Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1701-1720 of 1991 results.
Abdul Mannaf Khan and others Vs. Bangladesh & another, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decisions the appeals are dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 201. ......Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decisions the appeals are dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 201. ......ng on Tuesdays and Fridays of the week, the appellant’s attempt to establish their right of franchise of a market in the Civil Court must be adjudged as an exercise in futility………….(62) Cases Referred to- R.V. Halifa County Court Judge [1891] 2 Q.B. 263; Bow v. Hart [1904] 2 K. B. 6..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Ismail Ullah, being dead his heirs Bazidullah & ors Vs. Sukumar Chandra Das & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....d as defendant No. 49 in the partition suit. In the result, therefore, this appeals as allowed. There will be do order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 125 ......d as defendant No. 49 in the partition suit. In the result, therefore, this appeals as allowed. There will be do order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 125 ......he suit, the decree is liable to be amended by excluding the first schedule of the written statement, under section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Appeal is allowed…………(24,25 & 26) Cases Referred to- A.I.R 1961(S.C).790, 42 IA 91. AIR 1965 (S.C.) 1325; Inre Swire Mellor vs. Swi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Hajee Abdus Sattar Vs. Mahiuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s reprehensible, calling for costs of the appeal, but since he got two judgments in his favour, we refrain from awarding any cost against him. Ed.This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 97......s reprehensible, calling for costs of the appeal, but since he got two judgments in his favour, we refrain from awarding any cost against him. Ed.This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 97......no title on the property and in case such heirs claiming title must first restore possession to the landlord. These tenants are tenants by holding over. The Appeal is allowed………….(11 & 12) Cases Referred to- Jessel M. R. in Re. Stringer's Estate, page 384 L.R. 6 Chi; J. M. Singh v. Bal..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Abani Kanta Chakraborty & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s unfounded. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 93 ......s unfounded. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 93 ......on in the disputed land is not an impediment to others who are claiming possession in the suit plot through lease from the government, the suit plot covering a large area besides the parties claim. Cases Referred to- M.H. Khanddkar Vs. Bangladesh 30 DLR (S.C) 1. Lawyers Involved: B. Hoss..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Sk. Abdul Latif and another Vs. Abdul Malek Kazi & others, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)
....rt Division and the appellate Court below are set aside and that of the learned Munsif is restored. The appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 22. ......rt Division and the appellate Court below are set aside and that of the learned Munsif is restored. The appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 22. ......dlord……(7 & 8) The suit being not barred by Limitation, the Trial Court rightly held that the plea of adverse possession cannot be raised. The Appeal is allowed with cost……….(8) Cases Referred to- 19 DLR 912; Runge Lall Mandul vs. Abdul Gaffur and others—4 Calcutta 315; Ba..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Rahela Khatun and another Vs. Fayezuddin Shah, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
....aside. The appellants are given the liberty to adduce additional evidence before the Appellate Court below. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 6. ......aside. The appellants are given the liberty to adduce additional evidence before the Appellate Court below. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 6. ......uring pendency of appeal and such receipt containing substantial cause for making decision in the suit shall have to be taken into evidence on appeal as additional evidence. The Appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Venkataramiah vs. Seethamma, AIR 1963 SC 1526. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Mst. Esarunnessa Bibi Vs. Md. Amir Hossain, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
..... Judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Appellate Court below are restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 1. ....... Judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Appellate Court below are restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 1. .......S. which was refused by the plaintiff, (iv) Defendant paid Municipal Tax against distress warrant on 27.10.63 =Tk. 311.75 and again on 18.3.64 Tk. 66.00. (v) Defendant deposited rent in H.R. Case No 53 of 1964 on 12.5.64 Tk. 42.25 (vi) Plaintiff brought the suit on 18.9.64, Mr. Ahmed co..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Birendra Chandra Saha Vs. Sashi Mohan Saha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....e judgment of the High Court is set aside. The case is sent back on remand for disposal of the appeal in the light of what have been stated above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......e judgment of the High Court is set aside. The case is sent back on remand for disposal of the appeal in the light of what have been stated above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ip;…………....Appellant. Vs. Sashi Mohan Saha and others…………….....Respondents Judgment April 8, 1975. Cases Referred to: Bharat Singh vs. Bhagirathi AIR 1966 (SC) 405; Firm Malik Das Raj vs. Fir..