Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1761-1780 of 3391 results.
Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation Vs. Md. Kashem and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....it be dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 350.......chalan at the old rate was passed. And the plaintiff was awaiting for the order after due process of the file. The lease order was passed by defendant No. 1 through a section officer of the abandoned property as the suit land was declared abandoned. The government suddenly served a letter dated 25â€..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Chairman, National Housing Authority Vs. M/s. MR. Trading Co. and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....l Wahhab Miah J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Chairman, National Housing Authority ............................Appellant Vs. M/s. MR. Trading Co. and others ....................................Respondents Judgment June 2, 2011. Result: ......observed that the suit is not maintainable, that the plaintiff had already received the running bills for the works done and that the plaintiff would be entitled to the money for the works done after proper measurement in accordance with tender documents. On appeal from the said judgment the High Co..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Shahidullah and others Vs. State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....€¦Respondent Judgment November 4, 1991. Result: The appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Md. Kalu Bhuiyan @ Kalu Mia Vs. Special Tribunal No.II Comilla, 30 DLR 124; Dost Mohammad and others Vs. State, 29 DLR 122. Lawyers Involved: Md. Azizul Haque, Advocate ‑ For Appella......f holding trial before the Drug Court trial was held before the Special Tribunal and as a wrong forum has been chosen for the prosecution of the appellants, I am inclined to send back the case to the proper Court for fresh trial and I hold that the cognizance taken by the Special Tribunal in this ca..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
AKM Mukhlesur Rahman Vs. State, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....StateMohammad Sarwar Vs. State, 21 DLR (SC) 182; Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman, 1982 BCR 367; Abdul Jabbar Vs. The State, 37 DLR 278; Emperor Vs. Anwar Ali, 1948 AIR (Lahore) 27; Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh and another Vs. State of Vindh‑P, 1954 AIR (SC) 322. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq with Zulm...... of gratification must be corroborated by other witnesses and on that principle of law the learned Advocate submits that when in the present case demand of gratification has not been substantiated by proper corroborative evidence the conviction cannot be sustained. But it has been held by a Division..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Globe Bruges Ltd. Vs. Arab Bangladesh Bank Ltd. And others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....structed by Zohirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.7. Not Represented-For Respondent Nos. 3-6 & 8-10. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 548 of 2010. (From the judgment and order dated 7.1.2010 passed by the High Court Division in Firs! Appeal No.78 of 2007.) Judgme......panies. The defendant No.4 Company obtained loan from the defendant No.1 Bank and the defendant No.5 as the Managing Director of the defendant No.4 Company and guarantor of the loan had mortgaged his property with the defendant No.1 Bank as collateral security. The defendant No.4 failed to repay the..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Kazi Kamrul and others Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....nt: Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Nazmun Ara Sultana J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Muhammad Imman Ali J Muhammad Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed J Md. Shamsul Huda J Kazi Kamrul and others …………………….......Petitioners Vs. The State ……………………â€......ing the said confessions against the accused-respondents in finding them guilty of the charges. 5. We have perused the materials on record and heard me learned counsel, me High Court Division on a proper assessÂment of the evidence on record has arrived at a conclusion that "the trawler in quesÂ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Bashaboo Girls High School Vs. Sharafunnessa and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....Wahhab Miah J Bashaboo Girls High School, Madhay Bashaboo, Police Station- Sabujbagh, Dhaka represented by its Head Master-Cum-Secretary……………………..Petitioner Vs. Sharafunnessa and others …………....................................Respondents Order May 9, 2011. ......s under: "1. Is the suit maintainable in its presÂent form? 2. Has the suit land, been acquired? 3. Is the resolution dated 09.11.1995 taken by the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 as to allotment of property mentioned in the 'Schedule-A' of the plaint illegal? 4. Are the plaintiffs entitled to g..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Ali Amzad Khan Vs. Md. Titam Khan and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Ali Amzad Khan…………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Titam Khan and others ................................Respondents Order January 6, 2011. Result: Le......ision erred in law in interfering with the findings of fact arrived at by the Court of appeal below in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction in failing to consider that the Court of appeal below on proper assessment of the eviÂdence on record came to a definite finding that the plaintiff has titl..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Shahidul Islam and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 492. ......rming the common judgment and decree passed in Title Appeal Nos.157 and 158 of 1994. 6. The High Court Division however observed that the contesting parties are co-sharers in the suit land but the property has not been divided by metes and bounds and thus remained in ejmali and since both the par..