Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Nur Hossain & Nur Hossain Howlader Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....e may be set at liberty fort with if not wanted in any other connection. Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 405 ......e may be set at liberty fort with if not wanted in any other connection. Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 405 ...... December 15, 1976. Result: The appeal is allowed. Question of Doubt or Presumption under section 114(g) of the Evidence Act- As the petitioner witness were not examined and no explanation was given for his non examination, presumption under section 114(g) of ......ion and benefit of this defect would go to the appellant………(5) Lawyers Involved: A. B. M. Knairul Hoque Advocate—For the Appellant. A.T.M Afzal, Dy. Attorney General—For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 518 of 1973. Judgment Badrul Haider ..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 15 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 1
DR. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....that the impugned notification besides being violative of the various provisions of the Constitution has been passed mala fide at the instance of respondent No.2 who was at the relevant time the Deputy Prime Minister in charge of the Ministry of Health & Population Control. It has been alle......petitioner which we assess at 20 (twenty) gold mohurs. 31. The rule is accordingly made absolute with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 12 ......sh & others ……………..Respondents Judgment December 6, 1976. Result: The rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- The State of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. Triloki Nath Khosa and others, AIR 1174 SC1; State of Assam and others Vs. Kanak Cha......Assam and others Vs. Kanak Chandra Dutta, AIR 1967 SC 884. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed with Mahmudul Islam and Rokanuddin Mahmud, Advocates-For Petitioner. K.A. Bokr, Attorney General, with M M. Haque, Assistant Attorney General- For Respondent No. 1. Hamidul Huq Ch..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 5
Shafiuddin Mia Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... the Waqfs Ordinance and as such can be deemed to be a public servant within the meaning of section 21 of the penal Code. Section 98 of the Wafs Ordinance runs thus: "98. The Administrator, Deputy Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Inspector, Auditor and any other person appointe......our instance the learned Attorney-General appeared and assisted us in the disposal of the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 127. ...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 127. ......lip;.Respondent Judgment December 6, 1976 Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: A. Rab II. Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. K. A. Bakr, Attorney General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney General instructed by B.C. Pandey, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 6 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 147
Category: Civil Law, Others | Date: 24 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 3
Controller of Imports & Exports Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. Dacca and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... already been considered by us. In the result, all the twenty-eight appeals are allowed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 283. ...... already been considered by us. In the result, all the twenty-eight appeals are allowed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 283. ...... as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 283. ......Dae.)55; Shanmugha Oil Mill Vs. Coimbafore Market Committee, AIR 1960 Mad. 162; Kunnathat Thathunni Moopil Vs. State of Kerala AIR 1961 (SC) 559. Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakar, Attorney-General with Quasi Shafiuddin, Assistant Attorney-General Instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 226
Md. Nazimuddin Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....in the absence of any express Or implied intendments in the statute, the same cannot be construed as re-respective, affecting the proceedings pending before the Special Tribunals. 7. The learned Deputy Attorney-General, representing the Stale in support of the above contention referred to a jud......irul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree. Abdul Momith Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 49. ......ing Co. Vs. Irving, (1905) AC 369; Saeed Ahmed, (1964) 16 DLR 484 (SC); Quilter, (1882) 9 QBD 672 (CA); Smith, (1901) AC 297, 305; West, (1911) 2CH. 1; I.T.Commissioner, (1916) 2 KBD 249; Delhi Cloth and General Milk, 54 JA 421; DaiVanayaka Reddiyar, ILR 50 Mad. 857; Ram Singha, ILR 50 All. 965; Uni......Co. Vs. Irving, (1905) AC 369; Saeed Ahmed, (1964) 16 DLR 484 (SC); Quilter, (1882) 9 QBD 672 (CA); Smith, (1901) AC 297, 305; West, (1911) 2CH. 1; I.T.Commissioner, (1916) 2 KBD 249; Delhi Cloth and General Milk, 54 JA 421; DaiVanayaka Reddiyar, ILR 50 Mad. 857; Ram Singha, ILR 50 All. 965; United ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jul, 1976 | Hits: 2
Gurudas Saha Vs. Deputy Custodian, Enemy Property (Lands & Buildings) & others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Munim J Gurudas Saha............Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 61-D of 1970). Monoranjan Saha.............Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 62-D of 1970). Vs. Deputy Custodian, Enemy Property (Lands & Buildings) & others............Respondents (In ......ationality, subject to the observation made above, these appeals are dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 133. ............Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 61-D of 1970). Monoranjan Saha.............Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 62-D of 1970). Vs. Deputy Custodian, Enemy Property (Lands & Buildings) & others............Respondents (In both the appeals Judgment ......ationality, subject to the observation made above, these appeals are dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 133. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 May, 1976 | Hits: 55
Salamat Khan Vs. Q.G. Ahad, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
..... Plot No.579 of the same mouza belongs to Mr. Salamat Khan the appellant. Over the demarcation of a common boundary dispute arose between the parties and Mr. Ahad, the Respondent approached the Deputy Commissioner, Chittagong for demarcation of that boundary and Miscellaneous Case No.1 of 1967......es and we reject them. In the result the appeal is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 271. ......B. 256; Brogden Vs. Metropolitan Railway Company, 1877 (2) Appeal Cases 666; Muhd. Sagir Bhatti & Sons Vs. Federation of Pakistan, (1968) 10 DLR (SC) 169. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, with B.B. Roy Chowdhury and B.K. Das, Advocates, instructed by S.M. Huq, Ad......an in the case of Muhammad Saghir Bhatti & Sons Vs. Federation of Pakistan. The passage on the point says "that the argument was that after the first arbitrator was appointed, Quarter Master General had no power to make without the permission of the Court, another appointment; but the appel..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 20 Jan, 1976 | Hits: 352
