Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Golam Rabbani and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
..... However, dismissal of the leave petition will not affect the character of the property which will be decided in the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 90. ......Attorney‑General, instructed by Sufla Khatun, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioners. Not represented‑ the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.777 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 8‑3‑2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1631 of..Category: Property Law | Date: 22 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 107
Abul Kashem & anr. Vs. Govt. of BD and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....herefore discharged the Rule. 5. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......AM Zahangir, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑For the Petitioners. Not represented‑The Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 201 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 17 August 1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 36..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 13 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 133
Ali Ahmed and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... liable to be released even if it remains unutilised by the requiring body. In view of the above, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 92. ......4) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioners. Not represented‑the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 584 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 6‑3‑2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No 1383 of ..Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 84
Aroti Rani Paul Vs. Sudarshan Kumar Paul and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....indings and decisions of the High Court Division and consequently the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 73. ......dvocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellant. Ex Parte ‑ the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 3rd March, 1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 323..Category: Family Law | Date: 1 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 181
Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....the order for two weeks. Mr. Razzaq opposed the prayer. However, the operation of the order is stayed for ten days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (HCD) (2002) 537. ...... of acceptance of the proposal of ETV as most responsive and granting of licence to ETV by respondent No. 1 was done without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect. After delivery of the judgment Mr. Rafiqul Huq, the learned Advocate for the respondent Nos. 6 and 8 prayed for staying th..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 7
Mahmood Alam (Md.) and another Vs. Moklesur Rahman Bhuiya, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ed judgment and decree affirming those of the trial Court are hereby confirmed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (HCD) (2002) 523. ......0 Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by defendant Nos. 1 and 10 upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and decree dated 30-3-2000 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 2 at Barisal in T..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 4
Abul Hussain and others Vs. Afezuddin Mondal and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 93. ......;For Respondent Nos. 1‑3 Ex‑Parte‑Respondent Nos. 4‑ 7.5. Civil Appeal No. 66 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 6 April 1995 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 371 of..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 80
Alfazuddin Mollah and ors. Vs. Md. Almas Chokder and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....t Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the learned Assistant Judge is directed to proceed with the pre‑emption proceeding in accordance with law. Ed. ......bsp; Syed JR Mudassir Husain J.- This appeal, by way of granting leave, is decided against the judgment and order dated 11‑4‑1994 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division i..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 95
Raj Unnayan Kartripakshya (RAJUK), Dhk. & ors. Vs. Water Front Apt. Ltd. and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....nsel for the petitioners. We find no illegality is committed in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. Therefore, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by, Mvi. Md Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 301 of 1999. (From the judgment and order dated 22‑91998 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division i..Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 1202
Abu Taher Bhuiyan Vs. Lal Mohon Mondal and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....he result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The stay order granted earlier by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 604. ......he result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The stay order granted earlier by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 604. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 56
Shah Newaz Ebne Mostaque & ors. Vs. Shah Alam and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 69. ......etitioners Not represented‑The Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 993 of 1999. (From the judgment of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2849 of 1992.) ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 4 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 99
Rabeya Khatun Vs. Md. Saidur Rahman, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....iting the rent within 15 days of refusal of the rent by the landlord. 5. We do not find any illegality in the judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......nt under section 19(1) of the Premises Rent Control Ordinance, 19631. On appeal by the plaintiff‑respondent, the learned Subordinate Judge Rangpur in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 7 of 1992 affirmed the judgment passed by the Senior Assistant Judge and dismissed the appeal. The appellate Court found th..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 19 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 268
Monzur Alam (Md) Vs. State and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... All the three petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 62. ......ed 8-8-2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rules in Criminal Miscellaneous Case Nos. 7753, 7754 and 7755 of 2000. The leave applications are disposed of by this judgment as the facts and law points involved are similar. 2...Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 13 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 124
Bangladesh and others Vs. Eastern Beverage Industries Ltd. & another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... appeals are allowed setting aside the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) (1997) 153. ......dvocate and Rafiqueul‑Huq, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Respondents (In all the cases) Civil Appeal Nos.142‑148 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 22nd August 1994 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 72..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 13 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 161
Category: Property Law | Date: 12 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 28
Jaban Ali (Md) Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... any other case. The trial Court is at liberty to cancel the bail in case of any misuse of the privilege of bail by the accused appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 89....... any other case. The trial Court is at liberty to cancel the bail in case of any misuse of the privilege of bail by the accused appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 89...Category: Women and Children | Date: 10 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 79
Hazrat Khan @ Hazrat Ali Khan Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....t accused-appellant Hazrat Ali Khan @ Hazrat Khan be released from custody forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 636. ......dash;the Appellant. Sk Rezaul Karim, Assistant Attorney-General — For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 773 of 1987. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J. - This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 24-6-87 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Netrokona in Sessions Case..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 6 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 29
Mozibul Huq Vs. Chairman, 1st Labour Court and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 91. ......‑Record‑For the Petitioner. Not represented‑Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 708 of 1999. (From the judgment and order dated 7‑3‑1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No...Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 123
State Vs. Abdus Samad @ Samad Ali, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....f the matter, the Reference is rejected and the connected jail appeal is dismissed with the modification of sentence as stated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 590. ......No. 1723 of 1997 arising out of death sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Mymensingh to the condemned prisoner, Abdus Samad alias Samad Ali, are heard and disposed of by this judgment. The learned Additional Sessions Judge tried the condemned prisoner on the charge framed un..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 2 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 115
M. Saleemullah Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... unconditional apology and exonerating him from the charge of contempt of Court. The judgment and order passed by this Division on 23-7-1992 in Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 1989 is set aside. Ed. ...... him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented— the Respondent. Criminal Review Petition No. 7 of 1992. (From the judgment and order dated 23 July 1992 passed by the Appellate Division in Criminal Appeal No. 15 of ..Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jan, 2002 | Hits: 77