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Superintendent Musrat Dhulia Dakhil Madrasha Vs. Md. Rafiqul Islam and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....srat Dhulia Dakhil Madrasha, Sayedpur Police Station Sayedpur, District- Nilphamari……………………………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Rafiqul Islam and another ................................Respondents Order April 28, 2011. Result: Le......eave is granted to considÂer the Ground Nos. I and II of the leave petition, quoted herein below:- "I. For that in the suit the Madrasha was not made party and thus the suit must fail for want of proper and necesÂsary parties the High Court Division overlooked this point and decreed the suit; ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Bikash Ranjan Talukder and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....eported in: VIII ADC (2011) 471. ......it petitions and they have been serving for the last 22/25 years and have been receiving MPO from the Government. The Government of Bangladesh by the impugned memo stopped their MPO without assigning proper reason, which was illegal, arbitrary and not binding upon them. 4. The petitioners contest..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Continental Traders (BD) Ltd. Vs. Co. and GE Sea Services Ltd & others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Md. Abdul Wahhab Miah J Continental Traders (BD) Ltd..................................Petitioner Vs. Co. and GE Sea Services Ltd & others .....................Respondents Order May 8, 2011. Re......Âsignees on arrived at port of discharge in Bangladesh such containers do come withÂin the purview of section 3(2)(Ja) of the Admiralty Court Act, 2000, and accordingÂly the suit has been filed in proper forum. 6. The Admiralty Court on consideration of the material on record and the submissio..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 338
Matiur Rahman and others Vs. Md. Nowab Ali and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 468.......he respective parties the trial Court found the Issue Nos.2 and 3 in favour of the plaintiffs and the Issue No.4 against the plaintiffs and the Issue No.5 relating to exclusive possession in the suit property was found against the plaintiffs since found that the plaintiffs failed to prove their excl..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Tuglak Khan Vs. Md. Sultan Nasiruddin, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)
....r Rahman, with Serajur Rahman, Advocates ‑ For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.2183 of 1990. Judgment Naimuddin Ahmed J.- This revisional application is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge, 4th Court Dhaka on 6.8.1990 in Title Appeal No.319 of 19......contravention of sections 91 and section 92 of the Evidence Act. Section 91 of the Evidence Act runs as follows: "91. When the terms of a contract, or of a grant, or of any other disposition of property have been reduced to the form of a document, and in all cases in which any matter is requir..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Abul Ahsan Joardar Vs. Kazi Misbahul Alam, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)
....¦Petitioner Vs. Kazi Misbahul Alam……………………Opposite Party Judgment November 30, 1992. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Haji Azizur Rahman and others Vs. Syeedul Haque Chowdhury, 38 DLR 4; Ansaruddin Molla Vs. Hamed Molla and others, 18 DL......ot be quashed or in the alternative why the order dated 9.10.85 complained of in the petition should not be set aside or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may deem fit and proper. At the time of issuance of the Rule all further proceedings in Petition Case No.11016a of 19..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 98
.... also Reported in: 45 DLR (HCD) (1993) 601.
......holding the inclusion of a house being House No.22, Block 'B' Lane No.4 Section 13, Mirpur Housing Estate, PS Mirpur, Dhaka hereinafter referred to as the disputed house in the 'Ka' list of abandoned property.
2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1 is the wife of petitioner No..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Aftabur Rahman Vs. State, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....Khondakar Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 34 DLR (AD) 222; Mohd. Raft Vs. State, (1969) Pakistan Criminal Law Journal 873; Jahangir Lai Vs. Emperor, 1935 AIR Lahore 230; Naeemullah Vs. SSP Faisalabad and others, 1992 Pakistan Criminal Law Journal 985; Tofazzal Hossain Sheikh Vs. Mir Md. Akand and ot......necessary to interrogate him. 11. On 30.6.93 an application was filed on behalf of the accused petitioner for rejecting the prayer for remand and for directing the jail authority for arranging his proper treatment alleging torture by the police taking him to an unknown place in Kotwali PS Case No..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Mst. Momtaz Begum Vs. Anowar Hossain, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....a Shwe Baw (1929) 7 Rang 777, 121 I.C. 718, Gagu Bibi V. Mesal Shaikh (1936) 63 cal 415, 164 I.C. 957, Shahzada Begum V. Abdul Hamid (1950) Lah 773, Khorshed Alam @ Shah Alam V. Amir Sultan Ali Hyder and another, 38 DLR (AD) 133, Debendra Mohan Rai V. Sona Kunwar, (1904) 36 Allahbad 295, Abdool Raza...... their conduct infer a presumption as to the legal marriage, and (3) whether the High Court Division is justified in interfering with the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below on proper assessment of the evidence on record as to the solemnization of a legal marriage between the ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 318
KM Sarwar Hossain Vs. Mosharraf Hossain and others, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
....62. ....... In a case where the Court finds that it has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit the plaint need not be rejected; it should be returned under Order 7 rule 10 for presentation to the proper Court. It may be noted however that defendant No.9 undisputedly resides within the jurisdi..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Hosne Ara Begum Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1993, 22 CLC (HCD)
.... Mozammel Hoque J Md. Abdul Karim J Hosne Ara Begum……………………Appellant Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and Another……………………Respondents Judgment May 19, 1993. Case Referred to- ......n Money Suit No.9 of 1985 by the learned Subordinate Judge, First Court, Dhaka, dismissing the suit. 2. Plaintiff is the appellant before this Court. Plaintiff claims right and title over the suit property by purchase. We need not go into the detailed discussions in respect of right and title, of..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
55615557555655535549554855475544554155385537553655345532552955285526552255095507