Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha Vs. Abdul Jakir and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......is not maintainable and that the suit property along with other properties was acquired by the Government and the acquisition was notified in the official Gazette and the plaintiff has no title and possession in the suit property. 4. The trial Court decreed the suit by judgment and..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ......ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ......tending, inter alia, that the aforesaid house was allotted by the Government to his father Sk. Shamsuddin by registered lease deed 11-2-63 for 99 years. The lessee Sk. Shamsuddin was inducted into possession of the house and had been living there with other members of his family including the wr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Yaor Mia (Md) and another Vs. Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....which were not alive when PO No. 88 of 1972 was promulgated being transaction past and closed. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......which were not alive when PO No. 88 of 1972 was promulgated being transaction past and closed. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......A. & T. Act, transfer of land by out and out sale together with agreement of re-conveyance constitute complete usufructuary mortgage for a maximum period of 7 years and in that case possession shall lie with the mortgagee. In such a case provisions of Transfer of Property Act shal..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Sec., Min. of Food, Government of BD & ors Vs. Md. Sirajuddin Ahmed & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aka 3,000 in favour of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 within two months from the date of receipt of this order by the trial Court, in default, this appeal shall stand dismissed. Ed. ......aka 3,000 in favour of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 within two months from the date of receipt of this order by the trial Court, in default, this appeal shall stand dismissed. Ed. ......nager, Central Storage Department by its memo dated 16-3-1997 informed the Government Pleader, Narayanganj, that the entire suit land measuring 19.60 acres including suit plots have been under the possession and enjoyment of the Food Department since 1956 and the same was already acquired. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & others Vs. Khashru Miah, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....decisions arrived at by the High Court Division. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in these two petitions. Accordingly, these are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......e Sub-Divisional Officer executed 39 permanent deeds of settlement which were registered on 15-11-1975. In the manner, aforesaid petitioner and the other applicants each got 2.13 acres of Government khas land through registered deed of settlement for a period of 15 years with effect from the last o......ions. There was a prohibitory condition against alienation before 15 years. 4. The further case of the Khasru Mia was that the petitioner paid salami vide DCR dated 17-11-1975 and got delivery of possession on 18-11-1975. The land was mutated in his name in RoR khatian No. 454. The petitioner pr..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Dulal Chandra Das & ors Vs. Ratan Chandra Sarker and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....tion, both the appeals are allowed without any order as to cost, the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 149 and 560 of 1996 are set aside. Ed. ......tion, both the appeals are allowed without any order as to cost, the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 149 and 560 of 1996 are set aside. Ed. ...... November 3, 2003. The Limitation Act, 1908 (Act IX of 1908), section 149 As the property vested in the Government by operation of law in 1978, to claim any right by adverse possession, the plaintiff is required to possess the suit land for more than sixty years. Thus the ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abdur Rashid Mollah Vs. Bangladesh, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....r the appellant in the case of Bangladesh vs. Amena Khatun reported in 55 DLR (AD) 55. The appeal is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......r the appellant in the case of Bangladesh vs. Amena Khatun reported in 55 DLR (AD) 55. The appeal is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......d Disposal) Order, 1972 (President's Order No. 16 of 1972), article 7 The Abandoned Building (Supplementary Provision) Ordinance, 1985 (LIV of 1985), section 5 Abandoned property in possession of the government could only be included in the ‘Ka’ list of abandoned building in re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Qazi Karnal Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....bsolute and it is hereby directed that the name of the appellant be mutated in place of the original lessee Md. Abdul Matin, in the relevant registers and papers of the respondents. Ed. ......bsolute and it is hereby directed that the name of the appellant be mutated in place of the original lessee Md. Abdul Matin, in the relevant registers and papers of the respondents. Ed. ......0.00 if paid in lump or Tk. 2,35,000.00 if paid in 4 successive annual instalments was issued to him by the former DIT on 14.9.79. On payment of one instalment on 8.10.79 respondent No. 4 was given possession of 9 kathas 13 chataks of land of the said plot on 24.10.79. A lease deed for 99 years w..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Abdur Rashid Vs. Momtaz Ali Karikar and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Single Judge of the High Court Division is liable to be set aside and the pre‑emptor is entitled to pre‑emption. In the result the appeal is allowed without cost, Ed. ...... Single Judge of the High Court Division is liable to be set aside and the pre‑emptor is entitled to pre‑emption. In the result the appeal is allowed without cost, Ed. ......ed in proceeding for pre‑emption. But if a preemption is sought to be resisted on the ground that no transfer took place under the relevant kabala. in that vendor did not part with his possession but simply made a show of transfer for any purpose, such as to put away his creditors, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Subash Chandra Halder & another Vs. Abdul Bari & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......rom the Government on payment of annual lease money, that inspite of concurrent decision against the plaintiff the new transferees of the suit land are unlawfully creating disturbance in the peaceful possession of the suit property by the lessee and that the respondent and his brother are necessary ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Habibur Rahman Vs. Sree Jogiswar Roy Chowdhury Chand and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... second point urged by Mr. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed assumes a mere academic importance. He submits that the certificate sale of the suit property on 16.11.60 was not a mortgage sale, but a sale for recovery of money. Under section 20 of the Public Demands Recovery Act the purchaser, namely, defen......is outside of the net. For the above reasons we find no ment in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 247. ......n 7.9.56 and it was registered on 9.9.56. It was agreed that the sale deed would be executed within a year after obtaining permission and on receipt of the balance of the consideration money and that possession of the property would be made over thereafter. The appellants tendered the balance amount..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......akh 1354 BS at an yearly rent of Tk. 7600. The appellant has obtained a compromise decree on 19.7. 77 from the 2nd court of Munsif, Barisal in Title Suit No. 1 of 1977 wherein his right, title and possession in the suit premises has been decreed. 4. The plaintiff-respondents also filed T..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ......h January, 1990 the petitioner's learned Advocate filed an application with the said letter of the learned Advocate in the execution court for the stay of the execution. As the writ of delivery of possession had already been issued by the executing court to the Nazir Khan a second petition was f..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
.... by which the defendant‑respondent was claiming title over the suit land, be declared as illegal, void, etc. Later, the prayer was amended so as to include a prayer for permanent injunction as also recovery of possession. 3. One Alauddin Bhuiyan was the owner of the suit land. He sold the suit ......r date will prevail over the defendant's sale‑deed dated 11.7.75. The defendant entered into possession on 30.12.72 and the suit having been filed in 1976 the plaintiff was entitled to a decree for khas possession. During the revisional hearing, the defendant claimed protection of his possession u......e defendant‑respondent was claiming title over the suit land, be declared as illegal, void, etc. Later, the prayer was amended so as to include a prayer for permanent injunction as also recovery of possession. 3. One Alauddin Bhuiyan was the owner of the suit land. He sold the suit land twice, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...., the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ...... land the plaintiffs filed the suit for partition. 3. The suit was contested by defendant Nos. 10, 11, 13‑15 contending, inter alia, that the plaintiff’s have no title and possession; that the suit for simple partition is not maintainable; that the suit property Nos. 1 a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....nd decree passed in Title Suit No. 129 of 1958 of the Court of Munsif, Cox's Bazar. 21. Plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title, confirmation of possession or in the alternative for recovery of khas possession in the suit land and also for permanent injunction. Plaintiff’s c......e first appellate Court by judgment and decree dated 16‑1‑85. 5.The plaintiff‑respondent's suit was for declaration of tide and confirmation of possession or alternatively khas possession in the land of Schedule 2 to the plaint and for permanent injunction. It is his ca......g Bench, affirmed those of the first appellate Court by judgment and decree dated 16‑1‑85. 5.The plaintiff‑respondent's suit was for declaration of tide and confirmation of possession or alternatively khas possession in the land of Schedule 2 to the plaint and for perma..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... did the plaintiff empower her father to sign any partition arrangement on her behalf. The plaintiff prayed for declaration of title and joint possession in Schedule Ka land. declaration of title and recovery of possession in schedule Kha and Ga movable properties and for partition of item Nos. 2‑......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ro who was never empowered by the plaintiff to do so, nor did the plaintiff empower her father to sign any partition arrangement on her behalf. The plaintiff prayed for declaration of title and joint possession in Schedule Ka land. declaration of title and recovery of possession in schedule Kha and ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......nt dated 29 February, 1984 dismissed the same. The concurrent finding was that the suit was bad for defect of parties and that the plaintiff's interest in the suit land was extinguished by adverse possession of the contesting defendant for more than 12 years. 2. Leave to appeal was ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Abdus Sattar Vs. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman and others , 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....he courts below, however, disbelieved the plaintiff’s case of alleged possession and dispossession but at the same time found his title to the suit land. In such a case, the plaintiff can get recovery of possession only if the title was not lost by adverse possession of the defendants for o......low and dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, Title Suit No. 89 of 1964. 2. The said suit in the Additional Court of the Assistant Judge, Sylhet Sadar, was one for declaration of title and khas possession in respect of ‑/4/‑ annas share (schedule 2) out of schedule 1 land. Ad......nd dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, Title Suit No. 89 of 1964. 2. The said suit in the Additional Court of the Assistant Judge, Sylhet Sadar, was one for declaration of title and khas possession in respect of ‑/4/‑ annas share (schedule 2) out of schedule 1 land. Admitte..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62