Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1241-1260 of 3391 results.
Nizamuddin Dhali (Md.) Vs. State, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....te. Criminal Appeal No.29 of 1987 (Barisal) Criminal Appeal No.943 of 1991(Dhaka). Judgment Badrul Islam Chowdhury J.- This Criminal Appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction and sentence passed by Mr. Aktaruzzaman Bhuiya, Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhola in Special Case No.7......d at Taka 18,302.00, spare parts worth 24,301.70 and empty barrels worth Taka 90818037.00 by putting the same in his own use in breach of trust. Thus, he has committed breach of trust with respect to property worth Taka 61,319,07.00. 3. Allegation in writing to the above effect was made by the As..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Md. Aminul Haque Helal Vs. Mr. Justice Sultan Hossain Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....n (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J ATM Fazle Kabir J Md. Aminul Haque Helal…………………………Petitioner Vs. Mr. Justice Sultan Hossain Khan and others…………………………Respondents Judgment March 06, 2006. Result: The......man Commission" by the respondent No.1 should not be declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect and or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The case of the petitioner, in short, is that the petitioner is an Advocate of the Sup..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 228
Dhaka Leather Complex Ltd. BCIC Vs. Sikder Construction Ltd. and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Dhaka Leather Complex Ltd. BCIC...........................Appellant Vs. Sikder Construction Ltd. and another.....................Opposite-Parties Judgment August 18, 2003. Result: The A......he proceeding. It was so found by the court. The court held no error of misconduct was committed. Nobody was deprived of his right to defend beyond the law and/or rules. The award appeared to be made property. It was prepared on 15‑10‑1996. 13. Further, we find on 19‑8‑1999 the defendant ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 190
Bangladesh Parjatan Corporation Vs. Md. Ali Hossain and another, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
....Bhuiyan, 43 DLR (AD) 154; Workers of Bata Shoe Co. represented by Bata Mazdoor League (Regd), Lah Vs. Bata Shoe Co. Ltd. Batapur Lahore 23 DLR (SC), 60; Md. Motiar Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others being Writ Petition No.4540 of 2000; Secretary, Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation Vs. SAH......“held liable by the report of the inquiry committee dated 2.2.2006 for vandalism of the then Prime Minister, Begum Khaleda Zia.” The allegation of the petitioner that he was not terminated by the proper authority is not correct, the Corporation pursuant to the decision of the Board Meeting dated..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 156
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Abdul Quader Mollah and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....M Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Nazniun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Government of Bangladesh and others ……………......Petitioners Vs. Abdul Quader Mollah and another …………...... his rights available under the Jail Code cannot be denied. The classification of under trial prisoners as per Bengal Jail Code will be done by authorities mentioned in the rule. The respondents made proper prayers to the authorities ex-closing evidence in support of their claim. The respondents hav..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Ishaque Mia (Md.) & another Vs. Abdul Mazid Mollah & others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
.... others....................Opposite Parties Judgment July 31, 1995. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Hemnalini Basu Vs. Md. Sabed Ali, 12 DLR 24; Rani Mumary Devi and others Vs. Siva Prosad Singh, 42 CLJ 280; Moulavi Abdul Mannan Vs. Md. Rafiqul Islam and others,......our of defendant No.2. The case of the plaintiffs in the suit was that the solenama upon which the said Title Suit No.561 of 1976 was decreed was a forged solenama and the decree was obtained without proper notice on some of the defendants. Signature on the solenama were not that of the defendants. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Abdur Razzaque @ Geda Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....istant Attorney‑General ‑ For the State. Criminal Appeal No.2016 of 1991. Judgment Qazi Shariuddin J.- Accused Abdur Razzak @ Geda stood trial before the learned Assistant Sessions Judge and Special Tribunal Sylhet who found him guilty of the offence under section 395 of the Penal Code ......en made. Although there appears a charge to have been framed by the learned judge just before the delivery of the Judgment but by this framing of charge it cannot be said that the accused had secured proper opportunity of meeting the charge in defending himself or themselves. In fact, trial was over..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 144
Md. Nafaruddin Mollah Vs. Md. Serajuddin Khan & Others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....epresented-For Respondent Nos. 2-7. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 355 of 2005. Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. - This Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal arose out of the judgment and decree dated 09.02.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1621 of 1996 mak......ass Suit No.299 of 1985 decreeing the suit. 2. The plaintiff-respondent No.1 filed the suit for declaration of the cancellation of the plaintiff's permanent settlement dated 03.10.1984 in the suit property by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Naogaon and the subsequent order passed by..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Nitai Ch. Shaha and another Vs. M/s. City Ice and Cold Storage Ltd. and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Ranadhir Sen J Amin-ur-Rahman Khan J Nitai Ch. Shaha ……………Petitioners (In Civil Revision No. 4 of 1981) Umananda Shaha ……………Petitioners (In Civil Revision No. 233 of 1981) Vs. M/s. City Ice an...... are also legally bound by the aforesaid contract of the defendant No.1 and are consequently bound to join with defendant No.1 in the execution and registration of the necessary sale deed of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff and the plaintiff is legally entitled to enforce the said contra..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 132
