Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1741-1760 of 3399 results.
....oller of Examinations came to the examination hall. As per instruction of the Chief Invigilator he stapled his notes with the answer script of the examinee. His answer script and recovered notes were handed over to the Chief Invigilator in an envelope. Chief Invigilator and Controller of Examination......1 of the Architecture Department in room No.303 of EME Building. Dr. Joarder Kamruzzaman was the invigilator in that room. He caught the petitioner while he was attempting to procure answer from some notes in the toilet room and seized the notes and reported the matter in writing to the Chief Invigi..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Dr. Ahmed Sharif Vs. State and another, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
....f this Court. 9. Mr. Syed Matiul Islam, Assistant Attorney‑General along with Mr. Md. Abdur Rouf, Assistant Attorney‑General assisted by Mr. Md. Shamsul Huda the learned Advocate, on the other hand, cited a decision in the case of Dr. Muzzammel Huq Chowdhury Vs. Chief Martial Law Adminstrator......t before he could reach the Court, a 3rd summon was ordered to be issued directing the accused petitioner to appear either personally or through his lawyer on 5-10-93. This order dated 5‑9‑93 was noted by the lawyer Mr. Md. Mahmud Hasan Talukder as it appears from the record of the case. Subsequ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Mahmudul Hoque and 5 others Vs. Nowab Ali Chowdhury and 18 others, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)
....hs from the date of receipt of the lower Court record. Let the lower Court record be sent down to the Court concerned expeditiously. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 49 DLR (HD) (1997) 92 ...... on that date plaintiffs were directed to deposit the deficit Court fees of Taka 10.35. Thereafter on 10‑12‑77 plaintiff paid the deficit Court fee which also finds support from the Sharistader's note dated 10‑ 12‑77 recorded on the 1st page of the plaint. 11. Trial Court decided the case..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Sharifuddin (Md.) Vs. Md. Mofizuddin Sarker and others, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
....িশোধের অঙ্গীকার করেছেন এবং সূদ মউকুফের আবেদন করেছে ।” 6. Mr. Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, however, on the other hand, submits that the appellate Court rightly held that the opposite party No.2 was disqualified un......s. The authority concerned is directed to take expeditious step for holding re-election in view of the term office of the chairman. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 49 DLR (HD) (1997) 86. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Sk. Helal Uddin and another Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
.... 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 286, 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 444, 8 LG (2011) HCD 342. ......ective appellants. The office is directed to send down the L.C. Records immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 286, 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 444, 8 LG (2011) HCD 342. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Sultan Ahmed Vs. Golam Mostafa alias Dulal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
.... public servant under the proviso to the sec. 247 of the Cr. P.C., had only passed the order "not admitted." The learned Magistrate did not even care to reject the petition with reasons. On the other hand it is pointed out the learned Magistrate granted time to the opposite parties on 16.6.85, thoug....... 2,000/- each to the Magistrate concerned for keeping peace for a period of one year from this date. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 219...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Md. Abdu Mia Vs. The Election Commission & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....for both Chairman and members simultaneously and no piecemeal election of cither for the office of Chairman or the members has been permitted to hold under the said election Rules. 5. On the other hand Mr. Amir Hossain, the learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent No.3 submits that Rule 25 c......rdingly, the Rule is discharged without, however, any order as to cost. The Slay order passed on 12.7.88 hereby stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 215. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 161
Mostofa Kamal Vs. B. D. Habibullah & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....s) and AIR 1937 Allahabad 365 (Nawal Kishore Agarwala Vs. Municipal Board, Gorakhpur and others). 6. Mr. Md. Abdus Sobhan, the learned Advocate appearing for the opposite party No.1 on the other hand, denies that it is an election dispute as according to him the order of the Election Commis......hammadan Law that appropriate action for appointment of a permanent Mutawalli might be taken, and it was held that such a suit was maintainable and Section 92 of the said Code was No.bar. It may be noted that Waqf is a traditional right not introduced by any statute. The facts of the said case r..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 207
....aman, Rashiduzzaman and Sinku Akramuzzaman who have jointly set up an office for their various businesses in the said house and have also been using part of it in storing equipments and other merchandise connected with their businesses. The petitioner has been paying rent regularly to the Gove......tioner may avail of any other alternative remedy as advised.
