Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1481-1500 of 3679 results.
Mehedi Hasan Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
...., not this petitioner; (5) that the sale of shares of the said company upon revaluation is permissible under the law as well as the same has not been treated as an offence under any of the law of the land and (6) that, in two other similar cases being Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 26562 of 2009 an......he order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 361.......ending in the Court of Special Judge, Court No.3, Dhaka, should not be quashed and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Prosecution case is that one Mr. Saiful Alam, Assistant Director of the Anti-Corruption Commission (the ACC) has lodged a.............Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Opposite party Judgment June 16, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Yousuf Hossain Humayun, Senior Advocate with Ahsanul Karim, Advocate with Khairul Alam Chowdhury, Advocate with Aminul Haque, Ad..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 173
Noor Alam Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....is application dated 9.9.80 for issuance of a Bank Guarantee for TK. 6,50,000/- for a period of one year to transact the normal business of defendant No. 1 with Bangladesh Biman offering 15 Kathas of land as counter guarantee which valued at Tk. 15,00,000/- under Mouza Gulshan adjacent to Road No. 8......own at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 332.......(decree signed on 4.01.2000) passed by the Subordinate Judge, Additional Commercial Court No.1, Dhaka in Title Suit No.145 of 1999 decreeing the suit. 2. Relevant facts of the case, in short, are that the respondent No.1, Sonali Bank as plaintiff filed a suit being Title Suit No. 145 of 1999 in t...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 332...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Md. Ismail Hossain Vs. Al-haj Syedur Rahman Molla and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....e no objection if the petitioner is allowed to deposit the monthly rent of the case premises in favour of the opposite parties with the House Rent Controller, Narayanganj without any prejudice to the land lord. I have heard the submissions of the learned Advocates and perused the civil revision a...... Md. Ismail Hossain................Petitioner Vs. Al-haj Syedur Rahman Molla and another..............Opposite parties Judgment October 13, 2009. Result: The Rule is disposed. Case Referred to- Md. Osman Vs. Fatema Khatoon and others, 41 DLR 270; Sheik Mohd. Salimullah Vs. ......ioner Vs. Al-haj Syedur Rahman Molla and another..............Opposite parties Judgment October 13, 2009. Result: The Rule is disposed. Case Referred to- Md. Osman Vs. Fatema Khatoon and others, 41 DLR 270; Sheik Mohd. Salimullah Vs. Shafiqul Alam, 43 DLR 113; Rabeya Khatun V......s. Fatema Khatoon and others, 41 DLR 270; Sheik Mohd. Salimullah Vs. Shafiqul Alam, 43 DLR 113; Rabeya Khatun Vs. Md. Saidur Rahman, 56 DLR (AD) 19. Lawyers Involved: Shasti Sarker, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Abdul Quaim, Advocate with him Sarder Abul Hossain, Advocate - For the Opposit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Md. Abdul Bari and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ndamus could be issued in favour of such persons. At this juncture, it will be proper to refer to the decision of constitution Bench of this Court in Rai Shivendra Bahadur Vs. Governing Body of the Nalanda College (AIR 1962 SC 1210). That case arose out of a refusal to promote the writ petitioner th..................................Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others....................Respondents Judgment May 13, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Biman Vs. Rabia Bashri Irene, 55 DLR (AD)132; Sheikh Abdus Sabur Vs.......the signature of the respondent No.3 and thereby transferred all the existing employees of the Cabin Facilities Department of BFCC. Clause (b) of the said Organization Order No.13 of 1989 provides that the employees transferred to BFCC would be functionally and administratively accountable to ......ative Society Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 1981 BLD (AD) 103; Hazerullah Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Board of Management of Abandoned Property, 55 DLR (AD) 15; Yunus Mia Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Public Works & Urban Development, 45 DLR 498; State of Karnataka Vs. Umadevi (3), (2006) 4 SCC 1; Chief ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 145
