Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
M. M. Rafiqul Hyder Vs. The State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....P.W.1, P.W.2 M. Shamsuddin Molla prepared the detention Memo of the seized goods. P.W.1 Saifuddin Ahmed lodged typed F.I.R. Ext.3 on 30.5.86 at 21.45 hours at Cantonment P.S. Appellant could not show any valid paper authorising him to possess the seized gold bars. The seized goods were deposited i......ted in his examination-in-chief that at about 2 P.M. he was called by the Customs Officer and asked to be a witness. As already staled, this witness was not declared hostile by the prosecution at any stage and his evidence is uniform and consistent. The prosecution fully relied on his evidence. The ......h section 25B of the Special Powers Act and those two provisions are not triable together under Special Powers Act by the Special Tribunal constituted under that Act and this has vitiated the whole proceedings. He argued that the offences punishable under section 156 of the Customs Act which is ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Md. Osman Vs. Fatema Khatoon & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....er tendered nor they refused to accept the same and as such there was no service of notice determining the tenancy. The plea of bona fide requirement of the premises was false as the plaintiff had many other residential houses in the town. 4. The learned Munsif decreed the suit in part holding ......l is allowed with costs and the judgment and decree of the lower appellate Court is set aside and those of the Trial Court is upheld. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 270.......le 4 of the President’s Order no.12 of 1972 reads as: “Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for time being in force, in computing the period of limitation describe for any legal proceeding by or under any law, the period between the 1st day of March, 1971 and the 1st day of Mar..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 166
Rahima Khatun Vs. Md. Nurul Hoque & others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)
....t Nos. 12-17, jointly fuel a written statement in order to contest the suit but during the pendency of the suit he died in 1984 and his heirs were not brought on record by the plaintiff petitioner at any point of time and subsequently the preliminary decree was passed on 24-4-95 and the opposite par......the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The order of stay earlier granted by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 140.......ed man had, which death had prevented him from pursuing.” Besides, section 146, CPC is as follows: “Save as otherwise provided by this Code or by any law for the time being in force, where any proceeding may be taken or application made by or against any person, then the proceeding may be tak..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Naogaon Rice Mills Ltd. Vs. Pubali Batik Ltd., 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ed, the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that under section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the learned Magistrate is required to make a preliminary enquiry before lodging any complaint against the delinquent who is alleged to have used a forged document in relation to a ......he learned Artha Rin Adalat and the learned Cognizance Court and Magistrate, 1st Class, Naogaon for their information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 543. ......tha Rin Adalat, on hearing the contending parties and on careful perusal of the materials before him, passed the impugned order dated 10‑1‑2001 lodging a complaint to the Magistrate concerned for proceeding against the defendant-petitioner in accordance with law. Being aggrieved by the afores..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Khondaker Fazlul Haque and another Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....he subordinate officers of the trust and cannot avoid decision of the superior authority. Therefore, they are not at all involved for the allegation as made therein does not attract the petitioner in any way. 5. Mr. ABM Waliur Rahman Khan, the learned Assistant Attorney-General appearing on behal......ing to the Trust is a misuse of official power thus, committed the offence which is triable and they will be given opportunity to defend themselves in the court below, as such, the proceeding at this stage cannot be quashed. 6. We have gone through the first information report, charge sheet and t......gir Husain J.- Two Rules were heard analogously as they arise out of the same FIR and involved common question of facts and are disposed of by one judgment. 2. These Rules are directed against the proceeding in Metro Special Case No. 95 of 2002 under sections 409/402/109 of the Penal Code read wi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Md. Mosharaf Hossain Sukani Vs. State and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....managed to have heard the matter before that vacation on 15.08.2006 beyond the knowledge of the opposite party No.2 and got ex parte order of discharge of the rule with vacating order of stay without any finding as to merit of the case and as such deserves no consideration by this Hon'ble Court. ......ion and that too in the rarest of rare cases. It is further held in the case of Sukumaran Nair Vs. State of Kerala 1961 Ker LT 110 that ordinarily the High Court do not interfere at the interlocutory stage of criminal proceedings in a subordinate Court. This High Court Division would not be justifie......r. Md. Siraj, Advocate - For the opposite party No.2. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6294 of 2008. (An application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 for quashment of proceedings of the Patenga P.S case No.4 dated 11.4.2004 under section 302/34 of the Penal Code now ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Mollah Shabidul Islam Vs. Md. Monsur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... sale proceeding on the ground of fraud committed by the decree-holder and in deciding the question of fraud or material irregularity in the sale proceeding, the petitioner is not required to furnish any security at the rate of 25% of the decretal amount as contemplated under section 32(2) of the Ar......he application under Order XXI, rules 90 and 91 of the petitioner in accordance with law and with utmost expedition. No order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 164. ......ure filed by the petitioner and, as such, the order passed by the Artha Rin Adalat is without lawful authority. He has further argued that the petitioner and his brother have challenged the said sale proceeding on the ground of fraud committed by the decree-holder and in deciding the question of fra..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Adilur Rahman Khan Vs. Bangladesh, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
