Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1421-1440 of 1593 results.
Yaor Mia (Md) and another Vs. Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....which were not alive when PO No. 88 of 1972 was promulgated being transaction past and closed. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......er: "In Abdus Sattar Mallick vs Younus Mallick and ors, 12 DLR 849 the question of pre-emption under section 26F, Bengal Tenancy Act, came up for consideration before Hamoodur Rahman, J (as his Lordship then was) and on examination of a number of cases it was held that oper...... Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others..................Respondents Judgment October 18, 2005. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951). President’s Order No. 88 of 1972, Section 95(4)(5) & 95A Re-conveyance was made during pen......ury J Yaor Mia (Md) and another .......................Appellants Vs. Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others..................Respondents Judgment October 18, 2005. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951). President’s ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Sec., Min. of Food, Government of BD & ors Vs. Md. Sirajuddin Ahmed & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aka 3,000 in favour of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 within two months from the date of receipt of this order by the trial Court, in default, this appeal shall stand dismissed. Ed. ......aka 3,000 in favour of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 within two months from the date of receipt of this order by the trial Court, in default, this appeal shall stand dismissed. Ed. ......vidently wrong and not maintainable in law. In the interest of justice, the case must be sent back on remand to the trial Court for giving reasonable opportunity to the appellant to contest the suit……..……(13 & 14) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Kh......of Food, Government of Bangladesh and others..................Appellants Vs. Md. Sirajuddin Ahmed and others......................Respondents Judgment June 20, 2005. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 80. Mandatory period of t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abu Dakar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lotment of a plot to the writ petitioner. 5. So, there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......lotment of a plot to the writ petitioner. 5. So, there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......, Ministry of Works, Housing and Settlement and ors....... ... ......Petitioners vs Md. Abu Dakar and others... ..................Respondents Judgment February 16th, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
....decisions arrived at by the High Court Division. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in these two petitions.
Accordingly, these are dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: ......decisions arrived at by the High Court Division. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in these two petitions.
Accordingly, these are dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: ......eported in: .............Petitioners
Vs.
Khashru Miah.......................Respondent
Judgment
January 11, 2004.
Result:
The petitions are dismissed.
The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951), section 81(1)
The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102
A regis..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Dulal Chandra Das & ors Vs. Ratan Chandra Sarker and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....tion, both the appeals are allowed without any order as to cost, the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 149 and 560 of 1996 are set aside. Ed. ......tion, both the appeals are allowed without any order as to cost, the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 149 and 560 of 1996 are set aside. Ed. ......by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 149 and 560 of 1996 are set aside. Ed. ......it on consideration of the alleged long adverse possession of the plaintiff. Being aware that the property was enlisted as enemy property, he purchased it from the vendor by a kabala dated 25.3.85. Consequently he acquired no title in the case property on the basis of his kabala deed.&nbs..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abdur Rashid Mollah Vs. Bangladesh, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....r the appellant in the case of Bangladesh vs. Amena Khatun reported in 55 DLR (AD) 55. The appeal is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......r the appellant in the case of Bangladesh vs. Amena Khatun reported in 55 DLR (AD) 55. The appeal is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......t in the case of Bangladesh vs. Amena Khatun reported in 55 DLR (AD) 55. The appeal is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control Management and Disposal) Order, 1972 (President's Order No. 16 of 1972), article 7 The Abandoned Building (Supplementary Provision) Ordinance, 1985 (LIV of 1985), section 5 Abandoned property in possession of the government could only be..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Bijoy Kumar Chakroborty Vs. Md. Muzaffar Hossain , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ph Act, 1918. 13. In that view of the matter, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ....... Case Referred To: Magistrate, Lahore vs Sayed Fayezuddin and others 17 DLR (SC) 309. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—The Respondents...... J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bijoy Kumar Chakroborty......................Petitioner Vs. Md. Muzaffar Hossain being dead his heirs Hamida Begum and others..........…Respondents Judgment August 24th, 2005. The Cinematograph Act, 191......roborty......................Petitioner Vs. Md. Muzaffar Hossain being dead his heirs Hamida Begum and others..........…Respondents Judgment August 24th, 2005. The Cinematograph Act, 1918 (Act II of 1918), section 5 There are places of wors..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Qazi Karnal Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....bsolute and it is hereby directed that the name of the appellant be mutated in place of the original lessee Md. Abdul Matin, in the relevant registers and papers of the respondents. Ed. ......dul Matin, in the relevant registers and papers of the respondents. Ed. ....... ......cases. A J Mohammad Ali, Advocate instructed by Md. SaJadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record - For respondent Nos. 1‑3 in CA No. 7 of 1992. Ex parte ‑ Respondent Nos. 1-4 in CA No. 56/90. Ex parte ‑ Respondent No. 4 in CA No. 7/92. Civil Appeal No. 56 of 1990..