Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 17 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 1
Md. Kalu Bhuiyan@ Kalu Miah Vs. Special Tribunal No.II, Comilla and another, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....se is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 124. ......hat has been stated above, the rule is discharged without any order as to costs. M.H. Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 124. ....... This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 124. ......rt High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Ruhul Islam CJ M. H. Rahman J Md. Kalu Bhuiyan@ Kalu Miah................................Petitioner Vs. Special Tribunal No.II, Comilla and another.............Respondents Judgment June..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 2
M/s. Abdur Rahman Abdul Ghani Vs. M/s. East and West Steamship Co. and anoÂther, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ng Bank Limited Vs. Rambler Cycle Co. Ltd. (1959) 3 All. E.R. 182 (PC). Lawyers Involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Advocate instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Hafizullah, Advocate, instructed by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos.1 ......costs, the judgment of the High Court of East Pakistan is set aside and the judgment and decree of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 130. ......ted in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 130. ...... Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J M/s. Abdur Rahman Abdul Ghani……………………………….Appellant Vs. M/s. East and West Steamship Co. and another…......Respondents Judgment ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 357
Tahurul Karim @ Tahurul Karim Khan Chowdhury Vs. Abdul Hashim and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....since Hashim made his application on 10-6-69 it must fails because it is made after the expiry of the earlier period on 20-5-69]. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 8. ......since Hashim made his application on 10-6-69 it must fails because it is made after the expiry of the earlier period on 20-5-69]. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 8. ......learned subordinate Judge appears to have relied upon a decision of the Dacca High Court in the case of Munshi Tamijuddin Howlader & others vs. Altafuddin Monday and others 20 DLR 901. Mr. Raipur Rahman finds it difficult to explain away the non-examination of the process server and absence of t...... Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Ranadhir Sen J Tahurul Karim @ Tahurul Karim Khan Chowdhury………………Petitioner Vs. Abdul Hashim and others……………………&hel..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 5
Mainuddin Khan Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....te................................................Opposite party Judgment April 19, 1977 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mirza Golam Hafiz with Mr. Md. Abdul Aziz—For the petitioner. No one—For opposite party. Judgment A......hment Division, Government of Bangladesh for information and necessary action in the matter. M.A. Khaliq, J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 29. ......Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mirza Golam Hafiz with Mr. Md. Abdul Aziz—For the petitioner. No one—For opposite party. Judgment Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J.—This rule arises out of an application for quashing the proceedings in C.R......preme Court High Court Division (Criminal RevisionalJurisdiction) Present: A.R. Chowdhury J M. A. Khaliq J Mainuddin Khan................................Petitioner Vs. State................................................Opposite party Judgment Apr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 19 Apr, 1977 | Hits: 1
Khulna Tobacco Industries Limited Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Khulna and another
....re the Rule is discharged with costs. The cost is assessed at 30 (thirty) Gold Mohurs. M.H. Rahman J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 331. ......re the Rule is discharged with costs. The cost is assessed at 30 (thirty) Gold Mohurs. M.H. Rahman J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 331. ......d. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 331. ...... (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Ruhul Islam CJ M. H. Rahman J Khulna Tobacco Industries Limited…………………Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Khulna and another………………...Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1977 | Hits: 2
Category: Corporate Law | Date: 11 Apr, 1977 | Hits: 2
M/s. Jamal Jute Baling and Co. Vs. M/s. M. Sarkies and Son, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....rt of Pakistan delivered on 6th October, 1971 is valid. For the reasons, we dismiss the appeal but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......rt of Pakistan delivered on 6th October, 1971 is valid. For the reasons, we dismiss the appeal but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......on Army surrendered at Dacca, before the Allied Joint Command, and the Proclamation of IndepenÂdence became effective retrospectively from 26th March, 1971. On 11th January, 1972, Shaikh Mujibur Rahman, as the President, issued ProÂvisional Constitution Order which provided amongst others, th...... (Civil) Present: Ahasanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J M/s. Jamal Jute Baling and Co..........Appellant Vs. M/s. M. Sarkies and Son..............Respondent Judgment March 21, 19..Category: Contract Law | Date: 21 Mar, 1977 | Hits: 320
Md. Sharif and others Vs. M. Baharuddin Chowdhury and the State, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 344. ......ar, North, Chittagong against the accused-petitioners is hereby quashed. Mohammad Habibur Rahman J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 344. ......- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 344. ...... Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J Mohd. Habibur Rahman J Md. Sharif and others …………………………..Petitioners Vs. M. Baharuddin Chowdhury and the State.............Opposite Parties Judgment Marc..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 9 Mar, 1977 | Hits: 1
Owner, Abul Hashem Vs. Owners, Haji Mohammad Suruj Miah and anther, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
..... A.I R. 1961 Bom. 200 Lawyers Involved: Syed Azizul Huq with Sultan Hoisain Khan, Advocates—For the Appellant, (In Appeal No.12 of 1967 and Respondents (In Appeal No.1 of 1968). Md. Joynal Abedin with Mozammel Haque Khan, Advocate–For Respondent (In appeal No.1 of 1968 an......ct the parties to bear their costs in the appeals. M.H. Rahman J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 149. ...... 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 149. ......ties interested in the Vessel M.L. "Madina", the Owner being Abul Hashem…...........................Appellant, (In Appeal No.12 of 1967 and Respondents in Appeal No.1 of 1 968.) Vs. Owners of the Vessel "M.L. Jalamani" Haji Mohammad Suruj Miah and anther…...Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Mar, 1977 | Hits: 4
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1977 | Hits: 173