.... tried by the competent Court of justice or a Tribunal under the law of the land. But the commission has been established under the impugned Ordinance is neither a Court nor a Tribunal established by any law and it has been created only to frustrate the Rule of law and to undermine the Court of just......hority and are of no legal effect. We are grateful to the members of the bar who have actively assisted us. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 MLR (HCD) (2011) 3; 16 BLC (HCD) (2011) 100. ......aw and as such the “স্বপ্রনোদিত তথ্য প্রকাশ অধ্যাদেশ, ২০০৮” (Voluntary Disclosure of Information) Ordinance and the acts done and proceeding taken by the impugned Ordinance are liable to be declared to have been made without lawfu..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 264
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Abdullah (Md) and others Vs. Majibul Huq and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... setting aside the said Sole decree. 3. The case of the plaintiff‑ petitioners, in short, is that the petitioners had no knowledge about Title Suit No. 134 of 1958 as they were never served with any summons of the said suit nor they have filed any vokalatnama in the said suit to contest the sam......er was not challenged in any higher forum. Further contention of the opposite parties are that, the disputed solenama and decree being more than 30 years cannot be put under challenge at this belated stage and accordingly, the trial Court rightly rejected the same. It is further contended that Abdur......No. 14 dated 30‑5‑2001 be set aside and the application dated 20‑5‑2001 be allowed. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 528. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Animal Protection Society Chittagong Vs. Laxman Chadra Das & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....e plaintiff society was owner in possession of the suit land. The suit land was acquired and an award was made in the names of defendant Nos. 1 to 5 and unknown persons. The plaintiff did not receive any notice either under section 3 or 6 of the Ordinance. Plaintiff did not challenge the acquisition......he deposit account of the Public Account of the Republic as provided under section 10(2) of the Ordinance. Send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 522. ...... was made in the names of defendant Nos. 1 to 5 and unknown persons. The plaintiff did not receive any notice either under section 3 or 6 of the Ordinance. Plaintiff did not challenge the acquisition proceeding or the making of the award. Plaintiff instituted the suit only for declaration of its rig..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Gafur alias Kana Mia and others Vs. Md Nurul Islam, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....nt-opposite party it would be profitable to quote the section 195(1)(c) which is as follows : "195. (1) No Court shall take cognizance (a) .................. (b) .................. (c) of any offence described in section 463 or punishable under section 471, section 475 or section 476 of ......bmitted by the said officer upon which the learned Magistrate by order dated 8‑2‑2000 took cognizance of the case and issued summons against the accused including the present petitioners. At this stage, when both the cases were proceeding simultaneously before the same Magistrate, the petitioner...... This Rule arising out of an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure at the instance of the petitioners was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the proceedings of CR Case No. 31 of 2000 under sections 464/465/467/468 /469/471/109 of the Penal Code ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Rafiqul Alam (Md.) MD Dhaka Mercantile Co‑operative Bank Ltd. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....etitioner thereupon filed an application under section 241A Cr.P.C. for discharge on the ground that the first information report, police report and the documents submitted therewith did not disclose any offence. The learned Magistrate by order dated 28‑9‑03 rejected the said application and fra...... is hereby quashed. The petitioner is discharged from the bail bond. The order of stay granted earlier by this court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 145. ......Aktar Imam, Advocate—For the Informant. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.11845 of 2003. Judgment SK Sinha J.- This Rule at the instance of the petitioner Md. Rafiqul Alam is for quashing the proceedings in GR Case No.399 of 2003 arising out of Gulshan Police Station Case No.26 dated 10‑3-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Safiqur Rahman (Md.) and others Vs. Ambia Khatoon and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....sharers, in the case holding by purchase and what one Md. Anisul Hoque, another co-sharer transferred the case land in favour of Moulavi Md. Safiqur Rahman and Mst. Mohsena Khatoon without service of any notice on the pre‑emptors by a Kabala dated 16‑2‑1998 and the pre‑emptors learnt about t...... Case No.5 of 1998 as passed at the time of the issuance of the Rule for a period of 3(three) months and subsequently extended is vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 143. ......e petitioner, raised only one point. According to the learned Advocate, the Miscellaneous Case No.39 of 2001 under Order IX, rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure for restoration of the pre‑emption proceeding was not maintainable in view of section 96(13) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act w..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Al-Imran Ali and others Vs. Sudangshu Kumar Banik and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ce of defendant No.30 and by accepting the additional written statement filed by the defendant No.30 long after about 24 years and 15½ years after close of the plaintiffs' evidence without assigning any reason therefor has resulted in an error in the impugned judgment and order occasioning failure ......lie has to file a petition stating reason why he failed to say these things in the original written statement and what excuse there is for allowing him to file an additional written statement at that stage. Then, the other side has to be given an opportunity to oppose the petition and to contend why......2001 is hereby set aside. Since it is a long pending suit the trial Court is directed to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 106...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 140