Judgment search - Chancery Law Chronicles

Displaying 1921-1940 of 3679 results.

Abdur Razzaque Mollah Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....amely, Md. Qayum Mollah is a resident of Bagerhat district and by profession a Contractor. They have previous acquaintance with each other. It is not disputed that the subject matter of the suit is a land as well as the building on it and Mr. Abdur Razzaque Mollah is the real owner. Mr. Abdur Razzaq......resent: Md. Fazlul Haque J NK Chakravartty J Abdur Razzaque Mollah …………Appellant Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others……...Opposite Parties. Judgment August 14, 2001. Cases Referred To- 43 DLR (AD) 78; 43 DLR (AD) 125; AIR 1975 All 341; Ram Chand Appellant Vs. Rai......far it relates to remand of the case for fresh trial passed in Title Appeal No.168 of 1996 dated 28th June, 1998 and the decree signed on 2nd July, 1998 by the learned Additional District Judge, Bagerhat reversing and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 18th July, 1996 and decree signed on 2...... Vs. Rain Swamp Respondent AIR 1952 Allahabad 654; Jalaluddin Mia Vs. Md. Yunus 1982 BCR 270. Lawyers Involved: KS Nabi, Barrister-at-Law with Md. Abul Quashem, Md. Zakir Hossain, Advocates—For the Petitioner. KS Zaman Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 4197 of 19..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71

Sabed Ali Howlader and Others Vs. Abdul Barek and other, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)

..... Facts, in short, are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 22 of 1990 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Barisal for declaration of title and for partition of 1.95-acre of land out of 4.18 acres of land in the schedule 'Ka' of the plaint. 3. The plaintiffs’ case, in ......m, Advocate — For the Petitioners. Abdul Quayum with Md. Moqbul Hossain, Advocates — For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2391 of 1994. Judgment M M Ruhul Amin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1 and 10 to show cause as to why the impugned judgmen......, Barisal in Title Suit No.22 of 1990 dismissing the suit should not be set aside or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Facts, in short, are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 22 of 1990 in the Court of Senior Assistan......i Howlader and Others……………..Petitioners Vs. Abdul Barek and other…………….Opposite Parties Judgment May 26, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate — For the Petitioners. Abdul Quayum with Md. Moqbul Hossain, Advocates — For the Opposite Parties...

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 102

Dil Mohammad Vs. Jamir Hossain and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....mercial Court No. 1 at Dhaka in Title Suit No. 82 of 1997, which dismissed the suit. 2. On 28-5-95 the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 166 of 1995 for eviction of defendant No. 1 from the suit land measuring about 300 square yards with structures thereon comprising of Plot # 8, Road # 3 of Bl......ayed-for. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 88....... schedule to the plaint. On increase of the valuation, the suit was. On transfer to the aforesaid Court of Subordinate Judge, renumbered as Title Suit No. 82 of 1997. 3. Plaint case, in short, is that the suit land originally belonged to SA recorded tenant Abdur Rashid Matabbor, an uncle of the a......………………...Appellant Vs. Jamir Hossain and others…………………………………………..Respondents Judgment August 8, 2004. Cases Referred to- Atul vs. Rau Kishore, AIR 1956 Orissa 77, Muhammad Din vs. Atta Muhammad and others, PLD 1957 Lahore 971; Modan Mohan..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83

Atar Ali Sheikh (Md) & another Vs. Md Karam Ali Sheikh & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)

.... in the preliminary form allotting a share of 4.16 acres to the plaintiffs. As there was no appeal taken therefrom, an Advocate Commissioner was appointed to affect partition. After dividing the suit land and by allotting 4.16 acres to the plaintiff and 12.5 acres to said defendants, the learned Com......er is made final. Send down the LCR. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 81. ......elled the Commissioner's report and directed fresh commission for partition of the suit land, again. Hence, the Rule. 3. Mr. Mujibor Rahman Miah, the learned Advocate for the petitioners, submits that the impugned judgment of reversal is not a proper judgment of reversal as the appellate Court fa...... 215; Krishna Reddiar and others vs. Ramanyja Reddiar and another, AIR 1929 Madras 492, Md. Mahmud Miah vs. Ludu Miah and others, 1992 BLD 23. Lawyers Involved: Muzibur Rahman Miah, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Garib Newaz, Advocate—For Opposite Party Nos. 1 to 8 and 30. Civil Revis..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70

Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. Vs. Al-haj Md. Ishaque Chowdhury and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....ants gave a power of attorney to Shamsul Huq to execute and register necessary sale deed transferring said schedule- 1(Kha) property to the plaintiff and accordingly, Shamsul Huq transferred the suit land by a registered deed being No. 196 dated 13-1-91. The plaintiff got his name mutated in respect......ecords at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 62. ......��……………….Appellant Vs. Al-haj Md. Ishaque Chowdhury and others.........................Respondents Judgment July 19, 2004. Cases Referred to- Md. Yaqoob Khan vs. Sahib Khatoon and others, (1998) 20 CLC 1576; Mukhtar Baig vs. Sardar Baig 2000 SCMR 45; Jamila Khatum vs. ......ul Khaleque Choukder and others, 43 DLR (AD) 107 and Haji Md. Eshaque vs Rupali Bank, 43 DLR 621. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan with Sk. Zulfiqur Bulbul Chowdhury and Rezina Chowdhury, Advocates—For the Appellant. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Azim Khair and Faisal Mahmud Faijee, Advocates�..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71

Shamsul Haque Vs. Luna Fahmida Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....defendants therefrom. The suit property was described to be a two-storied building with 5 rooms in the ground floor and 4 rooms in the first floor erected upon about 12 decimals out of 36 decimals of land of plot No. 5158 appertaining to SA Khatian No. 184 of Mouza Radhavallav in the District of Ran......positively. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 51.......s described to be a two-storied building with 5 rooms in the ground floor and 4 rooms in the first floor erected upon about 12 decimals out of 36 decimals of land of plot No. 5158 appertaining to SA Khatian No. 184 of Mouza Radhavallav in the District of Rangpur. 3. The plaint case, in short, is ......, Hasan Ali vs. Jytendra Biswas, 1984 BLD (AD) 307, Jaydayal Poddar vs. Bibi Hazra, (1974) 2 SCR 90. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam with Md. Mozammel Hossain and Md. Sagir Anower, Advocates—For the Appellant. Shafique Ahmed, Advocate—For the Respondents. Appeal from Original Decree ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 139

State Vs. Mukul @ Swapan, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)

....pon be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Communicate the order at once. Send down the LC record. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 40. ......Mukul @ Swapan……………………………………………………..Respondent. Judgment July 19, 2004. Result: The death reference is rejected and the jail appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Mahmudul Islam @ Ratan vs. State, 53 DLR (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abd...... the learned Sessions Judge, Natore, have been heard together and are being disposed of by this Judgment as common questions of law and facts are involved. 2. Prosecution case, stated briefly, is that on 13-5-2002 informant PW 1, Sub-Inspector Md. Obaidur Rahman along with Sub-Inspector Abdul Bar......e death reference is rejected and the jail appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- Mahmudul Islam @ Ratan vs. State, 53 DLR (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Haque, State Defence Lawyer—For the Condemned Prisoner. Golam Mohammad Chowdhury, Deputy Attorney-General with Giasuddin Mitu,..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49

Abu Taher Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

.... persons and whether her dead body was brought down by Akabar. He also said that Jafar Kha (PW 3) said nothing to him about the death of his daughter. He heard that the appellant mortgaged a piece of land to Jafar Kha PW 3 who did not restore possession of that land to the appellant. Over that matte......er………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. State ………………………………………………………...Respondent Judgment January 12, 2005. Cases Referred to- State vs. Md. Shafiqul Islam alias Rafique and another, 43 DLR (AD) 92, State ......th the appeals arose out of same judgment and order of conviction and sentence are taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by this judgment. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the night following 27-2-1984 at about 3.00 AM the appellant in his hut at first beat his wif......amanik, 43 DLR (AD) 65, State vs. Khadem Mondal, 1990 BLD (AD) 228, 41 DLR 11, 45 DLR 660, 46 DLR 575. Lawyers Involved: SM Rezaul Karim with Afia Begum and Abdur Razzak (Razu), Advocates — For the Appellant. Md. Ibrahim Khalil, Assistant Attorney-General —For the Respondent. Crimin..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41

