Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Sona Mia Vs. Md. Zakaria & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... For the Petitioner. S.B. Barua, Advocate - For the State. Criminal Revision Case No. 194 of 1988. Judgment Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and complainant opposite party No.1 Md. Zakaria to show cause why the pro...... is quashed. But this will not debar the competent Court to make any complaint in accordance with law if it is thought to be necessary. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 433........ Barua, Advocate - For the State. Criminal Revision Case No. 194 of 1988. Judgment Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and complainant opposite party No.1 Md. Zakaria to show cause why the proceedings in petition Case N...... is quashed. But this will not debar the competent Court to make any complaint in accordance with law if it is thought to be necessary. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 433...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Abul Hashem Khan & others Vs. Md. Shamsuddin Khan & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....ed Subordinate Judge are set aside and the suit is dismissed. During the hearing of the appeal the appellants have filed an application under sections 476 and 476A Cr.P.C. praying for directÂing the Deputy Registrar II of this Court to lodge a complaint in the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magist......em. In the face of our findings in respect of Ext. W and Z series the appliÂcation is not maintainable. Accordingly, it is rejectÂed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 415....... Md. Shamsuddin Khan & others...................................Respondents Judgment May 2, 1989. Result: The appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Sarwar Khan Vs. Gulam Sarwar and others, PLD 1982 AJ & K 126; Ram Singh Kundan Singh and sons and another Vs. Ram Chand Issar......em. In the face of our findings in respect of Ext. W and Z series the appliÂcation is not maintainable. Accordingly, it is rejectÂed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 415...Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 349
Khalilur Rahman (Md.) alias Ismail Vs. State, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ivision (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mozammel Hoque J ABM Khairul Haque J Khalilur Rahman (Md.) alias Ismail………Petitioner Vs. State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka………Opposite Party Judgment May 20, 1999. Lawyers Involved: ......ted earlier by this Court is hereby vacated. Send down the lower Court records. Let the petitioner be discharged from his bail bonds. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) (HCD) 344. ...... Ismail………Petitioner Vs. State represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka………Opposite Party Judgment May 20, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Ahmad with Malik Syed Ahmad and Md. Joynul Abedin, Advocates — For the Petitioner. Abul Hossain Azadi, Assistant Attorney- ......osite Party Judgment May 20, 1999. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Ahmad with Malik Syed Ahmad and Md. Joynul Abedin, Advocates — For the Petitioner. Abul Hossain Azadi, Assistant Attorney- General — For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.2214 of 1995 Judgment ABM Khairul..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 159
Muzaffar Ali and another Vs. Monwara Hospital & others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....lier by this Court on 8-5-95 is hereby vacated and the learned Court below is directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) (HCD) 341.......lier by this Court on 8-5-95 is hereby vacated and the learned Court below is directed to proceed with the suit in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) (HCD) 341.......his Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) (HCD) 341.......ing the written deed of agreement on 6-3-80. Thereafter, the principal defendant Nos. 1 and 2 separately appointed and constituted Md. Hafizul Kadir and Mohammad Ali as their attorney by two deeds of General Power of Attorney executed and registered on 13-3-80 and 15-3-80 respectively authorising th..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....executed by the petitioner it becomes clear that in the instant case Bangladesh is represented by the Chairman of BTTB. No doubt generally Bangladesh is represented in the Courts of law either by the Deputy Commissioner or by the Secretary but when a proceeding is initiated by a citÂizen against de......cree is a nullity there remains nothing to proceed with the Execution case No.2 of 1998. Send down the Lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 405.......t High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Amirul Islam J Sheikh Abdul Awal J Bangladesh………………………………Petitioner Vs. Abdul Aziz and others………………………………Opposite Parties Judgment December 6 & 8, 20......cree is a nullity there remains nothing to proceed with the Execution case No.2 of 1998. Send down the Lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (HCD) (2011) 405...Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 291
