Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 121-140 of 614 results.
Abdul Majid (Md.) Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....ith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Lower Court's record be sent down at once with a copy of the Judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 52. ......ith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Lower Court's record be sent down at once with a copy of the Judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 52. ......riminal appeal at the instance of sole accused-appellant Md. Abdul Majid is directed against the Judgment and order dated 29-2-2000 passed by the learned Judge, Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman (Bishesh) Adalat, Jessore, in Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Special Case No.118 of 1999 whereby the accused-app......nbsp; Criminal Appeal No.402 of 2000. Judgment SAK Md. Dabirush-Shan J.- This criminal appeal at the instance of sole accused-appellant Md. Abdul Majid is directed against the Judgment and order dated 29-2-2000 passed by the learned Judge, Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman (Bishesh) Adalat..Category: Women and Children | Date: 24 Jul, 2007 | Hits: 159
....
Present:
Mirza Husain Hider J
Farah Maybug J
Arab Bangladesh Bank Limited, Motijheel Branch, Dhaka ………………Petitioner
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka and others…………………&hell......Present:
Mirza Husain Hider J
Farah Maybug J
Arab Bangladesh Bank Limited, Motijheel Branch, Dhaka ………………Petitioner
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka and others……………………Res......ent:
Mirza Husain Hider J
Farah Maybug J
Arab Bangladesh Bank Limited, Motijheel Branch, Dhaka ………………Petitioner
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka and others……………………Respond......ain Hider J
Farah Maybug J
Arab Bangladesh Bank Limited, Motijheel Branch, Dhaka ………………Petitioner
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka and others……………………Respondents
(Writ Pet..
Category: Banking Law | Date: 12 Mar, 2007 | Hits: 6
Md. Kamruzzaman Babul and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... of 2001 under sections 6(1)/7/30 of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 is quashed. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 68. ...... of 2001 under sections 6(1)/7/30 of Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 is quashed. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 68. ...... 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 03.11.2001 at about 19:30 hours one Sheikh Abdul Baten as complainant filed a petition of complaint before the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Dhaka against 9 accused persons including these petitioners alleging, inter-alia, that the ......ported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 68. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 19 Nov, 2006 | Hits: 11
M. H. Monzur Vs. Md. Nuruzzaman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....9 of 2000. Judgment Syed Mohammad Ziaul Karim J.- This Rule, calls in question, the legality and propriety of the order dated 25-10-1999 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.141 of 1999, allowing an application filed under orde......000. Judgment Syed Mohammad Ziaul Karim J.- This Rule, calls in question, the legality and propriety of the order dated 25-10-1999 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.141 of 1999, allowing an application filed under order VI R...... Judgment Syed Mohammad Ziaul Karim J.- This Rule, calls in question, the legality and propriety of the order dated 25-10-1999 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka, in Title Suit No.141 of 1999, allowing an application filed under order VI Rule ......esent: Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Syed Mohammad Ziaul Karim J M. H. Monzur………………………………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Md. Nuruzzaman and others……………………………………………….Opposite Parties Judgment Au..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 21 Aug, 2006 | Hits: 42
Md. Delwar Hossain Vs. State represented the DC, Narayanganj & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 788, 26 BLD (AD) 109. ......sion. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 788, 26 BLD (AD) 109. ......o suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years and also to pay a fine of Tk. 2,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6(six) months more by the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Narayangonj in Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Case No. 46 of 1996 by judgment and order dated 10.02.......ate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 426 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 28.11.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5684 of 2002). ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 9 Mar, 2006 | Hits: 127
Md. Abdul Hannan alias Khalil Vs. Sate and another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... Send down the lower Court's records at once with a copy of the judgment for information and for taking necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 291. ...... Send down the lower Court's records at once with a copy of the judgment for information and for taking necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 291. ...... appeal convict appellant Md. Abdul Hannan alias Khalil has challenged the propriety of the Judgment and order dated 31-01-1999 passed by the learned Judge of the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Patuakhali in Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Case No.43 of 1997 convicting the appellant under secti...... Court Division (Criminal) Present: AKM Fazlur Rahman J Sayed Mohammad Ziaul Karim J Md. Abdul Hannan alias Khalil………………………Appellant Vs. The Sate and another……………………...........Respondents Judgment February 7, 2006. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 7 Feb, 2006 | Hits: 78
....Jurisdiction)
Present:
Md. Awlad Ali J
Zinat Ara J
M/S. Uttara Properties Ltd…………………………………………Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artharin
Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others…………Respondents
Judgment
December 15, 20......nt District Judge and Artharin
Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others…………Respondents
Judgment
December 15, 2005.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 (Act No. VIII of 2003);
section 32
Furnishing of security under section......on)
Present:
Md. Awlad Ali J
Zinat Ara J
M/S. Uttara Properties Ltd…………………………………………Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artharin
Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others…………Respondents
Judgment
December 15, 2005.
