Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1441-1460 of 6261 results.
.... the Council's officers and employees have not yet been determined by any rules or regulations of the Council which has, however, been following the Government Servants (Efficient and Discipline) Rules, 1960 which have now been repeated and re-enacted by the Government Servants (Discipline and A......ca and others.………………Respondents
Judgment
February 27, 1978.
Result:
The prayer is refused.
Case Referred to-
29 D.L.R. 41
Lawyers Involved:
K.S. Nabi, A. F. AliAsgar—For the Petitioner.
S. R. Paul, wit..
Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 27 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 5
Meheruddin Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....s are directed to pay costs of this rule which we assess at Tk. 500.00 (five hundred). M.H. Rahman J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 426. ......ty Commissioner. This section does not authorize the Government to revise an order of de-requisition which is passed only under section 8. Case Referred to- (1975) 27 DLR (AD) 65. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Serajur Rahman—For the Petitioner. Quazi Shafiuddi..Category: Property Law | Date: 24 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 2
Abdul Aziz Vs. Election Tribunal and Munsif, 2nd Court, Comilla and another, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
.... The Judgment does not show that the Tribunal found and declared valid any ballot papers which had been rejected as invalid by the Presiding Officers under rule 40(4) of the Union Parishad (Election) Rules, 1976. When there was no allegation of tampering with the sealed packets of ballot papers end ..............Petitioner Vs. Election Tribunal and Munsif, 2nd Court, Comilla and another.......Respondents Judgment February 17, 1978. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Md. Shafiqur Rahman—For the Petitioner. ..Category: Election Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 7
Project in charge, Paruma (Eastern) Ltd Vs. Mr. Aminur Rahman Khan and another, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....l absence of a member was not there at all simply because, both the members of the Labour Court were present there all along. Moreover, the Supreme Court's decision was based on interpretation of Rule 34 of the Industrial Disputes Rules 1960. These Rules are no longer in force as the Industrial ......hellip;…………..Respondents Judgment February 17, 1978. Result: The rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- 26 DLR (SC) 33; 27 DLR 158. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, M. Hasan—For Petitioners (In all the petitions) Khon..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 3
Shnmsul Huda Vs. Jalaluddin Ahmed and others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....Huq, Md. Fazlul Huq-For the Appellant. M. Zahir, A.R. Yousuf & T. Rahman— For the Respondents. Appeal from original Decree No. 5 of 1978. with Civil Rule No. 122 (f) of 1978. Judgment K.M. Subhan J.- This appeal by the plaintiff-appellant ...... Chan. Div. 70; Alhaj Abdur Rahman Bhuiya Vs. Comr. of Narayanganj Municipality, 10 DLR 431; Fischer Vs. Secretary of State, ILR 39 Cal. 704; Sheoparsan Singh Vs. Ramnandan Singh, 43 IA 91. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Rafiqul Huq, Md. Fazlul Huq-For the Appellant. ..Category: Company Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 8
Farid Ahmed Vs. The Govt of Bangladesh & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
.... in accordance with law. In the result the rule is made absolute. No order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 300. .....................................Petitioner Vs. The Govt of Bangladesh & others.........Respondents Judgment February 10, 1978. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: A.M.M. Abdul Jalil—For the Petitioner. Quazi Shqfiuddin—For..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 10 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 2
Md. Mahboob Morshed Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....mal, Rezzaque Rahman—For Respondent No.1. Syed J.R. Mudassir Hossain, A.A.G.—For Respondent Nos. 2-4. Writ Petition No. 98 of 1977. Judgment M. H. Rahman J.–This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause why the Order No. 202-E/299(O) dated July......lt: The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Shoib Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh (1975) 27 DLR 315; Md. Ismail Jafar Vs. Director-General Pak. Tel and Tel. Dept. PLD 1967 Kar. 22. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal-For the Petitioner. Mustafa Kamal, Rezzaque Rahman—For ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 9 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 1
....r Rahman—For the Petitioner.
