Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1701-1720 of 3180 results.
Asaduzzaman (Md.) Vs. Md. Salamatullah & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... persons, if any, is civil liability. 16. As regards allegation under section 406 of the Penal Code it appears from the petition of complaint that there was no allegation of any entrustment of any property. So, we find that there are no ingredients of the offence under section 406 of the Penal Co......laneous Case No.767 of 1997 with 145 of 1997. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- By these two Rules, opposite parties were directed to show cause as to why the proceedings of CR Case No.555 of 1996 and CR Case No.65 of 1996 pending in the Nalishi Adalat ‘Ka’ Anchal, Satkhira should not be quas..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Tarique Rahman Vs. Director General, Bureau of Anti-Corruption, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....on and after making such enquiries as it may deem, necessary, is satisfied that there is reason to believe that any person or any other person on his behalf is in possession of pecuniary resources or property disproportionate to his known sources of income, it may, by order, require such person to f......risdiction) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J MA Aziz J Tarique Rahman………………………Petitioner Vs. Director General, Bureau of Anti-Corruption, Government of Bangladesh and others ……………..Respondent Judgment March 23, 1999. Cases Referred To- Sonto..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
....6/93 is hereby set aside and the appellant’s mark is restored to its original position.
Send down the lower Court records expeditiously.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 237.......
High Court Division
(Civil)
Present:
Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J
Md. Abdul Aziz J
Samah Razor Blades Industries Ltd…………….Appellant
Vs.
Supermax International Pvt. Ltd and another………….………….Respondents
Judgment
March 11, 1998.
Cases Referred to..
Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 319
Abdur Rahim Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
.... In the impugned order allegations have been made against the petitioner for the various irregularities committed for providing overdraft to Marshall Services Limited, accepting security of immovable property to a value more than market price and enhancing the loan amount illegally. The overdraft fa......me Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J M A Aziz J Abdur Rahim Chowdhury…………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka and others………………Respondents Judgment July 10, 1997. Lawyers Involved: Syed..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shahidul Vs. State, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....s defined under section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and that there is nothing on record to show that the incriminating articles were likely to endanger life or cause serious injury to person or property in danger. He thereafter submits that there is no evidence against the accused petitioner s......l Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Shahidul…………….. Petitioner Vs. State ………………..Respondent Judgment August 13, 1998. Cases Referred to- Mofazzal Hossain Mollah and others vs. State 45 DLR (AD) 175 & Md. Sher Ali and others vs. State and another 46 DLR (AD)..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Shah Abdul Hannan and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
...., with a commitment to secure economic and social justice for all, filed the instant public interest litigation, pro bono publico. It is the petitioners’ honest and sincere desire to protect public property under Article 21 of the Constitution, that drove them to embark upon this path. History......16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 386. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 231
Thomarshu alias Majhi Vs. Bangladesh, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... Rule is liable to be discharged and accordingly, is discharged but without any order as to cost. Let the records of the case be sent down. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 516. ......ajhi……………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh……………………….Opposite Party Judgment December 9, 1999. Case Referred To- Begum Lutfunnessa Vs. Nizamuddin Ahmed and others, 40 DLR 232. Lawyers Involved: ABM Mahbub, Advocate, on behalf of Md. Marfat Ali, A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Begum Tahmina Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....rawn. 4. No inquiry required under section 4(1) of the Act was ever held to have objective satisfaction by the Government based on positive materials as regards possession by the petitioner of any property and liabilities disproportionate to her known source of income before the issuance and serv......AN Mominur Rahman J Md. Abdul Quddus J Begum Tahmina…………………………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Prime Ministers Secretariat, Dhaka and others………………………….Respondents Judgment August 8, 2000. Cases Referre..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Wahida Begum Vs. Tajul Islam, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....e sent down at once. Consequently, the order of this Court directing the parties to maintain status quo granted earlier is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 491....... Sunder Kuer Vs. Udey Ram, AIR 1944 Allahabad 42; Ambabai Vs. HR Dani, AIR 1948 Nagpur 367; Bhagwan Vs. Ujagar, AIR 1928 PC 20; Sunder Kuer Vs. Udey Ram, AIR 1944 Allahabad 42; Nainsukhdas Vs. Gowardhandas, AIR 1968 (Nagpur). Lawyers Involved: SN Goswami Advocate—For the Petitioner. Abu S..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Saleha Khatun and others Vs. Fetema Hajura and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....shutosh Roy while in ownership and possession died leaving two sons— Kalipada Roy and Devi Pada Roy whose names were recorded in SA Khatian. Thereafter said Kalipada and Devi Pada sold out the suit property along with others to plaintiff by registered sale deed dated 11-8-1969 and delivered posses......vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 457...