R......nal Jurisdiction)
Present:
Md. Awlad Ali J
Zinat Ara J
M/S. Uttara Properties Ltd…………………………………………Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artharin
Adalat No.1, Dhaka and others…………Respondents
Judgment
December 15..
Category: Civil Law | Date: 15 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 19
.... Appellant.
None-For the Respondent.
First Miscellaneous Appeal No.177 of 2004.
Judgment
ABM Khairul Haque J.-This appeal arises in respect of an order dated 5.4.2004 passed by the Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Execution Case No.1 of 2003, rejecting an application und......hers……………………………………..Respondent
Judgment
December 7, 2005.
Result:
The Appeal is allowed.
When specific provision is not available in the Act i.e. the Artho Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 enabling the Artho Rin Court to put the decree-holder into possession, the Cour......……………………………………..Respondent
Judgment
December 7, 2005.
Result:
The Appeal is allowed.
When specific provision is not available in the Act i.e. the Artho Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 enabling the Artho Rin Court to put the decree-holder into possession, the Court ma......eported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007)61.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 2005 | Hits: 22
Swapon Kumar Gain Vs. Amita Golder, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ed Advocate for the petitioner further submits that, his client has duly paid the monthly amount of Taka 800 up to the months of March, 2005. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 26.......ed Advocate for the petitioner further submits that, his client has duly paid the monthly amount of Taka 800 up to the months of March, 2005. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 26.......he marriage. 5. The plaintiff then preferred Family Appeal No. 22 of 1993 before the learned District Judge, Dhaka. The appeal was transferred to the Court of Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Dhaka under a Memo of Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs but subsequently in view of ......………..……………….Petitioner Vs. Amita Golder………………………………………………..Opposite Party Judgment June 25, 2005. Cases Referred to- Amullya Chandra Modak petitioner vs. State, 55 DLR 160, Nelly Zaman vs. Giasuddin Khan, 34 DLR 221, Sharmin Ho..Category: Family Law | Date: 25 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 237
Golam Hossain Sikder (Md.) and others Vs. Deputy Commissioner & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... Rahman Bhuiyan J.- This hearing occasions consideration of the Rule issued directing against the judgment and decree dated 12‑6‑2001 and 26‑6‑2001 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge cum Artha Rin Adalat, Tangail, in Other Class Appeal No.193 of 2000 affirming those dated 12‑6‑2000 ......n Bhuiyan J.- This hearing occasions consideration of the Rule issued directing against the judgment and decree dated 12‑6‑2001 and 26‑6‑2001 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge cum Artha Rin Adalat, Tangail, in Other Class Appeal No.193 of 2000 affirming those dated 12‑6‑2000 and 21......uiyan J.- This hearing occasions consideration of the Rule issued directing against the judgment and decree dated 12‑6‑2001 and 26‑6‑2001 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge cum Artha Rin Adalat, Tangail, in Other Class Appeal No.193 of 2000 affirming those dated 12‑6‑2000 and 21‑6......ase is also Reported in: 57 DLR (HCD) (2005) 598. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 3
