Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Hazi Md. Lliyas Vs. Government of the People's Khan Republic of Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....plication which their Lordships assess at Tk. 1000/- (Taka one thousand) only. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 69. ......ioner Vs. Government of the People's Khan Republic of Bangladesh………..Respondents Judgment July 26, 1978. Result: The rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: A. Wahab-For the Petitioner. Syed J. R Mudassir Hussain, A. A.O-For the......plication which their Lordships assess at Tk. 1000/- (Taka one thousand) only. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 69. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 26 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 2
Md. Shahjahan and another Vs. Haji Yeaqub Ali Chowdhury and another, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
.... Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar (North) Chittagong. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. Abdul Malek J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 63 ......er…............Opposite-Parties Judgment July 25, 1978. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred To- AIR 1951 Calcutta 206 and 13 Cr.L.J. (F.B.) 1988 Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Mozammel Haque Bhuiyan with Rabia Bhuiyan—For the Petitioners. ...... Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar (North) Chittagong. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. Abdul Malek J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 63 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 25 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 1
Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 2
Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 3
Anwarul Huq Khan Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....er in rank than the petitioner to hold the enquiry. No order as to costs. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 21 .............Respondents Judgment July 19, 1978. Result: The rule is made absolute in part. Cases Referred To- 30 D.L.R. (SC) 96S; M. Saleh (1975) 27 DLR 328; 27 DLR 353. Lawyers Involved: Syed Istiaque Ahmed, Mahmudul Islam- For the Petitioner. Anwarul Hu......er in rank than the petitioner to hold the enquiry. No order as to costs. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 21 ..Category: Civil Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 19 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 1
Moulana Syed Ahmed Vs. Nurul Islam & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....e learned Magistrate is directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 13. ...... Syed Ahmed Jamil Vs. Kabir Ahmed (1970) 22 DLR 231; Malik Manjur Elahi Vs. Lala Bishambar Das (1964) 16 DLR (SC) 246; Moslem Fakir and others Vs. Ainuddin Talukdar and others (1965) 17 DLR 705. Lawyers Involved: Syed Azizul Huq, Syed Moinul Huq-For the Petitioner Fakhrul Islam&n...... Lawyers Involved: Syed Azizul Huq, Syed Moinul Huq-For the Petitioner Fakhrul Islam for Shah Md. Sharif-For Opposite Parties. Criminal Revision No. 786 of 1974. Order M.A. Khaliq J. – This rule arises out of an application filed by the 1st party peti..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 18 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 1
Keramat Ali Talukdar Vs. Election Tribunal and Munsif, 6th Court, Barisal and ano¬ther, 7 CLC (HCD)
....is set aside. In the circumstances of the case we do not pass any order as to costs. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 1 ......ublic servant holding whole-time office of profit so as to come within the mischief of Article 9 (2)(e) of the Local Government Ordinance and thereby disqualified to become Chairman. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Shafiqur Rahman-For the Petitioner Sham......y Management Cell within the office of the Addl. Dy. Commissioner is a local authority. "Local Authority" has been defined in the General Clauses Act, 1897 as amended by the President's Order No. 147 of 1972 as follows: “Local Authority”- local authority shall mean and..Category: Election Law, Property Law | Date: 18 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 5
Ali Akbar Pandit & others Vs. Jadu Gopal Shah Bhowmik & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....proceeding of Miscellaneous petition No. 2 of 1977 before the Deputy Commissioner, Bakerganj is vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 66. ......ent July 17, 1978. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Parmeshar Dat Vs. Emperor 18 Cr. LJ.900; Makhdoom Hussain Vs. Dr. Wahed Ali PLD 1961 (WP) Kar. 432. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ayub—For the Petitioners. &......ual of section 13 of the Police Act leads us to think that it is purely a temporary measure designed to meet the ' urgent requirement of keeping peace at any place; In the passing of an Order u/s 13 of the Police Act ho decision regarding the question of possession of any pro..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 17 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 1
