of the writ petition. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......eptance of the customs duty and other levies to be assessed by the Customs Authority is stayed till disposal of the writ petition. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......n. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 26 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 128
Hossain Shially (Fakir) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....eal, at the instance of sole accused-appellant Hossain Shially (Fakir), is directed against the judgment and order, dated 14‑10‑1997, passed by the teamed Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Special Judge 2, Barisal, in Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Case No. 57 of 1996 arising out of GR No. 114 ......Send down the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 637. ......n the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 637. ...... Send down the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 637. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 19 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 162
Bangladesh Vs. Rehana Kamal and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....d any merit in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... any merit in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......it in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......o costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Immigration and Citizenship Law | Date: 8 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 279
Abdul Kader Rabbani and others Vs. Ebaruddin and others, 2003,32 CLC (HCD)
.... case of the petitioners, in short, is that the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioners and opposite party Nos.14‑28 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No.96 of 1956 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, (now Joint District Judge) Rangpur, for declaration of title of 'Ka' and 'Kha&rsq......nce with law and in the light of the observation made in the body of the judgment. Send down the LC record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 307. ...... law and in the light of the observation made in the body of the judgment. Send down the LC record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 307. ......ance with law and in the light of the observation made in the body of the judgment. Send down the LC record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 307. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 1 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 4
Mrs. Razia Satter Vs. Mr. Azizul Huq and two others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....in this rule and accordingly this rule is discharged and the contemners are acquitted of the charges-eveled against them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 515. ......n this rule and accordingly this rule is discharged and the contemners are acquitted of the charges-eveled against them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 515. ......ule and accordingly this rule is discharged and the contemners are acquitted of the charges-eveled against them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 515. ......o the judicial pronouncements, included Art. 31 as a fundamental right, violation of which will entail the mischief of Art. 26 of the Constitution. It is the fundamental right of all citizens of Bangladesh and all persons residing in Bangladesh to be dealt with only in accordance with law...Category: Constitutional Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2003 | Hits: 13
Zahed Ali Foreman (Driver) and ors. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ivision in Criminal Appeal No. 1151 of 1994. The criminal appeal was filed by 10 convicts out of 12 convicts against the judgment and order dated June 13, 1994 of the 2nd Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Barisal in Sessions Case No. 12 of 1993. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted accu......ference is called for by this Division in respect to the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......is called for by this Division in respect to the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......terference is called for by this Division in respect to the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 24 May, 2003 | Hits: 84
Begum Lutfunnessa Vs. Md. Shafiullah and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ing the appeal and sending the suit back to the trial Court for disposal with Title Suit No. 39 of 1993 upon reversing the judgment and decree dated September 13, 1986 of the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 50 of 1984 dismissing the same with direction to the defendant No. 1 ......urt No. 2, Dhaka. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 102. ......2, Dhaka. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 102. ......of Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court No. 2, Dhaka. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 102. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 18 May, 2003 | Hits: 202
Jahanara Begum and others Vs. Hazera Khatun, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
..... The facts relevant for disposal of these appeals are that appellant in Civil Appeal No. 438 of 2001 as the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 27 of 1976 in the 3rd Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka for specific performance of contract against the present respondent No. 8 who allegedly......not sustainable in law and the same is accordingly set aside. In the result the appeals are allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ainable in law and the same is accordingly set aside. In the result the appeals are allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... not sustainable in law and the same is accordingly set aside. In the result the appeals are allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 12 May, 2003 | Hits: 251
State Vs. Md. Motiur Rahman & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....r Police Station Case No. 28 dated 18‑7‑2002 corresponding to GR No. 2938 of 2002 under sections 180(b)/302/380/ 201/212/114/411/134 of the Penal Code in the Court of Metropolitan Session Judge, Dhaka for bail. The said Session Judge, Dhaka after hearing rejected the prayer for bail by O......120(b)/302/380/201/212/114/411/34 of the Penal Code, rejecting the prayer for bail now pending in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka, is hereby set aside. Ed. ......02/380/201/212/114/411/34 of the Penal Code, rejecting the prayer for bail now pending in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka, is hereby set aside. Ed. ......ns 120(b)/302/380/201/212/114/411/34 of the Penal Code, rejecting the prayer for bail now pending in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka, is hereby set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 12 May, 2003 | Hits: 74
Chan Miah (Md) Vs. Md. Dabirul Islam Khan & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 seeks leave to appeal against the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division affirming the order dated 46‑2001 of the Subordinate Judge directing him to deposit the amount of consideration money together with the compensation th......d we also do not find any illegality or infirmity to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......o do not find any illegality or infirmity to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......it any consideration and we also do not find any illegality or infirmity to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 May, 2003 | Hits: 141
Bangladesh Biman Corporation, represented by MD Vs. Rabia Bashri Irene and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....sion. In the afore state of the matter we find no substance in these petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 132. ......d no substance in these petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 132. ...... afore state of the matter we find no substance in these petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 132. ......n: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 132. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 30 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 164
Nurul Huq (Md.) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
...., 2000 against the appellant, being informant of the case, is hereby set aside. Communicate this order to the Court concerned Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 588....... 2000 against the appellant, being informant of the case, is hereby set aside. Communicate this order to the Court concerned Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 588.......ainst the appellant, being informant of the case, is hereby set aside. Communicate this order to the Court concerned Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 588......., 2000 against the appellant, being informant of the case, is hereby set aside. Communicate this order to the Court concerned Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 588...Category: Women and Children | Date: 28 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 126
1576012710688818879770789073146636105889887311142063731661282137704