Abdul Halim Gazi and others Vs. Afzal Hossain & ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ers, are the owners of M/s. Gazi Enterprise and M/s. Gazi Salt Industries, who took loan of Tk.11 crores from Jhalakathi branch of Janata Bank and did not pay the loan, consequently the Bank filed Artha Rin Adalat Case Nos. 3 of 2002 and 2 of 2004 on 26.02.2002. Against the decision of the Artha......re the owners of M/s. Gazi Enterprise and M/s. Gazi Salt Industries, who took loan of Tk.11 crores from Jhalakathi branch of Janata Bank and did not pay the loan, consequently the Bank filed Artha Rin Adalat Case Nos. 3 of 2002 and 2 of 2004 on 26.02.2002. Against the decision of the Artha Rin A......he owners of M/s. Gazi Enterprise and M/s. Gazi Salt Industries, who took loan of Tk.11 crores from Jhalakathi branch of Janata Bank and did not pay the loan, consequently the Bank filed Artha Rin Adalat Case Nos. 3 of 2002 and 2 of 2004 on 26.02.2002. Against the decision of the Artha Rin Adala......howdhury J Abdul Halim Gazi ..........Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 229 of 2004) Government of Bangladesh through the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Engineering and Rural Development, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and Others.....Appellants (In Civil App..Category: Election Law | Date: 15 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 168
Firoz Chokder Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....oksedpur District-Gopalgonj be set at liberty if not wanted in any other case. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 85. ......oksedpur District-Gopalgonj be set at liberty if not wanted in any other case. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 85. ...... section 7 of the Nari-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain 2000 and final report against-4 accused persons on 1.8.2001. The Magistrate transmitted the case record to the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Damon Bishesh Adalat, Chandpur and cognizance was taken charged was framed under section 7(9)(1) of the Nari-O-Sh......ra, Assistant Attorney-General - For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.5780 of 2003. Judgment Syed Muhammad Dastagir Husain J.- This Rule is directed as against the Judgment and order of conviction dated 1.7.2002 passed by the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Damon Tribunal, Chandpu..Category: Women and Children | Date: 27 Oct, 2004 | Hits: 7
Bangladesh Jute Corporation Vs. AB Jute Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....this judgment. 2. The Bangladesh Jute Corporation, in brief, the Corporation on 23‑11‑99 first presented FMA No.92 of 2000 against order dated 28‑7‑99 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4 at Dhaka in Title Suit No.205 of 99 which decreed the suit ex-parte and made t......udgment. 2. The Bangladesh Jute Corporation, in brief, the Corporation on 23‑11‑99 first presented FMA No.92 of 2000 against order dated 28‑7‑99 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4 at Dhaka in Title Suit No.205 of 99 which decreed the suit ex-parte and made the awa......ent. 2. The Bangladesh Jute Corporation, in brief, the Corporation on 23‑11‑99 first presented FMA No.92 of 2000 against order dated 28‑7‑99 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4 at Dhaka in Title Suit No.205 of 99 which decreed the suit ex-parte and made the award d......ellip;……….Respondent Judgment August 18, 2004. Result: The Appeals are allowed. Cases Referred to- Chellappan Vs. Secretary Kerala Electricity Board and another, AIR 1975 SC 230; Waverly Jute Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Raymon and Co. India (Pvt.), AIR 1963 ..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 18 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 8
....that the property of defendant Nos.1, 4 and 5 as described in schedule 'Kha' and 'Ga’ were mortgaged to the bank. The suit was then transferred to the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3 at Dhaka and renumbered as Title Suit 120 of 1990.
3. The plaint case, in......R (AD) 174; Shipping Corporation Limited Vs. WH Bennett and others, 36 DLR (AD) 175; State of Gujarat Vs. Shantilal Mangaldass, AIR 1969 SC 634.
Lawyers Involved:
Sayyed Shahid Hossain with Rina Khan, Advocates- For the Appellant in First Appeal No.60 of 1992.
Fazlul Karim with ......roperty of defendant Nos.1, 4 and 5 as described in schedule 'Kha' and 'Ga’ were mortgaged to the bank. The suit was then transferred to the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3 at Dhaka and renumbered as Title Suit 120 of 1990.
