Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Abul Boshar Vs. Minakhi Begum & others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....e appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- 2 MLR (AD) 215; 57 DLR (AD) 39; 20 BLD (AD) 187; 43 DLR 360; 4 BLC (AD) 193; 5 BLD (AD) 51. Lawyers Involved: Khijir Ahmed with Hidar Alam Kollol and Shofiul Aziz, Advocates - For the Appellant. Zainul Abedin with Shirin Sultana and Md. Abu Ta......of contract impleading the defendant No.1, Minakhi Begum and two others. The case of the plaintiff is that defendant No.1, Minakhi Begum entered into a contract with plaintiff-appellant to sell her property under Mouza- Uttar Hali Shahar, District-Chittagong at a consideration of 8,07,000. Accordi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Siraj Mia (Md.) Vs. Nasima Akhter and another, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....l Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam J AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury J Siraj Mia (Md.)........................................................Appellant Vs. Nasima Akhter and another......................................Respondents Judgment January 21, 2002. Res......regarding default of payment of money within 2 months, in the case of Ram Chandra Das Vs. Khalilur Rahman and another 1985 BLD (AD) 41, it has been held that in case of agreement of sale of immovable property, time is not the essence of the contract and court ordinarily does not take into considerat..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Golam Nasir Vs. Abdul Aziz, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....an, Advocate -For the Appellant. Fakrul Islam, Assistant Attorney General - For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 54 of 1982. Judgment AM Mahmadur Rahman J. - This appeal under sections 417 and 418 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the older of acquittal dated 07.10.198......eto to which the hearing may be adjourned, the complainant does not appear, the Magistrate shall notwithstanding anything herein before contained, acquit the accused, unless for some reason he thinks proper to adjourn the hearing of the case to some other day: Provided that, where the complainan..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Hellenic Lines Ltd. Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
....1, 1985. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Adam Ltd. Vs. East & West Steamship Company, PLD 1962 Karachi 715; East & West Steam Ship Company Vs. Hossain Brothers and others, 19 DLR (SC) 530; The Karachi Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. Vs. Messrs Abdul Rahman Abdul Gan......mpany and another, 30 DLR (SC) 130. He has also referred to Rules 2 & 3 of Article III of the Hague Rules which are as follows: "2. Subject to the provisions of Article IV, the carrier shall properly and carefully load, handle, stow, carry, keep, care for and discharge the goods carried''. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 463
Shewe Hla Prue TK Vs. Commissioner, Chittagong Division, Chittagong and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....iginal Jurisdiction) Present: AKM Sadeque J Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Shewe Hla Prue TK………………Petitioner Vs. Commissioner, Chittagong Division, Chittagong and others………………Respondents Judgment May 4, 1992. Result: The ......stated above he could not perform his functions and duties for the welfare of the Naithong Mouza and as a result the people suffered to a great deal. It is contended that the petitioner failed to pay proper and effective attention to the interest of the people of Naithong Mouza and because he could ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 171
Padmabati Biswas Vs. Banglasdesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Badrul Islam Chowdhury J Padmabati Biswas………………………Appellant Vs. Banglasdesh and others ………………………Respondents Judgment June 28, 1992. Result: The ap......ndant Nos.43 and 44 filed one joint written statement while defendant Nos.45‑48 filed another. Defendant Nos.48A to 50 filed another set of written statements claiming some land out of the disputed property but by a joint petition dated 2‑10‑61 defendant Nos.31‑37 and 43‑51 came to a compr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Chairman, Chittagong Port Authority, Chittagong Vs. Kalipada Dey & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....s Referred to- Bangladesh Fishermen’s Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. The Chairman, Labour Court, Chittagong, 27 DLR (1975) 367; Khulna Tobacco Industries Limited Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Khulna and another, 29 DLR (1977) 148; Manager, Sonali Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Sonali Jute Mills Wor......uthority is a statutory body and that the promotion of employees are made according to the Rules and the Traffic Inspectors are promoted from amongst the senior staffs of different categories through proper selection in consideration of the requisite eligibility and qualification. The respondents ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 204