The Rule is, therefore, discharged but without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 193.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 171
Major (Retd.) Mohammad Afsaruddin Vs. Kamal Rahman, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....this Court, because it is an established law that amendment of the pleadings can be allowed at any stage. 8. Mr. S.R. Pal learned Advocate for the plaintiff-opposite party submits on the other hand that the proposed amendment is an instance of inconsistent pleading. It is the case of the peti......f Nrisingh Prasad Paul Vs. Steel Products Ltd., AIR 1953 (Cal) 15, regarding the difference between an amendment of the plaint and that of written statement in the following words- "It is to be noted that amendment of a plaint and amendment of a written statement are not necessarily governed b..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Shahabuddin Ahmed Vs. Upazila Election Officer, Bakerganj & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... the revised edition of 5 DLR and the case of Karim Gul Vs. Shahzad Gul reported in PLD 1968 Peshawar, 134, Mr. Hemayetuddin Ahmed, the learned Advocate for the opposite party No.1 and 4 on the other hand submits that in absence of any formal defect there was no scope for the learned Assistant Judge......tion thereof, to dispose of the defendant's prayer for rejection of the plaint. Let the lower Court record be sent down forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 188. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. The Election Commission, Dhaka & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....t any order as to costs. This judgment, however, will not prejudice the rights and remedies of the respondents in any other forum. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 178. ......Secretary to the Election Commission made the following observation on the margin of the application, "Seen. We may order re-poll in Chouhat centre in view of report of Presiding Officer". This note is dated 31.3.88. It appears that the Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commissioner..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 167
Siddiqur Rahman and others Vs. Abdul Jalil Meah and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ents Order November 17, 2009. Result: Leave is granted Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Khandoker Mahbubuddin Ahmed Senior Advocate (M.A, Azim Khair, Advocate with him), instructed by Zainu......are the paper-books out of Court in accordance with Rules. The parties are directed to maintain status quo till disposal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 1002...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Ministry of Communication and others Vs. Md. Ferozur Rahman & ors, 1991, 20, CLC (HCD)
....it the licence has been already granted to a third party who is in possession. 6. Mr. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, the learned Counsel appearing for the plaintiff‑respondent No.1, submitted, on the other hand, that this is not a mere question of revocability of the contract which is not to be specifical......6.91 the Railway Authority vide letter dated 19.7.88 as in paragraph 3 of the Supplementary Affidavit and which is also the case of the plaintiff, directed the caterer M/s. Golden Dragon Ltd. to take note that it has been decided that the breakfast and dinner and other meal would be supplied by him ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Kabir and others Vs. State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....e sent back to the police. 17. P.W.13 Abdur Rob Bhuiyan, who partly investigated into the case and submitted charge sheet. He stated that on 12.8.88 he was at Begumganj Police Station. He knew the hand writing of Abdus Salam who filled up the First Information Report form and he also knew the sig......e‑lists and on completion of the investigation submitted charge‑sheet on 8.12.88 against all the 8 accused persons including the appellants under sections 397/395/412 of the Penal Code. It may be noted that none of the accused appellants was named in the First Information Report. After arrest ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Siddiqur Rahman Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... ingredients of the alleged offence under Section 6 of Act 1 of 1956 or Section 25 of the Special Powers Act 1974. Mr. Gazi Siddique Ahmed, the learned Advocate appearing for the State on the other hand submits that the offence committed by the accused appellant is of serious nature from the n......nd the evidence on record along with the accusation (charge) and also the judgment of the trial Court. We have also noticed the seizure-list Ext. 1 which does not show seizure of any paddy. It may be noted that the allegation against this appellant as would appear from the prosecution case is of a..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Al-haj Abdul Aziz Vs. Kalipada Das & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
..... 3. Including the parties 2 P.Ws. and 2 O.P.Ws. have been examined at the time of hearing. P.W.1 Kalipada Das is a son of Hara Mohan Das. P.W.2 Haripada Das is the alleged informant. On the other hand, O.P.W.1 Alhaj Abdul Aziz Howlader is the opposite-party himself and O.P.W.2 Abdul Hashem is an......sis of such a decision calls for no interference in revision. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 170. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Shahabuddin Ahmed Vs. Upazila Education Officer, Bakerganj & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... the revised edition of 5 DLR and the case of Karim Gul Vs. Shahzad Gul reported in PLD 1968 Peshawar, 134. Mr. Hemayetuddin Ahmed, the learned Advocate for the opposite party No.1 and 4 on the other hand submits that in absence of any formal defect there was no scope for the learned Assistant Judge......ion thereof, to dispose of the defendant's prayer for rejection of the plaint. Let the lower court record be sent down forth with. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 168. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 206
Ayub Ali (Md) Vs. Abdul Khaleque, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ul Khaleque, Sub-Inspector of Narcotics and Liquor Department, Chittagong, apprehended him and recovered from his possession one gallon of hilly liquor which he held in a polythene bag in his right hand. He seized the same in presence of witnesses under a seizure list prepared by him and obtained ......Court below to undergo the remainder of the punishment and sentence. Sent down the LCR along with a copy of this judgment expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 489. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Kamaluddin and others Vs. Abdul Aziz (Md.) and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d Subordinate Judge committed serious error in believing and acting upon such story of exchange. 16. Mr. Nowshad Zamir, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. I to 4, on the other hand, tried to defend the judgment and submitted that though learned Subordinate Judge rejected thei......gned and above him Mobarakullah signed. The deed was marked with objection as Exhibit-Ka. Mobarakullah gave him possession of the exchanged land and he got possession of his exchanged land. It may be noted that Mobarakullah did not identify his signature on the exchange deed. 23. In cross-examina..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
58085807580458025797579057895785578457835782578057775775577457725771577057665765