Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1961-1980 of 3456 results.
Abdul Muhit and others Vs. Social Investment Bank Limited (SIBL) and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....t SIBL has three foreign Sponsor Directors in Group-B who live outside Bangladesh. Mr. Ahmed Saleh Jamjoom, Mr. Md Aminuddin, Dr. Abdullah Omar Naseef and Dr. Hamid Al-Gabid are all sponsor Directors holding shares numbering 7592, 4494, 499 and 1997 respectively. Mr. Ahmed Saleh Jamjoom, Mr. Abdulla......al of Taka 1 crore divided into ten lakh shares of Taka 100 (Annexure A). 3. The SIBL has four types of directors— Group-A Bangladesh Sponsor Director, Group-B Foreign Sponsor Director, Group-C Government nominated Director and Group-D Member of General Public. At present SIBL has three foreign..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 208
Kajemuddin Miah (Md) Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....nd determination of right in land reappearing on account of alluvion. By the said Act the right, title and interest of the original tenant or his successor-in-interest would subsist in the lands of a holding or portion thereof during the period of loss by diluvion if such lands re-appeared in situ w......d their residence and settled in Mouza Charbhadrason, Kallyanpur, etc. within the district of Faridpur in 1948. When the lands appeared the petitioner and other co-villagers took settlement from the Government and the usufruct thereof. Due to subsequent erosion the petitioner and co-villagers shifte..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
....ll not be called in question in or before any court, tribunal or authority on any ground whatsoever, and any person appointed under the said Proclamation to any such office during the said period and holding such office immediately before the date of commencement of the Constitution (Seventh Amendme......kistan, PLD 1998 SC 735, Halima Khatun –vs- Bangladesh and others, 30 DLR (SC) 207, State-v-Haji Joynal Abedin, 32 DLR AD 110, Kh. Ehteshamuddin Ahmed –v- Bangladesh, 33 DLR AD 154, Nasiruddin-v-Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, 32 DLR AD 216, Bangladesh Italian Marble Works Ltd-..
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 482
Shan Hosiery Vs. Bangladesh Jatiya Shamabaya Shilpa Samity Ltd and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... Suit No. 19 of 1998 in 5th Court of Subordinate Judge at Dhaka against the defendants for recovery of a total claim of Taka 61,64,470.67. Without refunding the security money, the defendants started holding out threats to dispossess the plaintiff from the suit premises. The plaintiff then institute......57 of 2000, which rejected the plaint while disposing an application for temporary injunction. 2. The plaintiff on or about 1-3-2000 instituted the suit against defendants, opposite parties for recovery of possession under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Sazeda Khatun Vs. Asad Ali and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....e under sub-section (1) shall be dismissed unless the applicant or the applicants, at the time of making it, deposit in the Court the amount of the consideration money or the value of the transferred holding or portion or share of the holding as stated in the notice under section 89 or in the deed o......provision, the Court has no jurisdiction to ignore such amount as consideration for the transfer for all purposes including that of the valuation of the proceeding for its pecuniary jurisdiction. Moreover, the proceeding under section 96 of the Act is essentially summary in nature. Deciding the appl..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Shaikh (Md) Obaidullah Raihan Vs. Sayed Shahidul Haque Jamal and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....he Respondents. Writ Petition No. 6200 of 2001. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause under what authority respondent No.1 has been holding the office of member of Jatiya Sangsad representing constituency No. 132 Barisal with Pirojp......indulged in for such a purpose. We may extend this principle in the present case and like to hold that such a writ cannot be indulged in to serve the ulterior purpose of another individual. 8. Moreover, we have also taken into consideration the fact that the main grounds on which the election of ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Ramesh Chandra Chowdhury @ Das Vs. Naresh Chandra Das @ Chowdhury, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....oner, submits that the learned Subordinate Judge committed an illegality in not correctly construing the provision of Order 3 rule 2(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Mr. Pal submits that the person holding a power-of-attorney is legally permitted to appear before the court and to take all steps in......Mr. Pal then submits that the learned Subordinate Judge has committed an error of law in directing the executor of the power-of-attorney to be present in Court in order to prove the power-of-attorney overlooking the mandatory provision of section 85 of the Evidence Act. According to Mr. Pal, since R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Tofazzal Hossain (Md) and others Vs. Momtaz Begum & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ed this Court and obtained the present Rule. 7. Mr. Ziaur Rahman Khan, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that the learned Courts below erred in law in allowing pre-emption holding without any lawful basis, that the jama in question was not legally separated and the same h......lication contending, inter alia, that after purchase they duly mutated their names in respect of the case land and the jama has been duly separated, following which they have been paying rent to the Government Acquired Estate and, consequently, the pre-emptor is no longer a co sharer to the case jot..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Abul Hossain Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....on the basis of the present application, we do not find any reason to issue any Rule. The order of the learned Sessions Judge dated 1-2-2000 is set aside to the extent of the portion which relates to holding of judicial inquiry. The Magistrate concerned is directed to treat the petition as a petitio......nce with law regarding that petition. Communicate the order to the Magistrate concerned. The application is accordingly disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 222...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Shah Alam (Md.) Vs. Abul Kalam and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....hey had nothing to contest. Shafiullah, father-in-law of the purchaser, and the “Tadbirkar” of the present case, received summons in the house of the purchaser. The purchaser is a stranger to the holding and he has not suffered any loss for the ex parte order allowing preemption. On 6-6-98 the p......rnt from them for the first time about the preemption case. Then on 28-9-98 her father by search through clerk Nurul Huq became sure about the ex parte order and accordingly, she informed her husband over telephone. Authorised by her husband, she got the application filed through her husband. 4. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Protima Sen and others Vs. Chitra Rani Dey and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....of the final decree and not as it prevails now or as it prevailed at the time of the impugned purchase. 9.The learned Subordinate Judge after hearing parties rejected the plaintiff’s application holding, inter alia, that the valuation of the 1/3rd share of the suit property should be made at th......of the order of the Court. Communicate the order to the learned Court below immediately for his information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 218. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Tanveerul Haque Vs. Unistar Shipping Limited and ors., 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... Rehena Iqbal, Mr. Mohammad Imtiaz, the Group A shareholders and the defendant Nos.1-3 i.e. Mr. Tanveerul Hoque, Mr. Masihuddin Ahmed, Mr. Kamal Rashid Chowdhury, the group B Shareholders, each group holding equal number of shares. Mr. Mohammad Iqbal was Chairman of the Board of Directors of the pla......and 2 as plaintiffs, filed Money Suit No. 31 of 1995 in the Court of Second Subordinate Judge, Chittagong against the defendant petitioner and the defendant opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 praying for recovery of Taka 17,39,780,70 stating inter alia that both the plaintiff companies were constituted by ..Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 197
Dr. Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division and other papers on record. 13. It appears that the High Court Division relied on the case of AKM Mayeedul Islam Vs. Bangladesh Election Commission reported in 48 DLR (AD) 208 in holding that the writ petition directed against rejection of nomination paper and dismissal of the a....... Abdul Matin J SAN Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Dr. Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir................................Petitioner Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh....................Respondents Judgment Jul..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Nure Alam and others Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....mination of prosecution witnesses the accused persons were examined under section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure wherein they once again pleaded not guilty. Learned Additional Session Judge on holding trial found the convict appellants guilty under sections 302/109 of the Penal Code and convi......ns Judge, Tangail for trial who transferred the case to the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tangail, who held the trial. Charge was framed under sections 302/109 of the Penal Code. Charge was read over to the accused persons to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. 4. During t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mafizul Hoq Bebu (Md) Vs. Majida Begum and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....in his evidence stated that he did not put his signature for identification of Mehera Khatun in those deeds. 5. The learned Subordinate, Judge, by the impugned order, rejected the said application holding that the said application has been filed at a belated stage and the issues of the instant ca......e is hereby re-called and vacated. The learned Subordinate Judge is directed to dispose of the suit in accordance with law. Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 219. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Jiban Bima Corporation represented by its MD Vs. Md. Mohibul Majid and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....evance and it cannot be executed. 5. The learned Senior Assistant Judge by his Order dated 10-8-89 dismissed the petitioner’s application under Order 21 rule 32(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure holding inter alia that since the plaintiff petitioner has already started an independent suit, bein......ion in the suit property since before and as such there is no question of disobedience of the decree. It was also contended that the plaintiff petitioner has already, filed an independent suit for recovery of khas possession in the suit property and as such the decree for permanent injunction has lo..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Idris alias Jamai Idris Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....at in the instant case, further investigation was held on the order of Police Commissioner, Khulna Metropolitan Police. According to him, such Police officer had no authority to issue a direction for holding further investigation in a case. So, according to him, the proceedings against the present p......n also cannot be a ground for quashing the proceedings against the present petitioner. The application is, thus, summarily rejected. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 184...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Commissioner of Taxes Vs. Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ations where the Bangladesh Food and Allied Industries Corporation is the petitioner, the following questions have been formulated for our opinion: (1) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding the status of the petitioner as a company instead of a local authority; (2) Whether the T......hority now mean that a “Local Authority” shall mean and include a Paurashava, Zilla Board, Union Panchayet, Board of Trustees of a port or other authority legally entitled to or entrusted by the Government with the control or management of a Municipal or local fund, or any corporation or other b..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Muslim (Md) Vs. Abdul Motaleb and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....ame of the suit and the evidences on record which is an error in the decision occasioning failure of justice. 9. Learned Advocate further submits that the appellate Court committed error of law in holding that the vendor of the plaintiff Jamina Khatun having sold out her portion of the ancestral ......ice of the subsequent event.” 13. In the case of Pangoti Mangarao Vs. Chinnadi Kisham Rao, reported in AIR 1965 (Andhra) 98, wherein their Lordships observed: “It is beyond the pale of controversy that a suit must be tried in all its stages on the cause of action that had arisen before the..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Md. Talebuddin (Taleb) Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....moreover the pillets and the gun was not examined to prove that shot was fired from the seized gun. 5. As it appears the High Court Division accepted death reference and dismissed criminal appeals holding that the evidence on record show that the prosecution case as made out by the informant, P.W......ed witnesses and further the next door neighbur was not examined in the case and the Chairman of the Union Parishad, through whom the F.I.R. was sent to the police station, was also not examined; moreover prosecution witnesses were also examined by the Investigating Officer after long lapse of time..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
41994197419341914189418841864185418441834181418041794176416641594158414941484146