World Tel Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....R 1976 (SC) 127, 48 DLR (AD) 20, Babashaheb/Rahimshaheb vs. Rajaram Ragunath Alpe, AIR 1931 Bombay 264, Dip Narain Singh vs. Nayeshar Prasad and others, AIR 1930 (Allahabad) 1 (Full Bench), Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. Vs. Brojonath, AIR 1986 (SC) 1571, Mukul Dutta Gupta and other......…………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others…………………………………Respondents. Judgment April 23, 2005. Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Power Development Board and others vs. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder, 9 BLC......reinafter referred to as Dhaka MEA). Accordingly, the MOPT published an invitation for international tender in The Financial Times, London on 1-12-1998 (Annexure- B). Article 4.2.2 of "RFP" provided that during the first four years of the licence term, MOPT would not license a fixed public wireline ......(2006) 14...

Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 321

Hayes Haier Appliance Company Ltd. Vs. Secretary, Internal Resources Division, Ministry of Finance and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....lity, but the denial of any special privilege by reason of birth, creed or the like in favour of any individual and also the equal subjection of all individuals and classes to the ordinary law of the land administered by the ordinary law Courts". 15. In the "Limitation of Government Power" by Rot......……………………………….Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Internal Resources Division, Ministry of Finance and others....................... Respondents. Judgment August 5, 2005. Cases Referred to- Federation of Hotel and Restaurant vs. Union of India and others, AIR 1990 (SC)......of by this common judgment. 2. Both the petitioner-companies assemble refrigerators after importing spare parts from abroad and then sell it in the local market. It is the case of the petitioners that supplementary duty on other electrical home appliances have been exempted by the Government whil......sh, 48 DLR 1, Abul Hosain's case, 41 DLR (AD) 30, Southern Railway Company vs. Greane, 216 US, 400 Day, Shrimoti Indira Gandhi vs. Raj Narayan, AIR 1975(SC) 2279, AIR 1958 SC 538, AIR 1967 SC 691, Colorado Rly. Vs. Ellis, 165 US 150, Shujat Ali vs. Union of India, AIR 1974 SC 1631, Lachman Das vs. S..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 81

Selim Reza Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)

....Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. The office is directed to communicate this order to the respondents for information. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 1. ......��…………………………………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………………………. Respondents. Judgment August 13, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Tashadduk Hasan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ms. Nahid Mahtab Assistant Attorney-General—For ......r vide application dated 26-4-2005 addressed to the Deputy Commissioner, Chuadanga, Annexure-F to the writ petition, excluding any offer below Taka 22,50,000. 2. It is stated in the writ-petition that the Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO), Jibannagar, District Chuadanga, respondent No. 6, initially f......�…………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………………………. Respondents. Judgment August 13, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md. Tashadduk Hasan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ms. Nahid Mahtab Assistant Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1. Sheikh ..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 114

Abdul Moin Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Secretariat Building & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

.... have been made without lawful authority and to be of no legal effect. 2. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner’s father acquired the property in question measuring 3.33 acres of land in Khatian No.2 under Sylhet Municipality by purchase on 12th Chaitra, 1354 BS by a registered ...... Kamal, Advocate—For Respondents No. 4. Abul Hossain Azadi, Assistant Attorney-General— For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 1895 of 1999. Judgment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- This Rule was issued under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh calling upo......e), Sylhet and the proceeding of mutation Appeal No.22 of 1994 should not be declared to have been made without lawful authority and to be of no legal effect. 2. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner’s father acquired the property in question measuring 3.33 acres of land in Khat......adesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Secretariat Building & others. ………………….Respondents. Judgment March 28, 2001. Lawyers Involved: JN Deb, Advocate—For the Petitioner. ABM Mostafa Kamal, Advocate—For Respondents No. 4. Abul Hossain Azadi, As..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95