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Abdur Rashid Vs. Momtaz Ali Karikar and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Single Judge of the High Court Division is liable to be set aside and the pre‑emptor is entitled to pre‑emption. In the result the appeal is allowed without cost, Ed. ......09;emption. In the result the appeal is allowed without cost, Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Karnal J Latifur Rahman J Abdur Rashid ........ ...... Pre-emptors-Appellant Vs. Momtaz Ali Karikar and others…&h......mtaz Ali Karikar and others………………….. Pre-emptee-Respondents Judgment March 12, 1992. Cases Referred to- 36 DLR (AD) 1, 51 CWN 644. Lawyers Involved: Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellant..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Subash Chandra Halder & another Vs. Abdul Bari & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......thout any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......74; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ...... -For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by M Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - for the Respondent No.1. Not Represented – Respondent Nos. 2‑3. Civil Appeal No. 5 of 1992. (From the Judgment and order dated 29th May, 1991 passed by the High Court Division i..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Habibur Rahman Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....is outside of the net. For the above reasons we find no ment in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ...... is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ......is outside of the net. For the above reasons we find no ment in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ......Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent No. 4. Civil Appeal No. 13 of 1987 (From the Judgment and Order dated 24.11.85 passed by the High Court Division, Barisal Bench in Civil Revision No. 311 of 1981) Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Shamser Ali (Md) and others Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....tion of the document. Consequently the judgment is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without cost and the judgment of the lower appellate Court is restored. Ed. ......, the appeal is allowed without cost and the judgment of the lower appellate Court is restored. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shamser Ali (Md) and others ……………………Appellants. Vs. ......9; For the Appellant. M Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1988 (From the Judgment and order dated 24th November, 1985 passed by the High Court Division, Rangpur Bench in Civil Revision No. 1627 of 1981) Judgm..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November 21 st, 1991. Lawyers I......ppellant. Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on -Record-For the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Not represented-Respondent Nos 3 and 5. Civil Appeal No. 29 of 1990. (From the Judgment and Order dated 6.7.89 passed by..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
.... the superior
Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the
Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order
of refusal.
Ed.
......y the
Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order
of refusal.
Ed.
......rder
of refusal.
Ed.
......y Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate‑on‑Record‑
For Respondent No. 4.
Moazzem
Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For
the Respondent Nos. 5-6.
Contempt
Petition No. 1 of 1990.
(Application for Contempt of Court
arising ou..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
....eal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Four months' time from date is granted to remove the structures, machineries, etc. from the disputed land.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
....... from the disputed land.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......t Dhaka was acquired by the Central Government of India under Rule 75A (2) of the Defence of India Rules, by a Notification dated 10.7.46 published in the Calcutta Gazette on 17.10.46. M/S Allenberry & Co. established a factory for manufacture of drums on 12.50 acres of the aforesaid acquired la......pellant
Vs.
Director, Military Lands and Cantonment Directorate, Ministry of Defence, Dhaka Cantonment and others……………………..Respondents
Judgment
March 5, 1992.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (M Nurullah, Senior Adv..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
.... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ......s to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ......ndent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The appeal is dismissed. The Registration Act,1908 (Act XVI of 1908),Section 47 The Transfer of Property Act,1882 (Act IV of 1882), Section 53A A sale- deed which is registered will relate back to its own date of execution not of any dat..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...., the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ...... appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Joynal Abedin and others…………….. Defendant‑Appellants Vs. ............ Plaintiff‑Respondents Judgment January 28th, 1992. Case Referred to- Abdullah & 3 others Vs. Abdul Karim & others 20 DLR (SC) 205. Lawyers Involved: SR Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Miah Abdul Ga..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ion (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Musa Ali ..................Appellant &n......p; Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1990 Lawyers Involved: Mia A Gafur, Advocate‑on‑Record-For the Appell..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ssed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......uit was accordingly decreed excepting 6 acres of land in item No. 1 of Schedule Ka land. The suit was also decreed in preliminary form in respect of those lands for which partition was sought. 5. On appeal by the appellant and defendant No. 2, the High Court Division fully concurred with the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......vision (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker ..........Plaintiff‑Appellant. Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others ..........Defendan......rker and others ..........Defendant‑Respondents. Judgment August 11th, 1991. Cases Referred to- P Lakshmi Reddy Vs. L Lakshmi Reddy AIR 1957 (SC) 314; Dwijendra Narain Roy Vs. Joges Chandra De AIR 1924 Cal 600; AIR 1932 Privy Council 92,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
10791075107410671063106210581047104010351032102710261023101510141010100910081006