Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 1701-1720 of 3391 results.

Kibria and Associates Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

....Case is also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 712. ......appellant was not entitled to compensation for the loss of business for 47 days as alleged and the appellant was not entitled to any amount for the non‑scheduled work and the bill submitted was not proper. 4. Both the appellant and the respondent filed documents including the measurement book b..

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 156

Inspector of Schools, Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, Dhaka and others Vs. Managing Committee, Khashmahal Balurchar High School and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

.... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 34. ......ers for rejection of the plaint under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure should not be set aside and or pas such other order or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Opposite parties Nos.1‑3 as plaintiffs filed title suit No.12 of 2002 in the Court o..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 66

Khorshed Alam (Md.) Vs. Government of the Peo­ple's Republic of Bangla­desh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....Affairs.....................Respondent Judgment March 1, 2004. Cases Referred to- Md. Anowar Hossain on behalf of detenu Chittaranjan Guha Vs. State, 29 DLR 15; Calcutta Dock Labour Board and others Vs. Jaffar Imam, AIR 1966 (SC) 282; Habiba Mahmood Vs. Bangladesh, 45 DLR (AD) 89. Law......o that it may satisfy itself that he is not being detained without lawful authority or in an unlawful manner and/or pass such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The detenu was arrested on 30‑10‑2003 in connection with Mongla PS Case No.5 dated..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64

AKM Haroon‑or‑Rashid & another Vs. AKM Mostafa Kamaluddin and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....urt High Court Division  (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: SM Hossain J AKM Haroon‑or‑Rashid & another..................Petitioners Vs. AKM Mostafa Kamaluddin and others.............Opposite Parties Judgment March 22, 2001. Result: The Rule is mad......o. V of 1908); Order VII rule 11(c)(d) The valuation of the suit is very important in determining the jurisdiction of the court and, as such, the question is required to be dealt with by passing a proper order assigning reasons by the learned Assistant Judge...........................(17) Case..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 68

Abdur Rahman Dhali and others Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 17. ......€‘7‑1992, now pending in the Court of Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Barisal Station) should not be quashed or such other order or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The relevant facts, for the purpose of disposal of this Rule are stated herein below: ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 85

Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan (Md.) Vs. University of Rajshahi and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....n (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Miftahuddin Chowdhury J Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan (Md.)........................Petitioner Vs. University of Rajshahi and others...............Respondents Judgment April 26, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Taju...... (5) of clause (e) reads as follows: "5. If the Chairman of any Examination Committee has reason to think that the scripts of any paper, which have been examined by a single examiner have not been properly examined, he may, with the previous approval of the Vice Chancellor, arrange for the re­ex..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 157

Fazlur Rahman (Md) Vs. Md. Abdul Hamid, Advocate and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

.... Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Hamidul Haque J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Fazlur Rahman (Md)…………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdul Hamid, Advocate and others……………………Respondents Judgment July 24, 2002 Result: The Rule is......er has made a prayer to the effect that respondent No. 3 should be deemed to have vacated his seat as Member of the 8th Parliament, Now at the time of hearing Mr. Khan Saifur Rahman could not explain properly whether it is a writ of quo warranto or a certiorari. In any case, in spite of this ambigui..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 242

Hafez (Md.) Bazlur Rahman and others Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 444.......onstitution of the country and, as such, the said proviso is liable to be struck down. He has referred to the case reported in 33 DLR (AD) 201 wherein their Lordships have held that in the absence of proper guidelines as to how discretion is to be exercised it will lead to arbitrary exercise of powe..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 70

Abdus Salam (Md) Vs. University of Rajshahi & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

.... For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 3397 of 2001. Judgment ABM Khairul Haque J. - This Rule Nisi was issued at the instance of one Md Abdus Salam, calling upon the University of Rajshahi and others to show cause as to why the order of dismissal (Annexure N (1) to the petition) dated 7â€......, in consideration of the report, the Syndicate in its meeting held on 27/28‑8‑2000, by its resolution No. 127, formed a 5 (five) members enquiry committee, that in order to afford the petitioner proper representation, the respondent No, 4 vide his letter No. 1040(2)Ra/47 dated 6‑9‑2000, req..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 60

Padma Oil Co. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Unions & another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....another ……...... Respondents Judgment February 24, 2003. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Rafique‑ul-Huq with Khalilur Rahman with Zubayer Rahman Chowdhury and Muhammad Sakhawat, Advocates ‑ For the Petitioner. Tufailur Rahman ‑ For Respondent No. 2......ondent No.1 (Annexure - A to this petition) should not be declared to have been made without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect and why the respondent No. 1 should not be directed to take proper steps for cancellation of the registration of the respondent No. 2 Union under section 10(1) ..