Abdul Kader Vs. Abdullah and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....90 passed in Other Suit 50 of 1986 by the Subordinate Judge, Cox’s Bazar, dismissing the suit. 2. Opposite parties 1-9 instituted the suit for declaration that the order pussed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner Chittagong on 4-4-84 in Settlement Appeal Case 154 of 1981-82 cancelling the set......ordingly, the Rule is made absolute. The judgment and decree of the appellate Court is set aside. The suit is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 435. ...... is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 435. ......ordingly, the Rule is made absolute. The judgment and decree of the appellate Court is set aside. The suit is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 435. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Humayun Matubbar Vs. State, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....fine of Taka 10,000.00 is altered to a sentence of Taka 3,000.00 in default to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 3(three) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 433. ......fine of Taka 10,000.00 is altered to a sentence of Taka 3,000.00 in default to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 3(three) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 433. ...... Assistant Attorney-General — For the State. Criminal Appeal No.431 of 1993. Judgment Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J.- Aleya Begum (P.W.1) came to the local Police Station on 11-6-91 at 2-15 PM and lodged the FIR stating that an ox owned by Maniruddin Matabbar entered into the jute field of he......udgment June 2, 1998. Result: The appeal is dismissed with the modification. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate — For the Appellant. Syed Abu Kowser, Assistant Attorney-General — For the State. Criminal Appeal No.431 of 1993. Judgment Mohammad Gholam Rabbani..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Nurjahan Begum Vs. Government of the Peoples Republic of and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....t May 19, 1998. Case Referred To- Md. Shoaib Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 27 DLR 315. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney General with FKM Ahsan Mahbub, Assistant Attorney-General — For the Respondents...... 2-9-87 (Annexure H) and the notice dated 24-10-1987 (Annexure-J) within one month from the date of receipt of this judgment and order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 426.......Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Mahfuzur Rahman J MA Aziz J Nurjahan Begum……........Petitioner Vs. Government of the Peoples Republic of and others..............Respondents Judgment May 19, 1998. Case Referred To- Md. Shoai......998. Case Referred To- Md. Shoaib Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 27 DLR 315. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney General with FKM Ahsan Mahbub, Assistant Attorney-General — For the Respondents. Writ Petiti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 156
Muklesur Rahman (Md.) Vs. Waziullah, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....ch he preferred Civil Revision No.916 of 1997 before this Court against the order of the learned Assistant Judge, rejecting the prayer for striking out the name of the defendant Nos.2 and 3 i.e., the Deputy Commissioner and Superintendent of Police, Comilla. It was further alleged that the civil rev......eferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 418.......— For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.1386 of 1998. Judgment Md. Ali Asgar Khan J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 27-4-98 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Daudkandi, Comilla in allowing......eferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (HCD) (1999) 418...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Ebadat Ali Vs. Ismail Hossain Akhond & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....33; 4 DLR 394; AIR 1962 ALL 503. Lawyers Involved: Mashi-Ul-Islam, Advocate - For the PetitionÂers. P.K. Bosu with Mansur Babib, Advocates - For Opposite Parties 1-15. Kaiseruddin Ahmed, Deputy Attorney General - Amicus curiae. Civil Revision No.285 of 1988 with 520 of 1988. Judgm......uty Attorney-General as amicus curiae in this matter. Let a copy of the judgment be transmitted to the Courts below expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 490. ...................Petitioner Vs. Ismail Hossain Akhond & others.......................Opposite Party Judgment April 27, 1989. Cases Referred to- A.K.M. Ruhul Amin Vs. District Judge and AppelÂlate Election Tribunal, Bhola and ors, 38 DLR (AD) 1972; 6 DLR (FC) 56; 11 DLR (SC) 200; ......IR 1962 ALL 503. Lawyers Involved: Mashi-Ul-Islam, Advocate - For the PetitionÂers. P.K. Bosu with Mansur Babib, Advocates - For Opposite Parties 1-15. Kaiseruddin Ahmed, Deputy Attorney General - Amicus curiae. Civil Revision No.285 of 1988 with 520 of 1988. Judgment Muhammad ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Hazrat Ali Vs. Election Commission & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... place there. The Election Commission passed an order on 18.6.88 reÂjecting the prayer of the respondent No.4 and acceptÂing the report of the Presiding Officer in pursuance of a report sent by the Deputy Commissioner (Annexures B and B1). 4. Thereafter the respondent No.4 filed an apÂplicatio......26. For the reasons stated above the Rule is made absolute but in the facts and circumstances of the case we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 486....... Vs. Election Commission & others..........................................Respondents Judgment May 2, 1989. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Kanta Devi and another Vs. State of Rajasthan and others, AIR 1957 Rajasthan 134. Lawyers Involved: Syed ......nd this perimeÂter even the Appellate Division, in our opinion, has not permitted the Election Commission to travel. 19. Although not argued from the Bar we are not unmindful of section 21 of the General Clauses Act which provides as follows: "21. Where, by any Act of Parliament or ReguÂlati..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Monoranjan Mukharjee Vs. Election Commission Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka & Others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD
....r all the above reasons we find no ground for interference. In the result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 484.......r all the above reasons we find no ground for interference. In the result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 484.......Abdul Jalil Biswas to seek election for the office of Chairman of No.4 Noapara Union Parishad, UpazilÂla Debhata, District Satkhira shall not be declared to have been passed without lawful authority and as to why the election of Chairman held on 10.2.88 at the said Union Parishad should not be decl......r all the above reasons we find no ground for interference. In the result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 484...Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 220
Anwar Hossain Maji (Md.) & others Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....t Magistrate, Additional Chief Magistrate and the Court of Sessions). On the above grounds the application is sumÂmarily rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 410. ......t Magistrate, Additional Chief Magistrate and the Court of Sessions). On the above grounds the application is sumÂmarily rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 410. ......of accused petitioner Md. Anwar Hossain Maji, 22 acÂcused persons named in FIR along with about 100 others came to the village of Narsinghapur all on a sudden being armed with various deadly weapons and started beating women inmates by entering into difÂferent houses. They took away cash money, or......he case. The legislature has not put any limitation on this power of the learned Sessions Judge to direct further investigation into the offence. In this connecÂtion we may refer to section 14(1) of General ClausÂes Act, 1897 which read as follows: "When, by any Act of Parliament or ReguÂlatio..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Shahidulla @ Md. Shahidulla & others Vs. State, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.16 of 1988. Judgment Muhammad Ansar Ali J. - This Rule was issued in an application under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur to show cause why the acÂcused-petitioners should not be enlarged on ......he satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur till commenceÂment of the trial of this case before the learned SesÂsions Judge. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (HCD) (1990) 394.......2. The facts relevant for the disposal of the Rule may be briefly stated as follows: 3. That according to the prosecution, there is a Civil litigation between the informant Shahidul, son of Haji Khandaker Ahmed Ali and accused Asheque Ali, petitioner No.3 still pending in a Civil Court in respect......inal Procedure to-grant or refuse bail to and accused person. It is the discretion of the Court which has to be exercised judicially and not arÂbitrarily in, the facts and circumstances of the case. Generally, the Court is reluctant to grant bail to an accused person in a case under section 302 of ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Fazlul Hoque & Others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
....e - For the Petitioner. S. B. Barua, Advocate - For the State. Criminal Revision No. 335 of 1988. Judgment Fazle Hussain Mohammad Habibur Rahman J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Deputy Commissioner, Mymensingh to show cause why the order of Mr. Sirajul Islam, Sessions Judge, My......n accorÂdance with law expeditiously. Let a copy of this judgment and order be sent to the Upazila Magistrate, Trishal immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 477....... of the Penal Code now pending in the Court of Upazila Magistrate, Trishal, District Mymensingh should not be set aside or such other or further order or orÂders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. In this case informant Md. Yunus Ali lodged F.I.R. on 20.11.87 at Trishal P.S. all...... Provided that the Government may, by orÂder, revive the case at any time if the case is triable exclusively by the Court of Sessions." Mr. A.K.M. Shamsul Karim, the learned AsÂsistant Attorney-General draws our attention to the provision of section 10(2) Cr.P.C. which reads as follows:- "1..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