Wing Commander M Hamidullah Khan Bir Protik Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....s Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 491....... directed to produce a list of 3 millions martyrs who made the highest sacrifice in the War of Liberation in 1971 and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. The Rule is made returnable within 4(four) weeks from date. Order of the Court Sinc..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 314
Mohiuddin Ahmed and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ase is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 504.......51 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendant's case, in short, is that the father of the defendant Nos.7-9 Anil Ranjan Shyam filed Title Suit No.68 of 1984 praying for declaration that the suit property was not enemy property and the Enemy Case No.58 of 1966-67 was illegal that the said suit w..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 121
GSH Jamal Vs. Surraiya Jabeen and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....gh Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Mirza Hussain Haider J Abu Zafor Siddique J GSH Jamal………………………Defendant-Appellant Vs. Surraiya Jabeen and others……………………Plaintiff-Respondents Judgment June 10, 2010. Result: ......he assent of the landlords, impliedly not expressly", to such continuance of possession. As such the tenant after 31-12-1996 continued the tenancy by "holding over". Once the tenant posses the suit property by holding over the terms and condition of the agreement automatically comes into operati..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 190
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Shahidul Islam Vs. State and another, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... Court High Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Quamrul Islam Siddiqui J JBM Hassan J Shahidul Islam…………………………Petitioner Vs. State and another…………………………Opposite parties Judgment March 16, 2011. Result: ......charge against the accused-petitioner under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Relevant facts for disposal of the Rule are that the opposite party No.2 as complainan..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Dr. Md. Rahmat Ali Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....or the State. Criminal Revision No.1062 of 2007. Judgment Salma Masud Chowdhury J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur, to show cause as to why the judgment and order Dated 12-8-2007 passed by the learned Special Sessions Judge, Dinajpur in Criminal Appeal ......akari Aporadh (Druto Bichar) Adalat, Dinajpur in Hakimpur PS case No.5, dated 13-3-2007 should not be set aside and or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 13-3-2007 at 17-15 hours the informant Anzu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Ganendra Nath Mondal Vs. Kalipada Mondal and another, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... Supreme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Nozrul Islam Chowdhury J Ganendra Nath Mondal………………………Petitioner Vs. Kalipada Mondal and another………………………Opposite Parties Judgment January 11, 2011. Result: ...... Court while reversing the same did neither advert to the finings arrived at by the trial Court nor did he consider the evidence adduced in the case as such the impugned judgment of reversal is not a proper judgment of reversal in the eye of law as such the same amounts to error of law which has res..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 207
Matiur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....sh Vs. Saifuddin Ahmed, 50 DLR (AD) 27; 3 BLC (AD) 6. Lawyers Involved: M Amir-ul Islam, Advocate - For the Petitioner AM Aminuddin, Assistant Attorney-General - For the Respondent Nos. 1, 5 and 6. Mahmudul Islam, Advocate - For the added-Respondent Nos. 7-10. Abdur Rab Chowdhury, Adv......ustoms and Excise) Cadre and if so how should their seniority be determined. After receiving the reply from the Ministry of Establishment a final decision could be made about these officers on making proper evaluation about their performance whilst under deputation.” 13. A copy of the minutes o..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Rehanuddin & others Vs. Abdul Hakim Maser and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....Comillah Bench) (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Nurul Huque Bhuiyan J Rehanuddin & others………………………………………Petitioners Vs. Abdul Hakim Maser and others…………………….Opposite-Parties Judgment September 14, 1986. Result: ...... 151 of the Civil Procedure code could not be thrown out in limine on the ground of maintainability and the learned Subordinate Judge should have treated the application under section 151 C.P.C. as a proper application and should have heard and disposed of it on merits. In the result, the rule is..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Joinal Abedin Jamal and others Vs. Noor Afza, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....eported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 432. ...... station, fully described in the Agreement (Bainapatra) (subsequently described as the arbitral agreement), executed between the appellants and the present respondent on 4-8-1999 for sale of the said property at a consideration of Taka 3,68,00,000. As per terms of the said agreement, the present res..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 251