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 20 Nov, 1975 | Hits: 149
Hasan Ali Daftary & others Vs. The State, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.... Khan Bahadur Md. Ismail—For the Informant Opposite Party Criminal Revision Case No. 218 of 1975. Judgment Amirul Islam Chowdhury J.— This rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Dacca, to show cause why the proceedings in G. R. Case No. 448/73 pending in th......nshiganj with direction for disposal of the case expeditiously. A.T.M. Masud J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 561 ......ellip;………………………Respondents Judgment September 3, 1975. Result: The Rule is discharged. Tofazzal Hossain Sardar and others Vs. The State; Abu Tayab Md. Mashood and Tipu Vs. the State, respectively at page 36 and ......section 36(2) (b) of the Special Powers Act, 1974. The intention of the legislature being clear that no proceeding except the "pending case" to be kept alive, the provision of the General Clause Act, 1897 would be inapplicable in the present case. In this connection he referred t..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 3 Sep, 1975 | Hits: 2
Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Sep, 1975 | Hits: 3
Category: Administrative Law | Date: 28 Aug, 1975 | Hits: 1
M/s. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. M/s. A. R. A. G. Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....or interference in the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1978) 76. ......or interference in the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1978) 76. ......td……..............Respondent Judgment July 31, 1975. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Jamal Vs. Moola Dowood and sons, AIR 1915 P. C. 48: A. V. Joseph Vs. R. Skow Bux, AIR 1918 Privy Council 149; Erroll Mocka......or interference in the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1978) 76. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 31 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 240
Category: Property Law | Date: 30 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 3
Jinnat Ali Muktear Vs. Abdul Majid, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....escribing the time limit would be rendered nugatory. 4. Rule 2 of Chapter VIII of the High Court Rules lays down that every appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent shall be presented to the Deputy Registrar within 60 days from the date of the judgment appealed from, unless the Court in its......or reasons stated above, I find that this application: is not maintainable and is accordingly rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 655. ......ury J. - This is an application for leave to appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent. It appears that the Second appeal out of which the present application arose was disposed of by me on 2.4.75 and the present application has been filed on 10.7.75. The earlier application filed on 8.7.75 was r......or reasons stated above, I find that this application: is not maintainable and is accordingly rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 655. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 24 Jul, 1975 | Hits: 2
Afazullah Manjhee Vs. Election Tribunal, Patiya, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....ed of in the above terms without any order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 577 ......ed of in the above terms without any order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 577 ......dings regarding irregularities with respect to one centre only i.e. centre No. III. Secondly, the Election Tribunal wrongly interpreted Article 9(i) of the Bangladesh Local Government (Union Parishad and Pourashava) Order, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Order' inasmuch as he found tha......ed of in the above terms without any order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 577 ..Category: Contract Law, Election Law | Date: 13 Jun, 1975 | Hits: 3
Bacha Meah Vs. Province of East Pakistan & anothers, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....e will be no order as to costs in any one of the cases. K. Hossain J.—I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 563 ......e will be no order as to costs in any one of the cases. K. Hossain J.—I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 563 ..............Opposite parties Pakistan Eastern Railway Administration……………Petitioner Vs. Md. Mafizuddin, Clerk under Chief Superintendent, Watch and Ward, P.E. Railway………………..Opposite party Judgment......other , 1962 P.L.C. 1021. Lawyars Involved: Mozammal Huq—For Petitioner (In C.R. No. 1423 of 1970 and for opposite party (In C.R, No. 811 of 1968) Ranadhir Sen—Dy. Attorney-General—For Opposite-party Ro.1 (In C.R. No. 1423 of 1970) Mohammad Ali—For Opposite par..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 30 May, 1975 | Hits: 1
Abdur Rashid and another Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
....is made absolute. We, however, make no order as costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 614 ......is made absolute. We, however, make no order as costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 614 ......nbsp; ......cumstances mentioned above…....(3) Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan with A. H. Md. Nurul Huda Khandaker, Advocates—For the Petitioners. Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General —For Respondent No. 1. Petition No. 691 of 1974 Judgment Fazle Munim J...Category: Abandoned Properties Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 22 May, 1975 | Hits: 7
Monipur Tea Co. Ltd. And Ahmedur Rahman, 1975, 4 CLC (HCD)
.... the Companies, Act. Let the Cost of the petitioner corns out of the assets of the company. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 490. ...... the Companies, Act. Let the Cost of the petitioner corns out of the assets of the company. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 DLR (HCD) (1975) 490. ......man………………………. Petitioner Judgment May 20, 1975. Result: The appeal is allowed. Section 76, sub-section (3) and section 79, sub-section (3) of the Companies Act, 1913 are not exclusive but supplementary ......;76 read with section 79 sub-section (3) of the Companies Act, 1913 filed by Mr. Ahmedur Rahman, Managing Director of Manipur Tea Co. Ltd. for condoning the delay in holding the Annual General Meeting for the year 1972 with a prayer for directing the petitioner to hold the said Annual..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 20 May, 1975 | Hits: 2
Category: Civil Law | Date: 30 Apr, 1975 | Hits: 5