Sheikh Hasina Wazed @ Sheikh Hasina Vs. State and another, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... the society they live. 62. Further reference may be made to case Afzalul Abedin Vs. Government of Bangladesh reported in 10 BLT 490=6 BLC 601. 63. Wherein Mr. MA Aziz, J held: Judges are not islands. They like all other individuals are human beings. They are neither robots nor do they live li......This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HD) (2011) 40. ...... Court of Special Judge, Court No.2 Dhaka, should not be quashed and or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that one MM Shabbir Hassan, Deputy Director, Anti-Corruption Commission on 9-12-2007 lodged First Inf......D) 147; Ali Akkas Vs. Enayet Hossain,17 BLD (AD) 44=2 BLC (AD) 116; Manindra Nath Vs. Rajendra AIR 1992 (SC) 1815; 7 BCR (AD) 179; Golam Sarwar Hiru Vs. State, 13 MLR (AD) 103; Gokul Chand Dwarkadas Moraka Vs. King, AIR 1948 (PC) 82; Abdul Hakim Vs. State, 45 DLR 352; Syed Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Stat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Maulana Abdul Motin & others Vs. Shah Alam Bhuiyan & others, 1989, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... by the subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.517 of 1987 rejecting the application under Order 26 rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure for holding a local investigation of the suit land. 2. The short fact that will be necessary for the disposal of the Rule is that, the plaintif......s................Petitioners Vs. Shah Alam Bhuiyan & others............Opposite Parties Judgment February 9, 1989. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Akkas Ali and S.R. Karmaker, Advocates - For the Petitioners. Wahidul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate - Fo......nd Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.517 of 1987 rejecting the application under Order 26 rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure for holding a local investigation of the suit land. 2. The short fact that will be necessary for the disposal of the Rule is that, the plaintiff opposite party no.1 filed ......Shah Alam Bhuiyan & others............Opposite Parties Judgment February 9, 1989. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Akkas Ali and S.R. Karmaker, Advocates - For the Petitioners. Wahidul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate - For the Opposite Party No.1. Civil Rev..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque and another Vs. Bangladesh, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....4, the petitioner is Sekandar Ali Mondol, a farmer, living in the village of Khaladbari under Police Station Tangail Sadar in the District of Tangail for generations and owns small piece of ancestral land, part of which he uses as homestead and part for cultivation for subsistence and cash earning o......Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, and others............Respondent (In both the Writ Petitions) Judgment August 28, 1997. Result: The Rules are made absolute-in-part. Cases Referred to- United States of America Vs. Iska W Carmack, 329 US 230-248 (91 Law Edition) of......resolution of the Executive Committee of “BELA” to represent the same and move the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh under Article 102 of the Constitution. Petitioner claims that “BELA” has been active since the year 1991 as one of the leading organizations with document......st 28, 1997. Result: The Rules are made absolute-in-part. Cases Referred to- United States of America Vs. Iska W Carmack, 329 US 230-248 (91 Law Edition) of United States Supreme Court Report page 209; Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1995 49 DLR (AD) 1 = 1997 BLD (AD) 1..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 1051
Habibur Rahman Khan Vs. Nurul Islam Khan, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....o transfer his 25% share in the company known as Habib Transport Co. Ltd. and the defendant in turn was to execute and register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff transferring his interest in the land with structures on plot No.1025 in SA Khatian No.105 corresponding to RS Khatian No.1251/1 in h...... Md. Ali Asgar Khan J Habibur Rahman Khan……………Appellant Vs. Nurul Islam Khan……………Respondent Judgment November 11, 1997. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Shirkat‑i‑Ahbab Vs. National Bank of Pakistan, 21 DLR (SC) 275. Lawyers I......ching, before judgment, MV Ishrat Khan, cargo Coaster No.C-678. 2. This first miscellaneous appeal arises out of Title Suit No.65 of 1995 filed by respondent Nurul Islam Khan stating, inter alia, that he entered into an agreement on 8-4-93 with his brother, namely, defendant-appellant Habibur Rah......ember 11, 1997. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Shirkat‑i‑Ahbab Vs. National Bank of Pakistan, 21 DLR (SC) 275. Lawyers Involved: Md. Waliul Islam, Advocate - For the Appellant. M Shamsul Alam, Advocate - For the Respondent. First Miscellaneous Appeal No..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Syed Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Md. Mujahar Ali Mridha and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