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Shamim Begum Vs. Chairman Court of Settlement and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....88 (Ka 303) Mirpur, Dhaka should not be declared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. The petitioner has stated, inter alia, that after liberation of Bangladesh the property was wrongly enlisted as abandoned property and it was published in the official gazette ‘......ourt Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Ali Asgar Khan J Shamim Begum…………………Petitioner Vs. Chairman Court of Settlement and others ……………………Respondents Judgment August 11, 1999. Case Referred To- ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Bibi Zarina and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....4 of 1995 and the respondent No.2 of Writ Petition No.548 of 1994 is the petitioner in Writ Petition No.464 of 1994. 2. The case of the petitioners of Writ Petition No.548 of 1994 is that the case property being House No.12 Bhitar Ban Lane, PS Kotwali, Dhaka belonged to late Md. Siddique, the pre...... This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 439...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Manager, Bangladseh Krishi Bank and others Vs. Al-Haj Md. Nurul Islam & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....tion of Krishi Bank in the matter of granting loan to the plaintiff and Exhibit 11 (ka) is the Exhibit that shows that in fact Krishi Bank refused clearance in getting Bank loan against the mortgaged property from the other Bank. 17. The learned Advocate for the plaintiff respondent could not ref...... also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 434. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Abdul Waresh Vs. Md. Abdul Halim and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ecessor of opposite party Nos.1-8 as plaintiffs filed SCC Suit No.155 of 1985 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Chittagong against the defendant petitioner for ejectment from the suit property. 4. The defendant-petitioner contested the suit by filing written statement denying all ...... in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 608. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Sumikin Bussan Corporation Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and Others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... declared accepting the decision No.8823 dated 13-9-2000 of the Chittagong Port Authority as contained in Annexure-B to the petition. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 599. ......t Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Kazi AT Monowaruddin J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Sumikin Bussan Corporation………….Petitioner Vs. Chittagong Port Authority and Others.........Respondents. Judgment June 4, 2001. Case Referred To- Sharping Matsh..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 153
Sultan Mia (Md.) Vs. Hazi Md. Yusuf, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... facts: Petitioner instituted title Suit No.180 of 1986 in the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka against late Md. Jalaluddin for Specific Performance of Contract for sale of schedule ‘Ka’ property. During pendency of the suit said Md. Jalaluddin died and his heirs have been substituted i......uf ………………Opposite Party. Judgment August 16, 2001. Lawyers Involved: KS Salahuddin Ahmed, Advocate—For the Petitioner. M Enayetur Rahman with Shahidul Islam, Md. Alamgir and Jail Gazi, Advocates—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Molla Mahjenul Islam Vs. State and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ced under the management of the local Union Parishad and therefore, the learned Additional District Judge has committed no error of law in vacating the order of injunction. 8. Admittedly, the suit property is a Hat. In the plaint which was produced at the time of hearing the Rule, I have noticed ......ed in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 552...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Abdur Razzaque Mollah Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....Court of Subordinate Judge, Bagerhat for a decree of Specific Performance of Contract. 3. The short facts of the said case is that, while the defendant No.1 was owning and possessing the said Suit property he proposed to sell the same to the plaintiff who agreed to purchase the suit property at a......………Appellant Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others……...Opposite Parties. Judgment August 14, 2001. Cases Referred To- 43 DLR (AD) 78; 43 DLR (AD) 125; AIR 1975 All 341; Ram Chand Appellant Vs. Rain Swamp Respondent AIR 1952 Allahabad 654; Jalaluddin Mia Vs. Md. Yunus 1982 BC..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Government of Bangladesh Vs. ASM Ferojuddin Bhuiyan, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....aid a suit being Title Suit No.368 of 1985 in the First Court of Munsif (now Assistant Judge), Dhaka for a decree that defendants are legally bound to execute necessary documents relating to the suit property in favour of plaintiff after accepting the price fixed by Government and also for a decree ......d in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 522. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
.... response to the public notice published on behalf of the respondent No.1, the petitioners submitted tenders to purchase the commercial premises at 25, Bangabandhu Avenue, Ramna, Dhaka, (‘the case- property’ in short) with the requisite earnest money and although their tender was highest still t......is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 519...
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 96
47114709470847064704469446924690468846874686468146794672467146644663466046574656