Afitan Nessa and others Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....rder dated 1993 refusing to vacate the impugned order dated 13-6-1993. 2. The petitioners’ case, in short, is that ore Md. Haja Mondal, the predecessor of the petitioners, took lease of the case land from ex-landlord, Opposite-Party No.2 while the suit land was in his khas possession. On 12th J......itan Nessa and others ………………….Petitioners Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others …………….Opposite Parties. Judgment August 09, 2001. Cases Referred To- Kamal Anwar and others Vs. Md. Kabir Khan, 1985 BLD 157; Raja Debi Baksh Singh...... the Code of Civil Procedure by Afitan Nessa and four other petitioners call upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 13-6-1993 passed learned Assistant Judge, Ghoraghat Police Station, District Dinajpur in Other Class Suit No.3 of 1984 dismissing the suit for defau......st 09, 2001. Cases Referred To- Kamal Anwar and others Vs. Md. Kabir Khan, 1985 BLD 157; Raja Debi Baksh Singh Vs. Habib Shah, 1913 CLJ (PC) 9. Lawyers Involved: Moksed Ali, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Not represented— the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2444 of 1993...

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106

Anindra Bhusan Ghose Vs. Bangladesh Government, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

.....156 of 1976 on 21-9-77 affirming those of the Munsif, 2nd Court, Satkhira passed in Title Suit No.419 of 1975 on 26-6-1976, dismissing the suit for declaration of title of the plaintiffs in the suit land. 2. Plaintiffs’ case, in short, is that the suit land originally belonged to Dhanobar and ......ate Jurisdiction) Present: Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Anindra Bhusan Ghose………………Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Government ………………Respondent. Judgment May 23, 2001. Case Referred To- Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Bima Corporation, 39 DLR (AD) 76. Lawyers...... Munsif, 2nd Court, Satkhira passed in Title Suit No.419 of 1975 on 26-6-1976, dismissing the suit for declaration of title of the plaintiffs in the suit land. 2. Plaintiffs’ case, in short, is that the suit land originally belonged to Dhanobar and Nafar which is not disputed. They mortgaged th......ra Bhusan Ghose………………Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Government ………………Respondent. Judgment May 23, 2001. Case Referred To- Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Bima Corporation, 39 DLR (AD) 76. Lawyers Involved: Sk Habibul Alam, Advocate—For the Appellant. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85

Parul Bala @ Parul Rani Shah Mondol Vs. Suruj Miah and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

.... certificate of sale dated 1-6-1959 held in OD Certificate case No.21/1955-56 and by the auction purchase made by the defendant No.1 and other defendants, they have not acquired any title in the suit land. 2. Plaintiff’s case, in short, is that the defendant No.2 Raj Kumar Ghose sold the suit l......Jurisdiction) Present: Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Parul Bala @ Parul Rani Shah Mondol……....Petitioner Vs. Suruj Miah and others…......Opposite Parties. Judgment May 22, 2001. Cases Referred To- Pravesh Chandra Mallik Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta, 39 CWN, 1076; State Vs. Mask a......akhali in OC Suit No.45 of 1960 dismissing the suit which was filed for declaration of title of the plaintiffs to the suit property, on the basis of purchase on 26-2-1951 from the defendant No.2 and that the title of the plaintiffs has not been affected by the so-called certificate of sale dated 1-6......); Annamali Chettiar Vs. Palamali and others, 41 ILR (Madras series) 265; Mozammel Hoq Vs. State and another, 1983 BLD 168. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan with Nikhles Dutta Advocates—For the Appellant. Kh Mahbubuddin Ahmed with Mirza Hossain Haider Advocates—For Respondent Nos. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83

Titas Gas Vs. Immense Washing Plant and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....ses out of 100 cases, the matter goes no further (after grant or refusal of an interlocutory injunction) [The closing chapter by Denning at 259]. I do not think the situation is very different in our land. The principle is also nearly settled long ago that a Court has no jurisdiction to grant an ‘......he Chairman of the Law Commission. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 471. ......00 by which the defendants were directed to restore gas connection to the plant of the plaintiff by way of an ad-interim order of mandatory injunction. 2. Short facts for disposal of the Rule are that, on 5-4-2000 opposite party No.1 as plaintiff instituted a suit being Title Suit No.90 of 2000 i...... Referred To- Abdul Jalil Vs. Abu Bakar Siddique, 35 DLR (AD) 42; Babul Kanti Das and others Vs. Abdul Hashem, 47 DLR (AD) 6. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hosein with Shamsul Alam, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Md. Ozair Farooq with Md. Shawkat Hossain and Sk Mohammad Morshed, Advocates�..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 151

