Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1541-1560 of 1569 results.
Akhteruzzaman Vs. Ali Amjad Khan and others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....case to call for an interference. The petitions, therefore, merit no leave and are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 199. ......case to call for an interference. The petitions, therefore, merit no leave and are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 199. ......es of land against its owner respondent No. 2 Shibajee Prasad Dam alias Shibu. Upon two applications for temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with the respondent’s possession therein the learned Subordinate Judge directed both the parties on 17 October 1996 to m..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Fazlul Karim Chowdhury and (Md) and others Vs. Lutfunnessa Begum and others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....urthermore, the instant case does not involve any question of law of public importance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 188. ......urthermore, the instant case does not involve any question of law of public importance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 188. ......lication by the plaintiffs for temporary injunction against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 the Subordinate Judge made an interim order on 16 June, 1996 directing the parties to maintain status quo respect of possession of the disputed CS Plot 71 measuring 0.41 acre of land. The plaintiffs subsequently made ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Ali Akbar (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....ioner was not entitled to retain its possession. The petition is therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 143; 1 MLR (AD) 1996, 379. ......ioner was not entitled to retain its possession. The petition is therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 143; 1 MLR (AD) 1996, 379. ......1396 to 1398 BS The petitioner thereupon filed an application before respondent No. 2 the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Habiganj for cancellation of the lease asserting his title to and possession in the fishery. Respondent No. 2 found that compensation assessment roll in respect of t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Cantonment Board Dhaka and another Vs. Sayeda Rahat Ara Quamrun Nahar and another, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....On the death of Syeda Khatun her husband Syed Sulaiman Ashraf inherited the house as her only heir. Having failed to have it released, he brought a suit for declaration of his title thereto and for recovery of khas possession therein. The suit was dismissed. He then took an appeal to the High Co...... of Syeda Khatun her husband Syed Sulaiman Ashraf inherited the house as her only heir. Having failed to have it released, he brought a suit for declaration of his title thereto and for recovery of khas possession therein. The suit was dismissed. He then took an appeal to the High Court Division......eda Khatun her husband Syed Sulaiman Ashraf inherited the house as her only heir. Having failed to have it released, he brought a suit for declaration of his title thereto and for recovery of khas possession therein. The suit was dismissed. He then took an appeal to the High Court Division which..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Atiqullah (Md) Vs. Sanawara Begum and others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....ance in the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 112. ......ance in the contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 112. ......is established that the person is a tenant he cannot be permitted during the continuance of the tenancy to resist a suit for eviction on ground of purchase from a co-sharer without surrendering his possession to the landlord. The petitioner was a tenant under the respondents to whom he paid rents..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Shahabuddin (Md) & others Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....ejection of the plaint of Title Suit No. 308 of 1994. 2. Respondent No.1 brought the said suit against several defendants praying for declaration of tile to certain land and also for recovery of khas possession therein. 3. Some of the defendants who are the petitione......the plaint of Title Suit No. 308 of 1994. 2. Respondent No.1 brought the said suit against several defendants praying for declaration of tile to certain land and also for recovery of khas possession therein. 3. Some of the defendants who are the petitioners here took......laint of Title Suit No. 308 of 1994. 2. Respondent No.1 brought the said suit against several defendants praying for declaration of tile to certain land and also for recovery of khas possession therein. 3. Some of the defendants who are the petitioners here took a pl..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Golam Moula and others Vs. Gourpada Das and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....ts. We find no reason to interfere judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 95. ......ts. We find no reason to interfere judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 95. ...... 2. The appeal arose out of a suit, Title Suit No. 689 of 1976, brought by the first respondent in the Third Court of Munsif, Jessore, for declaration of title to and confirmation of possession in certain land. The case of the plaintiff briefly, is that the land in suit belonged to..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Bangladesh Vs. Chairman, Court of Settlement and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
.... already determined by a Court of law. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 93. ...... already determined by a Court of law. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 93. ...... holding No. Ka-341, Mohammadpur, Block-D, Dhaka originally belonged to Sk. Jagoo who gifted the property in favour of his wife Farida Begum by registered deed No. 680 dated 30-5-72 and put her in possession of the same. Farida Begum mutated her name in the office of the Housing and Settlement a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Shahajadpur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Majibur Rahman and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....age of the proceedings may allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings as may be just and necessary for the purpose of determining the real question in controversy. The proposed amendments for recovery of possession in a suit for declaration of title will end all pending controversies between......assed by defendant No.3 is void, illegal and not binding upon them. 4. On 7-3-90 the plaintiff bank filed an application seeking amendment of the plaint by way of adding a prayer for recovery of khas possession in the suit land stating, inter alia, that during the pendency of the suit defendant......roceedings may allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings as may be just and necessary for the purpose of determining the real question in controversy. The proposed amendments for recovery of possession in a suit for declaration of title will end all pending controversies between the parties..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Enjaheruddin Mia alias Md. Enjaheruddin Mia Vs. Mohammad Hossain and others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