Anwara Khatun & Others Vs. Geasuddin Ahmed & Others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....tance in this Rule, which is accordingly discharged, withÂout any order as to costs. The order directing status quo is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 474.......tance in this Rule, which is accordingly discharged, withÂout any order as to costs. The order directing status quo is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 474.......Advocate - For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No.636 of 1986. Judgment Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J. - The Rule arises out of an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.8.86 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge,......tioners Vs. Geasuddin Ahmed & Others…………………………Opposite Parties Judgment September 1, 1986. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Attorney-General Vs. Ashbowene RC, (1903) I Chancery 101; Devonport Corporation Vs. Tozer, (1901) I Chancery ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Saju Hosein Vs. Press Appellate Board and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....-Ul Alam, Advocates, - For the Petitioner. Abdul Matin Khasru, with Ms. Rumeen Farhana, Advocates - For the Respondent No.2. M. K. Rahman, Additional Attorney General with A.B.M. Altaf Hossain, Deputy Attorney General - For the Respondents. Writ Petition No.7078 of 2011. Judgment AHM ...... For the reasons assigned above, the Rule is destined to founder, wherefor the same is discharged. There is no order on cost. Jahangir Hossain J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......n……………………Petitioner Vs. Press Appellate Board, represented by it’s Chairman, Mr. Justice B.K. Das, Bangladesh Press Council of House No.40, Topkhana Road, Segun Bagicha, Dhaka and others…………………Respondents Judgment November 23, 2011. Result: The Rule......Hosein with Manjur Kader and Shamim-Ul Alam, Advocates, - For the Petitioner. Abdul Matin Khasru, with Ms. Rumeen Farhana, Advocates - For the Respondent No.2. M. K. Rahman, Additional Attorney General with A.B.M. Altaf Hossain, Deputy Attorney General - For the Respondents. Writ Petition N..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 171
Parvaj Vs. State, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)
....The State…………………………Opposite Party Judgment May 3, 2012. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one appears - For the Petitioner. Khizir Hayat, Deputy Attorney General with Yousuf Mahmud Morshed, Assistant Attorney General - For the Opposite Pa......surrender before the trial Court to serve out the remaining period of his sentence. Communicate a copy of the judgment. Mohammad Marzi-ul-Huq J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:...... Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This Rule at the instance of the convict-petitioner was issued on an application under section 561 A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of the judgment and order dated 30.11.2002 passed by the Metropolitan Special Tribunal No.11, Dhaka in Metropolitan ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Opposite Party Judgment May 3, 2012. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: No one appears - For the Petitioner. Khizir Hayat, Deputy Attorney General with Yousuf Mahmud Morshed, Assistant Attorney General - For the Opposite Party. Criminal..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Md. Humayun Shaikh Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....ate……………………………Respondent Judgment April 17, 2011. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: No one appears - For the Appellant. Ms. Promila Biswas, Deputy Attorney General- For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.4786 of 1991. Judgment Md. ......ny reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly the appeal, having no merit, is dismissed. Send down the lower Court records. Naima Haider, J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......orney General- For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.4786 of 1991. Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J.- This appeal under section 410 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against judgment and order dated 3.2.1990 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Second Court, Barisal in Session C......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Respondent Judgment April 17, 2011. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: No one appears - For the Appellant. Ms. Promila Biswas, Deputy Attorney General- For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No.4786 of 1991. Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J.-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Md. Shah Alam Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....he sentence as altered, if he is not wanted in any other case. Send down the lower Court’s record with a copy of this judgment. Borhanuddin J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......he sentence as altered, if he is not wanted in any other case. Send down the lower Court’s record with a copy of this judgment. Borhanuddin J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......us J Md. Shah Alam…………………Appellant Vs. The State……………………Respondent Judgment March 24, 2011. Result: The criminal appeal is dismissed with alteration and modification. Cases Referred to- Mobarak Hossain Vs. State, 33 DLR 274; 45 DLR 16; Swapon ......ader Vs. State, 5 MLR (AD) 1; Dipak Kumar Sarker Vs State, 40 DLR (AD) 139. Lawyers Involved: Ms. Aynunnahar Siddiqua, Advocate - For the Appellant. Ms. Nawzish Ara Begum, Assistant Attorney General - For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 3509 of 2003. Judgment Md. Ruhul Quddus J..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 114