M/s. Free School Street Property Ltd. Dacca Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....sult: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khandker with M. B. Rahman–For the Petitioner. Mostafa Kamal, Advocate-General with Quazi Shafiuddin Ahmed and A. H. Md. Saadat Ali Khan—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 495 of 1974. In the matt......e absolute. The petitioner is entitled to costs of this application which is assessed at 35 G. Ms. M. H. Rahman J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 1. ......I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 1. ...... (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Ruhul Islam CJ M.H. Rahman J M/s. Free School Street Property Ltd. Dacca………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and another……………………&hell..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 3 Feb, 1977 | Hits: 3
BangÂladesh and others Vs. M/s. Speedbird Navigation Co. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....awful authority and are as such of no legal effect. In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 101. ......awful authority and are as such of no legal effect. In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 101. ......ed. In November, 1971 the partnership was again reconstituted by the remaining 3 partners K.P. Mahmud, Mohammad Kamal, H. Amir Ali along with 3 new partners namely, M.S. Islam Chowdhury, Mujibur Rahman and Syed Mohammad in place of the aforesaid retried partners. On the 6th of January, 197...... Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Govt. of People's Republic of Bangladesh and others……………..Appellants Vs. M/s. Speedbird Navigation Co. and others………………&he..Category: Others | Date: 27 Jan, 1977 | Hits: 217
Nur Hossain & Nur Hossain Howlader Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
.... went to the place of occurrence and saw that P W. 1 was showing one revolver and was telling that those were recovered from accused Nur Hossain. In cross-examination he stated Alauddin Mia, Nur Md. and NesaruddinSikdar are the local respectable. He further stated that he knew nothing about the......e may be set at liberty fort with if not wanted in any other connection. Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 405 ...... accused and another, and at about 4-30 P.M. in Sarikal Hat Police found that the accused and another were loitering suspiciously. The police therefore encircled them and on search P.W.1 Naik Mujibur Rahman recovered a revolver and a few cartridges and a cycle chain, material exts. 1, 2 and 3 and on......iction) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J Nur Hossain & Nur Hossain Howlader…………………Appellant Vs. State…………………………&helli..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 15 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 1
DR. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....petitioner which we assess at 20 (twenty) gold mohurs. 31. The rule is accordingly made absolute with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 12 ......petitioner which we assess at 20 (twenty) gold mohurs. 31. The rule is accordingly made absolute with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 12 ......te with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 12 ......ial Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Dr. Nurul Islam………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others ……………..Respondents Judgment..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 5
Shafiuddin Mia Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....our instance the learned Attorney-General appeared and assisted us in the disposal of the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 127. ......our instance the learned Attorney-General appeared and assisted us in the disposal of the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 127. ......our instance the learned Attorney-General appeared and assisted us in the disposal of the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 127. ...... Division (Criminal) Present: ABM Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Shafiuddin Mia.........................................Appellant. Vs. The State…………………………&h..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 6 Dec, 1976 | Hits: 147
Controller of Imports & Exports Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. Dacca and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....R (SFC) 385 ; Federation of Pakistan Vs. Tamizuddin Lhan, (1955) 7 DLR (FC) 291;Golam Zamin Vs. A.B. Khandker, (1964) 16 DLR 486; Mir Ahmed Nawaz Khzn Vs. Superintendent, (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 338; Md. Yusuf Vs. Chief Settle, & Reh. Comr (1968) 20 DLR (SC) 187; Wijeshiya Vs. Amit (1965) 3. AER...... already been considered by us. In the result, all the twenty-eight appeals are allowed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 283. ...... already been considered by us. In the result, all the twenty-eight appeals are allowed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 283. ......J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J FKMA Munim J Controller of Imports & Exports, Govt. of Pakistan (Now Bangladesh) and others..................Appellants (In all the cases) Vs. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. Dacca and others.......Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 20-D of 196..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1976 | Hits: 226
Md. Nazimuddin Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (HCD)
....Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Ruhul Islam J A. T. M. Masud J Amirul Islam Chowdhury J Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J A. M. Choudhury J Md. Nazimuddin...................................Appellant Vs. The State........................irul Islam Chowdhury J.—I agree Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree. Abdul Momith Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 49. ......(1962) Lah. 662; Khushiram Halidas, PLD (1969)Kar. 875; Dammal All AIR (1936) P.3: Indira, AIR (1956) (SC) 77. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rouf with Khademul Islam Chowdhury and Md. Luthfar Rahman Mazumdar—For Petitioner. K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan Ass......nt: Ruhul Islam J A. T. M. Masud J Amirul Islam Chowdhury J Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J A. M. Choudhury J Md. Nazimuddin...................................Appellant Vs. The State...........................................Respondent Judgment July 29,..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jul, 1976 | Hits: 2
Salamat Khan Vs. Q.G. Ahad, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... M. H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, with B.B. Roy Chowdhury and B.K. Das, Advocates, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, with Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent.......es and we reject them. In the result the appeal is dismissed but in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 271. ......ker, Senior Advocate, with B.B. Roy Chowdhury and B.K. Das, Advocates, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, with Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil A...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Salamat Khan...............................Appellant Vs. Q.G. Ahad...………………………&hellip..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 20 Jan, 1976 | Hits: 352
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 20 Nov, 1975 | Hits: 149