.... Civil Procedure. The learned Advocate further submits that he has no objection if the remand is open remand without any finding that the plaintiff has been able to prove their possession in the suit land. 5. Mr. Syed Ziaul Karim, the learned Advocate appearing for the plaintiff-opposite party, d...... Judgment Syed Amirul Islam J.- This Rule arose out of an application filed under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and is directed against the judgment and order of remand dated 4-1-94 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge Jhalakati, in Title Appeal No.42 of 1990 thereby setting asid......203 of 1987. 2. The opposite party as plaintiff filed Title Suit No.203 of 1987 in the Court of the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Jhalakati, for declaration of title and for further declaration that the decree passed in Title Suit No.329 of 1957 of the First Court of Munsif, Barisal, be declare...... Vs. Md. Mujahar Ali Mridha and others…………….Opposite Parties Judgment April 10, 1997. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Quyum Advocate - For the Petitioner. Syed Ziaul Karim Advocate - For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.127..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Hakim Ullah Vs. Mutaleb and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....t of the opposite parties, Abdul Hashim instituted Misc. Case No.134 of 1970 against the petitioner and others in the 4th Court of Munsif (now Assistant Judge), Habiganj for pre‑emption of the case land under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, claiming to be a co‑sharer by purc......……………….Petitioner Vs. Mutaleb and others…………………………………...Opposite Parties Judgment January 18, 1996. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- Hali Mandal and another Vs. Khirode Bala Debya, 12 DLR 74; Labbu Ram; Anantalal...... and prayed for pre‑emption of the case land under section 96(4) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act as co‑sharers by inheritance. In their written objection also it was specifically stated that the case is bad for defect of parties since Ebad Ullah, Afaiot Ullah, Rois Ullah, Meher Ullah, J......s. Chand Mohammad, AIR 1976 (Rajsthan) 65; Muhammad Jamal Vs. Chairman, Industrial Court 16 DLR (SC)) 386. Lawyers Involved: SK Sinha with AK Ahmadul Hasan and Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocates‑For the Petitioner. Jyotirmoy Narayan Dev with TK Datta, Advocates‑For the Opposite Parties. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
M R Sikder Vs. Bangladesh Water Development Board, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....Placing order with be surety no property was shown or given so that in case of success of the present petitioner in the suit and in case of failure of the opposite party to pay the amount awarded the land mentioned in the security may be produced upon. The learned Advocate contends that the alleged ......ed, Advocate-For the petitioner. Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General-For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 2766 of 1994. Judgment Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause why the order Date 29-6-94 passed by the Sub......epted the security bond furnished by the present opposite party in the aforesaid suit which was filed under section 33 of the Arbitration Act as amended. 2. The short fact leading to this Rule is that the Present petitioner had a contract with the opposite Party in respect of embankment work at P......opment Board…………………………………….Opposite Party Judgment May 28, 1996. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate-For the petitioner. Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General-For the Opposite Party. Ci..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 245
....estion is not in the list of the abandoned property.
3. Permission to transfer the house was given to the original lessee by memorandum No.KH‑8/81/2167/1 (3) dated 30-4-81 (Annexure-c). The case land was transferred in favour of the predecessor of the petitioner on 27‑7‑81 by registered sal......awful authority and is of no legal effect.
Ed.
This case is also Reported in: 49 DLR (HD) (1997) 108.
......F’ to the petition moved in Court today should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and to be of no legal effect.
2. The facts, as stated in the petitioner, in short, are that the aforementioned case property, was owned and possessed by once Nur Mohammad Sarder as lessee ......ahar and others……………………………………………………………………………………Petitioner
Vs.
Bangladesh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works Department, Government of the peoples republic of Bangladesh and others……………………..
Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Nuru Miah and another Vs. State, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....t the appellants are set aside. Let the accused appellants be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 49 DLR (HD) (1997) 97. ......……………………………………….Respondent Judgment October 31, 1996. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Alaluddin, Advocate-For the Appellants. AQ Rashid Ahmed, Assistant Attorney-General-For the State. Criminal Appeal No.875 of 1990. Judgmen......Code sentencing them thereunder to suffer imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Taka 3,000.00 in default to suffer RI for a further period of 6 months. 2. Prosecution case, in short, is that P.W.1 ASI of police Abdul Halim Mia was entrusted with the investigation of Rupganj PS Unnatural......llants Vs. State…………………………………………….Respondent Judgment October 31, 1996. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Alaluddin, Advocate-For the Appellants. AQ Rashid Ahmed, Assistant Attorney-General-For the State. Criminal Appeal ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Golam (Md.) Abdul Awal Sarker and others Vs. State, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....ation with RAJUK (Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakhaya) for approval of a project started by him for residential accommodation namely: “Jilanipuri Modern Residential Project” and started development of lands on 119 acres for the purpose of allotments of plots measuring ½ ‑Kathas, 5 kathas, 7 kathas......ners Vs. State……………………………………………………………………………Opposite Party Judgment January 29, 1996. Result: The Rule in made absolute. Case Referred to- Abut Basher Vs. State 47 DLR 521. Lawyers Involved: Md. Delear Hossain, Ad......7 dated 5-1-94 under sections 467/468/471/109 of the Penal Code read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (Act II/47) should not be quashed. 2. The short facts relevant are that, one Mr. Md. Moslehuddin, inspector, Bureau of Anti-Corruption, Dhaka, lodged an ejahar with the......pposite Party Judgment January 29, 1996. Result: The Rule in made absolute. Case Referred to- Abut Basher Vs. State 47 DLR 521. Lawyers Involved: Md. Delear Hossain, Advocate-For the Petitioners. Syed Abu Kowsar, Assistant Attorney-General-For the State. Criminal Miscel..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Mahmudul Hoque and 5 others Vs. Nowab Ali Chowdhury and 18 others, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
....aside judgment and decree dated 13-12-77 passed by the Munsif, Satkania, Chittagong in Partition Suit No.34 of 1973. 2. Plaintiffs filed Partition Suit No.98 of 1970 claiming 11 kanis 14 gandas of land or the quantum of land decided by the Court in their share out of 24.78 acres of the suit land ......f 1991(Dhaka) Civil Revision No.136 of 1990 (Chittagong) Judgment Kazi Ebadul Hoque J.- This Rule at the instance of the plaintiff-petitioners is against judgment and decree dated 12-5-1990 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Chittagong in Other Appeal No.207/1978/78/78 allowing the appeal and...... of ad valorem Court fee, on 26-11‑77, in course of hearing argument of the suit in the trial Court. Plaintiffs claimed title and possession in the said land by successions and transfers asserting that RS Khatian in respect of the suit property was wrong and that they purchased in the benami of an....... Nowab Ali Chowdhury and 18 others…………..Opposite Parties Judgment January 18, 1995. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate-For the Petitioners. Kamal‑Ul Alam, Advocate‑For the Opposite Party Nos. 4 and 5. Omar Faro..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. Arif Ahmed, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
....Suit No.10 of 1985 in the 3rd Court of Assistant Judge and SCC Judge, Comilla for eviction of the defendant Mr. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury from the suit premises. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit land originally belonged to Maharaja of Tripura who subsequently made a settlement of the same to Ni......owdhury.…………………….Petitioner Vs. Arif Ahmed…………………………………………Opposite Party Judgment June 22, 1994 Result: The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Mohammad Salim Vs. Md. Siddick Jamal and others 22 DLR 841; Ahmed Shan Khan Vs.......ff filed SCC Suit No.10 of 1985 in the 3rd Court of Assistant Judge and SCC Judge, Comilla for eviction of the defendant Mr. Faiz Ahmed Chowdhury from the suit premises. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit land originally belonged to Maharaja of Tripura who subsequently made a settlement of t...... The rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Mohammad Salim Vs. Md. Siddick Jamal and others 22 DLR 841; Ahmed Shan Khan Vs. Abdul Barkat;11 DLR 427; Abdul Khalek Mia Vs. Maya Debi and others reported in 35 DLR (AD) 310. Lawyers Involved: Amir Hossain, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. AK..