A. R. Yusuf, Abu Sufian Chowdhury Mahbubul Hoq—For the Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 43 of 1977.
Judgment
Shahabuddin Ahmed J.—This Rule under Article 102 of the Constitution calls in question an order dated 5.11.76 of the......
Vs.
Urea Fertilizer Factory Employees Union, Ghorasal Palash, Dacca and others....Respondents
Judgment
February 7, 1978.
Result:
The rule is made absolute.
Lawyers Involved:
Asrarul Hossain, Khaliur Rahman—For the Petitioner.
A. R. Yusuf, A..
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 7 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 1
....d Labour Court is set aside, there will, however, be no order as to costs.
M.H. Rahman J.-I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 211.
......t such a worker cannot file an application under section 34: his remedy lies in an application under section 25 of the Standing Orders Act, 1965…………(2)
Lawyers Involved:
ShaheedAlam—For the petitioner.
Mohd. A. Aziz—For the..
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 6 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 3
Progati Khudra Babashayee Samabaya Samity Ltd Vs. Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....r was passed without lawful authority and of no legal effect. There will be no order as to costs. M.H. Rahman J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 152 ......yee Samabaya Samity Ltd...........Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh.................................Respondent Judgment February 3, 1978. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Islam— For the Petitioner. Abdul Hamid Chowdhury—For..Category: Administrative Law, Civil Law | Date: 3 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 2
Fazlul Huq Chowdhury Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....pondent 3, Joint Secretary, Establishment Division, compulsorily retiring the petitioner, a Circle Officer (Revenue) from service under rule 3(3)(b) of the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1976. 2. Facts of the case, so far necessary for disposal of this rule, are that the petition......India and another Vs. I. M. Lall, A.I.R., 1948 P.C., 121; A.I.R. 1967, SC-1264; (P.L.D. 1958, S.C. Ind.) 217; Golam Sarkar Vs. Pakistan PLD 1962, S.C. 142; Md. Ismail Hussain, (1975) 27 DLR 354. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Hoque, Zakir Ahmed, Suranjit Sen Gupta—For the Petitioner. ..Category: Civil Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 1
Fazlul Huq Chowdhury Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....pondent 3, Joint Secretary, Establishment Division, compulsorily retiring the petitioner, a Circle Officer (Revenue) from service under rule 3(3)(b) of the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1976. 2. Facts of the case, so far necessary for disposal of this rule, are that the petition...... Cases Referred To- The-High Commissioner for India and another Vs. I. M. Lall, A.I.R., 1948 P.C., 121; Golam Sarkar Vs. Pakistan PLD 1962, S.C. 142; Md. Ismail Hussain, (1975) 27 DLR 354. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Hoque, Zakir Ahmed, Suranjit Sen Gupta—For the Petitioner. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 1
Dr. Rashiduddin Ahmed Vs. Dr. Quamarunnahar Ahmed, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....tiously. The rule is accordingly disposed of with the directions as above. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 208. .............................Petitioner Vs. Dr. Quamarunnahar Ahmed.............................Opposite party Judgment January 20, 1978. Result: The rule is disposed of. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider—for the petitioner. Civil Revision No.1263 ..Category: Family Law | Date: 20 Jan, 1978 | Hits: 4
Abu Bakr Siddique Vs. M.V. Aghia Thalassini and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....ager of Canopus Shipping Agency who managed the vessel concerned on behalf of the owner (defendant No. 2) and has also been looking after the case. Now, rule 51 of the Appendix 5 of the Original Side Rules of this court lays down as follows:- “where no other provision is made by these rul......Thalassini and others.....................Defendants Judgment December 20, 1977. Result: The prayer is refused. Cases Referred To- Annefield's case, 1971 All England Law Reports page 394; Lord Esher M. R. Leduk & Co. Vs. Ward and others (1888) 20 Queen's Ben..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Arbitration Law | Date: 20 Dec, 1977 | Hits: 39
