Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1381-1400 of 1468 results.
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......esent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accuse......upreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and anoth......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....l) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division an...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and another …...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and anoth......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J State, represented by the Solicitor to the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......................Petitioner. Vs Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and oth...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ......ustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J State, represented by the Solicitor to the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......................Petitioner. Vs Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others..................................................Respondents ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......iminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. ......ostile. 7. The real cause of the incident appears clearly from the questions put by the defence to PW 1. The defence case is that the boro field in question belongs to four brothers, such as Abdul Hamid (father of appellant's‑Siddique Munshi), Taher Uddin, Rashid and Danesh but that......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
SA Sultan Vs. The State and another, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ......39. ......der sections 420 and 406 of the Penal Code. 2. Respondent No. 2 filed a petition of complaint on 19.8.90 before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka alleging, inter alia, that her husband late Abdul Aziz Al‑Aman used to work in Kuwait and send her money from there; that the accused, a close......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Abdul Mannan and others Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ult, therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of conviction and sentence passed against the appellants is set aside. They may now be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ......nal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Mannan and others .........................Accused‑Appellants. Vs. State ....... .............................................Respondent Judgment ......l bonds. Ed. ......ult, therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of conviction and sentence passed against the appellants is set aside. They may now be released from their respective bail bonds. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Hazrat Ali and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ntenced W imprisonment for life and conviction of Abdul Khaleque under sections 302/34 of the Penal Code is maintained but his sentence of death is commuted to imprisonment for life. Ed. ...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hazrat Ali and others ......................................Condemned prisoners‑Appellants Vs. The State .....................Respondent Judgment August 6, 1991 ......ound the case filed by accused Shamsul Haque as false and consequently filed this Suo motu FIR. Tapan Kumar Piplai interrogated Shamsul Haque, his elder brother Hazrat Ali and his sister's husband Abdul Khaleque who stated to him that they in furtherance of their common intention committed the m......ntenced W imprisonment for life and conviction of Abdul Khaleque under sections 302/34 of the Penal Code is maintained but his sentence of death is commuted to imprisonment for life. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Abdul Matin and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ll continue on the same bail granted by this court earlier and if the trial starts in the meantime, the Sessions Judge, Sunamganj will be free to take them into custody during trial. Ed. ...... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Matin and others........................................Appellants Vs. The State .......................................................Respondent Judgm......ng trial. Ed. ......ll continue on the same bail granted by this court earlier and if the trial starts in the meantime, the Sessions Judge, Sunamganj will be free to take them into custody during trial. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Criminal appeal No. 3 of 1975. (From the judgment and order dated 24-7-1972 passed by the erstwhile High Court of Bangladesh in Criminal Appeal No. 581 of 1966). Judgment: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J.&md......ud Hussain, C. J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain. J. D.C. Bhattacharya. J. Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury……..... Appellant Vs. State…………...Respondent. Judgment &n...... transportation for life. The convicts then preferred an appeal by special leave to the Federal Court of Pakistan. The appeal was heard by four Judges and the judgment was delivered by his Lordship Abdul Rashid, the Chief Justice. The view taken by him is that a finding of acquittal can not be co......ng so the High Court committed no illegality. In the result the appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is directed to surrender to his bail to serve out the sentence. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sirajuddin alias Siraj Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ......sent: Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, C.J. Ahsanuddin Chowdhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. D.C. Bhattacharya, J. Sirajuddin alias Siraj…...Appellant. Vs. The State ……...Respondent. Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Cases ......acharya, J. Sirajuddin alias Siraj…...Appellant. Vs. The State ……...Respondent. Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Cases Referred to: Shaikh Abdul Gaffar Vs. Downing Jwala Prasad (A.I.R. 1926 Patna 465), Mosaher Dome Vs. Emperor (A.I.R. 194......e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Abul Hossain & ors. Vs. The State and anr., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......n (Criminal) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. D. C. Bhattacharya, J. Fazle Munim, J. Abul Hossain & ors………...Petitioners. Vs. The State and anr………...Respondents. Judgment April ......