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Sk. Helal Uddin and another Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....of properties of Tk.1,40,36,461.19 + Tk. 19,49,541= Tk. 1,59,86,002.19 without any basis. 4. By misusing the power and with the aid of appellant No. 1, appellant No.2 illegally acquired a piece of land measuring 7.50 khatas appertaining to plot No. 242, Block-B in Basundhara Residential Area and ......J Sk. Helal Uddin and another .......................Appellants Vs. The State............................. Respondent Judgment November 8, 2010. Result: The appeal succeeds. Case Referred to- Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Dr. Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir and others, (2010) 62 ...... 1947 and sentencing him thereunder to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Tk.50,00,000/- in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for 2 years with the direction that both the sentences would run consecutively. The learned Special Judge also convicted-appellant N......CD) (2011) 286, 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 444, 8 LG (2011) HCD 342. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Sirin Begum Vs. District Magistrate & another, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....arter), P.S. and District Lalmonirhat be set at liberty from Jail custody forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 235. ...... other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 235. ......ash Roy Chowdhury J Habibur Rahman Khan J Sirin Begum, wife of detenu Md. Ofazuddin Dewan, son of Late Samiruddin Dewan of Goshala Bazar (Tumal quarter), Police Station & District Lalmonirhat..............Petitioners Vs. District Magistrate & another................Respondents ......; Anwar Hossain Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 30 DLR 423; Sultan Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others, 38 DLR 1986 page 93. Lawyers Involved: M. Taleb Ali, Advocate - For the Petitioner. Sajjad Ali Chowdhury, Assistant Attorney-General - For the Respondents. Wri..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Abdul Jalil Khondaker & others Vs. Mohd. Mokan & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....en statements. Their case is that the suit plot No.3143, 3144, 3146 of Khatian No. 504 of Mohalla Talihaor, Sylhet Town are low lying ditches. They originally belonged to Khan Bahadur Estate. These lands along with other lands were settled with Sudanshu Mohan Das. The plaintiff No.1 of the prese......l Khondaker & others...................Appellants Vs. Mohd. Mokan & others............................Respondents Judgment March 30, 1988. Result: The appeal be allowed. Cases Referred to- Tofail Ahmed Vs. Ahmed AIR 1938 Nag 177; Gopal Krishna Sil, 34 CLJ 319; Gopal......th and/or changing its nature and feature in any manner." There were also prayer for temporary injunction and mandatory injunction made in pursuance of the suit. 3. It was alleged in the plaint that the suit ‘Doba’ or water reservoir had been existing for more than one hundred years and it ......Munshi Ainuddin and others, PLD 1964 (Dac.) 52, AIR 1938. Lawyers Involved: Dewan A.M.S. Zaman with Akhlaqur Rahman, Mahmud Hussain, Abdul Karim Chowdhury and Md. Shahjahan Biswas, Advocates - For the Appellants. J.N. Deb. with M.A. Matin Advocates - For the Respondents. Second Appeal No..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Tajidullah & others Vs. Sona Miah & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....2.4.73 and 2.3.73 respectively. 2. The facts of case are that respondent No.1 Sona Miah filed Title Suit No.1 of 1970 in the 1st Court of Sub-Judge, Sylhet for declaration of his title in the suit land measuring 5.75 acres and recovery of khas possession by removing all obstructions such as t......ullah & others........................Appellants Vs. Sona Miah & others.......................Respondents Judgment September 23, 24, 1986. Result: The appeal be allowed. Cases Referred to- Kalipada Roy Vs. Mukunda Lal, 34 CWN 131 Section 36; 7 DLR 94, 16 DLR 287 (SC......nd decrees passed by Mr. K.M. Hossain, Additional District Judge, Second Court, Sylhet in Title Appeals No. 24 of 1972 and 33 of 1972 on 2.4.73 and 2.3.73 respectively. 2. The facts of case are that respondent No.1 Sona Miah filed Title Suit No.1 of 1970 in the 1st Court of Sub-Judge, Sylhet fo......al be allowed. Cases Referred to- Kalipada Roy Vs. Mukunda Lal, 34 CWN 131 Section 36; 7 DLR 94, 16 DLR 287 (SC), 6 DLR 539, 23 DLR 99. Lawyers Involved: Dewan A.M.S. Zaman, Advocate - For appellants. B.K. Das with Miftahuddin Chowdhury, Advocates - For the Respondents. Second..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
58455841584058375836582458235822582158145811580958065805580458035797579357925791