Mohammed Chand Mia & others Vs. Barista Krishna Kundu & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... AIR 1944 Cal. 385 5. Md. NurulHuq with A.B.M. Khairul Haque—For the Petitioners. Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Md. Shafiqur Rahman—For Opposite Party Nos.1 and 2. Civil Rule No. 620 of 1977. Judgment Civil Revifional Jurisdiction. - This rule is directed agai..............Opposite parties Judgment December 15, 1977. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Kailash Chandra Vs Nanda Kumar A.I.R. 1944 Calcutta 385. Lawyers Involved: Kailash Chandra Vs. Nanda Kumar, AIR 1944 Cal. 385 5. Md. NurulHuq with ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 15 Dec, 1977 | Hits: 8
A. K. M. Abdur Rashid and others Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... K. M. Abdur Rashid and others..............Petitioners Vs. The State................................................Respondents Judgment December 15, 1977. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- Empress Vs. Nabln Chundiu Dutta I.L.R. Cal. Volu......s. Emperor A.I.R. 1929; Tarini Yadab and another Vs. The State A.I.R. 1962 Patna page 431; Wilayat Hossain Vs. The State 20 D.L.R. (W.P.) page 4; Golam Kader Vs. The State 22 D.L.R. (W. P.) 268. Lawyers Involved: Chowdhury Jahanara—For Petitioners. Kazi Abdul Wahab—For St..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Dec, 1977 | Hits: 1
Maram Ali Vs. The State and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....hellip;…………………Petitioner Vs. The State and others.....................Respondents Judgment December 9, 1977. Result: the Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Habib Ahmed—For the petitione......ip;…………Petitioner Vs. The State and others.....................Respondents Judgment December 9, 1977. Result: the Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Habib Ahmed—For the petitioner. Rafiqur Rahman&mdash..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Dec, 1977 | Hits: 1
....perties standing in the name of Paresh Chandra Nandi being really the benami properties belonging to the appellant, they could not be regarded as enemy properties.
The High Court having issued a Rule upon the respondents they opposed the said Rule by filing an affidavit-in-opposition and con&sh......Pakistan, (1971) 23 DLR 108; Ananda Mohan Kundu and others Vs. Province of East Pakistan, (1968) 20 DLR 976 980; Watson and Company Vs. Ramchand Dutta and others, LR 17 IA 110: I.L.R. 18 Cal.10.
Lawyers Involved:
B. N. Chowdhhury, Advocate with S.C. Das Advocate, instructed by A Rab-II, Ad..
Category: Property Law | Date: 29 Nov, 1977 | Hits: 112
Aftab Mia Vs. Wahab Ali and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....ellip;.................Petitioner Vs. Wahab Ali and others……………..................Opposite parties Judgment November 25, 1977 Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Meher Ali Mondal Vs.Md. Karam Ali Sarkar, 17 D........R. (S.C) 169; Bangladesh Vs. Md. ShamsulHuq and others (FMA. 356/76);Labhu Ram Vs. Ram Pratab and others, AIR. 1944 (Lahore) 76; Sm. Nripjit Kaur Vs. Sardar Satinder Singh AIR. 1955 (Punj) 190. Lawyers Involved: A. Hasib-For the Petitioner Md. Hannan-For Opposite Parties No.1 and 2 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Nov, 1977 | Hits: 2
Ibrahim Hossain and Delwara Begum Vs. Md. Khorshed Ali and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... Mihiralal & Mihilal Dig Vs. Panchkarl Santra & ors. 54 C.W. N. 637 Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rouf with Sharifuddin Chaklader-For the Petitioners (In all the three Rules). Kaheruddin Ahmed-For the Opposite Parties (In all the three Rules) Civil Rev......s. Farman Ali Mirdha & another 4 D.L.R. 621; Kafiluddin Chowdhury Vs. Dr. Abdus Sattar, 20 D.L.R (Dacca) 122; Mihiralal & Mihilal Dig Vs. Panchkarl Santra & ors. 54 C.W. N. 637 Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rouf with Sharifuddin Chaklader-For the Petitioners (In a..Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Nov, 1977 | Hits: 2
93089265924992478928926792449269942592529273913194249022924191369135712093099319