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 158

Rajab Ali Zulfiqar Vs. State, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)

....ssain, 16 DLR (WP) 48; 7 DLR (FC) 1; Ali Vs. Crown, 4 DLR (SC) 551; Fazal Elahi Vs. Crown, 5 DLR (WP) 13; Khan Vs. Crown, 7 DLR (FC) 1; Mobarak Hossain Vs. State, 33 DLR 274; Barkat Ali alias Gharibu and others Vs. Crown, 1969 (SCMR) 448; Muhammad Ismail and others Vs. State and another, 1970 PLD (K......as first drawn my attention to the definition o criminal breach of trust as given in section 405 of the Penal Code which is quoted below: Section 405. Whoever, being in any man­ner entrusted with property, or with any domi­nion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own u..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92

Air Marshal Jamaluddin Ahmed (Retd) Vs. Government of Bangla­desh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....Original Jurisdiction) Present: ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Miftahuddin Chowdhury J Air Marshal Jamaluddin Ahmed (Retd)…………………….Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangla­desh and others………………..Respondents Judgment June 13, 2004. Result: The Rule is ma......in paragraph 8 of the petition, that the background on which the petitioner was promoted to the rank of Air Marshal, is not known to the Air Head Quarters, that the complications were caused due to improper filling up of his pension papers for which it took a long time to make it ready, that the pen..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 148

State Vs. Abdul Hatem, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

....l Hatem ............….. Condemned Prisoner Judgment February 2, 2003. Result: Death Reference is accepted. Cases Referred to- Noor Jahan Begum Vs. State, 42 DLR (AD) 130; Al Amin and others Vs. State, 51 DLR 154. Lawyers Involved: Md. Helaluddin Mollah, Deputy Attorney ‑......d material in every case and prosecution is not bound to offer any motive and motive, if suggested, is required to be proved: Motive, if proved, affords a key to scan the evidences of the case in its proper perspective and motive proved indicates the high degree of probability and provides a link in..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 75

Mozibar Rahman Molla (Md) and another Vs. Rehazuddin and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 427.......16 of 1996 allowing pre-emption under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court many deem fit and proper. 2. Short facts, necessary for the purpose of the Rule is that the opposite Party Nos. 1â€..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98

Ziaul Hoque alias Bakul Vs. Md Sirajul Islam and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

.... ......udge and Election Tribunal Sadar. Brahmanbaria in Election Tribunal Case No.5 of 1998 should not be set aside and or pass such other order or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The present opposite party No. 1 as petitioner filed Election Tribunal Case No.5 of 19..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 156

Ambala Cold Storage (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Prime Insurance Co. Ltd., 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....Ahmed, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Md. Ibrahim Mollah, Advocate ‑ For the Respondent. Company Matter No. 131 of 1999. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This application under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 1994 has been made by the petitioner Ambala Cold Storage (Pvt.) Ltd. I...... in 1998 and after receiving ­information the respondent appointed Messrs Engineers Survey Associates and Rupali Surveys for inspection in order to ascertain the loss and damages of the petitioner's property and the surveyors after inspection submitted their report stating that the compressor No, 1..

Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 168

KM Fazlul Haque Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and another, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)

....n) Present: KM Hassan J Md. Fazlul Haque J KM Fazlul Haque…………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and another..............................................Respondents Judgment August 28, 1996.......order (Annexure‑D). On receipt of the above Memo dated 9‑3‑81 the petitioner filed an application explaining the reasons for shortage of fertilizer and further requested the authority to make a proper investigation in the light of the allegation made by him against the Tally Clerk and the Head..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 78

Commander (Rtd) A A Chowdhury Vs. AKM Imam Hossain and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)

.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 49 DLR (HD) (1997) 23 ......rming the judgment and decree dated 21-8-1993 respectively passed by Assistant Judge, 5th Addl. Court Dhaka in Title Suit No.90 of 1992 decreeing the suit for eviction of the petitioner from the suit property. 2. The facts giving rise to this Rule are, that the opposite party Nos.1 and 2 as plain..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65

Md. Moniruzzaman alias Chaklet and others Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....rt Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Moniruzzaman alias Chaklet and others……………………Petitioners Vs. The State……………………………â€......er rigorous imprisonment for one 2(two) years more. 5. Mr. Abdul Malek, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioners submitted that the High Court Division illegally dismissed the appeal without proper assessment of the evidence on record; that the High Court Division failed to consider the man..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70

Md. Saidur Rahman Vs. Farid Uddin Mahmud and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)

.... Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Md. Saidur Rahman………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Farid Uddin Mahmud and others………………………Respondents Judgment March 9, 2011. Result: The pe......in Adalat No.1, Chiltagong in accordance with section 4(5) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, the order of the Adalat accepting the tender of the respondent No.1 was without jurisdiction and that since the property in question was sold at a shockingly low price, the peti­tioner's right protected under Ar..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81