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Badal Rani Misra alias Badal Rani Goswami and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ......d. The case of Gordon, Dadds & co. supports the contention of the learned Attorney-General. There is accordingly no merit in this appeal which is dismissed but without any order as to cost. Ed. ......akistan of 1962 by the appellants challenging the legality of an order of requisition of some plots including plot Nos. 732, 733, 734, 694 and 737 of Mouza Shahar Khilgaon, P. S. Tejgaon in L. A. Case No. 91 of 1962-63, under the East Bengal (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act, 1948 (hereina..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Saokat Ali and others Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......nally. We find no substance in the only contention raised in support of this petition, which is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 DLR (AD) (1975) 59. ......aokat Ali and others…………...Petitioners. Vs. Shamsun Bibi and others……….....Respondents Judgment January 30, 1975. Cases Referred to: Sakalaguna Nayudu Vs. Chinna Munuswami Nayakar, 55 I.A. 243; Majeda Khat..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and ors. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......view of what have been stated above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the learned Judges of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Bangladesh Enemy Property Management Board and ors………….... .Appellants. Vs. Md. Abdul Majid…………..... Respondent Judgment March 27, 1975. Cases Referred to- M. M. Mansur Ali Vs. Aradendu Shekhar Chatterjee. (1959) 21 DLR (SC) 20; Daula..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Shamsuddin Ahmed @ Tofa Mia & others Vs. Abdul Latif Bhuiyan, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ...... the facts of this case. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and those of the Courts below are restored. Ed. ......bsp; Case Referred to- Budhar Sardar vs. Sonaulla Mridah 18 C.W.N. 890, Kheyali Prosad vs. Mullic..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......Pal, Purina Chandra Pal and Kailash Chandra Pal in Karsha right under the superior landlords Kederesaban and others. The Karsha was put to sale for arrears of rent in connection with Rent Execution Case No. 432 of 1948 and the plaintiffs purchased the suit land in auction on February 19, 1949 and..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
..... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ...... of a Bench of the High Court Division passed in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 15 of 1975 on April 15, 1975, reversing the judgment of the Subordinate Judge, Third Court, Dacca, in Miscellaneous Case No. 247 1973. 2. Appellant Abdur Rouf filed an application under section 24 of the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Baitul Aman Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & anr Vs. Md. Shamsur Rahman & ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ler the appeal is allowed. The application filed by the appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed We make no Order as to costs. Ed. ......ler the appeal is allowed. The application filed by the appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed We make no Order as to costs. Ed. ......ler the appeal is allowed. The application filed by the appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed We make no Order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Mohd. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others , 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Md. Mafizuddin Patwari Vs. Abdul Hakim Miazi , 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....t had been acted upon. In the result, therefore this appeal is allowed and the petition for pre-emption is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 305. ......t had been acted upon. In the result, therefore this appeal is allowed and the petition for pre-emption is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 305. ......g……..(12) No appeal was filed as provided by section 88 A against the sub-Division. On the contrary it had been acted upon so no preemption lies……….(13) Cases Referred to- Kafizan Bibi & ors vs. Naji Farid Kazi and ors, 18 D.L.R(Dacca) 281; Ch..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ......re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ......re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sreemati Charubala Sen Gupta Vs. Abul Hashem and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....udge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ......udge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ...... the High Court Division and the District Judge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Goutam Ranjan Sen and other Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ....... Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others……………………………. Respondent Judgment January 8, 1981. Case Referred To:- M/S. Dulichand Omraolal vs. Bangladesh (1981) 33 D.L.R (AD) 30. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
16171612160916071596159315921591158615841583157415721569156615651564155815561552