Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Warish Uddin Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....g the land, buying and installing machinery and constructing saw Mills office. 3. The petitioner has fulfilled all conditions set out in the license. The Mills generates income and revenue for the Government besides creating employment opportunity for the local people. Currently a total of 10 per......e above, the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner deserve no consideration. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 253...Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 127
Dhaka Leather ComÂplex Ltd. BCIC Vs. Sikder Construction Ltd. and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....order as to cost. Order of stay granted in the Rule on 10-Â9‑2002 is hereby recalled and vacated. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 578....... in the schedule to the Limitation Act for making such an application. Article 178 has clearly provided a period of 90 days for making of an application for filing the award in court from the late of service of notice of making of the award. The Court might have been swayed away by a decision of a D..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 190
Bangladesh Parjatan Corporation Vs. Md. Ali Hossain and another, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)
....ation Vs. Shahid Hossain Bhuiyan, 43 DLR (AD) 154; Workers of Bata Shoe Co. represented by Bata Mazdoor League (Regd), Lah Vs. Bata Shoe Co. Ltd. Batapur Lahore 23 DLR (SC), 60; Md. Motiar Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others being Writ Petition No.4540 of 2000; Secretary, Bangladesh Jute ......3.2006 issued under the signature of writ-respondent No.3, Manager (Admn), Bangladesh Parjatan Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation), appellant No.3 herein terminating him from his service as Electrical Foreman of the Corporation under bidhi 50(2) of “বাংলাদেশ à¦..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 156
Delwar Hossain and others Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....l Court, we award cost of Taka 5,000 (five thousand) only upon them. Cost shall be paid to the decree holder respondent Janata Bank. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 585. ...... it is found that the suit is barred by some provision of law, it is the statutory duty of the court to reject the plaint. The provision of Order VII rule 11(d) of The Code can be, thus, pressed into service when the suit is barred by any law. 9. Sections 6 and 7 of The Ain of 1990 may now be not..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Abdul Quader Mollah and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....ivil) Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Nazniun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Government of Bangladesh and others ……………......Petitioners Vs. Abdul Quader Mollah a......ts to provide the petitioners Division-1 status under the Jail Code. There is no merit in this petition, which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 240...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 251
Ishaque Mia (Md.) & another Vs. Abdul Mazid Mollah & others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....kground High Court Division held as follows: "it is true that a Nikah registrar is appointed under rule 5(1) of the said rules" on purely temporary basis until a Nikah registrar is licensed by the Government on regular basis. So the said decree passed in Tide Suit No.26 of 1977 is contrary to the...... multiplicity of suit and further litigation concerning them. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 465. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Sharon Laily Begum Jalil Vs. Abdul Jalil and others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....lean Akhter Jalil and Mohammad Shah Alam Jalil fortnightly and offer gifts, if any, at a time and place convenient to both the parties. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 460........ In the affidavitÂin‑oppositions it is stated by the respondent No.1 that he is a citizen of Bangladesh and on, 27‑4‑76 went to London and had been serving there at different places. While in service in London being acquainted with the father of the petitioner through his maternal uncle and ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 166
Md. Nafaruddin Mollah Vs. Md. Serajuddin Khan & Others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... illegal, ineffective and without jurisdiction. 3. The plaintiff-respondent filed the suit in respect of the schedule 'A' of the plaint stating, inter alia, that the suit land was khas land of the Government and the same was leased out to the petitioners by the then Additional Deputy Commissioner......ce with the impugned judgment. In the result, the application has no merit and accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 164. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Ataur Rahman Vs. Election Commission & Others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....as made by any of the candidates; that pursuant to the Inquiry report submitted by the Commission of Inquiry, the Election Commission decided to hold fresh election on 01.06.2009 at No.60. Shaharpara Government Primary School Centre. Jagannathpur Upazilla, Sunamgonj for the post of Chairman by a not......ies arrived at a correct decision which does not require any interference by this Court. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 99...Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 296
Mazharul Haque Vs. Bulk Management (BanglaÂdesh) Ltd. and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
.... present petition for winding up. The present application is therefore not admitted. It is rejected without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 453. ...... present petition for winding up. The present application is therefore not admitted. It is rejected without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 453. ..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Mahatab Hossain (Md) Vs. Upazila Nirbahi Officer and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....05(4) 86 dated 2-12-1986 (Annexure A 1). The respondent No.l is the Upazila Nirbahi Officer of Pirgonj, Rangpur. The respondent No.2 is the Deputy Commissioner, Rangpur and the respondent No.3 is the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Go...... not be declared to have been made without any lawful authority and to be of no legal effect for having failed to conclude the proceeding drawn against the petitioner within 180 days from the date of service of charge-sheet as contemplated under Rule 58(8) of the Upazila Parishad Karmachari Chakuri ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Mohammad Ismail Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....f Paurashava and Panel Mayor No. 1 of Teknaf Paurashava, Upazila-Teknaf, District—Cox’s Bazar. …………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Co-operative, of the People’s of the People Republic of Bangladesh Secretariat, ......acts. In the result, the Rule is discharged without however any order as to costs. The status-quo order granted in this Rule stands vacated. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) 2010, 360...Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 136
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 371
Abul Hashim (Md.) Vs. Election Commission of Bangladesh, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)
....icable" indicates that the decision on delimitation of the territorial constitution rests with the Election Commission. Again, the expression "administrative convenience" is a matter of policy of the Government which has to be considered keeping in view the ever growing population in the area and it......ight of the petitioner also. There is no merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, the petition is rejected summarily. No cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 490. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 271
Abul Basher Chowdhury Vs. Mehar Khatun, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ppellate Court below calls for any interÂference in revision. In the result the rule is discharged withÂout any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 6. ......al statute and the special statute conÂfers only the right of appeal, maintaining silence over the right of review, can it be said that section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure may be pressed into service and the remedy of review may be made available to the parties? 6. This question has been ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Fazlul Huq Haider @ Mollah Vs. State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....iginal jurisdicÂtion unless the accused has been sent to it a Magistrate duly empowered in this behalf. (2) Additional Sessions Judge and Assistant Sessions Judge shall try such cases only as the Government by general or special order may direct them to try as the Sessions Judge of the division,...... the trial Court immediately. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial as early as possible. Mustafa Kamal J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 1. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Shahryar Murshed and others Vs. Principal, Chittagong Medical College and others, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
.... Chittagong Medical College and others.....................Respondent Judgment May 17, 1994. Result: The Rules are accordingly made absolute. Cases Referred to- Farid Sons Ltd. Vs. Government of Pakistan, 13 DLR (SC) 233; Zakir Ahmed Vs. University of Dacca through its Vice-Chanc...... any lawful authority and, as such, is of no legal effect. The Rules are accordingly made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 482. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 168
Ansarul Huque Vs. Agrani Bank, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....tiously as possible preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the Judgment. Our order dated 12‑2‑96 is recalled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (HCD) (1996) 479. ......ed orders dated 30‑8‑94 accepted the written statement filed by the defendant fixing a date for framing issues even though the defendant did not obtain leave from the Court within ten days of the service of summons to appear and defend the suit in the face of clear requirement of rule 2, Order 3..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87