3. The plaint case, in short, is......Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 643.
..
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 1 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 4
Dewan Abul Abbas Vs. Muna Haque and other, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... Judgment Md. Arayesuddin J. - This appeal at the instance of the defendant has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 15‑4‑1994 passed by the Subordinate Judge and additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title suit with a direction to execute and register the sale deed wi......ment Md. Arayesuddin J. - This appeal at the instance of the defendant has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 15‑4‑1994 passed by the Subordinate Judge and additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title suit with a direction to execute and register the sale deed within 3...... Md. Arayesuddin J. - This appeal at the instance of the defendant has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 15‑4‑1994 passed by the Subordinate Judge and additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title suit with a direction to execute and register the sale deed within 30 da...... S Rahman Miah J Dewan Abul Abbas………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Muna Haque and other……………………………&he..Category: Civil Law | Date: 28 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 6
Mukul Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 22. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove as review cannot be granted for merely reexamination of the same argument, the petition for review is dismissed. Ed. ...... 22. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove as review cannot be granted for merely reexamination of the same argument, the petition for review is dismissed. Ed. ......884 of 2000). The High Court Division upon dismissing the appeals accepted the reference. 3. The reference was made by the learned Judge of the Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Adalat (the Adalat), Narail upon convicting, on October 24, 2000, the condemned prisoner under sect......sion) Rules, 1988 Rule I Order XXVI in Part IV This provision provides for review of criminal proceedings “ on the ground of an error apparent on the face of the record” and it implies that if such error or errors is/ are allowed to continue injustice would be perpetu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 10 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 100
Oriental Bank Ltd. Vs. Rina Alam and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 11 The matter in issue was not at all in controversy in the previous suit and that the same was not litigated upon or any decision arrived at by the Artha Rin Adalat and, as such, the issue that has been decided on evidence in the instant suit could......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Oriental Bank Ltd. ..........Petitioner Vs. Rina Alam and another ......Respondent Judgment July 5, 2004. Result: The petition is dis......rocedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 11 The matter in issue was not at all in controversy in the previous suit and that the same was not litigated upon or any decision arrived at by the Artha Rin Adalat and, as such, the issue that has been decided on evidence in the instant suit could not opera......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Oriental Bank Ltd. ..........Petitioner Vs. Rina Alam and another ......Respondent Judgment July 5, 2004. Result: The petition is dismissed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 5 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 171
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....rt High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Mir Hashmat Ali J Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury............... Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The ......High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Mir Hashmat Ali J Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury............... Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The Rule i...... Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Mir Hashmat Ali J Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury............... Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The Rule is di...... Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Mir Hashmat Ali J Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury............... Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Monajjel Hossain Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......in, 2002 and that the said Magistrate by an order of the same date directed the Investigation Officer to add relevant section of the aforesaid Ain and to have the case transferred to the Druta Bichar Adalat within 24 hours if there are ingredients. 3. Thereafter, the Investigating Officer fil......Khan alias Mintoo.......................Petitioner vs State, Represented by the DC......................Respondent Judgment March 24th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate, with him), Instructed by Md. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 92
State Vs. Md. Abu Taber, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....inding on the basis of the evidence to be available with the record. The office is directed to transmit the case record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 556. ......inding on the basis of the evidence to be available with the record. The office is directed to transmit the case record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 556. ...... SK Sinha J. - This reference under section 374 CrPC read with section 25 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman (Bishesh Bidhan) Ain, 1995 has been made by the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Lakshmipur. Condemned prisoner Md. Abu Taher has faced trial before the Bishesh Adalat in Na...... Cases referred to- State Vs. Bahar Miah, Death Reference No. 3 of 2002. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Deputy Attorney General with Mohammed Baset, Assistant Attorney General and Fara Mahmuda, Assistant Attorney General ‑ For the State. Dr. Mohammad Abul Bashar, Advoc..Category: Women and Children | Date: 1 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 164
84189184866084642452828486778475463589569286039025900188991526359502806299