Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 1581-1600 of 2270 results.

Iqbal Hossain Mollah Vs. Director, Plant Protection Wing and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....y the respondents shall not be directed to issue import permit to the petitioner as required under Rules 3 and 5 of the Destructive Insects and Pests Rules, 1966 and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioner is a citizen of Ban..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 219

Major Monjur Quader(Retd.) Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....No. 60220 and the inclusion of the name of the petitioner therein shall not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. It is stated that the petitioner, a retired O..

Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 125

Masudur Rahman Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice & parliamentary Affairs & ors., 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....rder Memo No. 20 dated 8-1-2003 (Annexure-G). 3. Being aggrieved thereby the petitioner has come to this Court and obtained the instant Rule and ad-interim order staying the aforesaid impugned orders. 4. Respondent No. 4 is contesting this Rule by filing Vokalatnama and an application ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77

Md. Ali Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

.... PS case No. 4(10)96 under section 19(1)3 ka, Narcotics Control Act 1990 but modifying and reducing sentence from 3 years RI to 2 years should not be set aside or to pass such order or other order or orders as the Court may deem fit and proper. 2. Rule was made returnable within 2 weeks. 3. Co..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30

Samiran Haider and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....gence) Recruitment Rules, 1981, (Annexures H and I) should not be declared to have been passed and issued without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. All these Rules concern common questions ..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 107

Barrister Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

.... of Divisional Special Judge, Dhaka as contained in Annexure-C should not be declared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioner was a former Member of Parliam..

Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 140

Mahbub-ur-Rahman Chowdhury Vs. DG, Bureau of Anti-Corruption and others , 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....s properties along with source and liabilities of the same should not be declared to have been made illegally, without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The brief fact of the writ petition is..

Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 150

Khorshed Alam Khan and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

.... No. 1059 MRR Khatian No. 340 of Mouza Shamsharabad, Lakshmipur due to abatement of LA Case No. 34 of 1993-1994 and publish the same in the official Gazette and or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The petitioners claim to have purchased an ar..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57

Bangladesh Film Development Corporation Vs. Chairman, Labour Court & another, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....7 of 2002 and 25 of 2002 (Annexure-A to all the Writ Petitions) would not be declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and are of no legal effect and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 3. At the time of issuance of the Rule, t..

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 181

Jakir Hossain Vs. Jel Vanu, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....eversing those dated 27-2­2003 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge-in-Charge, Barguna in Title Suit No. 78 of 2000 in dis­missing the suit should not be set aside or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. It is the petitioner's case that the o..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32

Farida Begum and others Vs. Kapil Krishna Goldar & another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

.... No.1, under sections 467/468/471 of the Penal Code for commission of offence of forging valuable documents by the accused petitioners should not be quashed and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may deem fit and proper. 2. At the time of issuance of the Rule, all furt..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 28

Noor Alam Hossain Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....ing in Complaint Case No. 379 of 1990 pending in the Court of Magistrate, First Class, Natore under sections 465/471 of the Penal Code should not be quashed and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this court may seem fit and proper. At the time of issuance of the Rule the accused pet..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40

Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd. Vs. Shams Company and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....matter is referred to arbitration, the Court shall not, save in the manner and to the extent provided in this Act, deal with such matter in the suit. 39. (1) An appeal shall lie from the following orders passed under this Act (and from no others) to the Court authorised by law to hear appeals fro..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31

Md. Khayruddin Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

.... petitioner. Preparation of the paper-book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is permitted to add additional grounds. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC(2010) 1018. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41

Khan and Company Ltd. Vs. Presiding Judge of the District Court and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)

....d, as such, the defendant filed applications in each of the suits on 3-8-89 this time under Order XXXVII rule 3 CPC praying for leave to enter appearance and to defend the suits. 2. By the similar orders passed on 1-11-98 in all the suits learned Judge allowed each of the applications of the defe..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 64

Mokim alias Md. Mokim Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....in the meantime the appellant has continued to suffer imprisonment, it is a fit and proper case in which the High Court Division should consider the case on merit and also then pass whatever order or orders it thinks appropriate in the interest of justice. 32. In the light of the decision referre..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38

Azizur Rahman Vs. Mariamunnessa and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....d above I am inclined to hold that the courts below committed error of law rejecting the application under Order IX rule 13 CPC which has occasioned failure of justice and, as such, the judgments and orders of the courts below are liable to be set aside. 33. In the result, the Rule is made absolu..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44

Ratan Chandra Karmaker. Vs. Afsar Ali, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)

.... was also dismissed on a find­ing that the summons was duly served. That brought the petitioner before this Court who obtained this Rule under the Revisional Jurisdiction of this court against those orders. 3. The learned Advocate for the present petitioner submits that Ratan Chandra Karmakar, p..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 66

Md. Shahjahan Ali Vs. The Chairman, Labour Court, Rajshahi, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)

....La­bour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965 provides the pow­er of a Labour Court in deciding a complaint filed under clause (b). It runs as follows:- "(d) in deciding the matter the Court may pass such orders including orders regarding costs, as it may deem just and proper and it may, in ap­propriate..

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 124

M.A. Hai and others Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangla­desh, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)

....t petitions that after sub-rule (II) of Rule 7 of the Rules of 1984 came into operation on 21.7.84, 120 or 150 working days, as the case may be, had elapsed in each of these Rules when the im­pugned orders were passed. It is their contention that they stand discharged of the charges brought against..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 80