Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Haripada Saha Vs. Md. Shamsuddin Quraishi and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....ection 4 of the Partition Act for buying up the share of the plaintiff opposite party No. 1. 2. The opposite party No. 1 as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 47 of 1978 for partition of the suit property against the petitioner and opposite party Nos. 2-11 alleging, inter alia, that the suit pro...... 54 DLR (2002) 606...Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 210
Abdur Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ation under section 7 of Ordinance No. LIV of 1985, hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance praying to delete House No. 40, Tejkunipara, PS Tejgaon, Dhaka from its inclusion in the list of abandoned property/buildings and to restore/hand over its possession to the petitioner. The application was re......nt: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nizamul Huq J Abdur Rahman…………………..………………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by Secretary, Ministry of Works and another……………………….Respondents Judgment November 2, 2002. Lawyers Invol..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Amena Khatun Vs. Chairman, Court of Settlement and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... Petition No.1003 of 1994.) Judgment SK Sinha J.- Leave was granted to consider whether, the learned Judges of the High Court Division were justified in holding that the listing of the disputed property as abandoned property is not hit by proviso (a) to section 5 of the Abandoned Buildings (Su......ourt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J SK Sinha J Amena Khatun…………....Appellant Vs. Chairman, Court of Settlement and others.…………Respondents Judgment May 24, 2010. Cases Referred To- CQMH Md. Ay..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Md. Ayub Ali and others Vs. Isa Mandal and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....as bad for defect of parties. The pre-emptors failed to implead all the S.A. recorded tenants as party in the instant application. They negotiated the transÂaction. The pre-emptee purchased the case property at a consideration of TK. 38,500.00 but in the deed the conÂsideration was mentioned as TK...... Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 1006...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Abdul Jalil Molla and others Vs. Mahtab Uddin Biswas, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....e Kumarkhali Sub-Registry Office to be forged and not binding upon them. The defendant Mahtabuddin contested the suit by filing a written statement conÂtending inter alia that he is the owner of the property by virtue of a registered kabala Deed No. 6812 dated 12.10.1974 and that he is in possessio...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Abdul Jalil Molla and others…........Petitioners (In both the cases) Vs. Mahtab Uddin Biswas being dead his he..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Shahadat Hossain (Md.) Vs. Base Textile Ltd., 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... in the usual manner. It is further claimed that the respondent No. 2 as the Chairman and Managing Director of the respondent No. 1 Company invested huge amount of money and also mortgaged his landed property to Sonali Bank for the project loan of the Company. It is further stated that the remunerat......) 3 SCC 333. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed with Rokanuddin Mahmud, Sheikh Hassan Ariff, Mubina Asar Rahman, Advocates— For the Petitioner. Dr. M Zahir with M Hafizullah, SK Siddique and Abdul Barek Chowdhury, Md. Shamsul Hoq Sarker, Advocates—For Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Aminu..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 247
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Alizan Shaikh Vs. Moniruddin, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....efrom as possessor, and she subsequently settled the suit properÂty with Surendra Nath Bhowmik, the predecessor-in-interest of the defendant, said Kallayani Debi had only life interÂest on the said property and that the S.A. record was prepared in the name of Surendra Nath Bhowmik and at the relÂ......r the Petitioners. Md. Nurul Amin, Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Hug, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 725 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 16.02.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.885 of 2004.) J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Suraiya Begum and others Vs. Misir Ali and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....nd Alam sons of Kalimuddin transferred their shares in favour of Ausha Miah in the year, 1937 by exhibit-G1. The plainÂtiff claimed that Bangu Sheikh while alive, by way of oral gift handed over the property in question in favour of the wife of his grand son, Aushi Bibi. It furÂther appears that o......n: VII ADC (2010) 945. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Nasrin Akhter and another Vs. Sree Gouranga Lal Mukherjee and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....out partition in metes and bounds i.e. on proper measurement. 5. The defendant-respondent Nos. 1-4 contested the suit by filing written stateÂment contending, inter alia, that they inherited the property from their predecessor-in-interest, Gopal Chandra, who inherited the properties of his brot......her. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 940. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 171