Ali Akbar Pandit & others Vs. Jadu Gopal Shah Bhowmik & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....e order staying further proceeding of Miscellaneous petition No. 2 of 1977 before the Deputy Commissioner, Bakerganj is vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 66. ......ent July 17, 1978. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Parmeshar Dat Vs. Emperor 18 Cr. LJ.900; Makhdoom Hussain Vs. Dr. Wahed Ali PLD 1961 (WP) Kar. 432. Lawyers Involved: Mohammad Ayub—For the Petitioners. &......ual of section 13 of the Police Act leads us to think that it is purely a temporary measure designed to meet the urgent requirement of keeping peace at any place; In the passing of an Order u/s 13 of the Police Act ho decision regarding the question of possession of any pro..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 17 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 1
Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Abu Taher, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....nd for granting leave, the second ground becomes redundant for our answer. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 33. ...... Vs. Shivabasappa Makapur, AIR 1963 (SC) 375 (377); Board of Education Vs. Rice, 1911 AD 179 (182); Government Board Vs. Arlidge 1915 AC 120; Abdul Kashem Vs. Bangladesh, (C A. No. 138 of 1977). Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General with B.B. Roy Chowdhury, instructed by D. Hossai......ecord - For the Appellants. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A. Backkar, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1978 From the Judgment and Order dated 27-5-1977, passed by the High Court in Writ Petition No. 141 of 1976. Judgment ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 12 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 96
R.R. Textile Mills Ltd. & others Vs. Din Mohammad & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....nt back to the Labor Court for disposal according to law. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 346. ......& others.............Petitioners Vs. Din Mohammad & others.....................Respondents Judgment July 5, 1978. Result: Both the rules are made absolute. Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General—For the Petitioner. Zamiruddin Sa......etitioner is the General Manager. This Mills is a nationalized industrial enterprise under the administrative control of the Bangladesh Textile Mills Corporation established under the President's Order No. 27 of 1972. These respondents had filed the Industrial Dispute Cases before the Labor Cour..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 5 Jul, 1978 | Hits: 3
Zauz Ali Molla Vs. Fatema Bibi and others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....d Munsif is directed to proceed with the partition suit according to law. Send down the records expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 424. ...... Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Lachmi Narayan, 29 C.W.N. 391 (P.C.); Kambala Sandararojamma, AIR 1932 Mad. 519; Lichmi Narayan Tewari, AIR 1925 Pat. 433. Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider—For the Petitioner. M. A. Sattar—For Oppo......l Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Ranadhir Sen J Zauz Ali Molla...............................Petitioner Vs. Fatema Bibi and others....................Opposite parties Order June 20, 1978. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- ..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Jun, 1978 | Hits: 3
Category: Property Law | Date: 14 Jun, 1978 | Hits: 2
Monoruddin @ Mona & another Vs. The State, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....lants and direct them to be set at liberty forthwith if not required in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 282. ............................Appellants Vs. The State....................................................Respondents Judgment June 13, 1978. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Mostafa Kamal—For the Appellant. Humayun Habibur Rasul—For ......lants and direct them to be set at liberty forthwith if not required in connection with any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 282. ..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 13 Jun, 1978 | Hits: 1
A. K. Mujibur Rah¬man, alias Mujibar Rahman Vs. Returning Officer & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....Government of Bangladeshby an order dated 28-4-78 (Annexure-B) published in the Bangladesh Gazette. According to this amendment, an officer of the Bangladesh Army holding the office of the Chief Martial Law Administrator is now qualified for seeking any election. This amendment has been made by....................Petitioner Vs. Returning Officer & others...................................Respondent Judgment June 2, 1978. Result: The application is rejected. Lawyers Involved: K S. Nabi, A. Hasib-For the Petitioner. K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General, An......t only the Chief Martial Law Administrator and President of Bangladesh but it also the Commander in Chief of the Defence Forces of Bangladesh under the Thirteenth Amendment of the Second Proclamation Order No.11 of 1970 Ordinary Gazette. It reads thus: "(a) the Chief Martial Law Administra..Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 2 Jun, 1978 | Hits: 4
