Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1541-1543 of 1543 results.
M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J M/S. Concord Engineers and Construction Ltd.........Appellant. Vs. The Chief Engineer Road and Highways......down in the Act have been complied with and the application is filed within the statutory time limit under the Limitation Act, otherwise, even a void order will operate as a valid effective award the remedy to set aside the order having been cut off. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed submits that in the present ca..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......nt of Bangladesh, 44 DLR (AD) 111; SP Sampath Kumar Vs. Union of India, AIR 1937 SC 386; JB Chopra Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 357. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4......), strike down any law or rule on the ground of its constitutionality. A person in the service of the Republic who intends to invoke fundamental right for challenging the vires of a law will seek his remedy under Article 102(1), but in all other cases he will be required to seek remedy under Article..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ons was being heard by the High Court Division. Therefore, they out of their sincerity informed that in the circumstances they would pray for extension of time in Matter No. 60 of 2003 or in the alternative they would apply for extension of time in Matter No.2 of 2000 for holding the AGM. There......dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
347346324