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Cr.P.C. and on conclusion of the trial they were found guilty and convicted under section 19(A) & (f) of the Arms Act read with President's Order No. 50 of 1972, namely, Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order and sentenced to rigorous imprison...... F.K.M.A. Munim J Abdur Razzaque & anr………………..Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. ...... submitted a charge-sheet against them. Besides the complainant P.W.I, four other witnesses, namely, P.W. 2 Syed Ali Gazi, P.W. 3 Noor Mohammad Mondal, P.W. 4, Afazuddin Biswas and P.W. 5 S.I. Abdul Bari were examined in respect of recovery of the incriminating articles. 4. The learn...... in the trial held against them. It will be expedient to mention here that the Federal Court as regards the examination of the accused took similar view in similar manner in the case of Abdul Wahab Vs. The Crown reported in 7 DLR (FC) 87. 8. It may be noted that the High Court Divisi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J The State.....................Appellant. Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others .................Respondents. ......s in the case of Joygun Bibi Vs. State 12 D.L.R. (S.C.) 157 and in the case of Maqbool Hossain vs. State in the same volume at page 217. Joygun Bibi faced a trial along with one Abdul Majid for abetting the murder of her husband Abdus Samad. Abdul Majid implicated Joygun Bibi ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J: The petitioner along with one Akkas AH Dafadar faced a trial on three charges viz. under section 148 read with Article II(c) of Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunal) Order, 1972, 364/34 and 302/34 in the alternative under......tion 364. The law in respect of the charge for the offence of abduction followed by murder and the recovery of the dead body has been clearly laid down by this court in the case of Hafez Abul Khair Vs. The State in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1975 of this court. Needless to say that the decision of...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
K. M. Zaker Hossain Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J: The petitioner K.M. Zaker Hossain faced a trial in the Court of the Special Judge, Pabna on two charges namely, under section 409 of the Bangladesh Penal Code as well as under section 5 (2) of Act II of 1947. He was acquired of the char......hmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J K. M. Zaker Hossain................Petitioner Vs. The State.............................Respondent Judgment Feb. 21, 197......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....al No. 1, Bogra. 2. The appellant along with 11 others were put on trial before the aforesaid Special Tribunal on charges under section 302/34 Penal Code read with Article 11 (a) and (b) of the Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunal) Order, 1972, which is commonly known as President's Orde......l) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment April 21, 1977. Result: The ap......passed by the Government; while the order of conviction and sentence passed against the appellant was upheld by the High Court Division. 4. The case of the prosecution briefly stated was that Abdul Jabbar Dewan along with his wife, children and nephews Abu Bakar, Altaf Hassain and Amjad Hoss......n of the appellant as well as of Pakistan Army in killing Saimuddin in the manner it were done. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 246. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf Vs. Appellate Tribunal and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e cigarettes and another shopkeeper named Harunur Rashid. The police after investigation submitted a charge sheet when the appellant faced the trial before the Special Tribunal under section 392, Bangladesh Penal Code read with section 28 of the Special Powers Act. The trial ended in conviction ......Mahmud Hossain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf.................................Appellant. Vs. Appellate Tribunal and another............................... Respondent. Judgment A......nces having a strong bearing upon the quantum of punishment had been either ascertained or not correctly estimates the High Court." 10. The Supreme Court of Pakistan reiterated this view again in Abdul Khaliq Vs. State, PLD 1964 (SC) 482 at page 494 in refusing to interfere with a sentence on st......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Ashraf Ali Sikdar and another Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....w was not vitiated for want of any previous sanction of the District Magistrate under section 29 of the Arms Act as the instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is d......sanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattachary J Ashraf Ali Sikdar and another........................Appellant. Vs. The State........................ Respondent Judgment &nbs......e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......e instant case falls within the ambit of a special enactment, namely, the Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order, 1972. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Akhtar Hossain Khan & others Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....rate or Special Tribunal as contemplated under section 36(2)(b) of the Act In support of his argument the learned counsel relied upon a decision of Appellate Division in the case of solicitor. Bangladesh Vs. A T. Mridha reported in 26 D.L.R. 17 to show that a case which was pending with the......C J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Mumin J Akhtar Hossain Khan & others .................Appellants. Vs. The State..............................................Respondent Judgment ......t) Rafique-ul-Huq, Advocate and Mainul Hossain, Advocate, Court, appeared on 12.3.76 with permission of Court—For the Appellant. Faquer Shahabuddin Ahmed, Attorney-General with Abdul Wadud Bhuiya, Assistant Attorney-General, Shah Abu Nayeem, Advocate instructed by......which charge-sheet has been, submitted and cognizance has been taken under P.O. 50 after its repeal is' be tried by the Special Magistrate or the Special Tribunal as the case may be. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 113
102410221017101310121001988985975968964958944932931928927924917912