M. Anwar Hossain and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and Others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
....used registration of the deed of sale as stamp duty had been paid on the consideration mentioned in the agreement for sale. The Registrar claimed payment of duties on the basis of market value of the property on the date of presentation of the deed before him, prescribed by the Shammpattir Bazar Mul......o Reported in: 29 BLD (HCD) (2009) 703. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Munshi Abdul Hai Vs. Sanjoy Kumar Shil, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....nd are illegal, without jurisdicÂtion and void holding, amongst others, that the plaintiff has proved his title and possession in the suit land and that the suit land is not a vested or non-resident property and that the sale vide deed dated 28.10.1970 could not be executed or registered by Jadhuna......e Petitioner. Mozaffar Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 382 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 27.10.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1827 of 2004.) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Sharif Hossain Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....sposal of the Rule are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.291 of 1987 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, 1st Court, Dhaka against the opposite parties for getting the suit property by way of pre-emption under Mohammedan Law on the averments that the plaintiff is owner of ......ision (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Sheikh Abdul Awal J Md. Sharif Hossain……………………………………..Plaintiff-respondent-petitioner Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil and another…………………Defendant-appellant-opposite parties. Judgment October 19, 200..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Abdul Jalil Miah and another Vs. Siddiqur Rahman, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....ly belonged to 2 brothers, Fazar Ali Sheikh and Mabu Sheikh alias Nabu Sheikh. That for convenience of the possession the said two brothers namely Fazar Ali and Mabu amicably partitioned their entire property before C.S. operation. By such amicable partition the lands of C.S. Plot Nos.87, 107 and 12......is Case is also Reported in: 29 BLD (HCD) (2009) 735. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Azizul Hoq Vs. Administrator of Waqf, Government of Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... should not be declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect. 2. The relevant facts stated in the writ petition are that one Dagon Majumder made a Waqf of his property by a registered deed of Waqf dated 16-10-1878. According to the terms and conditions of the......Jurisdiction) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Hossain J Syed Mahmud Hossain J Azizul Hoq (Md.)...............................Petitioner Vs. Administrator of Waqf, Government of Bangladesh and others …..Opposite Party Judgment July 25, 2001. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim ..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Md. Osman Gani & others Vs. Begum Tofatun Nahar & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....e some pucca construction according to the plan passed by the local Municipality and the same awaits only completion; that the construction in no way would change the nature and character of the suit property; that the plaintiffs-petitioners have no prima facie case and that the balance of convenÂi............................Petitioners Vs. Begum Tofatun Nahar & others ....................Opposite Parties Judgment December 14, 1988. Cases Referred to- 28 DLR (AD) 57, Naimullah and another Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, the Bangladesh Supreme Court DiÂgest 1972-1977, Vol..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Md. Nurul Abser Miah Vs. Kiron Shankar Nandy & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....e necessary parties in a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale are the parties to the contract or if they are dead their legal repÂresentatives, as also a person who had purchased the property from the vendor after the contract". In N.T. Palanisamy Chattier following the deciÂsio......preme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: AM Mahmudur Rahman J Md. Nurul Abser Miah...................................Petitioner Vs. Kiron Shankar Nandy & others........................Opposite Parties Judgment March 1, 1988. Cases Ref..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
M/s. Nawab Askari Jute Mills Ltd. & others Vs. Giasuddin Ahmed, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... AIR 1949 Nagpur 368 (2) AIR 1952 MB 196 (3) AIR 1954 MB 6 (4) 11 DLR 57 (5) 22 DLR 646. 6. In the first case, in a suit to redeem pledge of ornaments it was held that Court fee on market value of property was to be paid. In the second case under reference it was held that as the suit was for the...... Ali J.- This Rule is directed against an order dated 2.9.84 passed by the Munsif, 4th Court, Narayanganj, in Title Suit No.166 of 1983. The learned Munsif by this order held: "This is a suit for mandatory injunction and the relief sought for by way of mandatory inÂjunction has got no market val..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 159