Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdul Quddus & Another Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......a with whom she voluntarily fled away in the night of occurrence. Accused appellant Abdul Quddus in his statement under section 342 Cr.P.C. produced a true copy of the Kabinnama dated 19-5-79 in order to show that his marriage with P.W.2 Ferdousi was solemnised and registered by the Kazi of Che......accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 6 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ts of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ......e defendants. E. That a decree for khas possession of the suit property be passed against the defendants." A further prayer was incorporated that defendants 8 to 18 should be ordered to remove at their own costs, the constructions made by their predecessor in any portion of ...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......tatement that the insured value of the goods was Tk. 3, 48,650/- is not denied. Defendant No 3 who has already made a part payment is to pay the reminder of the plaintiffs claim. 13. Hence it is ordered that the suit against defendant Nos.1 and 2 is dismissed, but it is decreed with costs again...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......nt that the insured value of the goods was Tk. 3, 48,650/- is not denied. Defendant No. 3 who has already made a part payment is to pay the reminder of the plaintiff's claim. 10. Hence it is ordered that the suit against defendant Nos.1 and 2 is dismissed, but it is decreed with costs again...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Md. Asghar Vs. Nowab Miah and others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)
....order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37. ......ds expeditiously. The connected Rule for stay of further proceeding is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37. ......shy;spondents. First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 82 of 1973. Judgment Ranadhir Sen J.— This appeal at the instance of the plaintiff opposite party is directed against the order dated 23-12-78 of the learned Subordinate, Judge on an application of the defendant under sect......ds expeditiously. The connected Rule for stay of further proceeding is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2
Bashir Ahmed Vs. Abdul Shaheed, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... constituted by the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 and 2, having been effective on and from 9.2.78, defendant No.1 became the managing partner, as the plaintiff and defendant No. 2 mostly resides abroad. 3. The plaintiff and defendant No.2 have been sending different goods from U.K. under wage ......e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......om Original Order No. 510 of 1981. Civil Rule No. 1721 (FM) of 1981. Judgment Chowdhury A. T. M. Masud J.— This appeal at the instance of defendant No. 1 is directed against the order dated 16.9.81 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court. Chittagong, in other Suit No. 193 of......e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 2
Surendra Mohan Shaha Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....;……..Respondents and Surendra Mohan Shaha.......................Petitioner Vs. Abdur Rashid Khan, Resident Magistrate, Sherpur, M.A. Rashid, Sub divisional Officer (Sadar) Jamalpur.................Respottdenis-Contemners Judgment February 5, 1982. Res......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ......of the said Sherpur P.S. Case No.14, so far it related to plot No. 14 of Khatian No. 22 mouza Narayanpur. 3. The petitioner stated that after obtaining a certified copy of the aforesaid rule and order of stay passed by this court, he went back to Sherpur, where the said Sherpur P.S. case No. 14......sit the find to the Registrar of this court within 10 days from date. Md. Altaf Hossain J. — I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)110 ..Category: Contempt of Court Law | Date: 5 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ......all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ......nd staffs of Zilla Parishad. In the absence of any other rule modifying the provisions relating to appointment and dismissal in Local Council Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1968 the order of dismissal passed by the Chairman of the Zilla Parishad cannot be said to have suffered from......all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ourt Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhery J A.T. M. Afzal J Ragib Ali.......................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment ......and the respondents were called upon to show cause why they should not be directed to restore vacant possession of the premises in question forthwith. 2. Although the petitioner prayed for an ad-interim mandatory injunction directing the respondents to restore vacant possession of the premises ......ts and possession of the petitioner threw him out of possession of his legally acquired property. It was, to say the least, an act of extreme high handedness on the part of responsible official bordering on vandalism. Government officials would do well to remember that to enjoy the protect......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Salehuddin Khan..................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Resul......p Cap. Mazher Ali without the knowledge and approval of the competent authority as required under the law. Upon these allegations, the petitioner moved this court and obtained the rule but no ad-interim order staying the operation of the impugned order was passed. 3. In the affidavit in op......cised its descretion in favour of one of the two alternatives--The papers on record no where indicate that the authorities applied their mind to the alternative proviso in Rule II before the impugned order was passed. Delegation of power- Whenever there is a question of delegation of power......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....J ATM Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate & another……………………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors………………………&he......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......ed 5-12-74 after discussion with the then Prime Minister Mr. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. On the basis of the said not initiated by Mr. Taheruddin Thakur, Mr. Sheik Mujibur Rahman passed the following order on the same date in the matter: “সরকার জন স্বার্থে ......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....al Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another……………........Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others ………...............Respondent Judgment Janu......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ......dated 5.12.74 after discussion with the then Prime Minister Mr. Sheikh Mujlbur Rahman. On the basis of the said note insulated by Mr. Taheruddin Thakur, Mr. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman passed the following order on the same date in the matter; “সরকার জনস্বার্থে ন......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Gopal Chandra Mondol Vs. Lashmat Dasi, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.............................Respondent Judgment January 7, 1982. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Seshammat Vs. Kuppanatyyangar, reported in A.I.R. 1926 Madras, at page 475. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim—For the Appellant. Kh. ......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ......e, properties. If so, what is the extent of his share.” 6. It was framed so by the court as it was the duty of the plaintiff to prove that be was a co-sharer of the property in question in order to be entitled to ask for partition. To prove that co-sharer ship of the property the plaintif......dge, Dacca are hereby affirmed. But in the facts and circumstances of the case the parties are directed to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 145 ..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 7 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 3
Zainal Abedin & Another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....e is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 77, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 493 ...... transmitted to the appellate Division of this Court alongwith the certificate for leave to appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 77, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 493 ......h is as to whether the aforesaid Government Savants (Seniority of Freedom Fighters) Rules, 1979 whereunder the respondent No. 4 was granted antedated seniority over the petitioners under the impugned order Annexure B, has been made in accordance with the provision of the Constitution of Bangladesh p...... transmitted to the appellate Division of this Court alongwith the certificate for leave to appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 77, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 493 ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Shahidur Rahman Molla & others Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J Sultan Hossain Khan J Shahidur Rahman Molla & others…&hellip......for preemption are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 89. ......y Act. Upon these two grounds the appeal was allowed and the application for pre-emption was dismissed. This Rule under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Subordinate Judge. 3. Mr. Abdur Rahim, the learned Advocate appearing......for preemption are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 89. ..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Shahidur Rahman Molla & other Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....owdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 79. ......ion are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 79. ...... Upon these two grounds the appeal was allowed and the application for pre-emption was dismissed. This rule under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the Judgment and order of the learned Subordinate Judge. 3. Mr. Abdur Rahim, the learned Advocate appearing on b......ion are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:35 DLR (HCD) (1983) 79. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 19
Aftabuddin Miah Vs. Kudrat Ali Miah & ors, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....Tazal Hoque and others Vs. Affan and others, 17 D.L.R. Dacca at page 613; Jalil Ahmed Vs. Raish Mia, 20 D.L.R at page 80; Ratish Chandra Vs. Hara Krishna Goldar, 15 D.L.R. at page 654; Majada Khatun Vs. Rabindra Chandra Roy, P.L.D. (Dacca) at page 112. Lawyers Involved: Md. Yas...... the facts and circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 51 ......ecree of the court of appeal below are set aside and those of the trial court restored. The plaintiff's suit is decreed on contest but in the facts and circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 51 ...... the facts and circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 51 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 2
Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 2 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1