.... appellate Court. The impugned judgment of the High Court Division thus, does not call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 84. ...... appellate Court. The impugned judgment of the High Court Division thus, does not call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 84. ......¦â€¦.Respondent Judgment July 31, 1997. Result: The petition is dismissed. The Specific Relief Act, 1877 (I of 1877), Section 42 The plaintiff not asking for further relief of joint possession or partition as co-sharer of the defendant (as claimed by the plaintiffs), the plaintiff ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Paresh Chandra Gharami and others, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....the High Court Division. No point of law of public importance is involved in this case. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 70. ......the High Court Division. No point of law of public importance is involved in this case. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 70. ......resh Chandra Gharami and others……Plaintiff- respondents Judgment May 15, 1997. Result: The petition is dismissed. Vested Property The plaintiff having proved their title and possession in the property by producing valid documents of title and adducing evidence as to possess..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Golam Sarwar (Md) & others Vs. Md Liakat Ali and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....te Court, We do not find any legal infirmity in the impugned judgment which calls for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 67. ......te Court, We do not find any legal infirmity in the impugned judgment which calls for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 67. ......dkher Mahbubuddin Ahmed, learned Counsel appearing for the defendant petitioners submits that having regard to the case of the plaintiff as well as the defendants the important question is, who is in possession in the disputed land and that on consideration of the evidence on record the trial court ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Jahanara Begum Vs. Md. Aminul Islam Chowdhury and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....id provision of law. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the suit is decreed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD)(1998) 52; 2 MLR (AD) 112. ......id provision of law. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the suit is decreed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD)(1998) 52; 2 MLR (AD) 112. ......a 1500.00 and executed another bainapatra dated 31-3-73 and promised to execute and register the deed within 6 months. The defendants in all received Taka 9,500.00 Out of Taka 10,000.00 and delivered possession of the suit land in part performance of the contract but the defendants did not execute a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Mansur Ali Sikder Vs. Kanailal Banaajee & others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....committed any error of law leading to a failure of justice. No interference is therefore called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 14. ......committed any error of law leading to a failure of justice. No interference is therefore called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 14. ...... in schedule ‘Ka’ to the plaint which originally belonged to Kunja Lal Shaha. The plaintiff contends that Kunja Lal died leaving surviving three sons Ranajit, Sunil and Benoy, that Benoy being in possession of the disputed structure leased out the same to him at a monthly rental of Taka 300.00 a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Moslemuddin (Md) and others Vs. Md. Jonab Ali and another, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....ng with the judgment of the appellate Court, which we uphold. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 13; 17 BLD (AD) 328. ......ng with the judgment of the appellate Court, which we uphold. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 13; 17 BLD (AD) 328. ...... The trial court found that the place, time, manner of entering into any oral agreement, settlement of consideration and payment towards the same, demand of conveyance and also alleged delivery of possession have not been proved. When the trial court gave cogent reasons of its decision, it was ob..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Al-Haj Abul Basher Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1997, 49 CLC (AD)
....same cannot be said to be arbitrary, unfair and illegal. For the reasons stated above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 11, 1997 BLD (AD) 321. ......same cannot be said to be arbitrary, unfair and illegal. For the reasons stated above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 11, 1997 BLD (AD) 321. ......original owners. But respondent No. 1 by the impugned letter refused to release the land of the petitioners. 3. The common case of respondent Nos. 2-4 is that in pursuance of LA Case No. 138/62-63 possession had already been taken of the entire requisitioned land including the disputed land of th..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Abdus Samad Akand and others Vs. Abdul Halim Miji and others, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....fere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 6. ......fere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (AD) (1998) 6. ...... The appeal is dismissed. The Specific Relief Act, 1877 (I of 1877), Section 56 The trial court as well as the court of appeal have not been able to find that the plaintiffs are in exclusive possession of a specific and separate share of the suit plot well demarcated by boundaries so as to ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd and others, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....d. He further submits that since their purchase these respondents are in possession of the entire CS plot No. 371 which has been admitted by the respondents in their present suit when they prayed for recovery of Khas possession. The property was purchased by the predecessor of the defendants in 1954......’ schedule land defendant No. 1 had not acquired any title over the remaining ‘Ga’ schedules land and they also prayed for declaration of their title over ‘Ga’ schedule land and recovery of khas possession of this land. 11. We have gone through the plaints of both these suits and it ap...... 0090 Ajutangsha land but the claim of the defendants was that they purchased 94 Ajutangsha. In the earlier Suit defendants claimed entire CS plot No. 371 and they mutated their names and they are in possession all through. And in that suit the trial Court as well as the appellate Court on considera..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Tara Mia & others Vs. Taru Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e, we are of the view that the High Court Division did not commit any error in allowing the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e, we are of the view that the High Court Division did not commit any error in allowing the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ssor of plaintiff Nos. 4 -9 became owners of 12 annas share and odd share of the suit land. Modaris Ali died leaving the defendants who have 2 annas share and odd shares. The plaintiffs are in ejmali possession of the suit land with the defendants and have been enjoying the usufructs of the suit lan..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Agrabad Hotel Ltd. & another Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ......e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ......k. 3,53,335/- by letter dated 24th April, 1986. Accordingly the Company deposited the entire money and a registered deed of lease dated 19.06.1986 was executed between the parties. The appellant took possession of the land and started the construction of the proposed 5-Star Hotel. During the progres..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127
499495479471465460457456451450444442437426425424422387382375