Sultan Ahmed Vs. Election Commission of Bangla¬desh and another, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....rned Attorney General on wham a notice of the applications was served has appeared Jo oppose the applications. The learned Attorney General has referred to certain provisions of the Proclamations and Martial Law Regulations and Orders and contended that in view of these Proclamations and Martial Law......etitioner Vs. Election Commission of Bangladesh and another.....Respondents (In Petition No.447 of 1978) Judgment May 31, 1978. Result: The prayer is rejected. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Aleem-Al-Razee, Ahmad Husain, Mohammdd Abdur Rouf—For the Petitione......m a notice of the applications was served has appeared Jo oppose the applications. The learned Attorney General has referred to certain provisions of the Proclamations and Martial Law Regulations and Orders and contended that in view of these Proclamations and Martial Law Regulations and Orders, the..Category: Constitutional Law, Election Law | Date: 31 May, 1978 | Hits: 3
Haji Joynal Abedin Vs. State, People's Republic, Bangladesh others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....he Respondents. M. H. Khandkar—Amicus Curiae. Writ Petition No. 345 of 1978. Judgment Badrul Haider Chowdhury J.-. This is directed against an order of conviction passed in Martial Law Case No. 6 of 1977 by Special Martial Law Court No. II, Dacca sentencing the accused to ......Anisminic Ltd, 1969 (2) Appeal Cases 147; Kefhabananda AIR (SC) 461; Actoan Afzal (1969; 21 DLR (SC) 123; State of West Bengal Vs. Anwar Ati AIR 1952 (SC) 92; Kangeshari Haldar AIR 1960 (SC)457. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Amir Hossain Khandkar, Zakir Ahmed, Suranjit Sen Gupta, Sohrab H......amation of 20th August, 1975 and canvassed that the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh has continued to remain in force subject to the proclamation and Martial Law Regulation and Orders. In clause (g) the jurisdiction of the superior Courts has been ousted on a very limited grou..Category: Administrative Law, Criminal Law | Date: 4 May, 1978 | Hits: 3
Abu Daud and others Vs. Sailuddin Sardar & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....Code of Civil Procedure. The result, therefore, is that the Rules are discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 421 ......Sailuddin Sardar & others…………………Opposite Parties (In C.R. 446/75) Judgment May 2, 1978. Result: The Rules are discharged. Lawyers Involved: A.F.M. Shahid-For the Petitioner. M. B. Rahman-For Opposite parties. ......th the cases and filed written objection. Thereafter the order sheets indicate various other developments of the proceedings. Upon application of the instant petitioners for addition of parties under Order 1 rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the learned Munsif heard the parties and r..Category: Property Law | Date: 2 May, 1978 | Hits: 1
Jagar Chandra Das & ors Vs. Dherendra Mohan Pramanik, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....o the lower appellate Court for rehearing of the appeal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 240. ......takhoolie Tea Estate Vs. Its Workmen AIR, 1960 SC 1949; Sri C.P.J. Temple Vs. Harikrishna, A.I.R. 1973 SC 2565; Roshan and others Vs. Mst. Abedur Nessa and others reported in PLD 1963 Dacca 712. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rashid for B.B. Roy Chowdhury—For the Appellants. B.N. C......udge held that the defendant came upon the suit land earlier than 1368 B.S. 5. Mr. Md. Abdur Rashid, the learned Advocate for the appellants, has submitted that having regard to the provision of Order 41, rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure the Court of Appeal below erred in law in..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 21 Apr, 1978 | Hits: 1
Monlndra Nath Chowdhury Vs. Rahmat Ali Galdar & others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....missed as not maintainable. In the facts and circumstances of the case, however, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979)180. ......tary of State for India in Council and another, 44 C.W.N. 745); Sudhir Kumar Chatterjee Vs. Mahadeb Chakraborty & ors., 52 C.W.N. 685; Mahalaxmi Devi Vs. Bamacharan, A.I.R. 1953 Calcutta 42. Lawyers Involved: Latifur Rahman—For the Appellnt. Syed Mohammad Ali—For Respo......sp;of the Court Fees Act and as such it was not a decree within the meaning of section 2(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, though the trial Court has in its order rejected the plaint under Order 7 rule 11 C.P.C. and decree was drawn up. The learned Advocate for the respondent su..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 17 Apr, 1978 | Hits: 1