Abdus Sukur (Md.) and others Vs. Bhasani Mandal and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....n Title Suit No. 51 of 1997 and also for declaration that those are not operative against and binding upon the plaintiffs. 3. Plaint case, in short, is that after successive transactions, the suit land measuring about 96 decimals of CS and SA Plot No.1244 appertaining to CS Khatian No. 212 and SA......his Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 452.......ed 24-5-1998 and 31-5-1998 respectively, exhibit 12 and 12 (ka) obtained by defendant No.1 from 3rd Court of Additional Assistant Judge at Dhaka in Title Suit No. 51 of 1997 and also for declaration that those are not operative against and binding upon the plaintiffs. 3. Plaint case, in short, is......17, 2001. Cases Referred to- Haider Ali Vs. the State, 47 DLR (AD) 47, Moulavi Abdul Mannan Vs. Md. Rafiqul Islam, 46 DLR 493, Jhanda Singh and another Vs. Harman Singh and others, AIR 1926 Lahore 415, Sheikh Karimullah Vs. Gudar Koeri and others, AIR 1925 Allahabad 56, Gopal Das and another ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75

Seastar Shipping Lines Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....the petitioner. In other words, the learned Advocate contends that the impugned order of detention of the said vessel is manifestly illegal as it could not be justified by reference to any law of the land. 5. Mr. Obaidur Rahman Mostafa, learned Deputy Attorney-General, appearing for respondent No...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 449.......berth at buoy No.8 on 15-4-1999 for discharge. After discharge of 40 bags of rice from the said vessel respondent No.1 refused to take delivery of the balance cargo on board the vessel on the ground that the quality of the cargo of rice supplied was not according to the contract specifications. Alth......Seastar Shipping Lines Ltd………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh & others……….Respondents Judgment May 16, 2001. Lawyers Involved: M Hafizullah with Md. Ohiullah, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Obaidur Rahman Mostafa, Deputy Attorney-General with Mashfiqur Rahman, Assista..

Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 212

State Vs. Md. Shamim alias Shamim Sikder and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)

....nce of P.W.3 on this point must be disbelieved. From the evidence of P.W. 3, we also find that at about 8-30 PM on 27-10-93 while he was returning home after closing his shop when he reached near the land where his dwelling hut was situated a boy told him that his son Rajib was assaulted by Shamim a......1) 439.......sions Judge, 1st Court, Barisal for confirmation of the sentence of death imposed under upon the condemned prisoner Md. Shamim @ Shamim Sikder son of late Abdur Rouf Sikder @ Nuru Mia son of Srenath Chatterjee Lane, Kalibari Road PS Kotwali Barisal on his conviction for the offence punishable under ......ontu alias Nazrul Haque and 7 others, 44 DLR (AD) 287; Abdul Quddus Vs. State, 43 DLR (AD) 234; Chowla Vs. State of Haryana, AIR 1974 (SC) 1039. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate—For the Condemned Prisoner-Appellants. Shamsul Alam, Advocate—For the Appellant. Khondaker Ma..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50

Abul Kashen (Md.) Vs. Chairman, RAJUK and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)

...., without lawful authority, arbitrarily and without any legal effect. 2. The petitioner is the owner of Plot No.22/A/1 of the layout plan of Eastern Housing Ltd. comprising more or less 1 katha of land which he purchased on 12-4-89. The petitioner obtained an approved plan in the year 1989 for co...... There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 488. ...... respondent No.3 served a notice vide Memo No. রাজউক নঅঅ/২সি-২৯৪/৯৮/১০৩৭ upon the petitioner on 29-10-98 (Annexure-B) and in the notice the respondent alleged that the petitioner is constructing the building in violation of section 3B of the Building Construct......�………Petitioner Vs. Chairman, RAJUK and others ……………………….Respondents. Judgment March 13, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed with Matiur Rahman, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Shah Khasruzzaman—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 3599 of 1998. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 114

Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search