Matira Bewa & others Vs. Sree Sudhir Chandra Saha & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Chowdhury ATM Masud J Md. Altaf Hosain J Matira Bewa & others…………………Appellants Vs. Sree Sudhir Chandra Saha & others…………………Respondents Judgment February 10, 1982. Result......tage of his own wrong). In the circumstances of the present case, it is clear that the plaintiffs in trying to undo the transaction of lease evidenced by the impugned kabulyat and to get back their property are attempting to take advantage of their own fraud. We find no reason why the principle of..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 146
Md. Anowarul Islam Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
..... None represented-For Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.106 of 2008. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 15.1.2008 of the High Court Division passed in Criminal Rule 187(R) of 2007 giving d......them to justice. The High Court Division further held that the seal of the Court as contained in the forged certified copies were also forged. 5. We are of the view that the High Court Division on proper consideration of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no illega..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 146
Suratunnessa and others Vs. Nurjahab Bibi and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....CJ Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Mohammad Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Md. Shamsul Huda J Suratunnessa and others……………………………….....Appellants Vs. Nurjahab Bibi and others…......bmitted that the High Court Division has erred in law in not reversing the decision of the appellate Court when the appellate Court has not rebutted the findings of the trial Court which was based on proper assessment of evidence. 10. He further contented that the learned Judge of the High Court ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Mahatab Hossain (Md) Vs. Upazila Nirbahi Officer and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....reme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: MM Hossain J Farid Ahmed J Mahatab Hossain (Md)…………….Petitioner Vs. Upazila Nirbahi Officer and others……………..Respondents Judgment May 4, 2006. Lawyers involved: Md. Mazi......rvice of charge-sheet as contemplated under Rule 58(8) of the Upazila Parishad Karmachari Chakuri Bidhimala, 1989 and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioner being a citizen of Bangladesh was appointed "জীপ গাড়..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Mohammad Ismail Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Imman Ali J Md. Abu Tariq J Mohammad Ismail, son of Noor Aziz, elected Councilor of Ward No. 9 of Teknaf Paurashava and Panel Mayor No. 1 of Teknaf Paurashava, Upazila-Teknaf, District—Cox’s Bazar. …………......ashava (Annexure-K) should not be declared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this court may deem fit and proper. 2. Short facts for disposal of the Rule are that the petitioner is an elected councilor o..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 136
....obinda Chandra Tagore J. - I agree
This Case is also Reported in:
...... passed by a Division Bench of this Division in Writ Petition No.5125 of 2004 discharging the Rule should not be reviewed and/or pass such other or further order orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.”
2. Relying on the following averments the petitioner seeks for review of the judgment..
Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 371
Shahryar Murshed and others Vs. Principal, Chittagong Medical College and others, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
...................Petitioner [Writ Petition No. 2195 of 1993] Rabiul Karim…………………………….Petitioner [Writ Petition No. 2195 of 1993] Vs. Principal, Chittagong Medical College and others.....................Respondent Judgment May 17, 1994. Result: The Rules are a......ure-13 to the petitions should not be declared to have been made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The facts of the respective cases which have given rise to the Rules are, briefly, sta..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 168
Asgar Ali Mia and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....is Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 37.......Roy Chowdhury, Bhanu Roy Chowdhury, Haripada Roy Chowdhury, Kanu Roy Chowdhury, Dipali Roy Chowdhury, Nibedita Roy Chowdhury, Sanjib Roy Chowdhury got saham in the suit schedule land along with other properties in Partition Suit No.12 of 1938 which was decreed on 13-12-1958 by the learned Sub-Judge,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 147
Ayezuddin Sheikh & others Vs. Abdul Karim Sheikh & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....vocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.74 of 1986. Judgment Muhammad Ansar J. - The Rule issued at the instance of the plaintiff-petitioners is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.12.85 passed by Mr. Md. Shamsher Ali, Subordinate Judge, Kushtia in Misc. Appeal ......cree. 3. The contesting defendants-opposite party Nos.1-5 filed a written statement in this suit contending, inter alia, that the suit is not maintainable in its present form and the same is not properly valued and stamped is also barred by res judicata, waiver and acquiescence. It is also co..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 174
Abdus Sukur Mia Vs. State, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
....ate…………………………Opposite Party Judgment June 19, 1994. Result: The appeal is dismissed with modification of sentence. Cases Referred to- Firoza Begum Vs. Harmuz Ali and another, 40 DLR 161; Nurul Islam & others Vs. State, 40 DLR 122; Nurul Islam Vs. State, 27 D...... P.Ws. are not at all independent and disinterested and further there are material contradictions in their evidences but the learned Special Tribunal wrongly relied upon them and most illegally and improperly convicted and punished the accused appellant. The learned Advocate for the appellant furthe..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 135
Tara Mohan Barman Vs. Ananda Mohan Barman & others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....ted in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 226. ......দেখান হইয়াছে।” This sort of relinquishment or nadabi does not create any title in favour of the person to whom it is made as it is not a transfer in the case of immovable property. Even a transfer deed of Nadabipatra does not create any title in favour of the transferee ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 123
77147710770677057702769976977695769376927690768876867681767976717666766376627661