Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Giasuddin (Md) Vs. MV Forum Power and ors, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....ion of US $ 22,631.80 equivalent to Taka 9,50,535.60 at the conversion rate of Taka 42.00 per US dollar from the principal defendant-respondent Nos. 1 to 5. The case of the appellant was that he is a businessman carrying on the business of ship repairer and ship chandler, watchman, chipping and pain......p; Giasuddin (Md)..................................................... Appellant Vs. MV Forum Power and ors........... ....................... Respondents Judgment July ......realisation of Taka 11,59,882.25 with cost against the defendant respondent Nos. 1-5 as prayed for. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001)19 ......realisation of Taka 11,59,882.25 with cost against the defendant respondent Nos. 1-5 as prayed for. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001)19 ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....No. 7 of 1992 for preemption of the case land under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act as contiguous land owner by inheritance stating inter alia that he went to London for business purpose and returned home on 02-02-1992. After his return he came to know from his neighbor......Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdul Matlib and others.......Appellants. Vs. Abdul Malik...............Respondent Judgment 8th May 2002. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate and J. N. Deb, Advocate with him) instructed by Sha......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....impugning the order of the respondent No. 1 herein issued under the signature of the respondent No. 1 herein issued under the signature of the respondent No.2 asking the respondent No.3 to manage the business of the Waqf Estate of Hazrat Khaza Kalu Shah Mazar Waqf Estate, Sitakundu, Chittagong. ......bdus Quddus.............Appellant. Vs. Administration of Waqf & others.............Respondents. Judgment 16th August 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Abdus Sob......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....is the managing Director of 'Friends Fishing Corporation' a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1913 and is also the owner of two Fishing Trawlers at Chittagong engaged in the business of catching shrimps in the deep sea, processes them in the trawlers and pack them in the in...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: A. F. Hassan Ariff, Attorney General (Borhanuddin, Deputy Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advoc......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......m J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. The State.................................Petitioner. Vs. Mofizuddin and others ......... Respondents. Judgment 29 November 2005 Criminal Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 135 of 2O04. (From the judgment and order dated 15.02.2004 passed by the Hig......nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......of Tk. 2,64,290/- in total breaking open the iron safes. In the morning the informant and others finding the grill of the window and iron safes broken, cash kept in the iron safes broken and the dead bodies of night guard, Abdul Mannan and treasurer Abul Kalam Azad lying in the delivery room could u..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ts contested the case filing affidavit-in-opposition contending, inter alia, that the Bank is run and managed by a Board of Directors. According to Article 131 of the Articles of Association its business is managed by the Directors who exercise all such powers and do all such acts as authorised......dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ...... Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Abdul Motalab Mian Vs. Secretary, Establishment Division and others, 1982 BLD 144. Lawyers Involved: Nurul Hoque Miah in person- For the Appellant. Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General- For the Respondent. Civil Appe......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162